Overall outcome after endovascular aneurysm repair with a first-generation stent graft (Vanguard): A 20-year single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE: The problems with first-generation stent grafts for endovascular aneurysm repair are well known, but their long-term outcome remains to be established. The purpose of the study was to characterize the outcome of patients treated for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with a first-generation stent graft, Vanguard (Boston Scientific, Natick, Mass), in a single academic center with a follow-up of up to 20 years. METHODS: There were 48 AAA patients electively treated with a Vanguard stent graft between February 1997 and November 1999. The patients were monitored annually until the end of 2018. The outcomes were overall survival and the number of graft-related complications and reinterventions. RESULTS: The mean age was 70 years (range, 54-85 years), and the mean follow-up was 107 months (range, 6-262 months). All stent grafts were successfully implanted, but 90% of the patients encountered graft-related complications during follow-up. The most common complications were endoleaks (type I, 27%; type II, 29%; type III, 31%), stent fracture (46%), graft thrombosis (31%), and migration (40%). A total of 40 (83%) patients required a secondary procedure during long-term follow-up. The endovascular method for treating the complication was successful in 73 (87%) of 84 cases. There were no primary conversions, but 10 patients (21%) required a late conversion. In five cases, the complications required relining with a newer device. There were four AAA ruptures (8.3%), two of them fatal. The cumulative overall survival rates were 94%, 69%, 33%, 15%, and 13% at 1 year, 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, and 20 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the Vanguard, a first-generation stent graft, was associated with multiple graft-related complications. However, these complications could mainly be treated by endovascular means. The Vanguard stent graft is a good example of how new technology can cause unpredictable problems that can magnify the workload and endanger the patient's well-being even decades after the initial procedure.

Systematic Long-term Follow Up After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair With the Zenith Stent Graft.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Although endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been widely adopted, long-term data remain limited. This study analyses the long-term outcome (16 years) after EVAR with the Zenith stent graft in a single academic centre. METHODS: From 2000 to 2010, 282 patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) were treated electively and monitored annually. Primary outcomes were overall and AAA rupture free survival; the secondary outcomes were complication and re-intervention free survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to examine survival. RESULTS: The median patient age was 76 years (range 49-92 years) and mean aneurysm diameter 61 mm (range 40-110 mm). Patients were followed for a median of 76 months (range 0-201 months). Overall survival was 93% (SE 0.02), 61% (SE 0.08), 25% (SE 0.16), and 9% (0.19) at 1, 2, 5, 10, and 16 years, respectively. Ten (3.5%) AAA ruptures occurred, and the cumulative AAA rupture free survival was 100%, 98% (SE 0.01), 96% (SE0.02), and 79% (SE 0.12) at 1, 5, 10, and 16 years, respectively. The mean annual AAA rupture rate was 0.5%. Freedom from any stent graft related complications was 68% (SE 0.03), 58% (SE 0.09), 54% (SE 0.17), and 52% (SE 0.21), respectively; freedom from graft related re-interventions was 95% (SE 0.01), 80% (SE 0.08), 73% (SE 0.11), 70% (SE 0.16), at 1, 5, 10, and 16 years, respectively. Five (1.8%) late conversions were required during follow up. The variables that significantly and independently correlated with ruptured AAA were pre-operative aneurysm size and primary type II endoleak. The latter was the only independent significant factor to increase the risk of re-intervention. CONCLUSION: The number of graft related complications is high after EVAR, and new complications keep appearing years after the initial procedure. Even though fatal AAA rupture after EVAR is rare, it cannot be totally avoided despite systematic follow up.

Hybrid Repair of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms Is a Durable Option for High-Risk Patients in the Endovascular Era.

OBJECTIVE: To report our long-term experience in using the hybrid technique in complex thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). METHODS: Between March 2005 and September 2013, 10 patients with TAAA underwent hybrid procedures with open renovisceral revascularization and thoracoabdominal aortic endografting. Patients were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Six men and 4 women with a mean age of 66 years (range 54-81 years) were treated electively during the study period. All 4 visceral vessels were revascularized in 8 patients, whereas 1 patient underwent 3-vessel revascularization and another 2-vessel revascularization. The primary technical success rate was 100%. Eight of the procedures were single staged, and the 2 most recent cases were performed in 2 stages. Perioperative and 30-day mortality was 0%. The mean follow-up was 55 months (4-133 months). None of the patients died due to aortic complications. Major complications included paraplegia (10%, n = 1) and bowel ischemia (n = 1). Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure and mean arterial pressure measurements were systematically monitored and corrected. The CSF drainage solved another 4 cases of paraparesis. Three patients required postoperative dialysis, but none of them required permanently. Postoperative spinal cord ischemia and renal complications accumulated in extensive TAAA cases. One renal graft was occluded 45 days after the initial procedure but was successfully treated with thrombolysis. One type I and 1 type III endoleak were noted and successfully treated with an additional stent graft. Two cases of type II endoleak were detected-one with a growing aneurysm sac was treated successfully and another showed no growth and further procedures were abandoned after 2 embolization attempts. In long-term follow-up, 90% of the aneurysms showed shrinkage by a mean of 23 mm (range 7-45 mm). CONCLUSION: The results of hybrid repair on high-risk patients with complex TAAAs are encouraging, and this approach is a valuable alternative when branched and fenestrated endovascular techniques are not considered an option.

Long-Term Experience of Endovascular Repair for Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms and Dissections.

PURPOSE: To report the long-term results of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in both elective and emergency cases of thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) and type B dissection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective single-center study of 78 TEVAR patients treated between February 1998 and February 2013. Stent-graft implantation was performed in 51 (65%) patients for TAA (43 elective and 8 emergency cases) and in 27 (35%) patients for type B dissection (11 elective and 16 emergency cases). Short- and long-term results were evaluated, and a subgroup of patients with left subclavian artery (LSA) coverage was also analyzed. RESULTS: The patients were followed for a mean of 55 months (1-160 months). The technical success rate was 81% and 30-day mortality 6.4% (n = 5). The stroke rate was 7.7% (n = 6) and permanent paraparesis 2.6% (n = 2). In follow-up, there were 28 (36%) primary (15 type I and 13 type II) and 10 secondary endoleaks (8 type I and 2 type II). Multivariate analysis showed no significant predictive factors for developing a type I endoleak. Secondary interventions were required in 24% of the patients. There was 1 late thoracic aortic rupture and 1 late conversion (1.3%). Patients with LSA coverage had a higher incidence of stroke (12.5% vs 4.3%, P = .18) and paraparesis (3.1% vs 2.2%, P = .79) compared to those without LSA coverage, although this difference was not statistically significant. Stroke rates were significantly higher in patients treated in an emergency setting (P = .048). CONCLUSION: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair is a relatively safe and effective therapy for different aortic pathologies with good long-term success. The risk of stroke and paraparesis is notable whether the LSA is covered, and strokes clearly accumulate in the emergency setting. A type I endoleak is the most common complication, but there are no predictive factors for its development.

Long-term experience of endovascular aneurysm repair with Zenith prosthesis: diminishing graft-related complications over time.

BACKGROUND: Only limited data on the long-term results after endovascular aneurysm repair exist to date. MATERIALS: Data on 282 patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with a Zenith endoprosthesis between March 2000 and March 2010 were retrospectively analyzed from a prospective database. Operative, total, and aneurysm-related mortality was assessed, as were graft-related complications and reinterventions. RESULTS: All procedures were performed successfully without primary conversions. Median follow-up was 40 months (range: 1-119 months). Thirty-day mortality was 1.4%, and aneurysm-related mortality was 0.7%. Cumulative survival was 62% at 5 years and 52% at 8 years. Graft-related complications occurred in 107 (38%) patients. The most common finding was a type II endoleak (n = 73) that sealed mainly spontaneously (n = 46, 63%). Most endoleaks, and complications in general (87%), appeared during the first 3 years of follow-up, and no events occurred after 6 years. Altogether, 59 additional procedures, mainly embolizations (n = 35), in 38 patients (24%) were required owing to graft-related complications. Of all the reinterventions, 82% were performed during the first 4 years, and no new complications were treated after 6 years. CONCLUSION: Complications and reinterventions related to endovascular aneurysm repair become practically nonexistent after 5 to 6 years. This finding suggests that a lifelong follow-up may not always be needed after treatment with a Zenith endoprosthesis.

Challenging treatment of multiple late complications after endovascular aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: To report a case of multiple additional procedures after successful endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm. METHODS: An endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with a bifurcated aortic Vanguard endograft successfully performed in 1999 resulted in multiple complications, including endoleaks and a row separation, treated endovascularly. Subsequently, tuberculosis sepsis and prosthesis infection resulted in long-term antibiotic treatment. Additional graft leaks, aneurysm sack growth, and sack ruptures were also treated endovascularly because the patient consistently denied open repair. Endovascular procedures, however, did not solve the problem, turning to be increasingly challenging. The patient finally approved open graft removal and aortobifemoral reconstruction that were successfully performed 11 years after the initial endograft implantation. RESULTS: The patient has recovered from surgery well and is asymptomatic. No evidence of bacterial colonization was found according to the specimen taken during the laparotomy. CONCLUSION: Vanguard and other first-generation aortic endografts are associated with high incidence of complications and reinterventions. Open surgery is a method of choice in similar cases.

Nonoperative approach to endotension.

OBJECTIVE: The necessity of operative treatment of endotension after endovascular grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms (endovascular aneurysm repair; EVAR) is under debate. The proposed causes of endotension and related treatment protocols are controversial. We report the outcome of a nonoperative approach to five patients with endotension after EVAR. METHODS: From February 1997 to August 2004, 160 patients who underwent EVAR of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm were evaluated for the incidence of endotension. According to the endovascular protocol, plain radiographs, spiral computed tomography, and angiography were performed before and after surgery for follow-up. To detect endotension, spiral computed tomography was performed by using a delayed imaging technique after the infusion of contrast medium. Endotension was defined as an aneurysm sac enlargement after EVAR without evidence of endoleak. Aneurysm sac rupture was defined as discontinuity of the calcific rim of the aneurysmal sac and the presence of intra-aneurysmal fluid outside the sac. RESULTS: We found five (3.1%) patients with endotension. Three of these experienced aneurysmal sac rupture. Only one of the three was underwent operation on experiencing sudden intestinal occlusion due to intra-abdominal adhesions. This patient had no intra-abdominal or retroperitoneal bleeding or hematoma but died after intensive care as a result of non-aneurysm-related problems. Four patients with endotension are still being closely followed up according to our surveillance protocol, and they are doing clinically well. After rupture, clear shrinking of the aneurysm sac was seen in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: Endotension after EVAR may cause subsequent aneurysm rupture. Endotension is evidently not associated with endoleak I to III provided that the endovascular graft is maintained in appropriate position and that free endovascular flow is observed. We propose to consider a nonoperative approach in the clinically asymptomatic patient with aneurysm enlargement after EVAR if endoleak is excluded by well-performed imaging techniques.