RESUMO
In this professional theoretical article, the authors argue that patient care should be centered on connection and that authentically turning toward suffering necessitates an approach to care that transcends medicine's traditional focus on cure and physical restoration and differentiates between pathology and disability. The meaning of illness and suffering for those who have experienced life-changing injuries or illness is explored. Strategies for approaching the lifeworld of these individuals are discussed using the concepts of phenomenology and embodiment, rooted in the work of philosophers from the phenomenological tradition. The authors also propose an approach to patient care offering a case-based example based on postmodernist concepts that elevate connection, relationship, and interdependency above the traditional focus of restoring normality and physical independence for individuals with disabilities. Traditional assumptions about quality of life, illness, and disability are called into question by focusing on the fluidity of being and disability identity, which serves to destabilize static, binary conceptions of individuals as either healthy or ill, disabled, or able-bodied. A postmodern lens invites healthcare practitioners to envision themselves as part of an assemblage that may promote a more expansive view of the relationship between patient and healthcare practitioner.
RESUMO
This paper offers a novel, qualitative approach to evaluating the outcomes of integrating humanities and ethics into a newly revised pre-clerkship medical education curriculum. The authors set out to evaluate medical students' perceptions, learning outcomes, and growth in identity development. Led by a team of interdisciplinary scholars, this qualitative project examines multiple sources of student experience and perception data, including student essays, end-of-year surveys, and semi-structured interviews with students. Data were analyzed using deductive and inductive processes to identify key categories and recurring themes. Results suggest that students not only engaged with the curricular content and met the stated learning objectives but also acknowledged their experience in the humanities and ethics curriculum as an opportunity to reflect, expand their perceptions of medicine (and what it means to be "in" medicine), connect with their classmates, and further cultivate their personal and professional identities. Results of this qualitative study show how and in what ways the ethics and humanities curriculum motivates students past surface-level memorization of factual knowledge and encourages thoughtful analysis and evaluation about how the course material relates to and influences their thinking and how they see themselves as future doctors. The comprehensive qualitative approach reflects a holistic model for evaluating the integration of humanities and ethics into the pre-clerkship medical education curriculum. Future research should examine if this approach provides a protective factor against the demonstrated ethical erosion and empathy decrease during clinical training.
Assuntos
Educação Médica , Médicos , Estudantes de Medicina , Humanos , Ciências Humanas/educação , Currículo , Aprendizagem , Ética MédicaRESUMO
PROBLEM: In 2018, Creighton University School of Medicine initiated a multiyear strategy to redesign the pedagogic approach of its educational program, transitioning from large-group, lecture-based experiences to small-group, active learning experiences using case-based learning (CBL) as required prework for team-based learning (TBL). In July 2019, the authors introduced their first-year medical students to the pedagogic and empiric underpinnings of the new curriculum they would experience. Initially, and ironically, this introduction was presented as a 30-minute didactic lecture, and students' ability to assimilate this information in any meaningful way was challenged. In addition, students required several sessions of the CBL-TBL activities during the official curriculum before they were able to effectively function as a team of learners. The authors created a novel introduction to their educational program that was active, meaningful, and efficient. APPROACH: In 2022, the authors created a 2-hour, small-group CBL activity using a fictional narrative of a medical student encountering their curriculum. During development, the authors recognized that the narrative was conducive to introduction of affective responses to medical education stressors, such as imposter phenomenon and Stanford duck syndrome. The CBL activity was given 4 hours during the formal 2022 orientation; 230 students participated. The CBL activity occurred on the second day of orientation and the TBL activity on the third (final) day of orientation. OUTCOMES: The results of the TBL activity indicate that students acquired a fundamental understanding of the attributes of active learning, features of imposter syndrome, substance abuse associated with Stanford duck syndrome, and peer evaluation. NEXT STEPS: This CBL-TBL activity will become a permanent part of orientation. The authors hope to evaluate the qualitative outcomes of this innovation on students' professional identity formation, institutional affiliation, and motivation. The authors will assess for any negative impact of this experience and the overall orientation.
Assuntos
Educação Médica , Estudantes de Medicina , Humanos , Faculdades de Medicina , Currículo , Aprendizagem Baseada em Problemas/métodos , Avaliação Educacional , Processos GrupaisRESUMO
Issue: The evaluation of medical students is a critical, complex, and controversial process. It is tightly woven into the medical school curriculum, beginning at the inception of the medical student's professional journey. In this respect, medical student evaluation is among the first in a series of ongoing, lifelong assessments that influence the interpersonal, ethical, and socioeconomic dimensions necessary for an effective physician workforce. Yet, tiered grading has a questionable historic pedagogic basis in American medical education, and evidence suggests that tiered grading itself is a source of student burnout, anxiety, depression, increased competitiveness, reduced group cohesion, and racial biases. Evidence: In its most basic form, medical student evaluation is an assessment of the initial cognitive and technical competencies ultimately needed for the safe and effective practice of contemporary medicine. At many American medical schools, such evaluation relies largely on norm-based comparisons, such as tiered grading. Yet, tiered grading can cause student distress, is considered unfair by most students, is associated with biases against under-represented minorities, and demonstrates inconsistent correlation with residency performance. While arguments that tiered grading motivates student performance have enjoyed historic precedence in academia, such arguments are not supported by robust data or theories of motivation. Implications: Given the evolving recognition of the deleterious effects on medical student mental health, cohesiveness, and diversity, the use of tiered grading in medical schools to measure or stimulate academic performance, or by residency program directors to distinguish residency applicants, remains questionable. Examination of tiered grading in its historical, psychometric, psychosocial, and moral dimensions and the various arguments used to maintain it reveals a need for investigation of, if not transition to, alternative and non-tiered assessments of our medical students.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The traditional domains of learning are cognitive, psychomotor, and affective. These parallel the habits of head, hand, and heart as the foundations for knowing, doing, and being in health professions education. Physical therapy education is deeply rooted in a cognitive (head) and psychomotor (hand) taxonomy despite the mission, vision, and values of the profession that embody the knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSAs) requiring competence in the affective (heart) domain. Recently, the Model for Excellence and Innovation in Physical Therapy Education and the American Council of Academic Physical Therapy excellence framework in academic physical therapy identified pedagogical variables grounded in the affective domain (AD), including shared beliefs and values, partnerships and collaborations, leadership and innovation, social responsibility and inclusion, and a drive for excellence with high expectations. POSITION AND RATIONALE: Fully integrating the AD into physical therapy education equips the future of the profession with the KSAs to achieve the mission and vision, meet stakeholder needs, and endure the demands of clinical practice. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Explicitly using the AD in physical therapy education is imperative to the success and sustainability of the profession and in meeting critical societal needs. Engaging all learners in the AD does not require monumental curricular change. Intentional activities and strategies can develop the humanistic values of the learner across a curriculum and can shift the culture of academia from primarily cognitive and psychomotor to one that is comprehensive across all domains. The AD informs the cognitive and psychomotor aspects of learning and has direct implications for clinical practice in meeting stakeholder needs.
Assuntos
Currículo , Aprendizagem , Estados Unidos , Modelos Educacionais , HábitosRESUMO
Background. The mother-daughter relationship can be central to women who are coping with breast cancer and provide a key source of support. However, the adolescent and young adult (AYA) daughters of diagnosed mothers have been known to exhibit notable distress during this time, withdrawing and avoiding communication, further challenging their ability to cope together. Objective. We sought to identify challenging topics that contribute to this avoidant mother-daughter communication pattern, as a first step in helping mothers and AYA daughters facilitate health-promoting communication. Methods. We examined thematically analyzed transcripts of one-on-one, in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 27 women (12 mother-daughter dyads). Results. We to identified 3 broad topics that were challenging to discuss: daughters' future breast cancer risk; emotionally related concerns; and clinical and physical aspects of disease. Thematic properties illustrate the challenging nature of each topic that informed their ability to communally cope together. Implications. Findings provide an initial roadmap for developing communication skills interventions that help mothers and AYA daughters navigate challenging conversations and facilitate communal coping.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Comunicação em Saúde , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Feminino , Humanos , Mães/psicologia , Relações Mãe-Filho/psicologia , Neoplasias da Mama/psicologia , Núcleo Familiar/psicologia , Adaptação PsicológicaRESUMO
Background: Mothers diagnosed with breast cancer describe daughters as a critical source of support. Talking about breast cancer is especially distressing and challenging for mothers and their adolescent-young adult (AYA) daughters. Objective: The over-arching study aim was to generate findings to integrate into an intervention to enhance diagnosed mothers' and AYA daughters' communication skills by identifying approaches they find helpful when talking about cancer. Methods: We recruited 27 women (12 dyads). Diagnosed mothers and their AYA daughters (aged 18-29) participated in individual, in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were thematically analyzed. Mothers'/daughters' perspectives were compared/ triangulated. Results: Both mothers and daughters identified 3 approaches that helped them navigate cancer communication: (mothers) initiate conversations, keep communication positive, and limit cancer conversations. Only mothers reported it was helpful to downplay the seriousness of cancer. Only daughters identified it was important for them to reframe their perspective of mothers' disclosures. Conclusions: Findings provide clinicians like nurses and families with a "psychosocial map" of communication approaches and associated strategies mothers and AYA daughters can use to talk about breast cancer in ways that promote daughters' comfort and/or alleviate distress. Implications for Practice: Findings capture communication skills to focus on when tailoring developmentally focused interventions targeting diagnosed mothers and AYA daughters. Nurses can translate findings into practice to help patients talk to AYA daughters about cancer, thereby promoting a family-centered cancer care approach. What Is Foundational: AYA daughters are especially distressed talking about cancer with their diagnosed mothers. They can both use communication strategies to enhance their communal coping.
RESUMO
Although humor in health care can facilitate relationship building between patients and clinicians, callous humor used to deflect or dismiss distressing emotions undermines relationships, erodes trust, and expresses disregard for vulnerability. Because it affects collegiality, training, and patient care, callous humor should not be tolerated, especially when directed at patients. This article considers why it is important to respond to colleagues who make callous jokes and suggests how to do so.
Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Emoções , HumanosRESUMO
Much has been said about the formative process that occurs via the "hidden curriculum" of medical education during which many students experience a disconnect between the professional values espoused within the formal curriculum and the implicit values communicated through interactions with peers and mentors. Less attention, however, has been paid to the formation of the future medical self that takes place during students' premedical years, a time in which many undergraduate students seek out immersive clinical experiences -such as medical scribing- before applying to medical school. Despite the fact that medical scribes undoubtedly are affected by their clinical experiences, scribes are rarely offered opportunities to reflect on them. The authors contend that the developmental processes of medical scribes, especially those who intend on pursuing a career in the health professions, ought to be supported. This can be achieved, at least in part, through engaging in well-designed reflective sessions with other scribes. Encouraging students to reflect on their experiences can help them make sense of troubling events and give voice to the inconsistencies and value conflicts within medical practice that are so often ignored. The authors describe the development of their new Reflective Scribe program and offer suggestions for future directions.
Assuntos
Currículo , Educação em Saúde , Estudantes de Medicina , Redação , Educação de Graduação em Medicina , Ciências Humanas , MentoresRESUMO
In describing the foundations of our pedagogical approaches to service-learning, we seek to go beyond the navel-gazing-at times, paralyzing-paradoxes of neoliberal forces, which can do "good" for students and their communities, yet which also call students into further calculative frameworks for understanding the "value" of pre-health humanities education and social engagement. We discuss methods to create quiet forms of subversion that call for a moral imagination in extending an ethics of care to students as well as to the communities with which they engage. While we recognize the partiality and limitations of our attempts, framing mentored service-learning in unexpected ways can help students and practitioners to understand their role within broader social, historical, cultural, and emotional contexts and encourage them to act intentionally toward the communities they seek to serve in response to this new self-knowledge. To that end, we outline an academically rigorous service-learning intervention at one of our universities.
Assuntos
Educação de Graduação em Medicina , Ciências Humanas/educação , Mentores , Política , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária , Atenção à Saúde/ética , FeminismoRESUMO
Samuel H. LiPuma and Joseph P. DeMarco argue for a positive right to continuous sedation until death (CSD) for any patient with a life expectancy less than six months. They reject any requirement of proportionality. Their proposed guideline makes CSD an option for a decisional adult patient with an appropriate terminal diagnosis regardless of whether suffering (physical or existential) is present. This guideline purports to "empower" the patient with the ability to control the timing and manner of her death. This extends even to the option to "opt out" of the awareness and experience of dying and to avoid suffering altogether, even if one's symptoms and suffering could be effectively treated. We respond first with a critique of their terminology. We then turn to some purely practical considerations of how this guideline might be enacted in the current atmosphere of American hospice and palliative care medicine. We close with a consideration of one philosophical concern that might ground the discussion of risks, benefits, and alternatives necessary for informed consent.
Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões/ética , Sedação Profunda/ética , Manejo da Dor/ética , Cuidados Paliativos/ética , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/ética , Autonomia Pessoal , Assistência Terminal/ética , Doente Terminal , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
This paper argues that "backstage" gallows humor among clinical mentors not only affects medical students' perceptions of what it means to be a doctor but is also symptomatic and indicative of a much larger problem in medicine-namely, the failure to attend fully to the complexity and profundity of the lived experiences of illness, suffering, and death. Reorienting the discourse surrounding gallows humor away from whether or in what context it is acceptable and toward the reasons why doctors feel the need to use such humor in the first place addresses this issue in a more illuminating way.
Assuntos
Educação Médica , Mentores , Senso de Humor e Humor como Assunto , Humanos , Estudantes de MedicinaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Medical students' reflective journals can be a rich source for understanding what students learn and think about during clinical rotations and can offer educators and mentors insight into students' professional identity formation. The aim of this paper is to ascertain, from reflective accounts, students' development and reactions to psychiatry following their psychiatry clerkship. METHOD: The patterns, recurrent categories, and themes in 100 psychiatry clerks' reflective journals were analyzed using grounded theory. Constant comparative method was employed to identify and quantify emergent themes and uncover relationships between these themes. RESULTS: The most common "unprompted" themes that students reported were the recognition of the complexity of the illness condition and the fact that the psychiatric patient does not exist in a vacuum (52 %); an acknowledgement of one's respect for the struggle of patients with mental illness (49 %); an expressed or demonstrated empathy for patients (48 %); and a reduced skepticism of the biological basis of mental illness and efficacy of treatments (46 %). CONCLUSION: Reflective exercises-along with quality mentorship-can be used to understand students' experience with clinical encounters, facilitate change, refine assumptions among students, and promote critical self-assessment and personal growth.