Validity and reproducibility of the ARL-RSI score to assess psychological readiness before returning to sport after lateral ankle sprain.

Purpose: Although multiple scales exist to evaluate psychological readiness before returning to sport post-lateral ankle sprain (LAS), no score has been validated specifically for LAS or chronic ankle instability. The main aim of the study is to evaluate the validity and reproducibility of the ankle ligament reconstruction-return to sport injury (ALR-RSI) scale in assessing psychological readiness after LAS and its ability to identify patients who can return to their preinjury level. Methods: A total of 64 patients (35 females and 29 males; 33.8 ± 13.2 years) who recently experienced an acute LAS were included in this study. All patients participated in a predictive validation component of the study and were assessed at 2 and 4 months following an LAS. The ALR-RSI was completed twice by 20 patients at a 7-day interval to evaluate the reliability of the score in patients suffering from LAS. Results: The ALR-RSI was significantly (p < 0.001) and positively correlated with the other scores. The correlation was strong with the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Sports: r = 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-0.83) and moderate with the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (r = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.60-0.78) and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Activities of Daily Living Scores (r = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.51-0.72). Two-month ALR-RSI scores had good ability for predicting nonreturners at 4 months (area under the curve = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.6-0.9; p = 0.005). A Youden index of 0.51 was observed at an ALR-RSI score of 46%, corresponding to a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 83%. Test-retest reliability of the ALR-RSI was excellent, with an ICC of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99), a standard error of measurement of 3.02% and a minimum detectable change of 8.37%. Conclusions: The results of the current study validated the ALR-RSI as an important questionnaire to assess psychological readiness to return to sport after LAS. Level of Evidence: Level II prospective cohort study.

Ankle scientific knowledge is not translated into physiotherapy practice: a thematic analysis of French-speaking physiotherapists clinical behaviors.

CONTEXT: Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is prevalent amongst individuals who sustain a lateral ankle sprain (LAS) injury. The persistent of the characteristic long-standing clinical symptoms of CAI maybe attributable to the lack of adoption of evidence-informed clinical guidelines. OBJECTIVE: To investigate to what extent French-speaking physiotherapists implement the International Ankle Consortium Rehabilitation-Oriented-ASsessmenT (ROAST) framework when providing clinical care for individuals with an acute LAS injury. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: We created an online survey informed by a Delphi process of foot-ankle experts, and disseminated it to French-speaking physiotherapists in France, Switzerland, Quebec-Canada, Belgium, and Luxembourg. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: In total, 426 physiotherapists completed the online survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The online survey comprised closed and open-ended questions organized in 5 sections: (1) participants' demographics, (2) participants' self-assessment expertise, (3) clinical diagnostic assessment (bones and ligaments), (4) clinical evaluation after an acute LAS injury (ROAST framework), and (5) CAI. The qualitative data from the open-ended questions was analyzed using best practice thematic analysis guidelines. RESULTS: Only 6% of the respondents could name all Ottawa Ankle Rules criteria. Only 25% of the respondents cited or described "gold standard" tests from the literature to assess the integrity of the ankle lateral ligaments. Less than 25% of the respondents used some of the International Ankle Consortium ROAST recommended clinical evaluation outcome metrics to inform their clinical care for individuals with an acute LAS injury. In general, the respondents had a greater knowledge of the functional insufficiencies that associated with CAI when compared to the mechanical insufficiencies. CONCLUSION: A minority of French-speaking physiotherapists use the International Ankle Consortium ROAST recommended clinical evaluation outcome metrics to inform their clinical care for individuals with an acute LAS injury. This highlights the responsibility of the scientific community to better disseminate evidence-informed research to clinicians.

Low Ankle-GO Score While Returning to Sport After Lateral Ankle Sprain Leads to a 9-fold Increased Risk of Recurrence: A Two-year Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Lateral ankle sprain (LAS) is the most common sports injury, leading to a high rate of recurrence and the development of chronic ankle instability. One possible explanation is the lack of objective, evidence-based criteria to inform return to sport decisions following LAS. The aim of this study was therefore to assess the efficacy of a new functional score to distinguish patients at risk of recurrent LAS within two years after the initial injury. METHODS: The Ankle-GO score was used in 64 active patients two months after LAS. This composite score includes 2 self-reported questionnaires and 4 functional tests, for a maximum score of 25 points. The rate of reinjury was prospectively recorded 2 years after inclusion. Potential predictive variables for reinjury were tested using the Chi-square and independent t-tests. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) with the optimal cut-off score was determined to assess the predictive value of the Ankle-GO score for the risk of reinjury. Multivariate logistic regression was then used to determine the influence of risk factors of reinjury. RESULTS: Fifty-four (85%) patients were included (23 men and 31 women, 34.7 ± 13 years old) including 18 (33.3%) with a reinjury. The two-month Ankle-GO score was lower in patients with a recurrent LAS (5.4 ± 2.8 points vs. 9.1 ± 4.5, p = 0.002) and predicted the risk of reinjury (AUC = 0.75). Patients with < 8 points were found to have a significantly higher risk of reinjury (OR = 8.6; 95%CI: 2-37.2, p = 0.001). Women also tend to have a higher risk of recurrence (OR = 3.8; 95%CI: 0.9-15.5, p = 0.065). CONCLUSION: The Ankle-GO score is a new objective criterion for RTS after LAS. Patients with a low score at two months have a 9-fold greater risk of recurrence within two years.

Lack of Proprioceptive Strategy Modulation Leads to At-Risk Biomechanics for Anterior Cruciate Ligament in Healthy Athletes.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are frequent in handball, and altered sensory integration may contribute to increased injury risk. Recent evidence showed that proprioceptive postural control strategies differ among athletes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between proprioceptive strategy and biomechanics during side-cutting maneuvers. METHODS: A total of 47 handball players performed anticipated and unanticipated cutting tasks. Their postural proprioceptive strategy was then characterized according to the perturbation of the center of pressure displacement generated by the muscle vibration on a firm and foam surface. Individuals able to reweight proprioception from ankle to lumbar signals according to the stability of the support were defined as flexible. Conversely, athletes maintaining an ankle-steered strategy on foam surface were characterized as rigid. Statistical parametric mapping analysis was used to compare pelvic and lower limb side-cutting kinematics, kinetics, and EMG activity from seven muscles 200 ms before and after initial contact (IC) using a two-way ANOVA (group-condition). RESULTS: Twenty athletes (11 females and 9 males, 18.5 yr) were characterized as flexible and 20 athletes (12 females and 8 males, 18.9 yr) as rigid. No interaction between condition and proprioceptive profile was observed. More ipsilateral pelvic tilt before IC and lower vastus lateralis (VL) activity immediately after IC was observed during CUT ant . When comparing proprioceptive strategy, rigid individuals exhibited less preactivity of the semitendinosus ( P < 0.001) and higher VL activity ( P = 0.032). Conversely, rigid showed higher gluteus medius preactivity ( P < 0.05) and higher VL activity 100 ms after IC ( P < 0.001). Ankle was also more internally rotated before and during the stance phase ( P < 0.05) among rigid athletes. CONCLUSIONS: Rigid handball players exhibited at-risk determinants for anterior cruciate ligament injuries during side-cutting maneuvers.

Development and Validation of the Ankle-GO Score for Discriminating and Predicting Return-to-Sport Outcomes After Lateral Ankle Sprain.

BACKGROUND: Lateral ankle sprain (LAS) is the most common sports-related injury. However, there are currently no published evidence-based criteria to guide the patient's return to sport (RTS) and this decision is generally time-based. The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of a new score (Ankle-GO) and its predictive ability for RTS at the same level of play after LAS. HYPOTHESIS: The Ankle-GO is robust for discriminating and predicting RTS outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective diagnostic study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2. METHODS: The Ankle-GO was administered to 30 healthy participants and 64 patients at 2 and 4 months after LAS. The score was calculated as the sum of 6 tests for a maximum of 25 points. Construct validity, internal consistency, discriminant validity, and test-retest reliability were used to validate the score. The predictive value for the RTS was also validated based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: The internal consistency of the score was good (Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.79) with no ceiling or floor effect. Test-retest reliability was excellent (intraclass coefficient correlation = 0.99) with a minimum detectable change of 1.2 points. The 2-month scores were significantly lower than 4-month and control group scores (7.7 ± 4, 13.9 ± 4.6, and 19.6 ± 3.4 points, respectively, P < 0.01). Ankle-GO values were also significantly higher in patients who returned to their preinjury level at 4 months compared with those who did not (P < 0.01). The predictive value of the 2-month Ankle-GO score was fair for a RTS at the same or higher than preinjury level at 4 months (area under ROC curve, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.65-0.89; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The Ankle-GO appears to be a valid and robust score for clinicians to predict and discriminate RTS in patients after LAS. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Ankle-GO is the first objective score to help in the decision-making of the RTS after LAS. At 2 months, patients with an Ankle-GO score <8 points are unlikely to RTS at the same preinjury level.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rehabilitation for the 10- to 18-Year-Old Adolescent Athlete: Practice Guidelines Based on International Delphi Consensus.

Background: There are 2 treatment options for adolescent athletes with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries-rehabilitation alone (nonsurgical treatment) or ACL reconstruction plus rehabilitation. However, there is no clear consensus on how to include strength and neuromuscular training during each phase of rehabilitation. Purpose: To develop a practical consensus for adolescent ACL rehabilitation to help provide care to this age group using an international Delphi panel. Study Design: Consensus statement. Methods: A 3-round online international Delphi consensus study was conducted. A mix of open and closed literature-based statements were formulated and sent out to an international panel of 20 ACL rehabilitation experts. Statements were divided into 3 domains as follows: (1) nonsurgical rehabilitation; (2) prehabilitation; and (3) postoperative rehabilitation. Consensus was defined as 70% agreement between panel members. Results: Panel members agreed that rehabilitation should consist of 3 criterion-based phases, with continued injury prevention serving as a fourth phase. They also reached a consensus on rehabilitation being different for 10- to 16-year-olds compared with 17- and 18-year-olds, with a need to distinguish between prepubertal (Tanner stage 1) and mid- to postpubertal (Tanner stages 2-5) athletes. The panel members reached a consensus on the following topics: educational topics during rehabilitation; psychological interventions during rehabilitation; additional consultation of the orthopaedic surgeon; duration of postoperative rehabilitation; exercises during phase 1 of nonsurgical and postoperative rehabilitation; criteria for progression from phase 1 to phase 2; resistance training during phase 2; jumping exercises during phase 2; criteria for progression from phase 2 to phase 3; and criteria for return to sports (RTS). The most notable differences in recommendations for prepubertal compared with mid- to postpubertal athletes were described for resistance training and RTS criteria. Conclusion: Together with available evidence, this international Delphi statement provides a framework based on expert consensus and describes a practice guideline for adolescent ACL rehabilitation, which can be used in day-to-day practice. This is an important step toward reducing practice inconsistencies, improving the quality of rehabilitation after adolescent ACL injuries, and closing the evidence-practice gap while waiting for further studies to provide clarity.

Reliability and validity of 2D-video analysis to objectively assess hamstring performance during the H-test.

The H-test is commonly used during return-to-sport decisions after hamstring muscle injury. The primary aim was to evaluate the reliability of two-dimensional (2D) video analysis for the H-Test. The second aim was to assess its validity compared to an electronic gyroscope (gold standard), and the third aim was to establish normative values. We conducted a cross-sectional study including 30 healthy individuals. Mean, maximal velocities (VMean and Vmax) and range of motion (ROM) of hip flexion were captured during the H-test to evaluate inter-rater and test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) and standard error of measurement (SEM). Correlation analysis (r) and as typical error of estimate (TEE) were used to assess the validity between the video and the gyroscope. Reliability was excellent for ROM (ICC:0.91, [95% CI:0.83-0.95]), moderate for VMean (ICC:0.57; [95% CI:0.32-0.74]) and VMax (ICC:0.64, [95% CI:0.43-0.79]). Strong positive correlations were found between video and gyroscope for VMean (r = 0.79, [95% CI:0.71-0.86]) and VMax (r = 0.84, [95% CI:0.77-0.89]) and very strong for ROM (r = 0.89, [95% CI:0.85-0.93]). Males exhibited a higher VMax (p < 0.001) than females, while females had a higher ROM (p < 0.001). 2D-video analysis is a valid and reliable method to assess ROM during the H-Test and could easily be implemented in clinical practice.

Establishing Normative Dynamic Postural Control Values in Elite Female Handball Players.

Background: Lower extremity injuries among young female handball players are very common. The modified Star Excursion Balance Test (mSEBT) is a valid clinical tool to assess dynamic postural control and identify athletes with higher risk of injury. However, its interpretation is difficult since performance on this test is highly sport dependent. No normative values on the mSEBT exist in handball. Purpose: The aim of this investigation was to establish normative ranges of mSEBT performance in young, healthy female handball players to help practitioners when interpreting risk estimates. Study design: Cross-Sectional Study. Methods: Athletes from 14 elite teams were recruited during a national tournament and performed 3 trials in the anterior (ANT), posteromedial (PM), posterolateral (PL) directions of the mSEBT. Means, standard deviations and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) of normalized reached distances were calculated for each direction and the composite score (COMP). Level of asymmetry between dominant and non-dominant limbs were calculated for each direction using Bland Altman analyses. Group differences were weighed against the established mSEBT minimum detectable differences (MDD) to compare scores between limbs and across different player positions. Results: One-hundred and eighty-eight females (16.8±0.9 years) were tested. Mean reach distances were 65.2±5% (64.7-65.7), 110.0±6.2% (109.3-110.6), 107.1±6.2% (106.5-107.8) and 94.1±4.9% (93.6-94.6) for the ANT, PM, PL directions and COMP score respectively. Bias and limits of agreement for limb asymmetry were -0.23% (-5.85%, 5.38%) for ANT, -0.83% (-8.80%, 7.14%) for PM, 0.33% (-8.51%, 9.17%) for PL and -0.27% (-4.88%, 4.33%) for COMP score. No meaningful differences were observed between limbs or across player positions since the values did not exceed the MDD and all 95%CIs overlapped. Conclusion: This study provides normative performance values for dynamic postural control as measured by the mSEBT among young, healthy, elite female handball players. Considering the high incidence of injury in this population, these values can be used for injury risk reduction and return to sport decisions. Further prospective studies are needed to established specific cut-off scores in this population. Level of evidence: 2c.

Which Functional Tests and Self-Reported Questionnaires Can Help Clinicians Make Valid Return to Sport Decisions in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability? A Narrative Review and Expert Opinion.

Lateral ankle sprain is the most common injury in sports, with up to 40% of patients developing chronic ankle instability (CAI). One possible cause underlying this high rate of recurrence or feeling of giving way may be a premature return to sport (RTS). Indeed, except for time-based parameters, there are no specific criteria to guide clinicians in their RTS decisions in patients with CAI. A recent international consensus highlighted the relevance and importance of including patient-reported ankle function questionnaires combined with functional tests targeting ankle impairments in this population. Thus, the aim of this narrative review and expert opinion was to identify the most relevant functional performance tests and self-reported questionnaires to help clinicians in their RTS decision-making process following recurrent ankle sprains or surgical ankle stabilization. The PubMed (MEDLINE), PEDro, Cochrane Library and ScienceDirect databases were searched to identify published articles. Results showed that the single leg stance test on firm surfaces, the modified version of the star excursion balance test, the side hop test and the figure-of-8 test appeared to be the most relevant functional performance tests to target ankle impairments in patients with CAI. A combination of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and the Ankle Ligament Reconstruction-Return to Sport after Injury (ALR-RSI) questionnaires were the most relevant self-reported questionnaires to assess patient function in the context of CAI. Although these functional tests and questionnaires provide a solid foundation for clinicians to validate their RTS decisions in patient with CAI, objective scientific criteria with cut-off scores are still lacking. In addition to the proposed test cluster, an analysis of the context, in particular characteristics related to sports (e.g., fatigue, cognitive constraints), to obtain more information about the patient's risk of recurrent injury could be of added value when making a RTS decision in patients with CAI. In order to evaluate the strength of evertors under ecological conditions, it would also be interesting to assess the ability to control weight-bearing ankle inversion in a unipodal stance. Further studies are needed to assess the relevance of this proposed test cluster in RTS decision-making following lateral ankle sprain injury and CAI.

Proprioceptive postural control strategies differ among non-injured athletes.

Postural control during complex tasks requires adequate sensory integration and somaesthetic reweighting: suboptimal postural strategies can lead to injury. We assessed the ability of healthy athletes to reweight somaesthetic signals during postural perturbations on different surfaces. Thirty-five young (16 ± 1 years), healthy, elite handball players participated in this cross-sectional study. Proprioceptive reweighting was evaluated via vibration of the triceps surae and lumbar muscles on firm and foam surfaces. Postural variables and the electromyographic activity of the gluteus medius (GM), semitendinosus (ST) and fibularis longus (FL) were recorded during the PRE (10 s), VIBRATION (20 s) and POST (20 s) periods. Ankle proprioception was predominantly used on the firm compared to foam support. However, two opposing behaviours were observed: a "rigid" strategy in which reliance on ankle proprioception increased on the foam, and a "plastic" strategy that involved a proximal shift of proprioceptive reliance (p < 0.001). The plastic strategy was associated with a more effective recovery of balance after vibration cessation (p < 0.05). ST activation was higher during POST in the rigid strategy and did not return to the PRE level (p < 0.05) whereas it did in the plastic strategy. Proprioceptive strategies for postural control are highly variable and future studies should evaluate their contribution to injury.

Validity and reliability of video analysis to evaluate ankle proprioceptive reintegration during postural control.

BACKGROUND: The ability to dynamically reintegrate proprioceptive signals after they have been perturbated is impaired in certain pathologies. Evaluation of proprioceptive reintegration is useful for clinical practice but currently requires expensive laboratory tools. We developed a simple method, accessible to clinicians. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is two-dimensional (2D) video analysis of earlobe displacement a valid and reliable tool for the evaluation of ankle proprioceptive reintegration following muscle vibration? METHODS: Thirty-eight healthy individuals underwent vibration of the triceps surae while standing on a force plate (FP). Anterior (sagittal plane) earlobe displacement ('overshoot') was recorded at vibration cessation using 2D video analysis and rated by 3 blind examiners. Correlation analysis was performed between earlobe and center of pressure displacement (dCoP, recorded with the FP) to determine validity. Intra and interrater reliability were determined by calculation of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), change in the mean (CiM), standard error of measurement (SEM) and the minimal detectable change (MDC). RESULTS AND SIGNIFICANCE: Strong positive correlations (r = 0.82-0.94, p < .001) were found between video and FP data. Intra- and interrater reliability were excellent (ICC from 0.99 to 1.00 and from 0.90 to 0.97 respectively). For intrarater analysis, the CiM was 0.01 cm, SEM were 0.27 cm (95% CI: 0.23-0.33) and 3.43% (95% CI: 2.92-4.20) and the MDC was 0.74 cm. For interrater reliability, the CiM ranged from - 0.81-0.55 cm, the SEM from 0.61 to 1.12 cm and the MDC from 1.69 to 3.10 cm. 2D video analysis of anterior (sagittal) earlobe displacement is therefore a valid and reliable method to assess postural recovery following muscle vibration. This simple method could be used by clinicians to evaluate the ability of the central nervous system to reintegrate proprioceptive signals from the ankle. Further studies are needed to assess its validity in individuals with proprioceptive impairment.