The validity of serologic tests for Trypanosoma cruzi and the effectiveness of transfusional screening strategies in a hyperendemic region.

BACKGROUND: This study aims at obtaining unbiased estimates of the sensitivity and specificity of existing screening tests for Trypanosoma cruzi and at simulating the effectiveness of alternative screening strategies at different prevalence rates. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A systematic random sample of 400 was taken from 1200 banked serum samples of donors screened between August 1998 and January 1999 in Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Samples were tested with indirect hemagglutination test (IHA), indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA), and four enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Sensitivity and specificity of tests were estimated through latent class analysis. RESULTS: The sensitivity of individual tests ranged from 96.5 to 100 percent, and their specificity from 87.0 to 98.9 percent. Combinations of two tests used in parallel would, even at 40 percent prevalence, only miss approximately 1 infected unit per 10,000 screened. At 5 percent prevalence, however, they would yield 75 to 120 false-positive units per 1000 units screened. Parallel testing with IHA plus ELISA or with IHA plus IFA is marginally more cost-effective, compared to single IHA testing, than single ELISA or single IFA testing, regardless of the T. cruzi prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: Routine blood donor screening for T. cruzi with a single test results in unacceptable numbers of false-negative samples in highly endemic areas or in at risk population groups. Adding a second test seems mandatory, but which one to choose depends on local cost components and feasibility.

Incidence of surgical-site infections and the validity of the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System risk index in a general surgical ward in Santa Cruz, Bolivia.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the frequency of and risk factors for surgical-site infections (SSIs) in Bolivia, and to study the performance of the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System risk index in a developing country. DESIGN: A prospective study with patient follow-up until the 30th postoperative day. SETTING: A general surgical ward of a public hospital in Santa Cruz, Bolivia. PATIENTS: Patients admitted to the ward between July 1998 and June 1999 on whom surgical procedures were performed. RESULTS: Follow-up was complete for 91.5% of 376 surgical procedures. The overall SSI rate was 12%. Thirty-four (75.6%) of the 45 SSIs were culture positive. A logistic regression model retained an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of more than 1 (odds ratio [OR], 1.87), a not-clean wound class (OR, 2.28), a procedure duration of more than 1 hour (OR, 1.81), and drain (OR, 1.98) as independent risk factors for SSI. There was no significant association between the NNIS System risk index and SSI rates. However, a "local" risk index constructed with the above cutoff points showed a linear trend with SSI (P < .001) and a relative risk of 3.18 for risk class 3 versus a class of less than 3. CONCLUSIONS: SSIs cause considerable morbidity in Santa Cruz. Appropriate nosocomial infection surveillance and control should be introduced. The NNIS System risk index did not discriminate between patients at low and high risk for SSI in this hospital setting, but a risk score based on local cutoff points performed substantially better.

Diagnóstico del uso de los medicamentos en servicios de salud de Santa Cruz: informe / Diagnosis of the use of medicaments in the health services of Santa Cruz: report

El presente documento tiene el objetivo de identificar y analizar prácticas de descripción y manejo de los medicamentos en servicios de salud del primer nivel de la zona urbana de Santa Cruz y Montero. Proponer indicadores para un seguimiento posterior. Dar inicio a un proceso de racionalización mediante la retroalimentación de los datos y los prescriptores