Compassionate drug uses and saving for the national health system: the case study of Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli.

OBJECTIVE: Compassionate Drug Use (CDU) allows patients with a specific disease and no further treatment option to access unauthorized treatments. In this study, we analyzed the requests of CDU approved by the Ethics Committee of Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli in the period January 1, 2018-June 30, 2021. We also estimated the economic impact of CUs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CDU requests were analyzed by year, by frequency and by regulatory status of the medicines requested. If an ex-factory price was available at the cutoff date of June 30, 2021, we estimated what would have been the costs for the National Health System (NHS) if the price was already negotiated at the time of CDU request. RESULTS: In the study period, 463 CDU requests were processed by the Ethics Committee. The number of requests increase linearly from 45 in 2018 to an estimated number of 260 in 2021. The requests included 68 medicines or combinations of medicines; 16 products out of 68 accounted for 75% of all requests. For 7 of these 16 highly requested treatments, accounting for 110 requests out of 463, it was possible to estimate the costs of therapies according to their ex-factory prices. If these products were to be purchased by the NHS, the estimated cost was € 5.472.225. CONCLUSIONS: The access to unauthorized drugs through CDUs is undergoing a huge increase in the last few years. Such increase meets the ethical need to provide patients with the most recent, often innovative, therapeutic options.

Relationship between injection site reactions and different adalimumab formulations. Analysis of the adverse events reported in Italy in the period 2016-2019.

OBJECTIVE: The adalimumab originator Humira® introduced a new citrate-free formulation in 2016, before the patent expiry that occurred in the European Union in October 2018. Some of the adalimumab biosimilars that were subsequently marketed are citrate-free, while others are not. Since citrate as an excipient is associated with pain at the injection site, recent anecdotical reporting in Italy raised the issue of possible prescription biases related to the differences in formulation existing among the various adalimumab products. In this study, we analyzed the data obtained from the 'Rete Nazionale di Farmacovigilanza' (Pharmacovigilance National Network) to investigate whether, and to what extent, the differences in the formulation of the various adalimumab versions had an impact on the rate of injection site reactions reported in Italy in the period 2016-2019. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search was conducted based on 3 search criteria: (1) time frame; (2) suspected drugs, and (3) adverse reaction type. Reports classified in the System Organ Class "Administration site conditions" were analyzed by year, product, and type of adverse event (whether including or not 'pain'). Data were reported both as absolute numbers, as well as signaling rates, considering the consumption data expressed as defined daily doses (DDD). RESULTS: We found that: (1) The change in Humira® formulation introduced in august 2016 was followed by a decrease in the reports of injection site reactions (from 45 in 2016 to 12, 12 and 8 in 2017, 2018, and 2019, respectively); (2) after the introduction of biosimilars during 2018, in 2019 a marked shift in reporting toward biosimilars was observed (52 out of 60; 87%). CONCLUSIONS: While the decrease in Humira® reports is consistent with the improved tolerability of the new formulation, the huge increase in biosimilar reporting may be only in part explained by the differences in formulation and cannot be accounted for by a parallel increase in exposure, since 58.3% of total DDDs provided in 2019 were still attributed to Humira®.