Precision Balance Assessment in Parkinson's Disease: Utilizing Vision-Based 3D Pose Tracking for Pull Test Analysis.

Postural instability is a common complication in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) associated with recurrent falls and fall-related injuries. The test of retropulsion, consisting of a rapid balance perturbation by a pull in the backward direction, is regarded as the gold standard for evaluating postural instability in PD and is a key component of the neurological examination and clinical rating in PD (e.g., MDS-UPDRS). However, significant variability in test execution and interpretation contributes to a low intra- and inter-rater test reliability. Here, we explore the potential for objective, vision-based assessment of the pull test (vPull) using 3D pose tracking applied to single-sensor RGB-Depth recordings of clinical assessments. The initial results in a cohort of healthy individuals (n = 15) demonstrate overall excellent agreement of vPull-derived metrics with the gold standard marker-based motion capture. Subsequently, in a cohort of PD patients and controls (n = 15 each), we assessed the inter-rater reliability of vPull and analyzed PD-related impairments in postural response (including pull-to-step latency, number of steps, retropulsion angle). These quantitative metrics effectively distinguish healthy performance from and within varying degrees of postural impairment in PD. vPull shows promise for straightforward clinical implementation with the potential to enhance the sensitivity and specificity of postural instability assessment and fall risk prediction in PD.

No evidence for effects of low-intensity vestibular noise stimulation on mild-to-moderate gait impairments in patients with Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Gait impairment is a key feature in later stages of Parkinson's disease (PD), which often responds poorly to pharmacological therapies. Neuromodulatory treatment by low-intensity noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (nGVS) has indicated positive effects on postural instability in PD, which may possibly be conveyed to improvement of dynamic gait dysfunction. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of individually tuned nGVS on normal and cognitively challenged walking in PD patients with mild-to-moderate gait dysfunction. METHODS: Effects of nGVS of varying intensities (0-0.7 mA) on body sway were examined in 32 patients with PD (ON medication state, Hoehn and Yahr: 2.3 ± 0.5), who were standing with eyes closed on a posturographic force plate. Treatment response and optimal nGVS stimulation intensity were determined on an individual patient level. In a second step, the effects of optimal nGVS vs. sham treatment on walking with preferred speed and with a cognitive dual task were investigated by assessment of spatiotemporal gait parameters on a pressure-sensitive gait carpet. RESULTS: Evaluation of individual balance responses yielded that 59% of patients displayed a beneficial balance response to nGVS treatment with an average optimal improvement of 23%. However, optimal nGVS had no effects on gait parameters neither for the normal nor the cognitively challenged walking condition compared to sham stimulation irrespective of the nGVS responder status. CONCLUSIONS: Low-intensity nGVS seems to have differential treatment effects on static postural imbalance and continuous gait dysfunction in PD, which could be explained by a selective modulation of midbrain-thalamic circuits of balance control.

Low-intensity vestibular noise stimulation improves postural symptoms in progressive supranuclear palsy.

BACKGROUND: Postural imbalance and falls are an early disabling symptom in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) of multifactorial origin that may involve abnormal vestibulospinal reflexes. Low-intensity noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (nGVS) is a non-invasive treatment to normalize deficient vestibular function and attenuate imbalance in Parkinson's disease. The presumed therapeutic mode of nGVS is stochastic resonance (SR), a mechanism by which weak sensory noise stimulation can enhance sensory information processing. OBJECTIVE: To examine potential treatment effects of nGVS on postural instability in 16 patients with PSP with a clinically probable and [18F]PI-2620 tau-PET-positive PSP. METHODS: Effects of nGVS of varying intensity (0-0.7 mA) on body sway were examined, while patients were standing with eyes closed on a posturographic force plate. We assumed a bell-shaped response curve with maximal sway reductions at intermediate nGVS intensities to be indicative of SR. An established SR-curve model was fitted on individual patient outcomes and three experienced human raters had to judge whether responses to nGVS were consistent with the exhibition of SR. RESULTS: We found nGVS-induced reductions of body sway compatible with SR in 9 patients (56%) with optimal improvements of 31 ± 10%. In eight patients (50%), nGVS-induced sway reductions exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (improvement: 34 ± 5%), indicative of strong SR. CONCLUSION: nGVS yielded clinically relevant reductions in body sway compatible with the exhibition of SR in vestibular sensorimotor pathways in at least half of the assessed patients. Non-invasive vestibular noise stimulation may be thus a well-tolerated treatment strategy to ameliorate postural symptoms in PSP.

Reliability and validity of a mobile tablet for assessing left/right judgements.

BACKGROUND: Left/right judgement (LRJ) of body parts is commonly used to assess the ability to perform implicit motor imagery and the integrity of brain-grounded maps of the body. Clinically, LRJ are often undertaken using a mobile tablet, but the concurrent validity and reliability of this approach has not yet been established. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of a mobile tablet for assessing LRJ. METHOD: Participants completed LRJ for 50 hand images (Experiment 1), and 40 back, foot, or neck images (Experiment 2) using a mobile tablet and desktop computer in random order. Participants in Experiment 2 performed a repeat test the following day to assess test-retest reliability. Accuracy and response time (RT) were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty participants aged 55.3 (±6.7) years in Experiment 1, and 37 participants aged 38.2 (±12.3) years in Experiment 2, were recruited. Concurrent validity of the mobile tablet was good to excellent for hand judgements (ICC3,1 = 0.836 for RT; ICC = 0.909 for accuracy), and was good for back, foot, and neck judgements (ICC = 0.781 for accuracy; ICC = 0.880 for RT). Test-retest reliability of the mobile tablet was good to excellent (ICC = 0.824 for accuracy; ICC = 0.903 for RT). CONCLUSIONS: The mobile tablet demonstrated good to excellent concurrent validity with the desktop computer in two separate samples. The mobile tablet also demonstrated good to excellent test-retest reliability. The mobile tablet for LRJ is a valid alternative to the original desktop version.

When touch predicts pain: predictive tactile cues modulate perceived intensity of painful stimulation independent of expectancy.

AIMS: Non-nociceptive somatosensory input, such as tactile or proprioceptive information, always precedes nociceptive input during a painful event. This relationship provides clear opportunities for predictive associative learning, which may shape future painful experiences. In this differential classical conditioning study we tested whether pain-associated tactile cues (conditioned stimuli; CS) could alter the perceived intensity of painful stimulation, and whether this depends on duration of the CS-seeing that CS duration might allow or prevent conscious expectation. METHODS: Subjects underwent a classical differential conditioning task in which a tactile cue at location A (CS+) preceded painful electrical stimulation at location B (UShigh), whereas a tactile cue at location C (CS-) preceded non-painful electrical stimulation at location B (USlow). At test, we compared the pain evoked by a moderately painful stimulus (USmed) when preceded by either the CS+ or CS-. CS duration was manipulated between subjects. Participants were assigned to one of three groups: Long CS (4s, allowing conscious expectation), Short CS (110ms) and CS-US indistinguishable (20ms), preventing conscious expectation). We hypothesised that more pain would be evoked by the US when preceded by the CS+ relative to the CS-, and that the effect would be independent of CS duration. RESULTS: Fifty-four healthy participants (31 females, age=26, SD=9) were included in the analysis. The hypotheses were supported in that more intense pain was evoked by the USmed when paired with the tactile CS+, than when paired with the tactile CS-; mean difference 3mm on a 150mm VAS (CI 0.4-4.8mm). CS duration did not moderate the effect. The effect was greater in those participants where calibration was optimal, as indicated by a relatively more painful UShigh. CONCLUSION: We conclude that pain-associated tactile cues can influence pain, and that this effect is not dependent on stimulus duration. This suggests that explicit expectation is not a requirement for predictive cues to modulate pain. That the presence of the CS+ resulted in only a 5.3% higher intensity rating compared with the CS- may reflect a limitation of laboratory studies, where a limited number of trials, an artificial context and the use of experimental pain are likely to reveal only glimpses of what is clinically possible. IMPLICATIONS: Pain-associated visual and auditory cues have been shown to enhance pain in laboratory and clinical scenarios, supposedly by influencing expectation of impending harm. We show that pain-associated somatosensory cues can also modulate pain and that this can occur independently of expectation. This points to a larger potential role for associative learning in the development and treatment of pain than has previously been considered. We suggest that research into associative mechanisms underpinning pain, as distinct from those that link pain to pain-related fear and avoidance, is worthwhile.