Sulfur and oxygen isotope constraints on sulfate sources and neutral rock drainage-related processes at a South African colliery.

Understanding the fundamental controls that govern the generation of mine drainage is essential for waste management strategies. Combining the isotopic composition of water (H and O) and dissolved sulfate (S and O) with hydrogeochemical measurements of surface and groundwater, microbial analysis, composition of sediments and precipitates, and geochemical modeling results in this study we discussed the processes that control mine water chemistry and identified the potential source(s) and possible mechanisms governing sulfate formation and transformation around a South African colliery. Compared to various South African water standards, water samples collected from the surroundings of a coal waste disposal facility had elevated Fe2+ (0.9 to 56.9 mg L-1), Ca (33.0 to 527.0 mg L-1), Mg (6.2 to 457.0 mg L-1), Mn (0.1 to 8.6 mg L-1) and SO4 (19.7 to 3440.8 mg L-1) and circumneutral pH. The pH conditions are mainly controlled by the release of H+ from pyrite oxidation and the subsequent dissolution of carbonates and aluminosilicate minerals. The phases predicted to precipitate by equilibrium calculation were green rusts, ferrihydrite, gypsum, ±epsomite. Low concentrations of deleterious metals in solution are due to their low abundance in the local host rocks, and their attenuation through adsorption onto secondary Fe precipitates and co-precipitation at the elevated pH values. The δ34S values of sulfate are enriched (-6.5 ‰ to +5.6 ‰) compared to that of pyrite sampled from the mine (mean -22.5 ‰) and overlap with that of the organic sulfur of coal from the region (-2.5 to +4.9 ‰). The presence of both sulfur reducing and oxidizing bacteria were detected in the collected sediment samples. Combined, the data are consistent with the dissolved sulfate in the sampled waters from the colliery being derived primarily from pyrite probably with the subordinate contribution of organic sulfur, followed by its partial removal through precipitation and microbially-induced reduction.

E-waste in the international context - A review of trade flows, regulations, hazards, waste management strategies and technologies for value recovery.

E-waste, or waste generated from electrical and electronic equipment, is considered as one of the fastest-growing waste categories, growing at a rate of 3-5% per year in the world. In 2016, 44.7 million tonnes of e-waste were generated in the world, which is equivalent to 6.1 kg for each person. E-waste is classified as a hazardous waste, but unlike other categories, e-waste also has significant potential for value recovery. As a result it is traded significantly between the developed and developing world, both as waste for disposal and as a resource for metal recovery. Only 20% of global e-waste in 2016 was properly recycled or disposed of, with the fate of the remaining 80% undocumented - likely to be dumped, traded or recycled under inferior conditions. This review paper provides an overview of the global e-waste resource and identifies the major challenges in the sector in terms of generation, global trade and waste management strategies. It lists the specific hazards associated with this type of waste that need to be taken into account in its management and includes a detailed overview of technologies employed or proposed for the recovery of value from e-waste. On the basis of this overview the paper identifies future directions for effective e-waste processing towards sustainable waste/resource management. It becomes clear that there is a strong divide between developed and developing countries with regard to this sector. While value recovery is practiced in centralised facilities employing advanced technologies in a highly regulated industrial environment in the developed world, in the developing world such recovery is practiced in a largely unregulated artisanal industry employing simplistic, labour intensive and environmentally hazardous approaches. Thus value is generated safely in the hi-tech environment of the developed world, whereas environmental burdens associated with exported waste and residual waste from simplistic processing remain largely in developing countries. It is argued that given the breadth of available technologies, a more systematic evaluation of the entire e-waste value chain needs to be conducted with a view to establishing integrated management of this resource (in terms of well-regulated value recovery and final residue disposal) at the appropriately local rather than global scale.