RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most studied chemoprophylaxis for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP). While previous systematic reviews have shown NSAIDs reduce PEP, their impact on moderate to severe PEP (MSPEP) is unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to understand the impact of NSAIDs on MSPEP among patients who developed PEP. We later surveyed physicians' understanding of that impact. DESIGN: A systematic search for randomized trials using NSAIDs for PEP prevention was conducted. Pooled-prevalence and Odds-ratio of PEP, MSPEP were compared between treated vs. control groups. Analysis was performed using R software. Random-effects model was used for all variables. Physicians were surveyed via email before and after reviewing our results. RESULTS: 7688 patients in 25 trials were included. PEP was significantly reduced to 0.598 (95%CI, 0.47-0.76) in the NSAIDs group. Overall burden of MSPEP was reduced among all patients undergoing ERCP: OR 0.59 (95%CI, 0.42-0.83). However, NSAIDs didn't affect the proportion of MSPEP among those who developed PEP (p = 0.658). Rectal Indomethacin and diclofenac reduced PEP but not MSPEP. Efficacy didn't vary by risk, timing of administration, or bias-risk. Survey revealed a change in the impression of the effect of NSAIDs on MSPEP after reviewing our results. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal diclofenac or indomethacin before or after ERCP reduce the overall burden of MSPEP by reducing the pool of PEP from which it can arise. However, the proportion of MSPEP among patients who developed PEP is unaffected. Therefore, NSAIDs prevent initiation of PEP, but do not affect severity among those that develop PEP. Alternative modalities are needed to reduce MSPEP among patients who develop PEP.
Assuntos
Diclofenaco , Pancreatite , Humanos , Diclofenaco/uso terapêutico , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efeitos adversos , Administração Retal , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Indometacina/uso terapêutico , Pancreatite/epidemiologia , Pancreatite/etiologia , Pancreatite/prevenção & controleRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To identify the influence of body mass index (BMI) on Acute Pancreatitis (AP) hospitalizations in the United States (US). METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample was utilized to identify normal weight, overweight and obese AP hospitalizations in the US from 2016-2019 based on BMI. Hospitalization characteristics and outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Between 2016-2019, there were 314,215 (74.7%) obese, 27,005 (6.4%) overweight and 79,380 (18.9%) normal weight AP hospitalizations. Obese AP hospitalizations were younger (51.5 vs 56.5 years, p < 0.0001) compared to the normal weight cohort. However, normal weight AP hospitalizations had a higher proportion of Blacks and Asians compared to the obese subgroup. We also noted a higher all-cause inpatient mortality for normal weight AP hospitalizations (3.4% vs 2.8% vs 1.8%, p < 0.0001) compared to the overweight and obese cohorts, respectively. Furthermore, normal weight AP hospitalizations had a higher proportion of patients with pancreatic pseudocyst formation and pancreatic necrosis compared to the overweight and obese cohorts. The mean length of stay (5.8 vs 8.2 days, p < 0.0001) and mean total healthcare costs ($66,742 vs $82,319, p < 0.0001) were lower for obese compared to normal weight AP hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: Normal weight AP hospitalizations had higher inpatient mortality and complications compared to obese hospitalizations.
Assuntos
Pancreatite , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Pancreatite/complicações , Pancreatite/diagnóstico , Pancreatite/terapia , Índice de Massa Corporal , Sobrepeso/complicações , Doença Aguda , Obesidade/complicações , HospitalizaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Eckardt score (ES) is used to assess symptom response to Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM), but reliable methods to assess physiologic success are needed. Functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) panometry has a potential role in post-POEM follow-up to predict long-term outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between clinical success and FLIP parameters following POEM to determine if short interval FLIP could predict long-term outcomes. METHODS: This was a prospective study of adult patients who underwent POEM with short interval follow-up FLIP between 11/2017 and 3/2020. Clinical success was defined as post-procedure ES ≤ 3. Physiologic success was based on an esophago-gastric junction distensibility index (EGJ-DI) > 2.8 mm2/mmHg on FLIP. RESULTS: 47 patients (55% female, mean age 55 years) were included in the study. Clinical success after POEM was seen in 45 (96%) patients (mean ES 6.5 ± 2.2 pre and 0.83 ± 1.0 post-POEM, p < 0.001). Physiologic success was noted in 43 (91.5%) patients (mean EGJ-DI 6.1 mm2/mmHg ± 2.5). Among 4 patients not meeting criteria for physiologic success, EGJ-DI was 2.5-2.6. There was no correlation between post-POEM EGJ-DI and ES in the short term or long term. Significant reflux esophagitis was seen in 6 (12.8%) patients with no difference in mean EGJ-DI with vs without esophagitis (5.9 vs 6.1, p = 0.44). CONCLUSION: Post-POEM endoscopy with FLIP is useful to both assess EGJ physiology and to examine for reflux esophagitis. Short interval FLIP has limited utility to predict long-term patient outcomes or risk of acid reflux.
Assuntos
Acalasia Esofágica , Esofagite Péptica , Miotomia , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Junção Esofagogástrica/cirurgia , Acalasia Esofágica/diagnóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural/métodos , Miotomia/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Esfíncter Esofágico InferiorRESUMO
Hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) is a metabolic disorder, defined when serum or plasma triglyceride concentration (seTG) is >1.7 mM. HTG can be categorized as mild to very severe groups based on the seTG value. The risk of acute pancreatitis (AP), a serious disease with high mortality and without specific therapy, increases with the degree of HTG. Furthermore, even mild or moderate HTG aggravates AP initiated by other important etiological factors, including alcohol or bile stone. This review briefly summarizes the pathophysiology of HTG, the epidemiology of HTG-induced AP and the clinically observed effects of HTG on the outcomes of AP. Our main focus is to discuss the pathophysiological mechanisms linking HTG to AP. HTG is accompanied by an increased serum fatty acid (FA) concentration, and experimental results have demonstrated that these FAs have the most prominent role in causing the consequences of HTG during AP. FAs inhibit mitochondrial complexes in pancreatic acinar cells, induce pathological elevation of intracellular Ca2+ concentration, cytokine release and tissue injury, and reduce the function of pancreatic ducts. Furthermore, high FA concentrations can induce respiratory, kidney, and cardiovascular failure in AP. All these effects may contribute to the observed increased AP severity and frequent organ failure in patients. Importantly, experimental results suggest that the reduction of FA production by lipase inhibitors can open up new therapeutic options of AP. Overall, investigating the pathophysiology of HTG-induced AP or AP in the presence of HTG and determining possible treatments are needed.
Assuntos
Hipertrigliceridemia , Pancreatite , Humanos , Doença Aguda , Hipertrigliceridemia/complicações , Hipertrigliceridemia/epidemiologia , TriglicerídeosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We identified trends of inpatient therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the United States (US), focusing on outcomes related to specific patient demographics. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample was utilized to identify all adult inpatient ERCP in the US between 2007-2018. Trends of utilization and adverse outcomes were highlighted. P-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: We noted a rising trend for total inpatient ERCP in the US from 126,921 in 2007 to 165,555 in 2018 (p = 0.0004), with a significant increase in utilization for Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians. Despite an increasing comorbidity burden [Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score ≥ 2], the overall inpatient mortality declined from 1.56% [2007] to 1.46% [2018] without a statistically significant trend (p = 0.14). Moreover, there was a rising trend of inpatient mortality for Black and Hispanic populations, while a decline was noted for Asians. After a comparative analysis, we noted higher rates of inpatient mortality for Blacks (2.4% vs 1.82%, p = 0.0112) and Hispanics (1.17% vs 0.83%, p = 0.0052) at urban teaching hospitals between July toand September compared to the October to June study period; however, we did not find a statistically significant difference for the Asian cohort (1.9% vs 2.10%, p = 0.56). The mean length of stay (LOS) decreased from 7 days in 2007 to 6 days in 2018 (p < 0.0001), while the mean total hospital charge (THC) increased from $48,883 in 2007 to $85,909 in 2018 (p < 0.0001) for inpatient ERCPs. Compared to the 2015-2018 study period, we noted higher rates of post-ERCP pancreatitis (27.76% vs 17.25%, p < 0.0001) from 2007-2014. CONCLUSION: Therapeutic ERCP utilization and inpatient mortality were on the rise for a subset of the American minority population, including Black and Hispanics.
Assuntos
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Pancreatite , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efeitos adversos , Tempo de Internação , Pancreatite/terapia , Pancreatite/etiologia , Grupos Raciais , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Background: This study aimed to assess the trends and characteristics of celiac disease (CeD) hospitalizations in the United States (US). Methods: The National Inpatient Sample was analyzed from 2007-2017 to identify all adult hospitalizations with a primary discharge diagnosis of CeD. Demographic trends, associations, and other aspects of CeD hospitalizations were analyzed. SAS 9.4 was used for statistical analysis and P-values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: From 2007-2017, we noted an increasing trend of CeD hospitalizations from 19,385 in 2007 to 38,395 in 2017 (P-trend <0.001). The mean age was 57.85 years, with a declining trend. Females and patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index score ≥3 had a rising trend of CeD hospitalizations from 70.68% in 2007 to 73% in 2017 (P-trend <0.001) and from 16.96% in 2007 to 26.59% in 2017 (P-trend <0.001), respectively. Additionally, a White predominance was seen in the study cohort. Furthermore, for CeD hospitalizations, all-cause inpatient mortality increased from 1.30% in 2007 to 1.58% in 2017 (P-trend <0.001) and the mean total hospital charge increased from $26,299 in 2007 to $49,282 in 2017 (P-trend <0.001). However, we noted a decline in the mean length of stay (LOS) from 4.88 days in 2007 to 4.59 days in 2017 (P-trend=0.0015) and rates of esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed from 2.09% in 2007 to 1.89% in 2017 (P-trend <0.001). Conclusion: We noted a rising trend in hospitalizations, inpatient mortality, and hospital costs for CeD hospitalizations in the US; however, inpatient EGDs performed and mean LOS showed a decline.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Early readmissions of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) are often associated with poor outcomes. We compared characteristics and outcomes for index and 30-day readmissions of SBP in the USA. METHODS: We analyzed the Nationwide Readmissions Database for 2018 to identify all adult (≥ 18 years) 30-day readmissions of SBP in the USA. Hospitalization characteristics and outcomes for index and 30-day readmissions of SBP were compared. Independent predictors of 30-day readmissions were also identified. RESULTS: In 2018, of the 5,797 index admissions for SBP, 30% (1726) were readmitted within 30 day. At the time of readmission, the most common admitting diagnosis was alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver with ascites (11.8%) followed by sepsis due to an unspecified organism (9.2%). SBP as an admitting diagnosis was identified for only 8.3% of these 30-day readmissions. Compared with index admissions, 30-day readmissions of SBP had a lower mean age (56.1 vs 58.6 years, P < 0.001) without a statistically significant difference for gender. Furthermore, 30-day readmissions of SBP were associated with significantly higher odds of inpatient mortality (10% vs 4.9%, OR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.66-2.79, P < 0.001), and mean total hospital charge ($85,031 vs $56,000, mean difference: 29,032, 95% CI: 12,867-45,197, P < 0.001) compared with index admissions. The presence of chronic pulmonary disease, liver failure, inpatient dialysis, and discharge against medical advice were identified as independent predictors for increased 30-day readmissions of SBP. CONCLUSION: The 30-day readmission rate of SBP was 30% and these readmissions were associated with higher odds of inpatient mortality compared with index admissions.
Assuntos
Readmissão do Paciente , Peritonite , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Diálise Renal , Estudos Retrospectivos , Peritonite/epidemiologia , Peritonite/etiologia , Peritonite/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) is on the rise worldwide. This rising prevalence is concerning as patients with CD and UC may frequently relapse leading to recurrent hospitalizations and increased healthcare utilization. AIM: To identify trends and adverse outcomes for 30 d readmissions for CD and UC. METHODS: This was a retrospective, interrupted trends study involving all adult (≥ 18 years) 30 d readmissions of CD and UC from the National Readmission Database (NRD) between 2008 and 2018. Patients < 18 years, elective, and traumatic hospitalizations were excluded from this study. We identified hospitalization characteristics and readmission rates for each calendar year. Trends of inpatient mortality, mean length of hospital stay (LOS) and mean total hospital cost (THC) were calculated using a multivariate logistic trend analysis adjusting for age, gender, insurance status, comorbidity burden and hospital factors. Furthermore, trends between CD and UC readmissions were compared using regression of the interaction coefficient after adjusting for age and gender to determine relative trends between the two populations. Stata® Version 16 software (StataCorp, TX, United States) was used for statistical analysis and P value ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Total number of 30 d readmissions increased from 6202 in 2010 to 7672 in 2018 for CD and from 3272 in 2010 to 4234 in 2018 for UC. We noted increasing trends for 30-day all-cause readmission rate of CD from 14.9% in 2010 to 17.6% in 2018 (P-trend < 0.001), CD specific readmission rate from 7.1% in 2010 to 8.2% in 2018 (P-trend < 0.001), 30-day all-cause readmission rate of UC from 14.1% in 2010 to 15.7% in 2018 (P-trend = 0.003), and UC specific readmission rate from 5.2% in 2010 to 5.6% in 2018 (P-trend = 0.029). There was no change in the risk adjusted trends of inpatient mortality and mean LOS for CD and UC readmissions. However, we found an increasing trend of mean THC for UC readmissions. After comparison, there was no statistical difference in the trends for 30 d all-cause readmission rate, inpatient mortality, and mean LOS between CD and UC readmissions. CONCLUSION: There was an increase in total number of 30 d readmissions for CD and UC with a trend towards increasing 30 d all-cause readmission rates.
RESUMO
Background: Hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) is a well-established cause of acute pancreatitis often leading to significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare burden. This study aimed to describe the rate, reasons, and predictors of HTG-induced acute pancreatitis (HTG-AP) in the USA. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) for 2018 to determine all adults (≥ 18 years) readmitted within 30 days of an index hospitalization of HTG-AP. Hospitalization characteristics and adverse outcomes for 30-day readmissions were highlighted and compared with index admissions of HTG-AP. Furthermore, independent predictors for 30-day readmissions of HTG-AP were also identified. P values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: In 2018, the rate of 30-day readmission of HTG-AP was noted to be 13.5%. At the time of readmission, AP (45.2%) was identified as the most common principal diagnosis, followed by chronic pancreatitis (6.3%) and unspecified sepsis (4.8%). Compared to index admissions, 30-day readmissions of HTG-AP had a higher proportion of patients with Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores ≥ 3 (48.5% vs. 33.8%, P < 0.001). Furthermore, we noted higher rates of inpatient mortality (1.7% vs. 0.7%, odds ratio (OR): 2.55, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.83 - 3.57, P < 0.001), mean length of stay (LOS) (5.6 vs. 4.1 days, OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.2 - 1.7, P < 0.001), and mean total healthcare charge (THC) ($56,799 vs. $36,078, OR: 18,702, 95% CI: 15,136 - 22,267, P < 0.001) for 30-day readmissions of HTG-AP compared to index admissions. Independent predictors for 30-day all-cause readmissions of HTG-AP included hypertension, protein energy malnutrition (PEM), CCI scores ≥ 3, chronic kidney disease and discharge against medical advice. Conclusions: AP was the principal diagnosis on presentation in only 45.2% patients for 30-day readmissions of HTG-AP. Compared to index admissions, 30-day readmissions of HTG-AP had a higher comorbidity burden, inpatient mortality, mean LOS and mean THC.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study was designed to determine the epidemiological trends and adverse outcomes of hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS). METHODS: This retrospective interrupted trend study analyzed data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) for the years 2012, 2014, 2016 and 2018 to identify adult (≥ 18 years) hospitalizations with a diagnosis of HPS. We highlighted epidemiological trends for HPS. Inpatient mortality, mean length of stay (LOS) and mean total hospital charge (THC) were estimated using multivariate regression trend analysis. RESULTS: We observed an increase in the total number of HPS hospitalizations from 1,565 in 2012 to 2,495 in 2018, with mean age ranging from 55.8 to 58.1 years. There was a trend towards increasing hospitalizations (P-trend < 0.001) with increasing mean age (P-trend = 0.003) for HPS. Whites made up most of the study population. The inpatient mortality for HPS ranged from 12.4% to 12.6%, but there was no statistically significant trend for mortality (P-trend = 0.534) between 2012 and 2018. Additionally, there was no change in both mean LOS (P-trend = 0.545) and mean THC (P-trend = 0.534) for HPS for these years. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalizations and mean age for HPS were on the rise. Inpatient mortality ranged from 12.4% to 12.6%; however, a statistically significant trend for mortality was absent.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid treatment is an effective and common therapeutic strategy for various inflammatory lung pathologies and may be an effective treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature was to investigate the clinical outcomes associated with corticosteroid treatment of COVID-19. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, medRxiv, Web of Science, and Scopus databases through March 10, 2021 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects of corticosteroid therapies for COVID-19 treatment. Outcomes of interest were mortality, need for mechanical ventilation, serious adverse events (SAEs), and superinfection. RESULTS: A total of 7737 patients from 8 RCTs were included in the quantitative meta-analysis, of which 2795 (36.1%) patients received corticosteroids plus standard of care (SOC) while 4942 (63.9%) patients received placebo and/or SOC alone. The odds of mortality were significantly lower in patients that received corticosteroids as compared to SOC (odds ratio [OR]â=â0.85 [95% CI: 0.76; 0.95], Pâ=â.003). Corticosteroid treatment reduced the odds of a need for mechanical ventilation as compared to SOC (ORâ=â0.76 [95% CI: 0.59; 0.97], Pâ=â.030). There was no significant difference between the corticosteroid and SOC groups with regards to SAEs and superinfections. CONCLUSION: Corticosteroid treatment can reduce the odds for mortality and the need for mechanical ventilation in severe COVID-19 patients.
Assuntos
Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , COVID-19/mortalidade , Humanos , Razão de Chances , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine clinical outcomes associated with convalescent plasma therapy in COVID-19 patients. We performed a literature search on PubMed, medRxiv, Web of Science, and Scopus to identify studies published up to December 10th, 2020 that examined the efficacy of convalescent plasma treatment for COVID-19. The primary endpoints were mortality, clinical improvement, and hospital length of stay. We screened 859 studies that met the search criteria, performed full-text reviews of 56 articles, and identified 15 articles that fulfilled inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. The odds of mortality were significantly lower in the convalescent plasma group compared to the control group (OR = 0.59 [95% CI = 0.44; 0.78], P < .001), although results from two key randomized controlled trials did not support the mortality benefit. The odds of clinical improvement were significantly higher in the convalescent plasma group compared to the control group (OR = 2.02 [95% CI = 1.54; 2.65], P < .001). There was no difference in hospital length of stay between the convalescent plasma group and the control group (MD = -0.49 days [95% CI = -3.11; 2.12], P = .713). In all, these data indicate that a mortality benefit with convalescent plasma is unclear, although there remain benefits with convalescent plasma therapy for COVID-19.
Assuntos
COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/mortalidade , Humanos , Imunização Passiva/métodos , Tempo de Internação , Plasma , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Soroterapia para COVID-19RESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With its impact on quality of life and increasing awareness, postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome (PI-IBS) is now gaining attention as one of the major health problems commonly encountered in gastrointestinal practice. Literature investigating the various pathogenic mechanisms involved is rapidly emerging. The objective of the current review is to provide an update on recent evidence published in the past 2 years describing advances in our understanding of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of PI-IBS. RECENT FINDINGS: Significant proportion of research in the recent past was preclinical in nature. Epidemiological studies continue to highlight the risk of IBS after infection, with recent studies documenting postprotozoal effects. Advances in pathogenic mechanisms included clinical studies, which documented micro-RNA down-regulation and Peroxiredoxin-1 up-regulation in colonic mucosa of PI-IBS patients. Protease-activated receptor-2 (PAR-2) activation in PI-IBS mice models resulted in increase in epithelial permeability, mucosal inflammation, visceral hypersensitivity. Moxibustion and rifamycin reduced intestinal inflammation by inhibiting cytokine and chemokine release via different mechanisms. Miltefosine reduced mast cell degranulation and TRPV1 activation, thereby reducing visceral hypersensitivity. SUMMARY: At present, generalization of limited diagnostic and therapeutic strategies across a heterogeneous prevalent patient population impedes the ability to provide effective personalized care in PI-IBS. Further development in pathogenesis discovery, diagnostic tool development are needed in order to design well tolerated and effective therapies that guide treatments based on distinct pathways of disease.
Assuntos
Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/diagnóstico , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/terapia , Adulto , Animais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Colo/metabolismo , Gastroenterite/complicações , Humanos , Infecções/complicações , Inflamação/epidemiologia , Inflamação/terapia , Mucosa Intestinal/metabolismo , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/epidemiologia , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/etiologia , Mastócitos/metabolismo , Camundongos , Moxibustão/métodos , Peroxirredoxinas/metabolismo , Fosforilcolina/análogos & derivados , Fosforilcolina/uso terapêutico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Receptor PAR-2/metabolismo , Rifamicinas/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND, CONTEXT AND PURPOSE: In spite of the mixed evidence for their impact, survivorship Care Plans (SCPs) are recommended to enhance quality of care for cancer survivors. Data on the feasibility of SCPs in bladder cancer (BC) is sparse. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study describes the iterative development, acceptability and feasibility of BC specific SCP (BC-SCP) in clinical settings. METHODS: In Phase I, we developed the BC-SCP. In Phase II, we conducted four focus groups with 19 patients and 15 providers to examine its acceptability and usability challenges. Data analyses using the Atlas.ti program, informed refinement of the BC-SCP. In Phase III, we conducted feasibility testing of the refined BC-SCP with 18 providers from 12 health-centers. An encounter survey was completed after each assessment to examine the feasibility of the BC-SCP. Chi-square and Fisher Exact tests were used for comparative analyses. RESULTS: During phase I, we observed high patient and provider acceptability of the BC-SCP and substantial engagement in improving its content, design, and structure. In Phase II, providers completed 59 BC-SCPs. Mean time for BC-SCP completion was 12.3 min. Providers reported that BC-SCP content was clear, did not hamper clinic flow and was readily completed with easy-to-access information. Comparative analyses to examine differences in SCP completion time by patient clinico-demographic characteristics and provider type revealed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Our BC-SCP has clinical relevance, and can be used in an active practice setting. However, considerable progress will be necessary to achieve implementation of and sharing the BC-SCP with patients and care providers, particularly within the electronic medical record. In summary, BC-SCPs are essential to improve the follow up care of BC survivors. Clinical resources are required to ensure appropriate implementation of BC-SCPs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study HUM00056082.
Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer/psicologia , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Sobrevivência , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/terapia , Idoso , Sobreviventes de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa QualitativaRESUMO
Acute chest pain is one of the most common presenting symptoms to the emergency department. Currently available risk scores are suboptimal in identifying low-risk patients eligible for early and safe discharge. Various, initially obtained clinical data have valuable discriminating power but are not being fully utilized. We developed a new scoring system based on 5 sets of variables; characteristics of Symptoms, history of Vascularâ¯disease, â¯Electrocardiography, â¯Age, andâ¯Troponin (SVEAT score). A total of 321 subjects presenting to the emergency department or admitted to the clinical decision unit at our institution with chest pain from May 2017 to August 2018 were prospectively recruited. The subjects were followed for 30 days for any major cardiovascular events (MACE); acute myocardial infarction, confirmed coronary artery disease requiring revascularization or medical therapy or death. A 30-day MACE occurred in 19.6% of the subjects. Predictive ability of SVEAT score for a 30-day MACE was compared with HEART and TIMI risk score using receiving-operator characteristic curve. The area under the curve of SVEAT score (0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97 to 0.99) is higher than HEART (0.92, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.96) and TIMI score (0.88, 95% CI 083 to 0.93). Using SVEAT score of 4 as a cut off, 0.8% of the subjects developed a 30-day MACE compared with 1.4% and 1.5% of those classified as low-risk based on the HEART and TIMI score respectively. SVEAT score additionally identified larger proportion of low-risk (73.8%) than the HEART (45.2%) and TIMI risk score (40.1%), (p <0.01, for both).
Assuntos
Dor no Peito/diagnóstico , Eletrocardiografia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Medição de Risco/métodos , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Dor no Peito/sangue , Dor no Peito/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nevada/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Troponina/sangueRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a major health problem that has been on the rise for the last couple of decades. It has significant mortality and morbidity in hospitalized patients. We looked at the outcomes of CDI in patients with liver cirrhosis compared to those without liver cirrhosis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study from a large inpatient database. The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried for CDI admissions between January 2012 and September 2015. Patients admitted with CDI were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. The outcomes included overall mortality, length of hospitalization, and healthcare expenditure related to hospitalization. RESULTS: Out of all patients, 53,765 (3.97%) had concurrent CDI and liver cirrhosis. Diabetes mellitus, alcohol abuse, and acquired immunodeficiency were observed more in patients with liver cirrhosis. Overall mortality (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.53 - 1.77, P < 0.001), cost of hospitalization and length of hospital stay (11.0 vs. 10.4 days, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in patients with cirrhosis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CDI and liver cirrhosis have significantly higher mortality, prolonged hospitalization and healthcare expenditure. Further studies are recommended to look at reversible risk factors for CDI in patients with liver cirrhosis to guide quality measures that would ultimately improve outcomes.
RESUMO
This study aims to describe the acceptability and feasibility of an educational and training experiential intervention (ETEI) we developed to enhance muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients with treatment decision-making and post-operative self-care. Twenty-five patients were randomized to a control group (N = 8) or ETEI group (N = 17). ETEI group participated in a nurse-led session on MIBC education. The control group received diet and nutrition education. Study questionnaires were completed at baseline and at 1-month post-intervention. Our results showed acceptable recruitment (58%) and retention rates (68%). The ETEI group reported increased knowledge (82% vs. 50%), improved decisional support (64% vs. 50%), improved communication (73% vs. 50%), and increased confidence in treatment decisions (73% vs. 50%) compared to the control group. Patients in the control group reported improved diet (50% v. 27%) as well as maintaining a healthy lifestyle (67% vs. 45%) compared to the ETEI group. Patients in the ETEI group reported a significant decrease in cancer worries and increases in self-efficacy beliefs over time compared to the control group. The ETEI was feasible, acceptable, and showed a potential for inducing desired changes in cancer worries and efficacy beliefs.