Consultation for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and asthma: clinical presentation, diagnostic work-up, and treatment options.

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is characterized by chronic inflammation of the sinonasal mucosa, affects over 12% of the US population, and costs over $20 billion annually. CRS can be divided into two major phenotypes based on whether nasal polyps are present (CRSwNP) or absent (CRSsNP). This grand rounds review will discuss the clinical approach to patients with CRSwNP, including typical presentations, work-up, and currently available treatment options. Tools that physicians can utilize to assess subjective sinonasal symptoms, as well as objective measures of disease, will be reviewed. Additional focus will be on recognizing clinical comorbidities commonly associated with CRSwNP, including asthma, bronchiectasis, allergic rhinitis, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease (NSAID-ERD). Clinical outcomes can be improved by providing a comprehensive approach to evaluating (and managing) patients with CRSwNP.

Associations between chronic rhinosinusitis and the development of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown an association between chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and non-cystic fibrosis (CF) bronchiectasis. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine if CRS increases the risk of developing non-CF bronchiectasis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted utilizing electronic medical records from an academic center. Patients with CRS without bronchiectasis, with at least one chest computed tomography (CT) performed after the diagnosis of CRS, were identified between January 2006 and December 2015. Charts were reviewed until May 2022. The control group was age, sex, and race matched, and included patients without CRS, asthma, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who had at least one chest CT. Bronchiectasis was identified by chest CT radiology reports. The odds of developing bronchiectasis were analyzed in patients with CRS without asthma or COPD (Cohort 1) and patients with CRS with asthma or COPD (Cohort 2). RESULTS: The odds of developing bronchiectasis were significantly higher in patients with CRS (139/1594, 8.7%) compared to patients in the control group (443/7992 [5.5%], OR 1.63 [1.34-1.99]). Furthermore, the odds of developing bronchiectasis were higher in Cohort 1 (63/863 [7.3%], OR 1.34 [1.02-1.76]) and Cohort 2 (76/731 [10.4%], OR 1.98 [1.53-2.55]) versus the control group. After adjusting for confounding diseases, the association was attenuated in Cohort 1 (OR 1.22 [0.92-1.61]) but remained significant in Cohort 2 (OR 1.78 [1.37-2.31]). CONCLUSIONS: CRS is associated with the future development of non-CF bronchiectasis. Patients with CRS, especially those with asthma or COPD, have a higher likelihood of developing bronchiectasis than patients without CRS.

Single cell RNA sequencing of human eosinophils from nasal polyps reveals eosinophil heterogeneity in chronic rhinosinusitis tissue.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is characterized by type 2 inflammation in the United States, but the actual roles that eosinophils play in CRSwNP remain largely unclear. OBJECTIVE: To reveal the roles and heterogeneity of eosinophils in nasal polyp (NP) tissue, we performed single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq) analysis of NP tissue. METHODS: Sinonasal tissues (NP and control sinus tissue) and patient matched peripheral blood (PB) samples were obtained from 5 control patients and 5 patients with CRSwNP. Eosinophils were enriched before processing for scRNA-Seq. The gene expression profiles in eosinophils were determined by microwell-based scRNA-Seq technology (BD Rhapsody platform). We predicted the overall function of NP eosinophils by Gene Ontology (geneontology.org) enrichment and pathway analyses and confirmed expression of selected genes by flow cytometry. RESULTS: After filtering out contaminating cells, we detected 5,542 eosinophils from control PB, 3,883 eosinophils from CRSwNP PB, 101 eosinophils from control sinus tissues (not included in further analyses), and 9,727 eosinophils from NPs by scRNA-Seq. We found that 204 genes were downregulated and 354 genes upregulated in NP eosinophils compared to all PB eosinophils (>1.5-fold, Padj < .05). Upregulated genes in NP eosinophils were associated with activation, cytokine-mediated signaling, growth factor activity, NF-κB signaling, and antiapoptotic molecules. NP eosinophils displayed 4 clusters revealing potential heterogeneity of eosinophils in NP tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated eosinophils in NP tissue appear to exist in several subtypes that may play important pathogenic roles in CRSwNP, in part by controlling inflammation and hyperproliferation of other cells.

The interleukin-4/interleukin-13 pathway in type 2 inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is predominantly a type 2 inflammatory disease associated with type 2 (T2) cell responses and epithelial barrier, mucociliary, and olfactory dysfunction. The inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-4, IL-13, and IL-5 are key mediators driving and perpetuating type 2 inflammation. The inflammatory responses driven by these cytokines include the recruitment and activation of eosinophils, basophils, mast cells, goblet cells, M2 macrophages, and B cells. The activation of these immune cells results in a range of pathologic effects including immunoglobulin E production, an increase in the number of smooth muscle cells within the nasal mucosa and a reduction in their contractility, increased deposition of fibrinogen, mucus hyperproduction, and local edema. The cytokine-driven structural changes include nasal polyp formation and nasal epithelial tissue remodeling, which perpetuate barrier dysfunction. Type 2 inflammation may also alter the availability or function of olfactory sensory neurons contributing to loss of sense of smell. Targeting these key cytokine pathways has emerged as an effective approach for the treatment of type 2 inflammatory airway diseases, and a number of biologic agents are now available or in development for CRSwNP. In this review, we provide an overview of the inflammatory pathways involved in CRSwNP and describe how targeting key drivers of type 2 inflammation is an effective therapeutic option for patients.

Patient-reported experiences with refractory or unexplained chronic cough: a qualitative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic cough, defined as a cough lasting 8 or more weeks, affects up to 10% of adults. Refractory chronic cough (RCC) is a cough that is uncontrolled despite comprehensive investigation and treatment of comorbid conditions while unexplained chronic cough (UCC) is a cough with no identifiable cause despite extensive evaluation of comorbid conditions. RCC and UCC are often poorly controlled. Understanding individuals' lived experience of the symptoms and impacts of these conditions may guide therapeutic strategies. OBJECTIVES: The primary objectives of this study were to assess respondents' perceptions of the key symptoms of RCC and UCC and the impacts of RCC and UCC and their symptoms on well-being, health-related quality of life, work productivity, and social relationships. DESIGN: Qualitative study. METHODS: This study enrolled 30 adults with physician-diagnosed RCC or UCC. Two trained qualitative researchers conducted individual, in-depth telephone interviews using a semi-structured interview guide. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded, and systematically analyzed to identify content themes. RESULTS: A total of 15 respondents with RCC and 15 with UCC were included in the study. Many respondents had RCC or UCC for a long duration (median 9 years, range: 0-24). Half of the respondents reported having a coughing episode at least once daily. Only 40% of respondents reported that medication had improved their symptoms. In over half of the respondents, RCC or UCC hindered communication, caused embarrassment, frustration, and worry, and lowered quality of life. Perceptions of meaningful treatment benefits in RCC or UCC varied widely across respondents. CONCLUSION: RCC and UCC remained poorly managed in many individuals and were associated with a wide range of symptoms and cough triggers that hindered daily activities and reduced emotional well-being. Understanding individuals' lived experiences may inform the development of RCC and UCC therapeutic strategies.

Patient-reported experiences with refractory or unexplained chronic cough: a qualitative analysisChronic cough, particularly refractory and unexplained chronic cough, remain poorly managed in many individuals and are associated with a wide range of symptoms and cough triggers that hinder daily activities and reduce emotional well-being. Currently there are no US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments for refractory or unexplained chronic cough. Understanding the experience and treatment preferences of individuals with these conditions may help inform the development of new therapies and clarify the potential impact of such therapies on the lives of individuals with chronic cough. Using in-depth interviews, the present study comprehensively evaluated individuals' experience with refractory or unexplained chronic cough and treatment priorities, a research area that has not been well-studied. This study detailed broad-ranging physical, behavioral, and emotional impacts of chronic cough, which hindered individuals' social well-being.

Efficacy of EDS-FLU for Chronic Rhinosinusitis: Two Randomized Controlled Trials (ReOpen1 and ReOpen2).

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a prevalent inflammatory disease. No medications are Food and Drug Administration-approved for the most common form, CRS without nasal polyps (also called "chronic sinusitis"). Novel biomechanics of the exhalation delivery system deliver fluticasone (EDS-FLU; XHANCE) to sinonasal areas above the inferior turbinate, especially sinus drainage pathways not reached by standard-delivery nasal sprays. OBJECTIVE: Assess EDS-FLU efficacy for CRS (irrespective of nasal polyps). METHODS: Two randomized, EDS-placebo-controlled trials in adults with CRS irrespective of polyps (ReOpen1) or exclusively without polyps (ReOpen2) were conducted at 120 sites in 13 countries. Patients received EDS-FLU 1 or 2 sprays/nostril, or EDS-placebo, twice daily for 24 weeks. Coprimary measures were composite symptom score through week 4 and ethmoid/maxillary sinus percent opacification by computed tomography at week 24. RESULTS: ReOpen1 (N = 332) composite symptom score least-squares mean change for EDS-FLU 1 or 2 sprays/nostril versus EDS-placebo was -1.58 and -1.60 versus -0.62 (P < .001, P < .001); ReOpen2 (N = 223), -1.54 and -1.74 versus -0.81 (P = .011, P = .001). In ReOpen1, sinus opacification least-squares mean change for EDS-FLU 1 or 2 sprays/nostril versus EDS-placebo was -5.58 and -6.20 versus -1.60 (P = .045, P = .018), and in ReOpen2, -7.00 and -5.14 versus +1.19 (P < .001, P = .009). Acute disease exacerbations were reduced by 56% to 66% with EDS-FLU versus EDS-placebo (P = .001). There were significant, and similar magnitude, symptom reductions in patients using standard-delivery nasal steroid products just before entering the study (P < .001). Adverse events were similar to standard-delivery intranasal steroids. CONCLUSIONS: EDS-FLU is the first nonsurgical treatment demonstrated to reduce symptoms, intrasinus opacification, and exacerbations in replicate randomized clinical trials in CRS, regardless of polyp status.

Long-Term Safety of Dupilumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Asthma: TRAVERSE Continuation Study.

BACKGROUND: Previous clinical trials have demonstrated dupilumab efficacy and safety in adults and adolescents with moderate to severe asthma for up to 3 years. OBJECTIVE: The TRAVERSE continuation study (NCT03620747), a single-arm, open-label study, assessed safety and tolerability of dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks up to an additional 144 weeks (∼3 years) in patients with moderate to severe asthma who previously completed TRAVERSE (NCT02134028). METHODS: Primary end points were incidence and event rates per 100 patient-years of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Secondary end points included adverse events (AEs) of special interest, serious AEs, and AEs leading to study discontinuation. RESULTS: A total of 393 patients participated in the TRAVERSE continuation study (cumulative dupilumab exposure, 431.7 patient-years; median treatment duration, 309 days). A total of 29 patients (7.4%) received more than 958 days of treatment. A total of 214 (54.5%) patients reported at least 1 TEAE (event rate: 171.4); 37 (9.4%) experienced at least 1 treatment-related TEAE, none of which were considered severe; 2 patients reported 6 TEAEs of moderate intensity. A total of 22 (5.6%) patients reported serious AEs (event rate: 6.9). AEs of special interest were reported in 24 patients (6.1%; event rate: 6.0). Five (1.3%) deaths occurred (event rate: 1.2) following serious AEs of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related pneumonia (3 patients), pancreatitis (1 patient), and pulmonary embolism (1 patient). None of the TEAEs leading to death were considered treatment-related. CONCLUSIONS: Dupilumab treatment was well tolerated for up to an additional 3 years. Safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of dupilumab. These findings further support the long-term use of dupilumab in patients with moderate to severe asthma.

Sustained efficacy of mepolizumab in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: SYNAPSE 24-week treatment-free follow-up.

BACKGROUND: In the 52-week Phase III SYNAPSE study, mepolizumab given every 4 weeks (100 mg subcutaneously) reduced nasal polyp (NP) size, improved symptoms and quality of life (QoL), and reduced corticosteroid use and number of sinus surgeries in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), versus placebo. Because the durability of mepolizumab's efficacy after discontinuation is poorly understood in CRSwNP, the efficacy of mepolizumab after discontinuation was analyzed in severe CRSwNP, over a 24-week follow-up. METHODS: Changes from SYNAPSE baseline to end of treatment (week 52) and end of follow-up (week 76) were assessed for total endoscopic NP score, nasal obstruction and overall symptoms visual analog scale scores, and 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test score. Time to first sinus surgery, time to first corticosteroid use, and geometric mean blood eosinophil counts (BECs) were also assessed. RESULTS: Among 134 follow-up patients, clinical improvements observed with mepolizumab versus placebo were partially evident 24 weeks after discontinuation despite BEC returning to baseline. The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) change from baseline in NP score (week 52: -1.3 [1.8 to -0.9] vs. -0.3 [-0.6 to 0.1]; week 76: -1.2 [-1.6 to -0.7] vs. -0.1 [-0.5 to 0.3]) and the proportion of patients having sinus surgery (week 52: 4% vs. 25%; week 76: 9% vs. 31%) remained substantially improved with mepolizumab versus placebo. Mepolizumab-associated improvements in overall symptoms, quality of life, and corticosteroid use versus placebo were partially sustained at week 76. CONCLUSION: Fifty-two weeks of mepolizumab treatment is associated with sustained clinical benefits up to 24 weeks after discontinuation in patients with severe CRSwNP, which should be considered by physicians when making treatment decisions.

Impact of dupilumab across seasons in patients with type 2, uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma.

BACKGROUND: Seasonal variability could influence asthma exacerbations. Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin (IL)-4/IL-13, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation. In the 52-week QUEST study (NCT02414854), add-on dupilumab every 2 weeks vs placebo significantly reduced exacerbations and improved prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma. TRAVERSE (NCT02134028), the open-label QUEST extension study, enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe asthma to investigate long-term safety and efficacy of dupilumab, including patients who previously received placebo that initiated dupilumab therapy. OBJECTIVE: To investigate long-term dupilumab efficacy in reducing exacerbations across yearly seasons in patients with type 2 inflammatory asthma with and without clinical evidence of allergic asthma. METHODS: Unadjusted annualized exacerbation rate and proportions of patients experiencing severe asthma exacerbations are reported by month and season and for both hemispheres. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with type 2 asthma experiencing 1 or more severe asthma exacerbations during QUEST was 20.8% vs 10.0% in spring, 18.2% vs 7.3% in summer, 22.2% vs 12.6% in autumn, and 26.4% vs 12.0% in winter, for placebo- vs dupilumab-treated patients, respectively; P was less than .001 for placebo vs dupilumab in all seasons. Reductions in the proportion of patients experiencing severe exacerbations across seasons in subgroups with and without evidence of allergic asthma were similar to the overall type 2 population. Reductions in severe exacerbations observed during QUEST were sustained during TRAVERSE, up to 96 weeks across both hemispheres. CONCLUSION: Dupilumab reduced asthma exacerbations, with no difference in the reduction between seasons, in patients with type 2 inflammation, with and without evidence of allergic asthma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02414854, NCT02134028.

Prevalence of type 2 inflammatory signatures and efficacy of dupilumab in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps from two phase 3 clinical trials: SINUS-24 and SINUS-52.

BACKGROUND: This post hoc analysis of the international SINUS-24/-52 trials (NCT02912468/NCT02898454) aimed to assess dupilumab efficacy in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) according to different definitions of type 2 inflammatory signature. METHODS: Six definitions of type 2 inflammation were used: ≥150 eosinophils/µL or total immunoglobulin E (IgE) ≥100 IU/mL with a coexisting type 2 condition; ≥150 eosinophils/µL or total IgE ≥100 IU/mL; ≥150 eosinophils/µL; ≥250 eosinophils/µL or total IgE ≥100 IU/mL; coexisting asthma or ≥300 eosinophils/µL; presence of a coexisting type 2 condition. Odds ratios (ORs; dupilumab vs. placebo) for achieving clinically meaningful improvement (≥1 point) from baseline to week 24 (pooled SINUS-24/-52) and week 52 (SINUS-52) were calculated for nasal polyp score (NPS; range 0-8), nasal congestion/obstruction score (NC; 0-3), and loss of smell score (LoS; 0-3). RESULTS: At baseline (n = 724), most patients displayed a type 2 inflammatory signature across definitions (64.2%-95.3%). At week 24, ORs for clinically meaningful improvement ranged from 11.9 to 14.9 for NPS across type 2 definitions, 6.5-9.6 for NC, and 12.2-17.8 for LoS (all p < 0.0001). OR ranges were similar or greater at week 52: 19.0-36.6, 7.6-12.1, and 9.2-33.5, respectively (all p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Most patients with CRSwNP in the SINUS study had type 2 inflammation. Dupilumab demonstrated robust efficacy across definitions of type 2 inflammation, consistent with its profile as an inhibitor of Interleukin-4 and Interleukin-13 signaling, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation in CRSwNP. KEY POINTS: This study assessed type 2 inflammation prevalence and dupilumab efficacy in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps according to algorithm-defined type 2 inflammation Dupilumab efficacy was similar across all type 2 definitions.

IL-13 and IL-13-induced periostin levels are specifically decreased in patients following endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 (T2) inflammation plays a pathogenic role in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The effects of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) on T2 inflammation are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare T2 inflammatory biomarkers from middle meatal (MM) mucus for distinguishing patients with CRS from CRS-free patients, identifying major phenotypes (CRS without nasal polyps [CRSsNP] and CRS with nasal polyps [CRSwNP]), assessing endotypic change, and establishing cross-sectional and longitudinal outcomes in patients undergoing ESS. METHODS: MM mucus samples were collected from patients with CRSsNP and patients with CRSwNP before and 6 to 12 months after ESS and compared with samples from CRS-free control patients. T2 biomarkers were evaluated both continuously and using threshold-based definitions of T2 endotype to identify relationships with patient-reported (based on the 22-Item Sinonasal Outcomes Test and Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patient-Reported Outcomes Measure) and clinician-reported (radiographic and endoscopic) severity. Linear mixed models were developed to analyze clinical variables associated with T2 biomarker levels. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients with CRS (89 with CRSsNP and 65 with CRSwNP) were enrolled, with a mean interval of 9 months between ESS and follow-up. An analysis of pre-ESS MM mucus samples revealed elevated levels of T2 mediators in patients with CRSwNP versus in patients with CRSsNP and CRS-free controls. Temporally stable correlations between levels of IL-13 and IL-5, levels of periostin and complement 5a, and levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and eotaxin-3 were observed. On this basis and on the basis of pathologic significance, levels of IL-13, periostin and ECP were further analyzed. After ESS, levels of IL-13 and periostin decreased significantly, whereas ECP levels remained unchanged. Across pre- and post-ESS evaluation, the T2 endotype was associated with radiographic severity but did not predict outcomes. CRSwNP status and African American race were associated with higher levels of IL-13 and periostin, whereas ECP level was higher in patients undergoing extensive surgery. CONCLUSION: ESS decreased levels of IL-13 and periostin in the middle meatus. T2 inflammation after ESS was correlated with patient- and clinician-reported severity across phenotypes. Pre-ESS T2 inflammation did not predict post-ESS outcomes.

EUFOREA/EPOS2020 statement on the clinical considerations for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps care.

Following the European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases (EUFOREA) treatment algorithm for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), patients suffering from severe uncontrolled CRSwNP are recommended to receive oral corticosteroids, (revision) sinus surgery, systemic biologicals and/or aspirin treatment after desensitization (ATAD). Given the major differences in indications, outcomes, practical considerations, risks and costs of these key pillars of treatment, there is a growing need to define criteria for each treatment option and list the clinically relevant and major considerations for them. This EUFOREA document therefore provides an expert panel overview of the expected outcomes, specific considerations and (contra)indications of the five major treatment arms of severe uncontrolled CRSwNP: oral corticosteroids, primary and revision sinus surgery, biological treatment and ATAD. This overview of treatment considerations is needed to allow physicians and patients to consider the different options in the context of providing optimal and personalized care for severe uncontrolled CRSwNP. In conclusion, the five major treatment options for severe uncontrolled CRSwNP have intrinsic advantages, specific indications and considerations that are of importance to the patient, the physician and the society. This EUFOREA statement supports the unmet need to define criteria for the indication of every treatment pillar of CRSwNP.

The chronic rhinosinusitis practice parameter.

The Allergy-Immunology Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters has published the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines for the medical management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). The practice parameter provides evidence-based guidelines on the use of intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) and biologics for CRSwNP, and aspirin therapy after desensitization (ATAD) for the management of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). Evidence on surgery was not assessed. Overall, the guidelines suggest INCS rather than no INCS (conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence), biologics rather than no biologics (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence), and ATAD rather than no ATAD (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence). Patient-important outcomes are compared across the various INCS delivery modalities and across the different biologics and ATAD. Specific consideration points for shared decision making with patients are detailed in the guideline. These include delivery method and small treatment effect sizes for INCS, disease burden at presentation, variability in efficacy among biologics, cost issues for biologics, and adverse effects of aspirin and risks related to desensitization for ATAD. The guidelines also identify a need for randomized control trials directly comparing treatment modalities and further investigation into which outcomes are important for patients.

Dupilumab efficacy in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps with and without allergic rhinitis.

Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a predominantly type 2 inflammatory disease, which often coexists with allergic rhinitis (AR). Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin-4 and interleukin-13, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation. Objective: This post hoc analysis investigated the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with severe CRSwNP with or without coexisting AR in the pooled phase III SINUS-24/SINUS-52 studies. Methods: Patients randomized to subcutaneous dupilumab 300 mg (n = 438) or placebo (n = 286) every 2 weeks for 24 (SINUS-24) or 52 weeks (SINUS-52) were analyzed. Pooled data from the first 24 weeks of treatment are presented. Changes from baseline in disease outcome measures and biomarker levels were analyzed by the patient-reported history of AR status. Results: Overall, 338 of 724 patients (46.7%) had AR. Baseline characteristics were generally similar between patients with and those without AR. Dupilumab significantly improved objective and patient-reported measures of CRSwNP, including loss of smell, and reduced systemic and nasal biomarker levels versus placebo at week 24, with no significant treatment difference between patients with and those without AR. Use of systemic corticosteroids and/or sinonasal surgery during treatment was significantly reduced with dupilumab versus placebo, irrespective of AR status (p ≤ 0.0029). The safety profile of dupilumab was similar in patients with and in patients without AR. Conclusion: Dupilumab demonstrated significant improvements in both clinical end points and symptom scores versus placebo in patients with severe CRSwNP, irrespective of comorbid AR status, a common subgroup of patients often associated with poorer CRSwNP outcomes. Clinical trials NCT02912468 (SINUS-24) and NCT02898454 (SINUS-52), www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Evaluation and treatment of rhinosinusitis with primary antibody deficiency in adults: Evidence-based review with recommendations.

BACKGROUND: There is clear evidence that the prevalence of primary antibody deficiency (PAD) is higher in patients with recurrent and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) than in the general population. The purpose of this multi-institutional and multidisciplinary evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) is to thoroughly review the literature on rhinosinusitis with PAD, summarize the existing evidence, and provide recommendations on the evaluation and management of rhinosinusitis in patients with PAD. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically reviewed from inception through August 2022. Studies on the evaluation and management of rhinosinusitis in PAD patients were included. An iterative review process was utilized in accordance with EBRR guidelines. Levels of evidence and recommendations on the evaluation and management principles for PAD were generated. RESULTS: A total of 42 studies were included in this evidence-based review. These studies were evaluated on incidence of PAD in rhinosinusitis patients, incidence of rhinosinusitis in PAD patients, and on the different treatment modalities used and their outcome. The aggregate quality of evidence was varied across reviewed domains. CONCLUSION: Based on the currently available evidence, PAD can occur in up to 50% of patients with recalcitrant CRS. Despite the presence of multiple studies addressing rhinosinusitis and PAD, the level of evidence supporting different treatment options continues to be lacking. Optimal management requires a multidisciplinary approach through collaboration with clinical immunology. There is need for higher-level studies that compare different treatments in patients with PAD and rhinosinusitis.

The Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) With Biologics.

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps affects a significant portion of the worldwide population. This illness is associated with several chronic conditions and has an important impact on patient quality of life, leading to a great societal economic burden. In recent years, biologic medications have been developed and found to be effective in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. This review focuses on these treatment options and their ability to improve patient outcomes, including quality of life. It also reviews available evidence with regards to patient selection, monitoring of patients after treatment initiation, and comparison of different biologics and with other treatment options such as sinus surgery.

Sinus inflammation and chronic rhinosinusitis are associated with a diagnosis of new onset asthma in the following year.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and asthma commonly co-occur. No studies have leveraged large samples needed to formally address whether preexisting CRS is associated with new onset asthma over time. METHODS: We evaluated whether prevalent CRS [identified in two ways: validated text algorithm applied to sinus computerized tomography (CT) scan or two diagnoses] was associated with new onset adult asthma in the following year. We used electronic health record data from Geisinger from 2008 to 2019. For each year we removed persons with any evidence of asthma through the end of the year, then identified those with new diagnosis of asthma in the following year. Complementary log-log regression was used to adjust for confounding variables (e.g., sociodemographic, contact with the health system, comorbidities), and hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 35,441 persons were diagnosed with new onset asthma and were compared to 890,956 persons who did not develop asthma. Persons with new onset asthma tended to be female (69.6%) and younger (mean [SD] age 45.9 [17.0] years). Both CRS definitions were associated (HR, 95% CI) with new onset asthma, with 2.21 (1.93, 2.54) and 1.48 (1.38, 1.59) for CRS based on sinus CT scan and two diagnoses, respectively. New onset asthma was uncommonly observed in persons with a history of sinus surgery. CONCLUSION: Prevalent CRS identified with two complementary approaches was associated with a diagnosis of new onset asthma in the following year. The findings may have clinical implications for the prevention of asthma.

Risk of new-onset and prevalent disease in chronic rhinosinusitis: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is accompanied by burdensome comorbid conditions. Understanding the relative timing of the onset of these conditions could inform disease prevention, detection, and management. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between CRS and new-onset and prevalent asthma, noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFBE), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study among primary care patients using a detailed medical and symptom questionnaire in 2014 and again in 2020. We used questionnaire and electronic health record (EHR) data to determine CRS status: CRSSE (moderate to severe symptoms with EHR evidence), CRSE (limited symptoms with EHR evidence), CRSS (moderate to severe symptoms without EHR evidence), CRSneg (limited symptoms and no EHR evidence; reference). We evaluated the association between CRS status and new-onset and prevalent disease using logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: There were 7847 and 4445 respondents to the 2014 and 2020 questionnaires, respectively. CRSSE (vs CRSneg ) was associated with increased odds of new-onset asthma (OR, 1.74 [CI, 1.09-2.77), NCFBE (OR, 1.87 [CI, 1.12-3.13]), COPD (OR, 1.73 [CI, 1.14-2.68]), GERD (OR, 1.95 [CI, 1.61-2.35]), and OSA (OR, 1.91 [CI, 1.39-2.62]). Similarly, increased odds were observed for associations with the prevalence of these conditions. CONCLUSION: The findings from the study support further exploration of CRS as a target for the prevention and detection of asthma, NCFBE, COPD, GERD, and OSA.

Evidence that oncostatin M synergizes with IL-4 signaling to induce TSLP expression in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

BACKGROUND: Oncostatin M (OSM) may promote type 2 inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) by inducing thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP). OBJECTIVE: We sought to study the impact of OSM on TSLP synthesis and release from nasal epithelial cells (NECs). METHODS: OSM receptors, IL-4 receptors (IL-4R), and TSLP were evaluated in mucosal tissue and primary NECs from patients with CRSwNP by quantitative PCR and immunofluorescence. Air-liquid interface-cultured NECs were stimulated with cytokines, including OSM, and quantitative PCR, ELISA, Western blot, and flow cytometry were used to assess the expression of OSM receptors, IL-4R, and TSLP. RESULTS: Increased levels of OSM receptor ß chain (OSMRß), IL-4Rα, and TSLP were observed in nasal polyp tissues and primary epithelial cells from nasal polyps of patients with CRSwNP compared with control tissues or cells from control subjects. The level of expression of OSMRß in tissue was correlated with levels of both IL-4Rα and TSLP. OSM stimulation of NECs increased the expression of OSMRß and IL-4Rα. Stimulation with IL-4 plus OSM augmented the production of TSLP; the response was suppressed by a signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 inhibitor. Stimulation of NECs with IL-4 plus OSM increased the expression of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 3, an enzyme that truncates and activates TSLP. CONCLUSIONS: OSM increases the expression of IL-4Rα and synergizes with IL-4 to induce the synthesis and release of TSLP in NECs. Because the combination of IL-4 and OSM also augmented the expression of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 3, these results suggest that OSM can induce both synthesis and posttranslational processing/activation of TSLP, promoting type 2 inflammation.