Long COVID-associated symptoms prevalent in both SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative individuals: A prospective follow-up study.

Background: Research into persistent symptoms among SARS-CoV-2-positive i.e. CoV(+) patients mostly focuses on hospitalized individuals. Our prospective follow-up study compares long COVID-associated symptoms among laboratory-confirmed CoV(+) and SARS-CoV-2 negative [CoV(-)] individuals. Methods: SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-tested volunteers were recruited into four cohorts: 1) CoV(+) outpatients, 2) CoV(-) outpatients, 3) CoV(+) intensive care unit (ICU) inpatients, and 4) CoV(+) non-ICU inpatients. Neutralizing antibodies were assessed and questionnaires filled in at enrolment and days 90-120, 121-180, 181-270, 271-365, and 365-533. Results: Of the 1326 participants, 1191 were CoV(+): 46 ICU, 123 non-ICU, and 1022 outpatients; 135 were CoV(-) outpatient controls. Both CoV(+) outpatients and CoV(-) controls showed high overall symptom rates at all time points. More prevalent among CoV(+) than CoV(-) outpatients were only impaired olfaction and taste; many others proved more frequent for CoV(-) participants. At ≥181 days, fatigue, dyspnoea, various neuropsychological symptoms and several others were recorded more often for CoV(+) inpatients than outpatients. Conclusions: Long COVID-associated symptoms were more frequent among hospitalized than non-hospitalized CoV(+) participants. As for outpatients, only impaired olfaction and taste showed higher rates in the CoV(+) group; some symptoms proved even more common among those CoV(-). Besides suggesting low long COVID prevalences for outpatients, our results highlight the weight of negative controls.

Treatment of Dientamoeba fragilis: A retrospective Finnish analysis of faecal clearance and clinical cure comparing four antiprotozoal drugs.

Background: Dientamoeba fragilis (DF), the most common intestinal protozoal pathogen in affluent countries, causes asymptomatic or symptomatic infections with severity ranging from mild to disabling. Currently, many studies of treatment options only have small sample sizes and report results that are partly contradictory. Methods: Investigating data retrieved from Helsinki University Hospital and Helsinki City patient records, we searched for the most effective antiprotozoal in treating DF infections. To study microbiological clearance of DF, we collected laboratory results of control samples from patients given one of four commonly used antiprotozoals: doxycycline, metronidazole, paromomycin, or secnidazole. For patients symptomatic prior to antiprotozoal treatment, we also retrieved data on clinical outcomes. Furthermore, we explored factors associated with faecal clearance and clinical cure. Results: A total of 369 patients (median age 38) and 492 treatment episodes were included. Paromomycin (n â€‹= â€‹297) proved effective (clearance rate 83%), showing strong association with faecal clearance (aOR 18.08 [7.24-45.16], p â€‹< â€‹0.001). For metronidazole the rate was 42% (n â€‹= â€‹84), for secnidazole 37% (n â€‹= â€‹79), and doxycycline 22% (n â€‹= â€‹32). In pairwise comparisons, paromomycin outdid the three other regimens (p â€‹< â€‹0.001, χ2 test). Faecal clearance was associated with clinical cure (aOR 5.85 [3.02-11.32], p â€‹< â€‹0.001). Conclusions: Faecal clearance, strongly associated with clinical cure, is most effectively achieved with a course of paromomycin, followed by metronidazole, secnidazole and doxycycline. Our findings will be useful in devising treatment guidelines for adults with symptomatic D. fragilis infection.

Safety and immunogenicity of ETVAX®, an oral inactivated vaccine against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli diarrhoea: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial amongst Finnish travellers to Benin, West Africa.

BACKGROUND: No licensed human vaccines are available against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), a major diarrhoeal pathogen affecting children in low- and middle-income countries and foreign travellers alike. ETVAX®, a multivalent oral whole-cell vaccine containing four inactivated ETEC strains and the heat-labile enterotoxin B subunit (LTB), has proved promising in Phase 1 and Phase 1/ 2 studies. METHODS: We conducted a Phase 2b double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial amongst Finnish travellers to Benin, West Africa. This report presents study design and safety and immunogenicity data. Volunteers aged 18-65 years were randomized 1:1 to receive ETVAX® or placebo. They visited Benin for 12 days, provided stool and blood samples and completed adverse event (AE) forms. IgA and IgG antibodies to LTB and O78 lipopolysaccharide (LPS) were measured by electrochemiluminescence. RESULTS: The AEs did not differ significantly between vaccine (n = 374) and placebo (n = 375) recipients. Of the solicited AEs, loose stools/diarrhoea (26.7/25.9%) and stomach ache (23.0/20.0%) were reported most commonly. Of all possibly/probably vaccine-related AEs, the most frequent were gastrointestinal symptoms (54.0/48.8%) and nervous system disorders (20.3/25.1%). Serious AEs were recorded for 4.3/5.6%, all unlikely to be vaccine related. Amongst the ETVAX® recipients, LTB-specific IgA antibodies increased 22-fold. For the 370/372 vaccine/placebo recipients, the frequency of ≥2-fold increases against LTB was 81/2.4%, and against O78 LPS 69/2.7%. The majority of ETVAX® recipients (93%) responded to either LTB or O78. CONCLUSIONS: This Phase 2b trial is the largest on ETVAX® undertaken amongst travellers to date. ETVAX® showed an excellent safety profile and proved strongly immunogenic, which encourages the further development of this vaccine.

Dientamoeba fragilis - the most common intestinal protozoan in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area, Finland, 2007 to 2017.

BackgroundDespite the global distribution of the intestinal protozoan Dientamoeba fragilis, its clinical picture remains unclear. This results from underdiagnosis: microscopic screening methods either lack sensitivity (wet preparation) or fail to reveal Dientamoeba (formalin-fixed sample).AimIn a retrospective study setting, we characterised the clinical picture of dientamoebiasis and compared it with giardiasis. In addition, we evaluated an improved approach to formalin-fixed samples for suitability in Dientamoeba diagnostics.MethodsThis study comprised four parts: (i) a descriptive part scrutinising rates of Dientamoeba findings; (ii) a methodological part analysing an approach to detect Dientamoeba-like structures in formalin samples; (iii) a clinical part comparing demographics and symptoms between patients with dientamoebiasis (n = 352) and giardiasis (n = 272), and (iv) a therapeutic part (n = 89 patients) investigating correlation between faecal eradication and clinical improvement.ResultsThe rate of Dientamoeba findings increased 20-fold after introducing criteria for Dientamoeba-like structures in formalin-fixed samples (88.9% sensitivity and 83.3% specificity). A further increase was seen after implementing faecal PCR. Compared with patients with giardiasis, the symptoms in the Dientamoeba group lasted longer and more often included abdominal pain, cramping, faecal urgency and loose rather than watery stools. Resolved symptoms correlated with successful faecal eradication (p < 0.001).ConclusionsPreviously underdiagnosed, Dientamoeba has become the most frequently recorded pathogenic enteroparasite in Finland. This presumably results from improved diagnostics with either PCR or detection of Dientamoeba-like structures in formalin-fixed samples, an approach applicable also in resource-poor settings. Symptoms of dientamoebiasis differ slightly from those of giardiasis; patients with distressing symptoms require treatment.