Data for validation and adjustment of APACHE II score in cardiogenic shock patients treated with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device.

A precise prognosis is of imminent importance in intensive care medicine. This article provides data showing the overestimation of intrahospital mortality by APACHE II score in various subgroups of cardiogenic shock patients treated with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device. The data set includes additional baseline characteristics regarding age, pre-existing diseases, characteristics of coronary artery disease, characteristics of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and hemodynamic parameter not included in the APACHE II score. Further data were provided which characterize derivation and validation group. Both groups were used for adjustment of the APACHE II approach. The data are supplemental to our original research article titled "Predictive value of the APACHE II score in cardiogenic shock patients treated with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device" (Mierke et al., IJC Heart & Vasculature. 40 (2022) 101013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101013).

Predictive value of the APACHE II score in cardiogenic shock patients treated with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device.

Background: The APACHE II score assesses patient prognosis in intensive care units. Different disease entities are predictable by using a specific factor called Diagnostic Category Weight (DCW). We aimed to validate the prognostic value of the APACHE II score in patients treated with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device because of refractory cardiogenic shock (CS). Methods: From the Dresden Impella Registry, we analyzed 180 patients receiving an Impella CP®. The main outcome was the observed intrahospital mortality ( S ^ ( t h o s p ) ), which was compared to the predicted mortality estimated by the APACHE II score. Results: The APACHE II score, which was 33.5 ± 0.6, significantly overestimated intrahospital mortality ( S ^ ( t h o s p ) 54.4 ± 3.7% vs. APACHE II 74.6 ± 1.6%; p < 0.001). Nevertheless, the APACHE II score showed an acceptable accuracy to predict intrahospital mortality (ROC AUC 0.70; 95% CI 0.62-0.78). Thus, we adapted the formula for calculation of predicted mortality by adjusting DCW. The total registry cohort was randomly divided into derivation group for calculation of adjusted DCW and validation group for testing. Intrahospital mortality was much more precisely predicted using the adjusted DCW compared to the conventional DCW (difference of predicted and observed mortality: -4.7 ± 2.4% vs. -23.2 ± 2.3%; p < 0.001). The new calculated DCW was -1.183 for the total cohort. Conclusion: The APACHE II score has an acceptable accuracy for the prediction of intrahospital mortality but overestimates its total amount in CS patients. Adjustment of the DCW can lead to a much more precise prediction of prognosis.