RESUMO
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become the standard treatment for early malignant lesions in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Its clinical results have been reported to be as good as surgery. The outcomes of rescue surgery after non-curative ESD have been reported to be as good as first-line surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of ESD in the upper GI tract and the outcomes of rescue surgery after non-curative ESD performed in Linz, Austria, between 2009 and January 2023. A total of 193 ESDs were included and divided into 104 esophageal ESD and 89 gastric ESD procedures. The criteria for curative ESD were in line with established guidelines' recommendations. For esophageal lesions, the mean lesion size was 40.3 mm and the rate of curative ESD was 56.7%. In the non-curative ESD, the rate of technical failure as the reason for non-curative ESD was 13.3% and the oncological failure rate was 86.7%. Only 48.7% of indicated rescue surgeries were performed. The main reason for not performing surgery was interdisciplinary consensus due to comorbidity. Perioperative complications Dindo-Clavien ≥ 3 occurred in 22.2% of cases with an in-hospital mortality rate of 0. In gastric lesions, the mean size was 39 mm and the rate of curative ESD was 69.7%. The rate of technical failure as a reason for non-curative ESD was 25.9% and the oncological failure rate was 74.1% for non-curative ESD. Rescue surgery was performed in 48.2% of indicated cases. The perioperative rate for major complications was 0. The outcome of ESD in the upper GI tract is in line with the published literature, and non-curative ESD does not worsen surgical outcomes. The available follow-up data are in line with the international published literature, showing a low rate of residual malignancy in surgical resection specimens. Therefore, the indication of rescue surgery for oncological failure remains challenging. Furthermore, the learning curve of ESD has shown a trend towards improving outcomes over time.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) cannot reliably be distinguished by routine diagnostics, and the role of alcohol consumption in metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) remains unclear. We investigated alcohol consumption in patients with presumed NAFLD and ALD using novel objective alcohol markers. METHODS: In total, 184 consecutive patients were included in this prospective observational study. Alcohol intake was assessed by ethylglucuronide in hair (hEtG) and urine (uEtG); the utility of these measures for alcohol detection was compared to Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C), carbohydrate deficient transferrin (CDT), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), and ALD/NAFLD index (ANI). Clinical characteristics of patients with NAFLD and ALD were re-assessed after reclassification based on repeated moderate (≥10 g <60 g EtOH/day) and excessive (≥60 g EtOH/day) alcohol consumption, and patients were retrospectively reclassified based on MAFLD criteria. RESULTS: Repeated moderate to excessive alcohol consumption was detected in 28.6%, 28.5%, and 25.0% of patients with presumed NAFLD, ALD or MAFLD, respectively. ANI score, AUDIT-C, uEtG, and hEtG showed AUCs of 0.628, 0.733, 0.754, and 0.927 for the detection of repeated moderate to excessive alcohol consumption, respectively. The indirect markers CDT, MCV and GGT were not reliable. Patients with repeated moderate or excessive alcohol consumption were significantly more often male, had a significantly lower BMI, and suffered significantly less often from type 2 diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: In total, 28.6% of patients with presumed NAFLD, and 25.0% with MAFLD are at risk of alcohol-related liver damage. AUDIT-C, uEtG and hEtG should be used to screen for alcohol consumption in patients with fatty liver disease. LAY SUMMARY: Fatty liver disease can be caused by metabolic factors and/or alcohol consumption. The diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is based on the exclusion of harmful alcohol consumption, while metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), which has been proposed as a new name for NAFLD, is based on the presence of metabolic comorbidities and allows for alcohol consumption. Herein, we show that up to 29% of patients diagnosed with NAFLD and 25% with MAFLD are at risk of alcohol-related liver damage. We show that ethyl glucuronide (a metabolite of alcohol) in the hair and urine can accurately detect potentially harmful alcohol consumption in these patients - as such, these tests should be integrated into routine diagnostic work-up for patients with fatty liver disease.