Prevalence and Risk Factors for Poor Sleep Quality in People Living with HIV: Preliminary Observations from an HIV Outpatient Clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Sleep disorders have been reported in individuals living with HIV (PLWH), with a prevalence rate of over 50%. The main risk factors contributing to the development of sleep disturbances are not yet fully understood. We investigate the prevalence and risk factors associated with poor sleep quality in a population of PLWH who are receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART). METHODS: The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was used to evaluate sleep quality in PLWH attending our HIV Outpatient Clinic between October 2022 and April 2023. All subjects with a PSQI score > 5 were considered bad sleepers. A logistic regression analysis was carried out to assess risk factors associated with a PSQI score > 5. RESULTS: A total of 132 PLWH (78% males) who received ART for at least one month were included in this observational study. The median age was 56 (IQR 47-61). Among all, 41 (31%) had a history of AIDS, and 95 (72%) were receiving an INSTI-based ART. The study population was divided into two groups: PSQI ≤ 5 (90; 68.2%) and PSQI > 5 (42; 31.8%). A lower BMI and the use of bictegravir in the current ART were associated with a PSQI score ≤ 5. In the multivariate analysis, the use of a bictegravir-based ART remained the only factor associated with better sleep quality (OR 0.17; p = 0.0222). No further associations between sleep disturbances and other epidemiological and clinical features were found. CONCLUSION: In this real-life scenario, poor sleep quality was observed in 31% of the cases, primarily among individuals with higher BMI. In addition, bictegravir users might seem to have a lower likelihood of experiencing poor sleep quality.

Oral antivirals against Sars-CoV-2 in multiple myeloma outpatients: a case series.

Recently, the therapeutic armamentarium against Sars-CoV-2 has been enriched with oral antivirals that can be used in the early phases of covid-19. Real-life data on their efficacy in multiple myeloma (Mm) outpatients with mild-to-moderate covid-19 are lacking. We described the clinical outcomes at 30 days in Mm subjects with covid-19 treated with oral antivirals. Nirmatrelvir/r was prescribed in 10 subjects whereas molnupiravir in 5. Despite two hospitalizations were reported, we did not observe deaths due to covid-19 in this vulnerable group. Our preliminary observations reinforce the early use of oral antivirals as a useful means to contain severe covid-19 in high-risk patients such as Mm individuals characterized by an impaired immune response.

Efficacy and safety of oral antivirals in individuals aged 80 years or older with mild-to-moderate COVID-19: preliminary report from an Italian Prescriber Center.

Introduction: Molnupiravir and Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir( r), have demonstrated to prevent the progression to severe COVID-19 in high-risk individuals. Real life data are lacking in the elderly. Methods: All consecutive individuals aged ≥80 years with confirmed COVID-19 and mild-to-moderate illness who received an oral antiviral prescription between 11th January and 31st May 2022 were included in this retrospective single-centre study. The aim was to assess safety and effectiveness of oral antivirals in individuals ≥80 years with mild to moderate COVID-19. Results: A total of 168 subjects ≥80 years were included. Molnupiravir was prescribed in 147 (87.5%) subjects whereas Nirmatrelvir/r in 21 (12.5%); 16 (9.5%) experienced at least one adverse event. Overall, 21 (12.5%) hospitalizations and five deaths were reported at 28 days. At multivariate analysis male sex (OR=4.196, 95% CI=1.479-11.908; p=0.007), a moderate illness at time of prescription (OR=10.946, 95% CI=2.857-41.395; p=0.0005) and a greater number of days from the onset of symptoms to the therapy (OR=2.066, 95% CI=1.285-3.322; p=0.0027) were associated with hospitalization and/or death. Conclusion: In this real-life setting, including older individuals' hospitalizations and mortality at 28 days remained low thanks to the prompt initiation of oral antiviral therapy. The use of oral antivirals can play a significant role in reducing healthcare costs and ensuring benefits among the elderly population.

Early Access to Oral Antivirals in High-Risk Outpatients: Good Weapons to Fight COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Molnupiravir and Nirmatrelvir/r (NMV-r) have been proven to reduce severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in unvaccinated high-risk individuals. Data regarding their impact in fully vaccinated vulnerable subjects with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 are still limited, particularly in the era of Omicron and sub-variants. METHODS: Our retrospective study aimed to compare the safety profile and effectiveness of the two antivirals in all consecutive high-risk outpatients between 11 January and 10 July 2022. A logistic regression model was carried out to assess factors associated with the composite outcome defined as all-cause hospitalization and/or death at 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 719 individuals were included: 554 (77%) received Molnupiravir, whereas 165 (23%) were NMV-r users. Overall, 43 all-cause hospitalizations (5.9%) and 13 (1.8%) deaths were observed at 30 days. A composite outcome occurred in 47 (6.5%) individuals. At multivariate analysis, male sex [OR 3.785; p = 0.0021], age ≥ 75 [OR 2.647; p = 0.0124], moderate illness [OR 16.75; p < 0.001], and treatment discontinuation after medical decision [OR 8.148; p = 0.0123] remained independently associated with the composite outcome. CONCLUSIONS: No differences between the two antivirals were observed. In this real-life setting, the early use of both of the oral antivirals helped limit composite outcome at 30 days among subjects who were at high risk of disease progression.