Optimizing hook implantation angle of the clavicular hook plate: a cadaveric study.

PURPOSE: While Clavicle hook plates have demonstrated favorable results regarding bone and shoulder function, their design can potentially lead to complications due to pressure concentration at the plate's tip. This study aims to investigate the impact of different hook implantation angles on the contact surface area between the hook plate and acromion, with the goal of minimizing mismatch and maximizing contact surface area. METHODS: Twenty soft shoulder cadavers were included in the study, and the contact surface area of the hook plate was measured in different positions based on the hook implantation angle. RESULTS: The results showed variations in compatibility, width, and length of the contact surface area depending on the hook implantation angle and the medial or lateral row placement. The lateral row generally demonstrated superior compatibility (84.0% vs 46.67%, p-value < 0.001), with a broader contact area (3.55 ± 0.08 mm vs 3.09 ± 0.10 mm, p-value = 0.004) and a longer contact area (7.36 ± 0.19 mm vs 5.10 ± 0.23 mm, p-value < 0.001) at specific angles. A detailed analysis of the lateral position revealed that the zero angle of implantation resulted in the greatest contact surface area, measuring 3.91 ± 0.70 mm in width (p value = 0.083) and 8.85 ± 1.24 mm in length (p value < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Placing the hook laterally and at the zero position according to the hook implantation angle can maximize contact surface area, may reduce stress concentration, and minimize complications in hook plate fixation. Further research and consideration of anatomical variations are warranted to refine the placement technique and enhance patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V evidence.

Comparative outcomes of foot cast and short leg cast in pseudo-Jones avulsion fracture: a single blinded randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the metatarsal bones account for 35% of all foot fractures. Conservative management of fractures proximal to the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction of the fifth metatarsal bone (pseudo-Jones) is by protected weight bearing. The methods of protected weight bearing include short-leg casting and splinting (boot cast, Jones's bandage and elastic bandage). However, currently there is no consensus as to which method is the most suitable. METHOD: We have conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare outcomes of foot casting (FC) and short leg casting (SLC) to assess pain, function and complication outcomes for the treatment of pseudo-jones metatarsal fractures. This single-center, single blind,randomized controlled trial was conducted between 1 June 2016-1 July 2018 at Police General Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. RESULT: A total of 72 pseudo-jones metatarsal fracture participants were randomly allocated to treatment by foot cast or short leg cast. The primary outcomes were pain VAS, AOFAS and complications measured at 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks after receiving the treatment. Seventy-two patients (36 paticipants per group) were enrolled to receive either FC or SLC. The mean VAS measured at baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks and 8 weeks were 7.36, 1.97, 0.58, 0.17 and 0.08 respectively in the FC group; and 6.09, 2.91, 1.23, 0.37 and 0.11 respectively in the SLC group. The mean AOFAS at baseline, 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks were 33.60, 68.22, 82.72, 91.75 and 98.11 respectively in the FC group; and 32.60, 60.20, 70.20, 92.24 and 99.13 in the SLC group. The estimated mean difference of pain VAS and AOFAS at 2 weeks and 4 weeks were - 0.94 (95% CI: - 1.53, - 0.34), - 0.65 (95%CI: - 1.24, - 0.05), 8.02 (95%CI: 3.74, 12.10) and 12.52 (95%CI: 8.27, 16.78), which were statistically significantly better in the FC groups when compared to the SLC groups. However, there were no statistically significant difference between the two groups at 6 and 8 weeks. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the application of foot casting can improve pain VAS and AOFAS function at 2 and 4 weeks in the treatment of pseudo-jones metatarsal fractures when compared to short leg casting. However, at 6 and 8 weeks, there were no statistically significantly different between the two groups.

Comparative Outcomes of Cast and Removable Support in Fracture Fifth Metatarsal Bone: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Fractures of the metatarsals account for 35% of all foot fractures. Conservative management of fractures proximal to the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction of the fifth metatarsal bone (pseudo-Jones) is protected weightbearing. The methods of protected weightbearing include a short-leg cast and splint (boot cast, Jones bandage, and elastic bandage). However, no consensus has yet been reached regarding which method is most suitable. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of a short-leg cast and splint for pseudo-Jones metatarsal fractures. We searched the PubMed and Scopus databases up to October 29, 2016. Five of 104 studies (3 comparative studies and 2 randomized controlled trials; n = 246 patients) were eligible. Of the studies, 3, 5, and 4 were included in pooling of early (within 1 month) and last follow-up foot function scale scores and fracture nonunion, respectively. The unstandardized mean difference of early (within 1 month) and last follow-up foot scores for the short leg cast were -14.58 (95% confidence interval [CI] -24.12 to -5.04) and -3.89 (95% CI -6.30 to -1.49), significantly lower than the scores for the splint (bandage or boot support) for pseudo-Jones fracture of the fifth metatarsal bone. The risk of nonunion of the fifth metatarsal bone fracture of the patients who were treated with short leg cast method was insignificantly greater at 1.57 times (95% CI 0.29 to 8.49) that compared with the splint. The treatment of fracture of the pseudo-Jones fifth metatarsal bone with a splint (boot or bandage) resulted in foot function scale scores better than those with short leg cast treatment and a lower nonunion rate.

Comparative outcome of PFNA, Gamma nails, PCCP, Medoff plate, LISS and dynamic hip screws for fixation in elderly trochanteric fractures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The ideal implant for the treatment of an unstable intertrochanteric femoral fracture is still a matter of discussion. The aim of this systematic review is to conduct a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing clinical outcomes between dynamic hip screws (DHS), Medoff sliding plating, percutaneous compression plating (PCCP), proximal femoral nails (PFN), Gamma nails and less invasive stabilization system fixation in femoral trochanteric fractures in the elderly. These clinical outcomes consist of total intra-operative time, intra-operative fluoroscopy time, intra-operative blood loss, blood component transfusion, length of hospital stay, postoperative general complications, wound complications, late complications and reoperation rates. This systematic review was conducted using PubMed and Scopus search engines for RCTs comparing clinical outcomes between treatments from inception to February 22, 2015. Thirty-six of 785 studies identified were eligible. Compared to the other implants, PCCP showed the lowest total operative time and units of blood transfusion with an unstandardized mean difference (UMD) of 29.27 min (95% CI 5.24, 53.50) and 0.89 units (95% CI 0.52, 1.25). The lowest incidence of general complications, wound complications and late complications of PCCP was 0.09 (95% CI 0.04, 0.18), 0.01 (95% CI 0.01, 0.04) and 0.05 (95% CI 0.02, 0.11), respectively, when compared to others. The lowest fluoroscopic time was with DHS with an UMD of 0.24 min (95% CI 0.16, 0.32), whereas the lowest blood loss and shortest hospital stay were with PFN with an UMD of 233.61 ml of blood loss (95% CI 153.17, 314.04) and 7.23 days of hospital stay (95% CI 7.15, 7.31) when compared to all other fixation methods. Reoperation rates of all implants had no statistically significant difference. The network meta-analysis suggested that fixation with PCCP significantly shortens operative time and decreases the units of blood transfusion required, while also lowering risks of general complications, wound complications and late complications when compared to fixation. Use of PFN showed the least intra-operative blood loss and shortest hospital stay. Multiple active treatment comparisons indicate that PCCP fixation in trochanteric fractures in the elderly is the treatment of choice in terms of intra-operative outcomes and postoperative complications.

Post-operative outcomes and complications of suspensory loop fixation device versus hook plate in acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of acute (≤3 weeks) acromioclavicular joint dislocation type III-VI is still controversial. Currently, the two modern techniques that are widely used are hook plate (HP) fixation and coracoclavicular ligament fixation using a suspensory loop device that consists of either a tightrope (single or double), endo-button (single or double), or synthetic ligament and absorbable polydioxansulfate sling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Relevant studies that reported Constant-Murley score (CMS), Pain Visual Analog score (VAS) and postoperative complications of either technique were identified from Medline and Scopus from inception to 5 October 2015. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included for the analysis of HP fixation, and 25 studies were included for analysis of loop suspensory fixation (LSF). Pooling of mean CMS and VAS scores gave 90.35 (95% CI 87.16, 93.54), 1.51 (95% CI 0.73, 2) in the HP group, and 92.48 (95% CI 90.91, 94.05), 0.32 (95% CI 0, 0.64) in the suspensory loop devices group, respectively. The pooled unstandardized mean differences (UMD) scores of CMS and VAS in LSF were 2.13 (95% CI -1.43, 5.69) and -1.19 (95% CI -2.03, -0.35) when compared to hook plating. The pooled prevalence of LSF and hook plating were 0.08 (95% CI 0.06, 0.10) and 0.05 (95% CI 0.02, 0.08) scores. The chance of having complications in the LSF group was 1.69 (95% CI 1.07, 2.60), which was statistically significantly higher than in the HP group. CONCLUSION: LSF have higher shoulder function scores (CMS) and lower postoperative pain when compared to HP fixation; however, there are higher complication rates with LSF when compared to hook plating. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Comparison of surgical outcomes between fixation with hook plate and loop suspensory fixation for acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Treatment of acute (≤4 weeks) high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint separation (types III-VI) is still controversial. Currently, the two modern techniques that are widely used include hook plate fixation and coracoclavicular (CC) ligament fixation using a suspensory loop device (tightrope, synthetic ligament or absorbable polydioxansulfate sling). These techniques are both reported to have superior clinical outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess and compare clinical outcomes of hook plate fixation versus fixation of the CC ligament using a loop suspensory fixation (LSF) device for the treatment of AC joint injury. These clinical outcomes consist of the Constant-Murley score (CMS), pain visual analog score (VAS) and postoperative complications. Relevant comparative studies were identified from MEDLINE and Scopus from inception to October 5, 2015. Five of 571 studies were eligible; 5, 3, 3, and 5 studies were included in the pooling of CMS, pain VAS, surgical time and postoperative complications, respectively. The unstandardized mean difference (UMD) of the CMS for LSF was 4.43 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.73, 8.14], which was statistically significantly higher than the CMS in hook plate fixation. For VAS, the UMD was 0.02 points (95 % CI -3.54, 3.73) higher than LSF but without statistical significance. The surgical time of LSF was 16.21 min (95 % CI 6.27, 26.15) statistically significantly higher than hook plate fixation. LSF had a lower chance of postoperative complications by 0.62 units (95 % CI 0.30, 1.32) when compared to hook plate fixation, but this also was not statistically significant. In acute high-grade AC joint injuries, loop suspensory fixation had higher postoperative functional CMS and mean surgical time when compared to hook plate fixation. However, for postoperative VAS and complication rates, there were no statistically significant differences between groups.

Short-term outcomes of platelet-rich plasma injection for treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes of osteoarthritis indices (WOMAC and Lequesne scores) and adverse events in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus hyaluronic acid (HA) or placebo. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-regression were performed to compare outcomes between PRP injections versus HA or placebo. Relevant randomized control trials were identified from Medline and Scopus from date of inception to 13 August 2015. RESULTS: Nine of 551 studies were eligible; 6, 5, 5, 5, 2, 2, 2 and 7 studies were included in pooling of WOMAC total, pain, stiffness and function scores, Lequesne score, IKDC score, EQ-VAS score and adverse events in OA knee patients, respectively. The PRP injections had -15.4 (95 % CI -28.6, -2.3, p = 0.021), lower mean WOMAC total scores, and 8.83 (95 % CI 5.88, 11.78, p < 0.001), 7.37 (95 % CI 4.33, 10.05, p = 0.021) higher mean IKDC and EQ-VAS scores when compared to HA injections. However, PRP injections had no significant differences in WOMAC pain, stiffness and function scores, as well as Lequesne score and adverse events when compared to HA or placebo. CONCLUSION: In short-term outcomes (≤1 year), PRP injection has improved functional outcomes (WOMAC total scores, IKDC score and EQ-VAS) when compared to HA and placebo, but has no statistically significant difference in adverse events when compared to HA and placebo. This study suggests that PRP injection is more efficacious than HA injection and placebo in reducing symptoms and improving function and quality of life. It has the potential to be the treatment of choice in patients with mild-to-moderate OA of the knee who have not responded to conventional treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Boomerang proximal tibial osteotomy for the treatment of severe varus gonarthrosis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to review the results of modified infratubercle displacement osteotomy in patients with severe varus gonarthrosis and to determine the factors influencing outcomes. METHODS: A total of 177 knees in 133 patients with severe varus gonarthrosis were treated with infratubercle boomerang-shaped osteotomy, stabilised with dual plates. The mean age of the patients was 63.8 years (range 43-80 years), and the mean follow-up period was 61.4 months (range 24 -139 months). The factors associated with clinical and survival outcomes were analysed including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), preoperative and post-operative femorotibial angle and femorotibial angle at one year after surgery. RESULTS: Using the Knee Society clinical rating system 149 knees or 84.2 % were rated as having good to excellent results and 21 knees or 15.8 % as having fair to poor results. Overall, the mean preoperative knee score of 33.6 points had improved significantly to 80.7 points at the final follow-up (p < 0.001). Using Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis the five-year survival was 97.1 % with conversion to arthroplasty or second osteotomy as the end point and 89.2 % with a knee score of under 70 points as the end point. The anatomical femorotibial angle at one year after osteotomy had the most significant positive effect on the clinical (p < 0.001) and survival outcomes for all end points (p = 0.002 for conversion to arthroplasty or second osteotomy and p < 0.001 for knee score less than 70 points). CONCLUSIONS: The boomerang osteotomy can create adequate valgus alignment in severe varus gonarthrosis. The one-year post-operative knee alignment of 11° valgus provided the most satisfactory results and that between six and 15° valgus the longest survival time.

Intertrochanteric valgus-lengthening-femoral neck osteotomy for developmental and posttraumatic conditions of the hips.

OBJECTIVE: To review the results of the treatment of coxa vara associated with femoral neck shortening and high-standing greater trochanter using the new technique of intertrochanteric valgus-lengthening-femoral neck osteotomy. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Twelve of the fifteen hips treated by the present technique of osteotomy were reviewed. Seven of the twelve cases were posttraumatic (four malunion, two nonunion and one childhood fracture of the femoral neck) and five were developmental conditions (three ischemic necrosis of the femoral head and one physeal dysplasia, all of which secondary to DDH and one coxa plana). The mean follow-up period was 34.3 months (range, 12-106). There were 5 male, 7 female. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 26.6 years (range, 13-50). The operation consisted of intertrochanteric opening wedge valgus osteotomy,femoral neck lengthening by lateralization of femoral shaft and trochanteric lateralization. No bone grafting or substitute was used. RESULTS: Mean preoperative Harris hip score of 51.8 points (range, 32-67) was significantly improved to 94.8 points (range, 60-100) at the last follow-up study (p = 0.002). The mean femoral shaft-neck angle was changed from 113 degrees (range, 70-140) preoperatively to 138.2 (range, 110-165) degrees at the last follow-up (p = 0.002). Mean length gain at the last follow-up was 12.7 mm (range 5-29 mm). No complications, including delayed or non-union, implant failure and neurovascular injuries were encountered. CONCLUSION: The newly present technique could simultaneously address coxa vara associated with femoral neck shortening, and high-standing greater trochanter. The technique is safe and reliable.