Perceptions of lecturers and students regarding discriminatory experiences and sexual harassment in academic medicine - results from a faculty-wide quantitative study.

BACKGROUND: Discrimination and sexual harassment are prevalent in higher education institutions and can affect students, faculty members and employees. Herein the aim was to assess the extent of discriminatory experiences and sexual harassment of students and lecturers at one of the largest teaching hospitals in Europe. We analyze whether there are differences between lecturers and students, different study programs as well as sex/gender differences. METHODS: In an interdisciplinary, iterative process, a semi-standardized questionnaire was developed and sent to N = 7095 students (S) of all study programs and N = 2528 lecturers (L) at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany. The study was conducted from November 2018 to February 2019. Besides a broad range of questions on sociodemographic background allowing for diversity sensitive data analysis, they were asked if they had witnessed and/or experienced any form of discrimination or sexual harassment at the medical faculty, if yes, how often, the perceived reasons, situational factors and perpetrators. RESULTS: The response rate was 14% (n = 964) for students and 11% (n = 275) for lecturers. A proportion of 49.6% of students (L: 31%) reported that they have witnessed and/or experienced discriminatory behavior. Sexual harassment was witnessed and/or experienced by 23.6% of students (L: 19.2%). Lecturers (85.9%) were identified as the main source of discriminatory behavior by students. Directors/supervisors (47.4%) were stated as the main source of discriminatory behavior by lecturers. As the most frequent perceived reason for discriminatory experiences sex/gender (S: 71%; L: 60.3%) was reported. Women and dental students experienced more discriminatory behavior and sexual harassment. CONCLUSIONS: Discriminatory behavior is experienced by a significant number of students and lecturers, with power structures having a relevant impact. Dental students and women appear to be particularly exposed. Specific institutional measures, such as training programs for lecturers and students are necessary to raise awareness and provide resources. Furthermore, national preventive strategies should be thoroughly implemented to fight discrimination and harassment at the workplace.

Design and usability testing of an in-house developed performance feedback tool for medical students.

BACKGROUND: Feedback is essential in a self-regulated learning environment such as medical education. When feedback channels are widely spread, the need arises for a system of integrating this information in a single platform. This article reports on the design and initial testing of a feedback tool for medical students at Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, a large teaching hospital. Following a needs analysis, we designed and programmed a feedback tool in a user-centered approach. The resulting interface was evaluated prior to release with usability testing and again post release using quantitative/qualitative questionnaires. RESULTS: The tool we created is a browser application for use on desktop or mobile devices. Students log in to see a dashboard of "cards" featuring summaries of assessment results, a portal for the documentation of acquired practical skills, and an overview of their progress along their course. Users see their cohort's average for each format. Learning analytics rank students' strengths by subject. The interface is characterized by colourful and simple graphics. In its initial form, the tool has been rated positively overall by students. During testing, the high task completion rate (78%) and low overall number of non-critical errors indicated good usability, while the quantitative data (system usability scoring) also indicates high ease of use. The source code for the tool is open-source and can be adapted by other medical faculties. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the implemented tool LevelUp is well-accepted by students. It therefore holds promise for improved, digitalized integrated feedback about students' learning progress. Our aim is that LevelUp will help medical students to keep track of their study progress and reflect on their skills. Further development will integrate users' recommendations for additional features as well as optimizing data flow.

Medical students' ratings of the relevance and actual implementation of interprofessional education and preferences for teaching formats: comparison by gender and prior education.

Objectives: Interprofessional education is becoming increasingly important for collaboration in patient care. In the national context, there are few empirical studies on the assessment of medical students as important stakeholders in their education. Method: Students (N=2,974) participated in a semester-wide online evaluation of the modular curriculum of medicine at the Charité Berlin. Socio-demographic data (including gender, completion of prior education/studies), assessments of the relevance and extent of interprofessional collaboration and preferences for interprofessional education in various teaching formats were collected. Results: In total, data from 1,019 students were included in the evaluation. The relevance of interprofessional collaboration was considered high by medical students. Female students rated the relevance higher than male students. The completion of pre-education (vocational training or study) had no additional influence. The actual implementation of interprofessional education was rated equally low by female and male students. Medical students rated patient-centred, interactive small group formats as particularly suitable for interprofessional education. There were no gender differences, but the effect was more pronounced among students with vocational training. Conclusion: The assessments of female and male students show a large difference between the perceived relevance and the actual implementation of interprofessional collaboration in the modular curriculum of medicine. This study provides an empirical basis for the actual implementation of interprofessional collaboration and students' views on suitable teaching formats for interprofessional education.

The modular curriculum of medicine at the Charité Berlin - a project report based on an across-semester student evaluation.

Aim: The introduction of a reform clause into the German licensing laws for medical doctors has enabled German faculties to pilot alternative designs for medical degree programmes. The aim of this project report is to outline the curricular features of the modular curriculum of medicine (MCM) at the Charité and to assess the results of its implementation based on a student evaluation across semesters. Project outline: The MCM was planned and implemented in a competency- and outcome-based manner from 2010-2016 in a faculty-wide process. The curriculum is characterised by a modular structure, longitudinal teaching formats and the integration of basic and clinical science. In the winter semester 2017, evaluations by students in semesters 1-10 were carried out. The results were analysed descriptively, and the coverage of overarching learning outcomes was compared to the results of a survey carried out amongst students on the traditional regular curriculum of medicine track in 2016. Results: A total of 1,047 students participated in the across-semester evaluation (return rate 35%). A high percentage of the respondents positively rated the achieved curricular integration and longitudinal teaching formats. The majority of the respondents agreed with the relevance of the overarching learning outcomes. Students' evaluations of the coverage of learning outcomes showed a differentiated picture for the MCM. Compared to the regular curriculum track, the coverage in the MCM programme showed substantial improvements in all aspects. Students found themselves to be better prepared for the M2 state examination and the practical year. The students' overall satisfaction with their decisions to study in the MCM was high. Conclusions: The results of the student evaluation show that a significant improvement in medical education has been achieved at the Charité with the new integrated, outcome-oriented design and the implementation of the MCM. At the same time, ongoing weaknesses have been revealed that serve as a basis for the continued development of the curriculum. This report aims to contribute to the discussion of the future of undergraduate medical education in Germany.

The use of quality assurance instruments and methods to integrate diversity aspects into health professions study programmes.

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Background With the increasing diversity in our population, future medical doctors need to have adequate diversity and gender competencies in order to provide adequate and good quality of medical care. Diversity, especially sex and gender aspects, were therefore systematically integrated into the new modular medical curriculum at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin. The aim was to integrate diversity aspects into further study programmes of the Charité Berlin by assessing the current degree of integration and the relevance for the professional work of students and graduates and identifying suitable and effective quality assurance instruments. Methods After the curriculum development of the new modular medical curriculum was completed, the gender and diversity change agent was transferred from the curriculum development team to the quality assurance section of the Office of the Dean of Student Affairs. The change agent identified in cooperation with the quality assurance team the accreditation process, student evaluations and graduate surveys as suitable methods for the integration. Furthermore, the change agent provided support to the programme directors and coordinators with the integration. The impact of the measures and instruments used for the integration are measured within the reaccredition process of the programmes. Results Diversity aspects could be integrated into the accreditation standards admission, curricular structure, didactics, assessment and student counselling. In the student evaluations and graduate surveys gender and diversity items like migration background, number of children, caring responsibilities, disabilities and economic status could be integrated. Furthermore, students and graduates were asked to evaluate the relevance of gender and diversity competencies for their professional work and the degree of the curricular integration. Discussion and Conclusion The impact of the integrated diversity aspects can only be evaluated within the accreditation process. In order to increase and improve the awareness of students and faculty members of diversity aspects and issues the support by a gender and diversity change agent with the integration and by lecturing on this subject is important. A gender and diversity sensitive accreditation process contributes to the reflexivity and awareness of the faculty members involved.