The Impact of Caregiver Depression on Child Asthma Outcomes: Pathways and Mechanisms.

BACKGROUND: Depression is common in caregivers of children with asthma and is associated with poor outcomes in their child. No prior studies have longitudinally examined caregiver depression remission as a predictor of improvement in child asthma control. OBJECTIVE: This 2-site study examined whether the proportion of time a caregiver was in depression remission predicted subsequent child asthma control at exit. METHOD: Caregivers (n = 205) with current major depressive disorder and their children, ages 7 to 17, with persistent asthma were observed every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. Caregiver depressive symptoms were measured using the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD). Child asthma was assessed with the (Childhood) Asthma Control Test (cACT/ACT) and spirometry, and depression with the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI). Linear regression analyses were conducted with change in cACT/ACT, CDI, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)% predicted as outcomes and proportion of time the caregiver was in remission (HRSD score ≤ 7) as the predictor. Multilevel mediation analyses examined the role of child depressive symptoms and asthma controller medication adherence. RESULTS: Children were, on average, 54.1% female and 11 years old. Caregiver proportion of time in HRSD-assessed remission of depression was a significant predictor of improvement in cACT/ACT, CDI, and FEV1% predicted. Child CDI score, but not medication adherence, mediated the relationship between caregiver HRSD scores and child asthma control scores. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in caregiver depression positively influences child asthma outcomes partially through improvement in child depressive symptom severity. Caregiver depression screening and treatment might lead to improvement in child asthma outcomes.

Impact of a clinical pharmacist within an HIV PrEP program for patients experiencing homelessness.

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) continues to be a concern in the United States despite pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) being a highly recommended preventative option. Homeless populations have a significantly increased risk of HIV acquisition, and recent literature found attrition to PrEP care being concentrated in demographics common to these populations. Pharmacist-led PrEP programs may be a feasible option to combat this attrition, as they have shown high rates of patient satisfaction and pharmacist comfortability in other populations. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate PrEP uptake and the continuum of care before and after a Clinical Pharmacy Specialist (CPS) expanded HIV prevention services within a primary care setting for persons experiencing homelessness. METHODS: We compared a retrospective cohort of patients experiencing homelessness who received an initial PrEP prescription during a pre-CPS period and those with an initial PrEP prescription after CPS. Charts were reviewed through the surrounding time period of a 3-month and a 6-month PrEP follow-up appointment. Outcomes evaluated included number of initial PrEP prescriptions, dispensations of PrEP, PrEP discontinuations, patient retention in PrEP care, and new HIV diagnoses. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were included, with 10 initial PrEP prescriptions in the pre-CPS population and 30 in the post-CPS one. Both groups largely represented those disproportionately impacted by HIV. After CPS, more patients were enrolled in patient assistance programs (100% vs. 44%; P < 0.01), and more patients picked up the first PrEP dispensation (80% vs. 40%; P = 0.04). The overall population had low dispensation rates and retention to care. Having no CPS management and a lack of medical appointment attendance trended toward attrition of care, and having no patient assistance program enrollment significantly led to attrition of care. CONCLUSION: These findings may prompt further studies and adaptations to PrEP care among persons experiencing homelessness, including the utilization of pharmacists to improve patient outcomes.

Timely preterm-birth prediction among pregnant women in Medicaid without preterm-birth history.

OBJECTIVES: To develop and prospectively validate a novel model incorporating claims and community-level socioeconomic data to predict preterm birth at scale among pregnant Medicaid women with no history of preterm birth (PTB). STUDY DESIGN: A longitudinal Texas Medicaid cohort study, with 2-year retrospective model building (October 2015-October 2017) and a 1-year prospective model validation phase (January 2018-December 2018). METHODS: Inclusion criteria were females aged 11 to 55 years with at least 1 live singleton birth and no history of PTB. The primary outcome was live singleton birth earlier than 35 weeks. Covariates were medical/mental/behavioral comorbidities, obstetric history, sociodemographic characteristics, and health services utilization. Of multiple models built, the most parsimonious was selected to classify pregnancies as very high, high, medium, and low risk. Model performance was evaluated using positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, case identification ratio (1 / PPV), and timing of prediction. RESULTS: The model was built on 6689 pregnancies and validated on 7855 pregnancies. PTB rate earlier than 35 weeks was approximately 3.3%. Significant risk predictors included prenatal visit attendance, insurance gap days, and medical/obstetrical comorbidities. Model PPV was approximately 4-fold higher for very high-risk women (14.7%) vs cohort (3.3%) and so was the case identification ratio (1:7 vs 1:30, respectively). Sensitivity was good, with 57% of PTBs classified as medium risk or higher. Timing of prediction was clinically relevant, with more than 80% of PTBs risk stratified before 24 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: We report a novel PTB prediction model among pregnant Medicaid women without PTB history, which is timely, accurate, practical, and scalable. We leverage Medicaid and community data readily accessible by Medicaid plans to support population-level interventions to prevent PTBs.

Multivariate Association of Child Depression and Anxiety with Asthma Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric asthma is associated with increased health services utilization, missed school days, and diminished quality of life. Children with asthma also report more frequent depressive and anxiety symptoms than children without asthma, which may further worsen asthma outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The current study investigated the relationship between depressive and anxiety symptoms and 4 asthma outcomes (asthma control, asthma severity, lung function, and asthma-related quality of life) in children (N = 205) with moderate to severe persistent asthma. METHODS: The data were analyzed using a canonical correlation analysis, a multivariate framework that allows examination of all variables of interest in the same model. RESULTS: We found a statistically significant relationship between symptoms of depression and anxiety and asthma outcomes (1 - Λ = .372; P < .001). A large effect size suggests that 37.2% of variance is shared between depression and anxiety symptoms and 4 asthma outcomes (particularly asthma control and asthma-related quality of life) in the overall sample. Among girls (vs. boys), asthma control (measured by the Asthma Control Test) emerged as a stronger contributor to asthma outcomes compared with boys. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that psychiatric symptoms, especially anxiety, are associated with poor asthma-related quality of life, and more negative perception of asthma control in girls compared with boys (with no observed sex difference in physiological lung function). Clinicians should consider incorporating questions about psychiatric symptoms as part of routine asthma management, and focus patient education on unique differences in which boys and girls perceive their asthma symptoms.

Parent-Provider Communication of HPV Vaccine Hesitancy.

: media-1vid110.1542/5754332185001PEDS-VA_2017-2312Video Abstract OBJECTIVES: To prevent human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancers, providers must effectively communicate with HPV vaccine-hesitant parents. Here, we developed a typology characterizing parent-provider communication around HPV vaccine hesitancy. METHODS: We audio-recorded 43 visits with unvaccinated adolescents at 6 pediatric clinics in Dallas, Texas in which parents were undecided about HPV vaccination. We qualitatively coded how parents verbally expressed hesitancy (assertive response, asking a question, or expressing concern) and whether providers responded with acquiescence (agree to defer vaccination) and/or persistence (continue discussion). We described the frequency of parent and provider communication codes and same-day vaccination. RESULTS: Among the 43 visits, 37 parents expressed hesitancy ≥1 times in many ways. Assertive responses were most common (27 visits), followed by questions (16 visits), and concerns (12 visits). When the first expression of hesitancy was a question or concern, 71% and 75% of adolescents, respectively, received same-day vaccinations, whereas 33% of adolescents who received an initial assertive response were vaccinated. Providers responded with only persistence in 18 visits, a mix of acquiescence and persistence in 13 visits, and only acquiescence in 6 visits. When providers only used persistence, 17 of 18 adolescents were vaccinated; when providers responded with only acquiescence, no adolescents received the vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Our exploratory analysis reveals that providers engaging hesitant parents and addressing their concerns can lead to same-day HPV vaccination. Data reveal that even parents making assertive statements are amenable to influence by providers. Our findings reveal an important missed opportunity when providers simply acquiesce to parental hesitation.

Translating self-persuasion into an adolescent HPV vaccine promotion intervention for parents attending safety-net clinics.

OBJECTIVE: Self-persuasion is an effective behavior change strategy, but has not been translated for low-income, less educated, uninsured populations attending safety-net clinics or to promote human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. We developed a tablet-based application (in English and Spanish) to elicit parental self-persuasion for adolescent HPV vaccination and evaluated its feasibility in a safety-net population. METHODS: Parents (N=45) of age-eligible adolescents used the self-persuasion application. Then, during cognitive interviews, staff gathered quantitative and qualitative feedback on the self-persuasion tasks including parental decision stage. RESULTS: The self-persuasion tasks were rated as easy to complete and helpful. We identified six question prompts rated as uniformly helpful, not difficult to answer, and generated non-redundant responses from participants. Among the 33 parents with unvaccinated adolescents, 27 (81.8%) reported deciding to get their adolescent vaccinated after completing the self-persuasion tasks. CONCLUSIONS: The self-persuasion application was feasible and resulted in a change in parents' decision stage. Future studies can now test the efficacy of the tablet-based application on HPV vaccination. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The self-persuasion application facilitates verbalization of reasons for HPV vaccination in low literacy, safety-net settings. This self-administered application has the potential to be more easily incorporated into clinical practice than other patient education approaches.

Characterizing safety-net providers' HPV vaccine recommendations to undecided parents: A pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: Although provider recommendation is a key predictor of HPV vaccination, how providers verbalize recommendations particularly strong ones is unknown. We developed a tool to describe strength and content of provider recommendations. METHODS: We used electronic health records to identify unvaccinated adolescents with appointments at six safety-net clinics in Dallas, Texas. Clinic visit audio-recordings were qualitatively analyzed to identify provider recommendation types (presumptive vs. participatory introduction; strong vs. weak), describe content communicated, and explore patterns between recommendation type and vaccination. RESULTS: We analyzed 43 audio-recorded discussions between parents and 12 providers. Most providers used a participatory introduction (42 discussions) and made weak recommendations (24 discussions) by using passive voice or adding a qualification (e.g., not school required). Few providers (11 discussions) gave strong recommendations (clear, personally-owned endorsement). HPV vaccination was lowest for those receiving only weak recommendations and highest when providers coupled the recommendation with an adjacent rationale. CONCLUSION: Our new tool provides initial evidence of how providers undercut their recommendations through qualifications or support them with a rationale. Most providers gave weak HPV vaccine recommendations and used a participatory introduction. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Providers would benefit from communication skills training on how to make explicit recommendations with an evidence-based rationale.

Developing a Tablet-Based Self-Persuasion Intervention Promoting Adolescent HPV Vaccination: Protocol for a Three-Stage Mixed-Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancers are a significant burden on the US health care system that can be prevented through adolescent HPV vaccination. Despite guidelines recommending vaccination, coverage among US adolescents is suboptimal particularly among underserved patients (uninsured, low income, racial, and ethnic minorities) seen in safety-net health care settings. Many parents are ambivalent about the vaccine and delay making a decision or talking with a provider about it. Self-persuasion-generating one's own arguments for a health behavior-may be particularly effective for parents who are undecided or not motivated to make a vaccine decision. OBJECTIVE: Through a 3-stage mixed-methods protocol, we will identify an optimal and feasible self-persuasion intervention strategy to promote adolescent HPV vaccination in safety-net clinics. METHODS: In Stage 1, we will define content for a tablet-based self-persuasion app by characterizing (1) parents' self-generated arguments through cognitive interviews conducted with parents (n=50) of patients and (2) parent-provider HPV vaccine discussions through audio recordings of clinic visits (n=50). In Stage 2, we will compare the effects of the four self-persuasion intervention conditions that vary by cognitive processing level (parents verbalize vs listen to arguments) and choice of argument topics (parents choose vs are assigned topics) on parental vaccine intentions in a 2 × 2 factorial design randomized controlled trial (n=160). This proof-of-concept trial design will identify which intervention condition is optimal by quantitatively examining basic self-persuasion mechanisms (cognitive processing and choice) and qualitatively exploring parent experiences with intervention tasks. In Stage 3, we will conduct a pilot trial (n=90) in the safety-net clinics to assess feasibility of the optimal intervention condition identified in Stage 2. We will also assess its impact on parent-provider discussions. RESULTS: This paper describes the study protocol and activities to date. Currently, we have developed the initial prototype of the tablet app for English- and Spanish-speaking populations, and completed Stage 1 data collection. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic collaboration between basic and applied behavioral scientists accelerates translation of promising basic psychological research into innovative interventions suitable for underserved, safety-net populations. At project's end, we plan to have a feasible and acceptable self-persuasion intervention that can affect key cancer disparities in the United States through prevention of HPV-related cancers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02537756 and http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02535845 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6e5XcOGXz and http://www.webcitation.org/6e5XfHoic, respectively).

Promoting HPV Vaccination in Safety-Net Clinics: A Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate effects of a multicomponent intervention (human papillomavirus [HPV] vaccine-specific brochure and recalls) on HPV vaccination and secondarily examine if race/ethnicity moderates effects. METHODS: Unvaccinated girls aged 11 to 18 years attending 4 safety-net pediatric clinics and their parent/guardian (n = 814 dyads) were randomized to (1) active comparison (general adolescent vaccine brochure), or (2) intervention consisting of a HPV vaccine-specific brochure, telephone recalls to parents who declined, and recalls to patients overdue for doses 2 and 3. HPV 1-dose and 3-dose coverages were assessed via electronic health records 12 months after randomization. Multivariate logistic regressions estimated adjusted odds and marginal predicted vaccine coverage by study arm and race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analyses found no main effect of the HPV vaccine-specific brochure on 1-dose coverage (42.0% vs 40.6%); however, secondary analyses found race/ethnicity was a significant moderator such that the intervention was effective only for Hispanic individuals (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-2.02), and not effective for black individuals (AOR 0.64; 95% CI 0.41-1.13). Recalls to parents who declined the vaccine during the index visit were not effective, but recalls to patients overdue for doses 2 and 3 were effective at increasing 3-dose coverage regardless of race/ethnicity (AOR 1.99; 95% CI 1.16-3.45). CONCLUSIONS: Educational materials describing only the HPV vaccine were effective for Hispanic but not black individuals. Future research should test mechanisms that may mediate intervention effects for different racial/ethnic groups, such as different informational needs or vaccine schemas (experiences, beliefs, norms).

Multilevel correlates for human papillomavirus vaccination of adolescent girls attending safety net clinics.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent HPV vaccination in minority and low income populations with high cervical cancer incidence and mortality could reduce disparities. Safety-net primary care clinics are a key delivery site for improving vaccination rates in these populations. PURPOSE: To examine prevalence of HPV initiation (≥ 1 dose), completion (receipt of dose 3 within 12 months of initiation), and receipt of 3 doses in four safety-net clinics as well as individual-, household-, and clinic-level correlates of initiation. METHODS: We used multilevel modeling to investigate HPV initiation among 700 adolescent females who sought primary care in four safety-net clinics in Dallas, Texas from March 2007 to December 2009. Data were abstracted from patients' paper and electronic medical records. RESULTS: HPV vaccine uptake varied significantly by clinic. Across clinics, initiation was 36.6% and completion was 39.7% among those who initiated. In the total study population, only 15.7% received all three doses. In multivariate, two-level logistic regression analyses, initiation was associated with receipt of other adolescent vaccines, influenza vaccination in the year prior to data abstraction, being sexually active, and having more chart documentation (presence of health maintenance questionnaire and/or immunization record). There was no association between initiation and age, race/ethnicity, or insurance status. CONCLUSIONS: In four urban safety-net clinics, HPV initiation rates paralleled 2008 national rates. The correlation of HPV initiation with other adolescent vaccines underscores the importance of reviewing vaccination status at every health care visit. HPV vaccine uptake in safety-net clinics should continue to be monitored to understand impact on cervical cancer disparities.