Meropenem plus Ceftaroline Is Active against Enterococcus faecalis in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model Using Humanized Dosing Simulations.

The standard of care for serious Enterococcus faecalis infections is ampicillin plus ceftriaxone. Ampicillin's inconvenient dosing schedule, drug instability, allergy potential, along with ceftriaxone's high risk for Clostridioides difficile infection and its promotion of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), led our team to explore alternative options. This work aimed to understand the role of carbapenems in combination with cephalosporins in these infections. We selected two ampicillin and penicillin susceptible E. faecalis strains (AMP-MIC 0.5-2 µg/mL; PCN-MIC 2 µg/mL) and simulated human therapeutic dosing regimens in a 48-h in vitro pharmacodynamic model (IVPD) with ampicillin (2g q4h), ertapenem (1g q24h), meropenem (2g q8h), ceftriaxone (2g q12h), and ceftaroline (600 mg q8h). As expected, ampicillin plus ceftriaxone demonstrated enhanced activity compared with ampicillin monotherapy with no MIC increases in either isolate. Meropenem and ceftaroline demonstrated significant kill against both isolates, with no regrowth or MIC increases occurring. Meropenem plus ceftriaxone also demonstrated significant kill, and while no MIC increases were identified for meropenem, there was minor regrowth and larger standard deviations. Ertapenem combined with either ceftriaxone or ceftaroline enhanced activity at 24 h, but at 48 h, regrowth occurred, and ertapenem MIC increases were noted. Meropenem-based combination therapy against E. faecalis may provide clinicians with another regimen to treat severe E. faecalis infections. Meropenem plus ceftaroline was as active as the standard of care treatment (ampicillin plus ceftriaxone) and may serve as an alternative for serious E. faecalis infections. Further studies are warranted to determine the clinical efficacy.

Treatment Heterogeneity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pneumonia.

We have previously identified substantial antibiotic treatment heterogeneity, even among organism-specific and site-specific infections with treatment guidelines. Therefore, we sought to quantify the extent of treatment heterogeneity among patients hospitalized with P. aeruginosa pneumonia in the national Veterans Affairs Healthcare System from Jan-2015 to Apr-2018. Daily antibiotic exposures were mapped from three days prior to culture collection until discharge. Heterogeneity was defined as unique patterns of antibiotic treatment (drug and duration) not shared by any other patient. Our study included 5300 patients, of whom 87.5% had unique patterns of antibiotic drug and duration. Among patients receiving any initial antibiotic/s with a change to at least one anti-pseudomonal antibiotic (n = 3530, 66.6%) heterogeneity was 97.2%, while heterogeneity was 91.5% in those changing from any initial antibiotic/s to only anti-pseudomonal antibiotics (n = 576, 10.9%). When assessing heterogeneity of anti-pseudomonal antibiotic classes, irrespective of other antibiotic/s received (n = 4542, 85.7%), 50.5% had unique patterns of antibiotic class and duration, with median time to first change of three days, and a median of two changes. Real-world evidence is needed to inform the development of treatment pathways and antibiotic stewardship initiatives based on clinical outcome data, which is currently lacking in the presence of such treatment heterogeneity.

Assessing Rates of Co-Resistance and Patient Outcomes in Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections are associated with poor patient outcomes due to complex co-resistance patterns. We described common co-resistance patterns, clinical characteristics, and associated outcomes in patients admitted with an MDR P. aeruginosa. This national, multicenter, retrospective cohort study within the Veterans Affairs included adults hospitalized with a MDR P. aeruginosa infection (January 2015-December 2020) per Centers for Disease Control definition. Clinical outcomes were compared among those with differing MDR P. aeruginosa co-resistance: resistant to carbapenems and extended-spectrum cephalosporins and piperacillin-tazobactam (CARB/ESC/PT) versus without CARB/ESC/PT resistance; resistant to carbapenems and extended-spectrum cephalosporins and fluoroquinolone (CARB/ESC/FQ) versus without CARB/ESC/FQ resistance. We included 3,763 hospitalized patients. Co-resistance to CARB/ESC/PT was observed in 42.7%, and to CARB/ESC/FQ in 40.7%. The lowest co-resistance rates were observed with ceftolozane-tazobactam (6.2%, n = 6/97; 12.5%, n = 10/80, respectively) and ceftazidime-avibactam (5.2%, n = 5/97; 12.5%, n = 10/80, respectively). Overall, 14.2% of patients died during hospitalization, 59.7% had an extended length of stay, and 14.9% had reinfection with hospitalization. Outcomes were similar between patients with MDR P. aeruginosa strains with and without co-resistance to CARB/ESC/PT and CARB/ESC/FQ. Among a national cohort of patients hospitalized with MDR P. aeruginosa infections, co-resistance to three classes of standard of care antibiotics, such as carbapenem, extended-spectrum cephalosporins, and piperacillin-tazobactam or fluoroquinolones, exceeded 40% in our study population, posing great concerns for selecting appropriate empirical therapy. Clinical outcomes were poor for all patients, regardless of different co-resistance patterns. New treatment options are needed for hospitalized patients with suspected or confirmed MDR P. aeruginosa infections. IMPORTANCE We studied antibiotic co-resistance patterns in a national group of hospitalized patients with infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a type of bacteria that resists treatment to at least three classes of antibiotics. Co-resistance to antibiotic classes most typically used for treatment was common, which makes selecting appropriate antibiotics to successfully treat the infections difficult. Outcomes, including death, were poor for all patients in our study, regardless of the different patterns of co-resistance to common antibiotic classes. New antibiotics are needed to help treat hospitalized patients with MDR P. aeruginosa infections.

The Comparative Effectiveness of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam versus Aminoglycoside- or Polymyxin-Based Regimens in Multi-Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections are challenging to treat due to multi-drug resistance (MDR) and the complexity of the patients affected by these serious infections. As new antibiotic therapies come on the market, limited data exist about the effectiveness of such treatments in clinical practice. In this comparative effectiveness study of ceftolozane/tazobactam versus aminoglycoside- or polymyxin-based therapies among hospitalized patients with positive MDR P. aeruginosa cultures, we identified 57 patients treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam compared with 155 patients treated with aminoglycoside- or polymyxin-based regimens. Patients treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam were younger (mean age 67.5 vs. 71.1, p = 0.03) and had a higher comorbidity burden prior to hospitalization (median Charlson 5 vs. 3, p = 0.01) as well as higher rates of spinal cord injury (38.6% vs. 21.9%, p = 0.02) and P. aeruginosa-positive bone/joint cultures (12.3% vs. 0.7%, p < 0.0001). Inpatient mortality was significantly lower in the ceftolozane/tazobactam group compared with aminoglycosides or polymyxins (15.8% vs. 27.7%, adjusted odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.16−0.93). There were no significant differences observed for the other outcomes assessed. In hospitalized patients with MDR P. aeruginosa, inpatient mortality was 61% lower among patients treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam compared to those treated with aminoglycoside- or polymyxin-based regimens.