RESUMO
Even a small percent increase in survival rates after treatment for lung cancer can produce a large benefit in terms of absolute numbers of lives saved, due to the very high incidence of the disease. Clinical results after surgery alone or radiotherapy alone are far from being satisfactory. Therefore, the integration of surgery with radiotherapy (both in the preoperative and in the postoperative setting) has been increasingly tested in the clinic. Radio-chemotherapeutic approaches progressively more effective have been developed for patients with inoperable disease, but also in combination with surgery. This review focuses on the current practice and on the ongoing clinical research in this field. The important issue of the short- and long-term toxicity of combined modality treatments in these patients is also emphasized, along with the research efforts for minimizing toxicity, especially as far as radiotherapy is concerned.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To retrospectively analyze the outcome and patterns of relapse in localized extranodal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the head and neck (HN-NHL) after radiotherapy alone or combined modality treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 107 patients with HN-NHL was performed. Relapse patterns, overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were analyzed. Only stage I (n=50) and stage II (n=57) patients were included with either low-grade (n=21) or high-grade (n=86) lymphoma. Fifty-nine patients were treated with radiotherapy (RT) alone and 48 patients received combined-modality treatment (CMT) consisting of chemotherapy (CHOP or CHOP-like) followed by radiotherapy. The volumes of irradiation included local field (n=24), involved field (n=13) and extended field (n=70). The median age at diagnosis was 63 years (range, 17-86 years). RESULTS: The overall response rates (CR+PR) in the radiotherapy group and the combined modality group were 100% and 96%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 49.4 months, 29 of 59 patients after RT alone (37%) and 30 of 48 patients after CMT (62%) were disease-free. In the whole series the projected five-year OS and RFS were 58.7% and 61.8%. At univariate analysis of clinical variables with potential impact on survival including age, stage, histology, IPI score, single or combined treatment and volumes of irradiation, only age and, to a limited extent, type of treatment influenced OS (age < or =60 years 79%, >60 years 41%, P < 0.001; RT alone 54.9%, CMT 62.8%, P = 0.0487) and RFS (< or =60 years 75%, >60 years 50%, P < 0.001; RT alone 54%, CMT 71%, P = 0.039). Better OS and RFS rates were obtained in patients with stage II and high-grade disease treated with CMT (five-year OS and RFS 63% and 69%, respectively; the corresponding values for RT alone were 38% and 34%). The final model of the multivariate analysis retained only age (< or =60 years) as a significant prognostic factor for both RFS and OS (P < 0.001). In the whole series, the sites of relapse were mainly systemic (n = 32/40, 80%) and in-field relapses were rare (n = 3/40, 7.5%). CONCLUSION: HN-NHL is characterized by a high risk of relapse, particularly at distant sites. Older patients have a significantly worse prognosis. Radiotherapy offers a very good local control rate although combined modality treatment possibly produces better RFS and OS, especially for stage II and high-grade disease. Better systemic approaches are warranted for a more consistent impact on survival in this particular subset of extranodal lymphoma. However, radiotherapy alone may offer a feasible and effective modality for patients who cannot tolerate more aggressive treatments. Extended-field radiotherapy and the treatment of a larger number of uninvolved lymph nodal regions does not confer a RFS or OS advantage, either after RT alone or after CMT.