Sedation from analgesics: patient preference survey.

BACKGROUND: The propensity for certain analgesics to cause sedation is well documented, yet physician-patient dialogue does not routinely include pre-emptive exploration of preferences regarding this side effect. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the extent to which palliative patients would accept sedation as a side effect of analgesia and to identify factors affecting decision-making. METHODS: Patients (n=76) known to a specialist palliative care services were given hypothetical scenarios regarding pain and asked about the acceptability of varying levels of sedation occurring as an analgesic side effect. Demographic data, including diagnosis, performance status and experience of pain and sedation, were collated for evaluation of the influence of these factors on patient opinion. RESULTS: Most patients (89.47%) would be quite or very likely to accept mild sedation. A significant minority (40.79%) would accept high levels of sedation. There is no significant association with the acceptability of sedation according to demographics. Almost half (40.79%) reported that their responses may change if the prognosis were extended, typically for less sedation with a longer prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing levels of sedation are less acceptable, although there is significant variation in views. Palliative care patients are likely to indicate preferences regarding their acceptability of sedation. Palliative physicians must explore preferences on an individualised basis.

Development of EASY-Care, for brief standardized assessment of the health and care needs of older people; with latest information about cross-national acceptability.

INTRODUCTION: The EASY-Care system has been developed in the past 20 years in the United States and Europe as a brief standardized method for assessing the perceptions of older people about their health and care needs and priorities for a service response. More recently, it has been adapted and tested for use in poor, middle-income, and rich countries across the world. In this article we review its development and report the latest data for cross-cultural acceptability to older people and their clinicians in 6 countries across 4 continents. METHOD: We used a multicenter, mixed-method (quantitative and qualitative) approach to assess clinician (n = 37) and patient (n = 115) perspectives of acceptability of the EASY-Care Standard (2010) instrument. Data were collected between 2008 and 2012 in Iran, Colombia, India, Lesotho, Tonga, and the United Kingdom. RESULTS: Key strengths identified included high levels of acceptability from both clinician and patient perspectives, with the tools seen as useful for identification of unmet need. Key recommendations included enhancing clarity in certain questions, ensuring it is not too long. Recommendations included minor context-specific adaptations, effective use of the screening questionnaire, and use of context-specific interviewer prompts. CONCLUSIONS: The EASY-Care Standard has high levels of acceptability from both clinicians and patients across poor, middle-income, and rich countries and has the potential to become a global gold standard for holistic person-centered assessment.

Bowel dysfunction after total abdominal hysterectomy for benign conditions: a prospective longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: On the basis of retrospective studies, hysterectomy has been considered a risk factor for functional bowel disorders. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the patients' bowel function and general health-related quality of life (QoL) before and after hysterectomy. Our hypothesis was that hysterectomy in properly selected patients can impact positively on the patients' self-reporting of their general health and bowel function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective longitudinal observational study was conducted in a university-based teaching hospital. Eighty-five patients who were scheduled for total abdominal hysterectomy for a nonmalignant cause completed the study. The main outcome measure was the patient's perception of her bowel function, which was assessed preoperatively and at 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks postoperatively using the gastrointestinal quality of life questionnaire. The patient's general health was also assessed using a generic general health questionnaire (EQ5D and EQVAS). The effect of time on change in questionnaire score was assessed using mixed model repeated measures at a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: The scores in the three questionnaires declined significantly at 6 weeks postoperatively as compared with those obtained preoperatively. However, there was a subsequent increase in the scores up to 12 months postoperatively. Smoking and use of laxative were identified as potential confounding variables. CONCLUSION: Apart from a transient negative effect, total abdominal hysterectomy improves the patient's gastrointestinal-related QoL, probably as part of general improvement in their QoL.