Antibacterial Activity of Leukocyte- and Platelet-Rich Plasma: An In Vitro Study.

The aim of the study was to investigate the leukocyte- and platelet-rich plasma (L-PRP) antimicrobial activity. The studied sample comprised 20 healthy males. The L-PRP gel, liquid L-PRP, and thrombin samples were tested in vitro for their antibacterial properties against selected bacterial strains using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Two types of thrombin were used (autologous and bovine). Zones of inhibition produced by L-PRP ranged between 6 and 18 mm in diameter. L-PRP inhibited the growth of Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA and MSSA strains) and was also active against Enterococcus faecalis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. There was no activity against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. The statistically significant increase of L-PRP antimicrobial effect was noted with the use of major volume of thrombin as an activator. Additionally, in groups where a bovine thrombin mixture was added to L-PRP the zones of inhibition concerning MRSA, Enterococcus faecalis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were larger than in the groups with autologous thrombin. Based on the conducted studies, it can be determined that L-PRP can evoke in vitro antimicrobial effects and might be used to treat selected infections in the clinical field. The major volume of thrombin as an activator increases the strength of the L-PRP antimicrobial effect.

Effect of L-PRP treatment on wound healing after surgical skin incision in an experimental animal model.

AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of leukocyte- and platelet-rich plasma (L-PRP) treatment on a noncomplicated would healing after surgical skin incision in an experimental animal model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The blood from 64 male Wistar rats was used to prepare L-PRP before a transverse dorsal incision was made and consecutively closed. At the same time after the surgery was completed, autologous L-PRP in the rats from the L-PRP group (n = 32) and NaCl in the control group (n = 32) were injected subcutaneously into the wound. The examination included clinical observations, laboratory examination, and examination of biopsy specimens taken from sacrificed animals on the second, third, fourth, and sixth days after the surgery (histopathological examination, immunochemistry, molecular examination). RESULTS: In all cases, no healing process complications were noted. The intergroup comparison revealed no statistically significant differences in terms of histopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular examinations results. In the intragroup analysis, statistically significant differences were observed within each group between periods of observations in terms of immunohistochemical and molecular examinations results. CONCLUSIONS: L-PRP treatment does not significantly accelerate a noncomplicated wound healing after surgical skin incision in an experimental animal model.

The application of L-PRP in AIDS patients with crural chronic ulcers: A pilot study.

PURPOSE: Nonhealing wounds or skin ulcerations are the result of insufficient repair and destruction of a local healing potential. Opportunistic infections which cause a lot of ulcer complications influence the worsening general condition of patients with AIDS, ultimately leading to death. The chronicity of the condition and poor results of conventional therapy have prompted the search for new methods of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have examined venous or arteriovenous insufficiency-related extensive crural ulcers in AIDS patients. Crural ulcer healing processes were evaluated with clinical observations and histopathological, immunohistochemical and molecular examinations of tissue samples harvested from the wound edges before and on day 10 after L-PRP cover dressing. RESULTS: Clinical observations showed positive effects of L-PRP in all patients. However, complete wound closure was noted in 60% of cases. Statistical analysis of histological examination showed increased epidermal processes between samples, but the difference was nonsignificant. However, immunohistochemical investigations showed an increased healing process with strong statistical significance. The mean VEGF level before L-PRP usage was 114.3 vessels/mm2 and on day 10 118.9 (p=0.001523). The mean FLK level was 103.2 and 109.9 respectively (p=0.008241). The biggest differences were observed for CD34, with values of 68.2 on day 0 and 100.8 on day 10 (p=0.006982). Molecular analysis generally showed decreased gene expression and confirmed vascular formation and reepithelialization processes. CONCLUSIONS: In our opinion, L-PRP may be used to eradicate microorganisms from wounds, to induce neovascularization, and in unhealed cases prepare the base and edge of the ulcer for skin grafting and tissue expansion procedures.