Effect of photodynamic therapy with verteporfin on tumor thickness and best corrected visual acuity in patients with circumscribed choroidal hemangioma: a single-center experience.

The management of circumscribed choroidal hemangioma (CCH) with photodynamic therapy (PDT) using verteporfin has resulted in significant functional and clinical improvement compared with the pre-PDT era. Literature data on factors influencing clinical outcomes and predictors of response to PDT in symptomatic CCH are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of PDT with verteporfin in patients with CCH depending on symptom duration and tumor thickness at baseline. We analyzed the medical records of 37 patients with symptomatic CCH divided into 3 groups according to symptom duration (≤ 50 weeks, 51 - 100 weeks, and > 100 weeks) and into 2 groups according to tumor thickness (≤ 2.3 mm and > 2.3 mm). Patients were subjected to PDT with verteporfin at a concentration of 6 mg/m2 body surface area and a light dose of 50 J/cm2 at a wavelength of 689 nm. The mean number of treatment sessions was 1.57 (range, 1 - 3). Tumor thickness, the transverse and longitudinal diameters of the tumor base, and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were evaluated at baseline and at 12 - 15 months after treatment. After PDT, the mean tumor thickness in the whole study group decreased by 1.19 ± 0.66 mm (from 3.14 mm to 1.95 mm). Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences between the 2 groups divided according to tumor thickness (p = 0.49). However, tumor thickness differed significantly between the 3 groups divided according to symptom duration (p < 0.05). BCVA increased in 22 patients (59.5%), remained unchanged in 12 patients (16.2%), and decreased in 3 patients (10.1%). Our study provides evidence for the efficacy of PDT with verteporfin in terms of improving or stabilizing visual function as well as reducing tumor thickness in patients with CCH, including those with long-lasting disease.

Differences in anti-endothelial and anti-retinal antibody titers: implications for the pathohysiology of acute and chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of serum anti-retinal (ARAs) and anti-endothelial cell antibodies (ACEAs) in patients with acute and chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). We enrolled 28 patients with acute CSC, 42 patients with chronic CSC, and 40 healthy controls. The presence of ARAs was determined by indirect immunofluorescence using monkey retina as an antigen substrate, while the presence of AECAs was determined using cultivated human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and primate skeletal muscle according to the manufacturer's instructions (Euroimmun AG). There were no differences in the prevalence of antibodies against rods, cones, cytoplasmic components of retinal nuclear layer cells, and retinal vessels between the acute and chronic CSC groups and the control group (P = 0.27, P = 0.16, P = 0.71, and P = 0.06, respectively). However, AECAs reactive with HUVECs were observed in 46% of patients with acute CSC, 45% of those with chronic CSC, and 22% of controls, whereas AECAs reactive with the skeletal muscle were present in 46%, 45%, and 15%, respectively (difference between groups: P = 0.045 for HUVECs and P = 0.005 for the skeletal muscle). Furthermore, AECA titers were higher in CSC patients than in controls (P = 0.004). This study provides evidence for the possible involvement of an autoimmune process directed against vessel antigens in the pathogenesis of CSC. AECAs may be more important than ARAs in this disease and may be involved in endothelial damage in the choroidal vessels and choriocapillaris, leading to hyperpermeability, which is central to the pathophysiology of CSC.

Non-responsiveness and tachyphylaxis to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment in naive patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration.

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of central visual loss in people aged over 50 years in well developed countries. Although the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy has become a standard treatment for exudative AMD, its effectiveness may be limited in some cases. We aimed to assess the prevalence of non-responsiveness and tachyphylaxis to anti-VEGF drugs in patients with exudative AMD. The study included 63 initially treatment-naive AMD patients who were analyzed for non-responsiveness and tachyphylaxis to intravitreal injections (IVI) of ranibizumab and aflibercept. The participants were enrolled in a National Healthcare Fund (NHF) Therapeutic Program for the Treatment of Exudative AMD. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and morphological features of a disease activity assessed in optical coherence tomography (OCT) were evaluated during a 12-month follow-up. The percentage of non-responders achieved 22.2% (14 eyes). No significant correlation was found between the type of VEGF inhibitor and a negative response to therapy. Eight patients (12.7%) developed early tachyphylaxis, which was more common in eyes treated with aflibercept (P = 0.04). The presence of serous pigment epithelium detachment (sPED) at baseline was associated with non-responsiveness as determined by both BCVA (OR 18.2, 95% CI 2.86 - 248; P = 0.021) and OCT features (OR 23.0, 95% CI 1.80 - 321; P = 0.030). Eyes treated with aflibercept showed statistically significant greater BCVA improvement (P = 0.0034) and central retinal thickness (CRT) reduction (P = 0.0129) as compared to ranibizumab group during a loading phase of therapy. In a maintain phase of treatment the differences in BCVA and CRT between these two groups were not statistically significant, however eyes treated with aflibercept still showed better functional and anatomical results. Anti-VEGF therapy is an effective method of treatment for exudative AMD, however some patients may show week or no positive reaction or may develop tachyphylaxis. Awareness of these possible negative effects is an important clinical problem in the long-term management of AMD patients with VEGF inhibitors.