RESUMO
El perfil parte de la situación demográfica así como de las condicionantes sociales que podrían influir en la salud materno neonatal y del niño(a) en todo su curso de vida, posteriormente se presenta el estado de la salud de la mujer en edad fértil, teniendo en cuenta su salud física y nutricional y su salud sexual y reproductiva. También se presenta el estado de la salud materna y del neonato, seguido de la salud en la población menor de 5 años de edad. Así mismo, el documento presenta el estado de la mortalidad materna, mortalidad en población neonatal y en la niñez. Se concluye el perfil con la presentación del estado de la oferta de los servicios para la atención materno neonatal y al final se presentan las conclusiones y recomendaciones respectivas
Assuntos
Perfil de Saúde , Diagnóstico da Situação de Saúde , Centros Comunitários de Saúde , Participação da Comunidade , Atenção Primária à SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There are no internationally validated questionnaires to investigate the prevalence of infant wheezing. This study was undertaken to validate a questionnaire for the International Study on the Prevalence of Wheezing in Infants (Estudio Internacional de Sibilancias en Lactantes, EISL). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Construct and criterion validity were tested for the question 'Has your baby had wheezing or whistling in the chest during his/her first 12 months of life?'. Construct validity (i.e. the ability of parents and doctors to refer to the same symptoms with the same words) was tested in a sample of 50 wheezing and 50 non-wheezy infants 12-15 months of age in each of 10 centres from 6 different Spanish- or Portuguese-speaking countries. Criterion validity (i.e. the ability of parents to correctly detect the symptom in the general population) was evaluated in 2 samples (Santiago, Chile and Cartagena, Spain) of 50 wheezing and 50 non-wheezing infants (according to parents) of the same age, randomly selected from the general population, who were later blindly diagnosed by a paediatric pulmonologist. RESULTS: Construct validity was very high (kappa test: 0.98-1) in all centres. According to Youden's index, criterion validity was good both in Cartagena (75.5%) and in Santiago (67.0%). Adding questions about asthma medication did not improve diagnosis accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The EISL questionnaire significantly distinguished wheezy infants from healthy ones. This questionnaire has a strong validity and can be employed in large international multicentre studies on wheezing during infancy.