What Is the Impact of Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery on Patient Function and Activity Levels?

BACKGROUND: Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a hip preserving procedure performed often in younger, highly active patients. However, counseling patients is difficult, as there are limited data regarding activity level after PAO. The purpose of this study is to analyze the physical activity levels after PAO in a large, prospective multicenter cohort. METHODS: Prospectively collected data from a multicenter study group included 359 hips treated by PAO for hip dysplasia at a mean age of 25.1 years. Patient demographics, radiographic measures, operative data, and clinical outcomes were evaluated preoperatively, at 1 year, and at minimum 2 years postoperatively. Activity level was assessed with the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, and patients were stratified into low activity, moderate activity, and high activity groups based on preoperative function. RESULTS: Compared to preoperative scores across the complete cohort, postoperative UCLA scores were improved on average 0.6 points at final follow-up (P = .001). The low activity and moderate activity groups had significant improvement in UCLA scores (P < .001 and P = .0007, respectively), while the high activity groups saw a significant decrease in UCLA activity scores (P < .0001). Modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Score Pain, and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Score Sports and Recreation scores were significantly improved across all preoperative activity levels. Multivariable linear regression (r2 = 0.45) confirmed prior ipsilateral surgery as a predictor for change in UCLA score (P = .002). CONCLUSION: Overall, these data suggest that consistent improvements in activity level and function can be expected following PAO surgery, with greater gains experienced by patients with lower preoperative levels of activity.

Are Complications After the Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy Associated With Subsequent Outcomes Scores?

BACKGROUND: The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) continues to be a commonly performed nonarthroplasty option to treat acetabular dysplasia, but only a few short-term studies have evaluated complications rigorously after PAO. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What complications are observed at 10-year mean followup of the Bernese PAO in patients with symptomatic acetabular dysplasia? (2) What factors are associated with these complications? (3) Do these complications affect clinical outcome scores? METHODS: We reviewed 238 hips in 206 patients treated with PAO from July 1994 to August 2008. Only PAOs performed for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia and those that had at a minimum 4-year followup were included. Patients who went on to THA before 4 years were included in the study. Patients with hip pain who presented with a clinical presentation of symptomatic acetabular dysplasia, radiographic evidence of femoral head uncovering, and a lateral center-edge angle < 25° were considered for PAO and no other juxtaacetabular osteotomy was offered other than PAO. Sixty-two hips had diagnoses other than acetabular dysplasia and 22 were lost to followup. The remaining 154 hips (129 patients) were evaluated by chart review at a mean of 10 years (range, 1.7-20.5 years) using the UCLA Activity Score, modified Harris hip score (mHHS), WOMAC, and radiographic analysis. The mean age at PAO was 26 years (range, 10-60 years) and consisted of 113 female patients (132 hips [86%]) and 16 male patients (22 hips [14%]). Complications were graded using the validated Clavien-Dindo system. Complications were assessed for each hip and the highest complication grade was assigned to the hip if multiple complications occurred. We divided complication grades into three groups for analysis: no complications, Grade 1 complications, and complications that deviated from the standard postoperative course (Grades 2, 3, and 4). There were no Grade 5 complications. Variables with significant (p < 0.05) univariable associations with complications were considered for inclusion in a multivariable model. Outcome variables (mHHS and WOMAC) at the most recent followup visit were analyzed using a generalized estimating equation approach. Analysis of variance was used to compare UCLA at the most recent followup among the complication classes. RESULTS: Major complications defined as Clavien-Dindo Grade 3/4 occurred in 14 hips (9%). After controlling for potential confounding variables, we found that increasing body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.25; p = 0.004) was associated with increased risk of complication. In contrast, greater surgeon experience was associated with a decreased risk (OR, 0.3; p = 0.002). Complications were associated with postoperative pain and activity, WOMAC (mean ± SD: 0 complications = 1.5 ± 15.1, 1 complication = 4.3 ± 4.1, 2-3 complications = 3.8 ± 4.6; p = 0.020) and UCLA scores (mean ± SD: 0 complications = 7.8 ± 2, 1 complication = 6.7 ± 2.1, 2-3 complications = 6.5 ± 2; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Most hips undergoing PAO have few complications. The most common major surgical complication is nonunion. Increasing BMI was a predictor of having a complication, and surgeon experience decreased complication risk. Having a complication adversely affected long-term pain and activity. To minimize complications and maximize outcomes, a patient's BMI should be assessed preoperatively and those with excessive BMI should be counseled on the increased risk of complications. In an experienced surgeon's hands, PAO has few complications at mean 10-year followup and a low risk of permanent disability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Practical Surgical Techniques for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Although total hip arthroplasty is an extremely successful procedure, the continual increase in the number of total hip arthroplasties that are performed is associated with the substantial burden of revision total hip arthroplasty. Modes of total hip arthroplasty failure include instability, aseptic loosening, infection, periprosthetic fracture, hardware failure, and component wear, all of which are indications for revision total hip arthroplasty. Surgeons must have a sound preoperative revision total hip arthroplasty plan and must be familiar with a variety of component removal and exposure techniques, such as the extended trochanteric osteotomy. Alternative surgical plan(s) and extra implants for reconstruction on both the acetabular and femoral sides should be available in anticipation of unexpected findings. Component removal and exposure techniques can be refined to avoid complications and achieve a successful outcome in patients who undergo revision total hip arthroplasty.