Multi-institutional investigation into the robustness of intra-cranial multi-target stereotactic radiosurgery plans to patient setup errors.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyse correlations between planning factors including plan geometry and plan complexity with robustness to patient setup errors. METHODS: Multiple-target brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) plans were obtained through the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) international treatment planning challenge (2018). The challenge dataset consisted of five intra-cranial targets with a 20 Gy prescription. Setup error was simulated using an in-house tool. Dose to targets was assessed via dose covering 99 % (D99 %) of gross tumour volume (GTV) and 98 % of planning target volume (PTV). Dose to organs at risk was assessed using volume of normal brain receiving 12 Gy and maximum dose covering 0.03 cc of brainstem. Plan complexity was assessed via edge metric, modulation complexity score, mean multi-leaf collimator (MLC) gap, mean MLC speed and plan modulation. RESULTS: Even for small (0.5 mm/°) errors, GTV D99 % was reduced by up to 20 %. The strongest correlation was found between lower complexity plans (larger mean MLC gap and lower edge metric) and higher robustness to setup error. Lower complexity plans had 1 %-20 % fewer targets/scenarios with GTV D99 % falling below the specified tolerance threshold. These complexity metrics correlated with 100 % isodose volume sphericity and dose conformity, though similar conformity was achievable with a range of complexities. CONCLUSIONS: A higher level of importance should be directed towards plan complexity when considering plan robustness. It is recommended when planning multi-target SRS, larger MLC gaps and lower MLC aperture irregularity be considered during plan optimisation due to higher robustness should patient positioning errors occur.

HDR brachytherapy afterloader quality assurance optimization using monolithic silicon strip detectors.

BACKGROUND: There currently exists no widespread high dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy afterloader quality assurance (QA) tool for simultaneously assessing the afterloader's positional, temporal, transit velocity and air kerma strength accuracy. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop a precise and rigorous technique for performing daily QA of HDR brachytherapy afterloaders, incorporating QA of: dwell position accuracy, dwell time accuracy, transit velocity consistency and relative air kerma strength (AKS) of an Ir-192 source. METHOD: A Sharp ProGuide 240 mm catheter (Elekta Brachytherapy, Veenendaal, The Netherlands) was fixed 5 mm above a 256 channel epitaxial diode array 'dose magnifying glass' (DMG256) (Centre for Medical and Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong). Three dwell positions, each of 5.0 s dwell times, were spaced 13.0 mm apart along the array with the Flexitron HDR afterloader (Elekta Brachytherapy, Veenendaal, The Netherlands). The DMG256 was connected to a data acquisition system (DAQ) and a computer via USB2.0 link for live readout and post-processing. The outputted data files were analyzed using a Python script to provide positional and temporal localization of the Ir-192 source by tracking the centroid of the detected response. Measurements were repeated on a weekly basis, for a period of 5 weeks to determine the consistency of the measured parameters over an extended period. RESULTS: Using the DMG256 for relative AKS measurements resulted in measured values within 0.6%-3.0% of the expected activity over a 7-week period. The sub-millisecond temporal accuracy of the device allowed for measurements of the transit velocity with an average of (10.88 ± 1.01) cm/s for 13 mm steps. The dwell position localization for 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 mm steps had an accuracy between 0.1 and 0.3 mm (3σ), with a fixed temporal accuracy of 10 ms. CONCLUSION: The DMG256 silicon strip detector allows for clinics to perform rigorous daily QA of HDR afterloader dwell position and dwell time accuracy with greater precision than the current standard methodology using closed circuit television and a stopwatch. Additionally, DMG256 unlocks the ability to perform measurements of transit velocity/time and relative AKS, which are not possible using current standard techniques.

Development of patient and catheter specific error thresholds for high dose rate prostate brachytherapy.

BACKGROUND: In-vivo source tracking has been an active topic of research in the field of high-dose rate brachytherapy in recent years to verify accuracy in treatment delivery. Although detection systems for source tracking are being developed, the allowable threshold of treatment error is still unknown and is likely patient-specific due to anatomy and planning variation. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine patient and catheter-specific shift error thresholds for in-vivo source tracking during high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (HDRPBT). METHODS: A module was developed in the previously described graphical processor unit multi-criteria optimization (gMCO) algorithm. The module generates systematic catheter shift errors retrospectively into HDRPBT treatment plans, performed on 50 patients. The catheter shift model iterates through the number of catheters shifted in the plan (from 1 to all catheters), the direction of shift (superior, inferior, medial, lateral, cranial, and caudal), and the magnitude of catheter shift (1-6 mm). For each combination of these parameters, 200 error plans were generated, randomly selecting the catheters in the plan to shift. After shifts were applied, dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters were re-calculated. Catheter shift thresholds were then derived based on plans where DVH parameters were clinically unacceptable (prostate V100 < 95%, urethra D0.1cc > 118%, and rectum Dmax > 80%). Catheter thresholds were also Pearson correlated to catheter robustness values. RESULTS: Patient-specific thresholds varied between 1 to 6 mm for all organs, in all shift directions. Overall, patient-specific thresholds typically decrease with an increasing number of catheters shifted. Anterior and inferior directions were less sensitive than other directions. Pearson's correlation test showed a strong correlation between catheter robustness and catheter thresholds for the rectum and urethra, with correlation values of -0.81 and -0.74, respectively (p < 0.01), but no correlation was found for the prostate. CONCLUSIONS: It was possible to determine thresholds for each patient, with thresholds showing dependence on shift direction, and number of catheters shifted. Not every catheter combination is explorable, however, this study shows the feasibility to determine patient-specific thresholds for clinical application. The correlation of patient-specific thresholds with the equivalent robustness value indicated the need for robustness consideration during plan optimization and treatment planning.

Preliminary Characterization of an Active CMOS Pad Detector for Tracking and Dosimetry in HDR Brachytherapy.

We assessed the accuracy of a prototype radiation detector with a built in CMOS amplifier for use in dosimetry for high dose rate brachytherapy. The detectors were fabricated on two substrates of epitaxial high resistivity silicon. The radiation detection performance of prototypes has been tested by ion beam induced charge (IBIC) microscopy using a 5.5 MeV alpha particle microbeam. We also carried out the HDR Ir-192 radiation source tracking at different depths and angular dose dependence in a water equivalent phantom. The detectors show sensitivities spanning from (5.8 ± 0.021) × 10-8 to (3.6 ± 0.14) × 10-8 nC Gy-1 mCi-1 mm-2. The depth variation of the dose is within 5% with that calculated by TG-43. Higher discrepancies are recorded for 2 mm and 7 mm depths due to the scattering of secondary particles and the perturbation of the radiation field induced in the ceramic/golden package. Dwell positions and dwell time are reconstructed within ±1 mm and 20 ms, respectively. The prototype detectors provide an unprecedented sensitivity thanks to its monolithic amplification stage. Future investigation of this technology will include the optimisation of the packaging technique.

Multi-institutional investigation into the robustness of intra-cranial multi-target stereotactic radiosurgery plans to delivery errors.

BACKGROUND: The use of modulated techniques for intra-cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) results in highly modulated fields with small apertures, which may be susceptible to uncertainties in the delivery device. PURPOSE: This study aimed to quantify the impact of simulated delivery errors on treatment plan dosimetry and how this is affected by treatment planning system (TPS), plan geometry, delivery technique, and plan complexity. A beam modelling error was also included as context to the dose uncertainties due to treatment delivery errors. METHODS: Delivery errors were assessed for multiple-target brain SRS plans obtained through the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) international treatment planning challenge (2018). The challenge dataset consisted of five intra-cranial targets, each with a prescription of 20 Gy. Of the final dataset of 54 plans, 51 were created using the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique and three used intensity modulated arc therapy (IMRT). Thirty-five plans were from the Varian Eclipse TPS, 17 from Elekta Monaco TPS, and one plan each from RayStation and Philips Pinnacle TPS. The errors introduced included: monitor unit calibration errors, multi-leaf collimator (MLC) bank offset, single MLC leaf offset, couch rotations, and collimator rotations. Dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) error was also included as a beam modelling error. Dose to targets was assessed via dose covering 98% of planning target volume (PTV) (D98%), dose covering 2% of PTV (D2%), and dose covering 99% of gross tumor volume (GTV) (D99%). Dose to organs at risk (OARs) was assessed using the volume of normal brain receiving 12 Gy (V12Gy), mean dose to normal brain, and maximum dose covering 0.03cc brainstem (D0.03cc). Plan complexity was also assessed via edge metric, modulation complexity score (MCS), mean MLC gap, mean MLC speed, and plan modulation (PM). RESULTS: PTV D98% showed high robustness on average to most errors with the exception of a bank shift of 1.0 mm and large rotational errors ≥1.0° for either the couch or collimator. However, in some cases, errors close to or within generally accepted machine tolerances resulted in clinically relevant impacts. The greatest impact upon normal brain V12Gy, mean dose to normal brain, and D0.03cc brainstem was found for DLG error in alignment with other recent studies. All delivery errors had on average a minimal impact across these parameters. Comparing plans from the Monaco TPS and the Eclipse TPS, showed a lesser increase to V12Gy, mean dose to normal brain, and D0.03cc brainstem for Monaco plans (p < 0.01) when DLG error was simulated. Monaco plans also correlated to lower plan complexity. Using Spearman's correlation coefficient (r) a strong negative correlation (r ≤ -0.8) was found between the mean MLC gap and dose to OARs for DLG errors. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing MLC complexity and using larger mean MLC gaps is recommended to improve plan robustness and reduce sensitivity to delivery and modelling errors. For cases in which the calculated dose distribution or dose indices are close to the clinically acceptable limits, this is especially important.

Viability of focal dose escalation to prostate cancer intraprostatic lesions using HDR prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the viability of focal dose escalation to prostate cancer intraprostatic lesions (IPLs) from multiparametric magnetic resonance (mpMRI) and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) images using high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy (pBT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Retrospective data from 20 patients treated with HDR pBT was utilized. The interobserver contouring variability of 5 observers was quantified using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean distance to agreement (MDA). Uncertainty in propagating IPL contours to trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) was quantified using a tissue equivalent prostate phantom. Feasibility of incorporating IPLs into HDR pBT planning was tested on retrospective patient data. RESULTS: The average observer DSC was 0.65 (PSMA-PET) and 0.52 (mpMRI). The uncertainty in propagating IPL contours was 0.6 mm (PSMA-PET), and 0.4 mm (mpMRI). Uncertainties could be accounted for by expanding IPL contours by 2 mm to create IPL PTVs. The mean D98% achieved using HDR pBT was 166% and 135% for the IPL and IPL PTV contours, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Focal dose escalation to IPLs identified on either PSMA-PET or mpMRI is viable using TRUS-based HDR pBT. Utilizing HDR pBT allows dose escalation of up to 166% of the prescribed dose to the prostate.

Feasibility of online adaptive HDR prostate brachytherapy: A novel treatment concept.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of online adaptive transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-based high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (HDRPBT) through retrospective simulation of source positioning and catheter swap errors on patient treatment plans. METHOD: Source positioning errors (catheter shifts in 1 mm increments in the cranial/caudal, anterior/posterior, and medial/lateral directions up to ±6 mm) and catheter swap errors (between the most and least heavily weighted) were introduced retrospectively into DICOM treatment plans of 20 patients that previously received TRUS HDRPBT. Dose volume histogram (DVH) indices were monitored as errors were introduced sequentially into individual catheters, simulating potential errors throughout treatment. Whenever DVH indices were outside institution thresholds: prostate V100% <95%, urethra D0.1cc >118% and rectum Dmax >80%, the plan was adapted using remaining catheters (i.e., simulating previous catheters as previously delivered). The final DVH indices were recorded. RESULTS: Prostate coverage (V100% >95%) could be maintained for source position errors up to 6 mm through online plan adaptation. The source position error at which the urethra D0.1cc and rectum Dmax was able to return to clinically acceptable levels using online adaptation varied between 6 mm to 1 mm, depending on the direction of the source position error and patient anatomy. After introduction of catheter swap errors to patient plans, prostate V100% was recoverable using online adaptation to near original plan characteristics. Urethra D0.1cc and rectum Dmax showed less recoverability. CONCLUSION: Online adaptive HDRPBT maintains the prostate V100% to clinically acceptable values for majority of directional shifts. However, the current online adaptive method may not correct for source position errors near organs at risk.

Detection of rotational errors in single-isocenter multiple-target radiosurgery: Is a routine off-axis Winston-Lutz test necessary?

PURPOSE: Recently the use of linear accelerator (linac)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has increased, including single-isocenter multiple-target SRS. The workload of medical physicists has grown as a result and so has the necessity of maximizing the efficiency of quality assurance (QA). This study aimed to determine if measurement-based patient-specific QA with a high-spatial-resolution dosimeter is sensitive to rotational errors, potentially reducing the need for routine off-axis Winston-Lutz (WL) testing. METHODS: The impact of rotational errors along gantry, couch, and collimator axes on dose coverage of the gross tumor volume (GTV) and planning target volume (PTV) was determined with a 1-mm GTV/PTV expansion margin. Two techniques, the off-axis WL test using the StereoPHAN MultiMet-WL Cube (Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, Florida, USA) and patient-specific QA using the SRS MapCHECK (Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, Florida, USA), were assessed on their ability to detect introduced errors before target coverage was compromised. These findings were also considered in the context of routine machine QA of rotational axis calibrations. RESULTS: Rotational errors significantly impacted PTV dose coverage, especially in the couch angle. GTV dose coverage remained unaffected except for with large couch angle errors (≥1.5°). The off-axis WL test was shown to be sensitive to rotational errors with results consistently exceeding tolerance levels when or before coverage fell below departmentally accepted limits. Although patient-specific QA using the SRS MapCHECK was previously validated for SRS, this study showed inconsistency in detection of rotational errors. CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that off-axis WL testing be conducted regularly to supplement routine monthly machine QA, as it is sensitive to errors that patient-specific QA may not detect. This frequency should be determined by individual departments, with consideration of GTV-PTV margins used, limitations on target off-axis distances, and routine mechanical QA results for particular linacs.

HDR prostate brachytherapy plan robustness and its effect on in-vivo source tracking error thresholds: A multi-institutional study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of departmental planning techniques on appropriate in-vivo source tracking error thresholds for high dose rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy (BT) treatments, and to determine if a single in-vivo source tracking error threshold would be appropriate for the same patient anatomy. METHODS: The prostate, rectum, and urethra were contoured on a single patient transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) dataset. Anonymized DICOM files were disseminated to 16 departments who created an HDR prostate BT treatment plan on the dataset with a prescription dose of 15 Gy in a single fraction. Departments were asked to follow their own local treatment planning guidelines. Source positioning errors were then simulated in the 16 treatment plans and the effect on dose-volume histogram (DVH) indices calculated. Change in DVH indices were used to determine appropriate in-vivo source tracking error thresholds. Plans were considered to require intervention if the following DVH conditions occurred: prostate V100% < 90%, urethra D0.1cc > 118%, and rectumtt Dmax > 80%. RESULTS: There was wide variation in appropriate in-vivo source tracking error thresholds among the 16 participating departments, ranging from 1 to 6 mm. Appropriate in-vivo source tracking error thresholds were also found to depend on the direction of the source positioning error and the endpoint. A robustness parameter was derived, and found to correlate with the sensitivity of plans to source positioning errors. CONCLUSIONS: A single HDR prostate BT in-vivo source tracking error threshold cannot be applied across multiple departments, even for the same patient anatomy. The burden on in-vivo source tracking devices may be eased through improving HDR prostate BT plan robustness during the plan optimisation phase.

Current status of intra-cranial stereotactic radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery in Australia and New Zealand: key considerations from a workshop and surveys.

Recently, there has been increased interest worldwide in the use of conventional linear accelerator (linac)-based systems for delivery of stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) contrasting with historical delivery in specialised clinics with dedicated equipment. In order to gain an understanding and define the current status of SRS/SRT delivery in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) we conducted surveys and provided a single-day workshop. Prior to the workshop ANZ medical physicists were invited to complete two surveys: a departmental survey regarding SRS/SRT practises and equipment; and an individual survey regarding opinions on current and future SRS/SRT practices. At the workshop conclusion, attendees completed a second opinion-based survey. Workshop discussion and survey data were utilised to identify areas of consensus, and areas where a community consensus was unclear. The workshop was held on the 8th Sept 2020 virtually due to pandemic-related travel restrictions and was attended by 238 radiation oncology medical physicists from 39 departments. The departmental survey received 32 responses; a further 89 and 142 responses were received to the pre-workshop and post-workshop surveys respectively. Workshop discussion indicated a consensus that for a department to offer an SRS/SRT service, a minimum case load should be considered depending on availability of training, peer-review, resources and equipment. It was suggested this service may be limited to brain metastases only, with less common indications reserved for departments with comprehensive SRS/SRT programs. Whilst most centres showed consensus with treatment delivery techniques and image guidance, opinions varied on the minimum target diameter and treatment margin that should be applied.

Investigation of in vivo source tracking error thresholds for interstitial and intra-cavitary high-dose-rate cervical brachytherapy.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine a comprehensive in vivo source tracking error thresholds in high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Achieving this enables the definition of an action level for imminent in vivo source tracking technologies and treatment monitoring devices, preventing clinically relevant changes to the applied dose. Material and methods: Retrospective HDR interstitial (n = 10) and intra-cavitary (n = 20) cervical brachytherapy patients were randomly selected to determine the feasibility of implementing in vivo source tracking error thresholds. A script was developed to displace all dwell positions in each treatment plan, along all major axes from their original position. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) indices were calculated without re-optimization of modified plans to determine the appropriate in vivo source tracking error thresholds in each direction. Results: In vivo source tracking error thresholds were directionally dependent; the smallest were found to be 2 mm in the anterior and posterior directions for both interstitial and intra-cavitary treatments. High-risk clinical treatment volume (HR-CTV) coverage was significantly impacted by displacements of 4 to 5 mm along each axis. Critically, there was a large variation in DVH metrics with displacement due to change in dwell weightings and patient anatomy. Conclusions: Determining the dosimetric impact of dwell position displacement provides a clinical benchmark for the development of pre-treatment verification devices and an action level for real-time treatment monitoring. It was established that an in vivo source tracking error threshold needs to be patient-specific. In vivo source tracking error thresholds should be determined for each patient, and can be conducted with extension of the method established in this work.

The use of collimator angle optimization and jaw tracking for VMAT-based single-isocenter multiple-target stereotactic radiosurgery for up to six targets in the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system.

PURPOSE: Island blocking occurs in single-isocenter multiple-target (SIMT) stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS) whenever targets share multi-leaf collimator (MLC) leaf pairs. This study investigated the effect on plan quality and delivery, of reducing island blocking through collimator angle optimization (CAO). In addition, the effect of jaw tracking in this context was also investigated. METHODS: For CAO, an algorithm was created that selects the collimator angle resulting in the lowest level of island blocking, for each beam in any given plan. Then, four volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) SIMT SRS plans each were generated for 10 retrospective patients: two CAO plans, with and without jaw tracking, and two plans with manually selected collimator angles, with and without jaw tracking. Plans were then assessed and compared using typical quality assurance procedures. RESULTS: There were no substantial differences between plans with and without CAO. Jaw tracking produced statistically significant reduction in low-dose level parameters; healthy brain V10% and mean dose were reduced by 9.66% and 15.58%, respectively. However, quantitative values (108 cc for V10% and 0.35 Gy for mean dose) were relatively small in relation to clinical relevance. Though there were no statistically significant changes in plan deliverability, there was a notable trend of plans with jaw tracking having lower gamma analysis pass rates. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that CAO has limited benefit in VMAT SIMT SRS of 2-6 targets when using a low-dose penalty to the healthy brain during plan optimization in Eclipse. As clinical benefits of jaw tracking were found to be minimal and plan deliverability was potentially reduced, a cautious approach would be to exclude jaw tracking in SIMT SRS plans.

Use of deformable image registration techniques to estimate dose to organs at risk following prostate external beam radiation therapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation was to examine differences in estimates of accumulated rectal dose when using deformable image registration (DIR) compared with rigid image registration (RIR) methods, and parameter addition methods for combined transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) treatments of prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, data from 10 patients who had previously received HDR-BT in one 15 Gy fraction, followed by 46 Gy EBRT in twenty-three fractions were used. To estimate total combined dose to the rectum, dose accumulation using both DIR and RIR methods were compared with parameter addition methods, which assume the same region of rectal anatomy receives the maximum dose from both treatment modalities. For both rigid and deformable image registration techniques, the quality of image registration was evaluated through metrics, including mean distance to agreement and dice similarity coefficient of prostate contours. Total D1cc and D2cc for the rectum was calculated and compared using each method. RESULTS: The parameter addition methods predicted the highest accumulated dose to the rectum. On average, the predicted D2cc dose was higher than that calculated by the DIR method by 6.59 Gy EQD2 (range, -3.03 to 13.68 Gy EQD2) for partial parameter addition (PPA), and 4.88 Gy EQD2 (range, -3.41 to 11.97 Gy EQD2) for the full parameter addition (FPA) methods. Similarly, RIR predicted higher average doses compared with DIR, with a difference of 3.46 Gy EQD2 (range, -5.50 to 7.90 Gy EQD2). The results showed a significant difference between DIR and parameter addition methods for dose estimation. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study demonstrates significant differences in accumulated rectal dose prediction using different image registration methods. Each method has limitations in its application, and when used with real-time HDR-BT dose planning, awareness of these limitations is essential.

Comparison of TG43 and Hounsfield Unit-based TG186 brachytherapy dose metrics in Oncentra Brachy for 100 patients receiving interstitial partial breast irradiation.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to conduct a retrospective analysis of 100 patients who received interstitial accelerated partial breast irradiation at a single institution, comparing the standard American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group (TG) 43 dose calculation algorithm to the model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) available in the Oncentra Brachy treatment planning system. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Dose-volume histogram parameters were compared between the different dose calculation algorithms for the planning target volume and organs at risk. and a statistical analysis was performed. The resulting changes in isodose distribution were assessed, with the worst-case data presented. RESULTS: The TG43 algorithm calculated higher doses to all structures compared with the MBDCAs. The largest discrepancy was observed for the skin, with maximum doses on average 2.0% lower with the MBDCA. The newly released Hounsfield Unit-based algorithm further decreased the skin dose compared with TG43 by <0.5%. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the differences between TG43 and MBDCA as implemented in Oncentra Brachy for accelerated partial breast irradiation are clinically insignificant in the treatment area and nearby organs at risk. Justification for investing in MBDCAs for this treatment site is limited when considering the additional calculation time, introduced uncertainties, and cost.

An international survey on the clinical use of rigid and deformable image registration in radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: Rigid image registration (RIR) and deformable image registration (DIR) are widely used in radiotherapy. This project aims to capture current international approaches to image registration. METHODS: A survey was designed to identify variations in use, resources, implementation, and decision-making criteria for clinical image registration. This was distributed to radiotherapy centers internationally in 2018. RESULTS: There were 57 responses internationally, from the Americas (46%), Australia/New Zealand (32%), Europe (12%), and Asia (10%). Rigid image registration and DIR were used clinically for computed tomography (CT)-CT registration (96% and 51%, respectively), followed by CT-PET (81% and 47%), CT-CBCT (84% and 19%), CT-MR (93% and 19%), MR-MR (49% and 5%), and CT-US (9% and 0%). Respondent centers performed DIR using dedicated software (75%) and treatment planning systems (29%), with 84% having some form of DIR software. Centers have clinically implemented DIR for atlas-based segmentation (47%), multi-modality treatment planning (65%), and dose deformation (63%). The clinical use of DIR for multi-modality treatment planning and accounting for retreatments was considered to have the highest benefit-to-risk ratio (69% and 67%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This survey data provides useful insights on where, when, and how image registration has been implemented in radiotherapy centers around the world. DIR is mainly in clinical use for CT-CT (51%) and CT-PET (47%) for the head and neck (43-57% over all use cases) region. The highest benefit-risk ratio for clinical use of DIR was for multi-modality treatment planning and accounting for retreatments, which also had higher clinical use than for adaptive radiotherapy and atlas-based segmentation.

Towards real time in-vivo rectal dosimetry during trans-rectal ultrasound based high dose rate prostate brachytherapy using MOSkin dosimeters.

PURPOSE: To compare the dose measured by MOSkin dosimeters coupled to a trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) probe to the dose predicted by the brachytherapy treatment planning system (BTPS) during high dose rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy (pBT), and to examine the feasibility of performing real-time catheter-by-catheter analysis of in-vivo rectal dosimetry during TRUS based HDR pBT. METHOD: Four MOSkin dosimeters were coupled to a TRUS probe during 20 TRUS-based HDR pBT treatment fractions. The measured MOSkin doses were retrospectively compared to those predicted by the BTPS for the total treatment fraction, as well as on a per catheter basis. RESULTS: The average relative percentage difference between MOSkin measured and BTPS predicted doses for a total treatment fraction was 0.3% ± 11.6% (k = 1), with a maximum of 23.2% and a minimum of -29.0%. The average relative percentage difference per catheter was +2.5% ± 16.9% (k = 1). The majority (64%) of per catheter MOSkin measured doses agreed with the treatment planning system within the calculated uncertainty budget of 12.3%. CONCLUSION: The results of the study agreed well with previously published data, despite differences in clinical workflows. To improve the redundancy to potential dosimeter errors, a minimum of 4 MOSkin dosimeters should be used when performing real-time in-vivo rectal dosimetry for HDR pBT, and error thresholds should be based off the total combined uncertainty estimate of measurement. 'Real time' error thresholds can be more confidently applied in the future through enhanced integration between IVD systems with both the imaging device and the BTPS/afterloader.

Deforming to Best Practice: Key considerations for deformable image registration in radiotherapy.

Image registration is a process that underlies many new techniques in radiation oncology - from multimodal imaging and contour propagation in treatment planning to dose accumulation throughout treatment. Deformable image registration (DIR) is a subset of image registration subject to high levels of complexity in process and validation. A need for local guidance to assist in high-quality utilisation and best practice was identified within the Australian community, leading to collaborative activity and workshops. This report communicates the current limitations and best practice advice from early adopters to help guide those implementing DIR in the clinic at this early stage. They are based on the state of image registration applications in radiotherapy in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ), and consensus discussions made at the 'Deforming to Best Practice' workshops in 2018. The current status of clinical application use cases is presented, including multimodal imaging, automatic segmentation, adaptive radiotherapy, retreatment, dose accumulation and response assessment, along with uptake, accuracy and limitations. Key areas of concern and preliminary suggestions for commissioning, quality assurance, education and training, and the use of automation are also reported. Many questions remain, and the radiotherapy community will benefit from continued research in this area. However, DIR is available to clinics and this report is intended to aid departments using or about to use DIR tools now.

The RABBIT risk-based approach to clinical implementation of new technology: SRS as a case study.

Radiation oncology technology continues to evolve rapidly, resulting in advanced versions frequently being brought to market. Before a new product is used standard tests are carried out to reduce the risks associated with failure of the equipment to comply with well-established technical specifications. It is much harder to identify and reduce the risks associated with how the new technology is used clinically, such as those related to poor communication and high workload. To ensure that new technology and techniques are used safely and appropriately the implementation project should be managed by a multidisciplinary team (MDT) made up of representatives from all the relevant professions. The MDT's role is to agree on the project scope, identify and rank all risks and benefits, and direct resources towards mitigating the highest risks. Before clinical release there should be consensus from the MDT that the benefits of the new technology outweigh the residual risks. The introduction of initiatives to optimise current practice may involve major changes which can be met with barriers such as limited support from management, insufficient time for MDT meetings, and staff fearful of being shown to have poor practices. To help overcome these challenges our team at St George Hospital Cancer Care Centre has developed a Risk and Benefit Balance Impact Template (RABBIT), which guides an MDT through the rapid implementation and safe use of new technology and techniques with an easy to follow Microsoft Word document. The implementation of stereotactic radiosurgery is used as a case study to illustrate the RABBIT methodology. The RABBIT is a user-friendly method for a busy radiotherapy clinic to transition to a risk-based MDT approach for the implementation of new technologies and techniques. When staff from all disciplines feel empowered to raise concerns about risks the workplace become inherently safer for patients and staff alike.

Low-dose-rate iodine-125 seed air kerma strength measurement intercomparison.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the rate of compliance of air kerma strength (AKS) measurements of iodine-125 (I-125) seeds with international recommendations by departments in Australia and determine the potential impact of noncompliance. METHODS AND MATERIALS: To achieve this aim, we present an intercomparison of AKS measurements for a single I-125 seed performed by 11 radiotherapy departments in Australia. Measurements were performed at two sites, with each participating department traveling to one of the two host sites and measuring the AKS using their own equipment and local protocols. Each of the AKS measurements was compared with each other and the manufacturer-certified AKS. RESULTS: Nine of the 11 participating departments measured AKS fell within ±3% of the manufacturer's calibration certificate value, whereas all participating departments measured AKS within ±5% of the manufacturer's calibration certificate value. The total spread of the measured AKS among the 11 departments was 7.7%. Only two of the 11 participating departments complied with international recommendations and had their well chamber calibrated within the last 2 years. In addition, 2 of the 11 departments used a well chamber calibrated that was calibrated with a different seed model used during the intercomparison, whereas 4 of the 11 departments calibrated their well chamber "in-house" using a factory-calibrated seed provided by the seed manufacturer. CONCLUSIONS: A significant variation in the methods used and frequency of calibration of well chambers were observed among the participating departments. The results of this study support the international recommendations on frequency and methodology of well chamber calibration. Failure to follow these recommendations significantly increases the uncertainty in AKS measurement of I-125 seeds.

Derivation of in vivo source tracking error thresholds for TRUS-based HDR prostate brachytherapy through simulation of source positioning errors.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to simulate treatment planning source positioning errors in transrectal ultrasound-based real-time high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy treatments and determine appropriate in vivo source tracking error thresholds. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment planning source positioning errors were simulated for 20 patient plans in the brachytherapy treatment planning system by manually adjusting the dwell position coordinates within selected catheters without plan reoptimization. The change in dose-volume histogram (DVH) indices was calculated as a function of the source positioning error. The magnitude of the change in the DVH indices was then used to derive appropriate in vivo source tracking error thresholds. RESULTS: Source positioning error thresholds to prevent potentially significant changes in prostate (target) DVH metrics ranged from 2 to 5 mm, dependent on the direction of the source positioning error, as well as the relative weight of the dwell position within the plan, and its position relative to the patient anatomy. Source positioning error thresholds to prevent potentially clinically significant changes in organ at risk DVH metrics were found to be complex and patient-dependent. CONCLUSIONS: In vivo source tracking error thresholds for transrectal ultrasound-based real-time high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy were investigated via the simulation of treatment planning source positioning errors. These error thresholds were found to be dependent not only on the direction of the error, but also on the endpoint. There is still the potential for larger changes in DVH indices to occur for catheter shifts smaller than the proposed threshold levels in this study.