Exercise-induced Bronchodilation Equalizes Exercise Ventilatory Mechanics despite Variable Baseline Airway Function in Asthma.

PURPOSE: We quantified the magnitude of exercise-induced bronchodilation in adult asthmatics under conditions of narrowed and dilated airways. We then assessed the effect of the bronchodilation on ventilatory capacity and the extent of ventilatory limitation during exercise. METHODS: Eleven asthmatics completed three exercise bouts on a cycle ergometer. Exercise was preceded by no treatment (trialCON), inhaled ß2 agonist (trialBD), or a eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea challenge (trialBC). Maximal expiratory flow-volume maneuvers (MEFV) were performed before and within 40 s of exercise cessation. Exercise tidal flow-volume loops were placed within the preexercise and postexercise MEFV curve and used to determine expiratory flow limitation and maximum ventilatory capacity (V˙ECap). RESULTS: Preexercise airway function was different among the trials (forced expiratory volume 1 s during trialCON, trialBD, and trialBC = 3.3 ± 0.8 L, 3.8 ± 0.8 L, and 2.9 ± 0.8 L, respectively; P < 0.05). Maximal expired airflow increased with exercise during all three trials, but the increase was greatest during trialBC (delta forced expiratory volume 1 s during trialCON, trialBD, and trialBC = +12.2% ± 13.1%, +5.2% ± 5.7%, +28.1% ± 15.7%). Thus, the extent of expiratory flow limitation decreased, and V˙ECap increased, when the postexercise MEFV curve was used. During trialCON and trialBC, actual exercise ventilation exceeded V˙ECap calculated with the preexercise MEFV curve in seven and nine subjects, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the critical importance of exercise bronchodilation in the asthmatic with narrowed airways. Of clinical relevance, the results also highlight the importance of assessing airway function during or immediately after exercise in asthmatic persons; otherwise, mechanical limitations to exercise ventilation will be overestimated.