Increased incidence of traumatic spinal injury in patients aged 65 years and older in the Netherlands.

PURPOSE: The global population is ageing rapidly. As a result, an increasing number of older patients with traumatic spine injuries are seen in hospitals worldwide. However, it is unknown how the incidence of traumatic spinal injury has developed over the past decade. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the incidence and characteristics of traumatic spinal injury in patients aged under and above 65 years. METHODS: During three time periods: 2009-2010, 2014-2015 and 2019-2020, all adult patients with traumatic spinal injury in the Netherlands were identified from the Dutch National Trauma Registry. Patient-related characteristics and 1-year mortality were collected from a subgroup of patients treated at a level-1 trauma centre, and patients aged ≥ 65 years were compared to patients aged < 65 years. RESULTS: In the Dutch National Trauma Registry 25,737 patients with traumatic spinal injury were identified. The incidence of spine injury in patients > 65 years was 49.5/100,000/yr in 2009-2010, 68.8 in 2014-2015 and 65.9 in 2019-2020. The percentage of patients ≥ 65 years increased from 37% in 2009-2010, to 43% in 2014-2015, and to 47% in 2019-2020. In the subgroup of 1054 patients treated in a level-1 trauma centre, a similar increasing incidence was seen in patients aged ≥ 65 years. In these patients low energy falls were the most common trauma mechanism and the cervical spine was the most commonly injured region. Moreover, patients ≥ 65 years had significantly higher 1-year mortality compared with patients aged < 65 years, 22.7% versus 9.2%. CONCLUSION: The incidence of traumatic spinal injury in older patients in the Netherlands has increased over the last 12 years. Almost half of the patients with traumatic spinal injury are currently aged ≥ 65 years. The increasing incidence and the high 1-year mortality highlight the need to modify existing treatment protocols for these patients.

The Impact of Delirium on Recovery in Geriatric Rehabilitation after Acute Infection.

OBJECTIVES: Delirium is common during acute infection in older patients and is associated with functional decline. Geriatric rehabilitation (GR) can help older patients to return to their premorbid functional level. It is unknown whether delirium affects GR outcomes in patients with acute infection. We evaluated whether delirium affects trajectories of activities of daily living (ADL) and quality of life (QoL) recovery in GR after COVID-19 infection. DESIGN: This study was part of the EU-COGER study, a multicenter cohort study conducted between October 2020 and October 2021. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants were recruited after COVID-19 infection from 59 GR centers in 10 European countries. METHODS: Data were collected at GR admission, discharge, and at the 6-week and 6-month follow-ups. Trajectories of ADL [using the Barthel index (BI)] and QoL [using the EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L)] recovery were examined using linear mixed models. RESULTS: Of the 723 patients included (mean age 75.5 ± 9.9 years; 52.4% male), 28.9% had delirium before or during GR admission. Participants with delirium recovered in ADL at approximately the same rate as those without (linear slope effect = -0.13, SE 0.16, P = .427) up to an estimated BI score of 16.1 at 6 months. Similarly, participants with delirium recovered in QoL at approximately the same rate as those without (linear slope effect = -0.017, SE 0.015, P = .248), up to an estimated EQ-5D-5L score of 0.8 at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Presence of delirium during the acute phase of infection or subsequent GR did not influence the recovery trajectory of ADL functioning and QoL.

Gait speed reference values in community-dwelling older adults - Cross-sectional analysis from the Rotterdam Study.

BACKGROUND: Gait speed is a simple, inexpensive and clinically useful marker of physical function in older adults. We aimed to establish gait speed reference values for community-dwelling older adults. To this end, we further explored the association of age, sex and height with gait speed. METHODS: This study included community-dwelling participants aged 50 years and over enrolled in the Rotterdam Study. Participants completed the gait protocol between 2009 and 2016. The mean gait speed was calculated for age and height groups, stratified by sex. Reference values for gait speed were calculated using a quantile regression model adjusted for sex, the non-linear effects of age and height, as well as the interaction between age and sex plus the interaction between age and height. RESULTS: The study population included 4656 Dutch participants with a mean (standard deviation) age of 67.7 (9.5) years, comprising 2569 (55.2%) women. The mean height of the participants was 1.69 (0.10) meters and the mean gait speed was 1.20 (0.20) m/s. Gait speed was lower with older age and greater with taller stature, but the effect of height disappeared above the age of 80 years. Sex did not affect gait speed after accounting for age and height. Age-, sex-, and height-specific reference values for gait speed are available for use at https://emcbiostatistics.shinyapps.io/GaitSpeedReferenceValues/. CONCLUSIONS: We found that height explains the commonly noted difference in usual gait speed between sexes and that neither height nor sex impacts gait speed in the very oldest adults. We developed reference values for usual gait speed in Western European community-dwelling older adults.

High fall incidence and fracture rate in elderly dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Although it is recognised that the dialysis population is ageing rapidly, geriatric complications such as falls are poorly appreciated, despite the many risk factors for falls in this population. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence, complications and risk factors for falls in an elderly dialysis population. METHODS: A one-year observational study of chronic dialysis patients aged ≥ 70 years. At baseline, patient characteristics were noted and during follow-up the vital parameters and laboratory values were recorded. Patients were questioned weekly about falls, fall circumstances and consequences by trained nurses. RESULTS: 49 patients were included with a median age of 79.3 years (70-89 years). During follow-up 40 fall accidents occurred in 27 (55%) patients. Falls resulted in fractures in 15% of cases and in hospital admissions in 15%. In haemodialysis (HD) patients, the mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) before HD was lower in fallers compared with non-fallers (130 vs. 143 mmHg). Several patients in the lower blood pressure category received antihypertensive medication. For every 5 mmHg lower SBP (before HD) the fall risk increased by 30% (hazard ratio (HR) 1.30, 95% CI 1.03-1.65, p = 0.03). Furthermore, fall risk increased by 22% for every 10 pmol/l rise of parathyroid hormone (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.06-1.39, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly dialysis patients have a high incidence of falls accompanied by a high fracture rate. Given the high complication rate, elderly patients at risk of falling should be identified and managed. Reduction of blood pressure-lowering medication might be a treatment strategy to reduce falls.