[Exhaustivity and critical tone of the news in print media reporting medical innovations]. / Exhaustividad y tono crítico de las noticias en la prensa escrita que informan de una innovación médica.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify how exhaustive and critical were stories reporting medical innovations published in print media and to analyze the characteristics that may be related. METHOD: Content analysis of the newspapers stories related to the discovery, introduction or improvement of a medical innovation through a questionnaire with ten criteria that allows calculating an overall score of exhaustiveness. The critical view was also included. RESULTS: We analyzed 204 newspapers stories that on average obtained a comprehensiveness score of 4.5. Were optimistic 70% of the stories. The most valued criteria were: level of detail of the explanation of the innovation and the correct differentiation between facts and opinions. While the worst-valued criteria were: disclosure of financial conflicts of interest and the quantification of harms. The variables author, length of the story and classification of the innovation were related to both the comprehensiveness score and the critical view. The comprehensiveness score was also related to the pathology, number of sources of information and the critical tone of the story, while the critical view was also related to the newspapers diffusion and the relevance of the news. CONCLUSIONS: The analyzed stories presented inaccuracies, biases or an excess of optimism (either intentional or involuntary). Some aspects of the stories discussed in more detail would provide solutions to many of the identified shortcomings.

Participación ciudadana en los comités éticos institucionales de investigación clínica y asistenciales de Cataluña / Participation of civilians in Catalonian clinical research and health care institutional ethical review committees / Participação dos cidadãos na pesquisa clínica institucional das comissões éticas e cuidado na Catalunha

Resumen: Objetivo: Conocer el nivel de participación de pacientes, usuarios y ciudadanos en los comités de ética de la investigación (CEI) y los comités de ética asistencial (CEA) acreditados en Cataluña. Material y métodos: Estudio descriptivo transversal en una muestra oportunista de 30 CEI y CEA. Se administró un cuestionario dirigido a los presidentes y al representante de los usuarios o ciudadanos (miembro lego). Para la interpretación de los resultados se analizó medias y desviación estándar. Las respuestas a las preguntas de texto abierto se analizaron mediante un análisis cualitativo del contenido. Resultados: Del total de los 30 comités de ética (CEI y CEA) contactados, 12 (40%) aceptaron participar. En total se realizaron 15 entrevistas (9 miembros de CEI y 6 miembros de CEA): 8 presenciales, 4 telefónicamente y 3 contestadas por correo electrónico. Resultados de los CEI: del total de 7 CEI entrevistados, 2 tenían representación ciudadana en su comité. El perfil correspondía a una mujer, de profesión administrativa y a un hombre de profesión auditor contable, ambos de más de 50 años. Resultados de los CEA: de los 5 CEA que participaron, 2 declararon tener representación de la ciudanía. El perfil correspondía a una mujer, de profesión administrativa y a un hombre de profesión profesor, ambos de más de 50 años. Discusión: Actualmente hay poca representación de la ciudadanía/pacientes en los comités éticos institucionales. Constituye un tema actual de debate la necesidad de incorporar el punto de vista del ciudadano/paciente, habiendo, sin embargo, un desconocimiento sobre el perfil más idóneo y en discusión su representatividad.

Abstract: Aim: To know the level of participation of patients, users and civilians in scientific ethical review committees (SERC) and health care ethical review committees (HCERC) accredited in Catalonian. Materials and methods: Descriptive transversal study using an opportunistic sample of 30 SERC and HCERC. A questionnaire was filled out addressed to presidents and consumer or civilian (lay member) representatives. For the interpretation of results means and standard deviations were analyzed. Answers to open texts questions were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results: 12 committees (40%) accepted to participate; 15 interviews were carried out (9 SERC members and 6 HCERC members): 8 person to person, 4 by phone and 3 by email. SERC Results: Of 7 SERC interviewed, 2 have a civilian representative in the committee. The profile was a woman of administrative profession and an auditor accountant man, both older than 50 years. HCERC Results: Of 5 HCERC participating, 2 declared having a civilian representative. The profile was a woman of administrative profession and a man teacher, both older than 50 years. Discussion: Currently, there is low civilian/patient representation in institutional ethical review committees. Today, the need to incorporate the point of view of the civilian/patient is a debatable issue, being unknown the suitable profile and their representativeness is under discussion.

Resumo: Objetivo: Conhecer o nível de participação de pacientes, usuários e cidadãos em comitês de ética de pesquisa (CEI) e as comissões de ética de cuidados de saúde (CEA) acreditados na Catalunha. Material e métodos: Estudo descritivo, transversal em uma amostra oportunista de 30 CEI e CEA. Um questionário dirigido aos presidentes e representante dos usuários ou cidadãos (membro de leigo) foi administrado. Para a interpretação dos resultados foi feita uma análise que incluiu as médias e o desvio-padrão. Analisaram-se as respostas às perguntas do texto aberto com uma análise qualitativa do conteúdo. Resultados: Do total dos 30 comitês de ética (CEI e CEA) contatados, 12 (40%) concordaram em participar. No total foram realizadas 15 entrevistas (9 membros do CEI e 6 membros da CEA). De todas as entrevistas realizadas, 8 foram presenciais, 4 foram realizadas por telefone e 3 foram respondidas por e-mail. Resultados da CEI: do total de 7 entrevistados da CEI, 2 tinham representação cidadã na sua Comissão. O perfil correspondia a uma mulher, de carreira administrativa e a um home de profissão auditor contábil, ambos com mais de 50 anos. Resultados da CEA: dos 5 CEA que participaram, 2 declararam ter representação cidadã. O perfil correspondente era de uma mulher, de carreira administrativa e a um homem professor, ambos com mais de 50 anos. Discussão: Atualmente há pouca representação dos cidadãos/pacientes em comitês de ética institucionais. A necessidade de incorporar o ponto de vista do cidadão/paciente constitui um tema atual de discussão, no entanto, falta conhecimento sobre o perfil mais adequado e discussão sua representatividade.

Towards the centralization of digestive oncologic surgery: changes in activity, techniques and outcome.

AIM: The objective of the present study was to examine changes in the activity, surgical techniques and results from the process of centralization of complex digestive oncologic surgery in 2005-2012 as compared to 1996-2000. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study employing the minimum basic data set of hospital discharge (MBDSHD 1996-2012) from public centers in Catalonia (Spain) was performed. The population consisted of individuals aged > 18 who underwent digestive oncologic surgery (esophagus, pancreas, liver, stomach or rectum). Medical centers were divided into low, medium, and high-volume centers (≤ 5, 6-10, and > 10 interventions/year, respectively). The tendency Chi-squared test was used to assess the centralization of patients in high-volume centers and hospital mortality evolution during the study period. Logistic regression was performed to assess the relationship between volume and outcome. RESULTS: A centralization of complex oncologic digestive surgery between 10% (liver) and 46% (esophagus) was obtained by means of a reduction in the number of hospitals that perform these interventions and a significant rise in the number of patients operated in high-volume centers (all types p ≤ 0.0001, except for esophagus). A significant decrease in mortality was observed, especially in esophagus (from 15% in 1996/2000 to 7% in 2009/12, p = 0.003) and pancreas (from 12% in 1996/2000 to 6% in 2009/12, p trend < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A centralization of oncologic digestive surgery in high-volume centers and a reduction of hospital mortality in Catalonia were reported among esophageal and pancreatic cancers. However, no significant changes were found for others cancer types.

Maps of systematic variation in renal replacement therapy in Catalonia (2002-2012). / Atlas de variaciones sistemáticas en el tratamiento sustitutivo renal en Cataluña (2002­2012).

INTRODUCTION: Variations in the use of healthcare services can be defined as systematic variations of adjusted rates for certain aggregation levels of the population. The study analyses how renal replacement therapy (RRT) is used, identifying RRT variability in Catalonia from 2002 to 2012. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ecological study by health area using data from the Catalan renal registry. We present incident rates, standardised incidence ratios and prevalence, while variability was calculated through direct and indirect standardisation methods. RESULTS: From 2002 until 31/12/2012, 10,784 patients initiated RRT in Catalonia: 9,238 on haemodialysis (HD) (50 treatments per 100,000 people 2010/2012), 1,076 on peritoneal dialysis (PD) (8.2 treatments per 100,000 people 2010/2012) and 470 received an early kidney transplant (KT) (4.4 treatments per 100,000 people 2010/2012). Over the 10 years, the HD cumulative incidence rate fell (7%), while the PD and KT incidence rates increased (63% and 177%, respectively); both are higher in young patients (<45 years). 4,750 patients received a kidney transplant in this period, 49% of which were aged between 45 and 65 years. There were no significant differences in variability in HD (RV5-95=1.3; Empirical Bayes [EB]∼ 0), or in the prevalence of KT (RV5-95=1.4; EB ∼ 0). Nevertheless, we found significant geographical variability in PD; notably in the districts of the province of Lérida, where the number of cases observed was greater than expected (RV5-95=4.01; EB=0.08). CONCLUSION: Although there was a notable rise in PD and early KT incidence rates, PD is still underused when compared to international recommendations. No territorial variability was found for HD or KT, but the use of PD was found to be higher in Lérida than in other areas. To reduce PD territorial variability and increase the uptake of this technique in the other regions, we propose 3initiatives: The development of RRT support tools for shared decision-making, the encouragement of specific PD professional training and the promotion of PD through complementary reimbursement systems.

Impact of clinical and health services research projects on decision-making: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: This article reports on the impact assessment experience of a funding program of non-commercial clinical and health services research. The aim was to assess the level of implementation of results from a subgroup of research projects (on respiratory diseases), and to detect barriers (or facilitators) in the translation of new knowledge to informed decision-making. METHODS: A qualitative study was performed. The sample consisted of six projects on respiratory diseases funded by the Agency for Health Quality and Assessment of Catalonia between 1996 and 2004. Semi-structured interviews to key informants including researchers and healthcare decision-makers were carried out. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed on an individual (key informant) and group (project) basis. In addition, the differences between achieved and expected impacts were described. RESULTS: Twenty-three semi-structured interviews were conducted. Most participants indicated changes in health services or clinical practice had resulted from research. The channels used to transfer new knowledge were mainly conventional ones, but also in less explicit ways, such as with the involvement of local scientific societies, or via debates and discussions with colleagues and local leaders. The barriers and facilitators identified were mostly organizational (in research management, and clinical and healthcare practice), although there were also some related to the nature of the research as well as personal factors. Both the expected and achieved impacts enabled the identification of the gaps between what is expected and what is truly achieved. CONCLUSIONS: In this study and according to key informants, the impact of these research projects on decision-making can be direct (the application of a finding or innovation) or indirect, contributing to a more complex change in clinical practice and healthcare organization, both having other contextual factors. The channels used to transfer this new knowledge to clinical practice are complex. Local scientific societies and the relationships between researchers and decision-makers can play a very important role. Specifically, the relationships between managers and research teams and the mutual knowledge of their activity have shown to be effective in applying research funding to practice and decision-making. Finally the facilitating factors and barriers identified by the respondents are closely related to the idiosyncrasy of the human relations between the different stakeholders involved.

Characteristics of Spanish articles of "scientific quality" cited in clinical practice guidelines on mental health.

INTRODUCTION: The study aims to illustrate the impact of Spanish research in clinical decision making. To this end, we analysed the characteristics of the most significant Spanish publications cited in clinical practice guidelines (CPG) on mental health. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a descriptive qualitative study on the characteristics of ten articles cited in Spanish CPG on mental health, and selected for their "scientific quality". We analysed the content of the articles on the basis of the following characteristics: topics, study design, research centres, scientific and practical relevance, type of funding, and area or influence of the reference to the content of the guidelines. RESULTS: Among the noteworthy studies, some basic science studies, which have examined the establishment of genetic associations in the pathogenesis of mental illness are included, and others on the effectiveness of educational interventions. The content of those latter had more influence on the GPC, because they were cited in the summary of the scientific evidence or in the recommendations. Some of the outstanding features in the selected articles are the sophisticated designs (experimental or analytical), and the number of study centres, especially in international collaborations. Debate or refutation of previous findings on controversial issues may have also contributed to the extensive citation of work. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of studies in the CPG is not a sufficient condition of "quality", but their description can be instructive for the design of future research or publications.

[Health technology assessment in public health interventions: is prevention better than cure?]. / La evaluación de tecnologías sanitarias en intervenciones de salud pública: más vale prevenir que curar?

Medical activities are increasingly performed with preventive purposes, as part of community programs for secondary prevention but also as part of many clinical activities. However, there are few evaluations of preventive and health promotion activities and, in general, these evaluations only assess aspects of efficacy/effectiveness with little consideration of cost and cost-effectiveness and even less of the ethical, legal, social or organizational consequences. Given the growing interest in evaluation of these interventions from different perspectives, health technology assessment (HTA) has emerged as a multidisciplinary analysis strategy with distinct methodological approaches that may be useful to health administrations and policy-makers for decision making at different levels (micro, meso and macro). This manuscript discusses the characteristics and differential aspects related to assessment of preventive and health promotion activities. This type of evaluation poses constraints, limitations and challenges that should be considered during the process of HTA. In the case of public health there are additional challenges, because the evidence must satisfy a diverse audience, including public health professionals, clinicians, politicians, managers, economists and consumers. The challenge is even greater when evaluating complex, integrated community interventions in which local and contextual aspects are of tremendous importance. In addition, assessment of ethical issues is of the utmost importance since these issues comprise the origin of health services and the target populations are usually healthy.

Setting priorities in clinical and health services research: properties of an adapted and updated method.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study is to review the set of criteria of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) for priority-setting in research with addition of new criteria if necessary, and to develop and evaluate the reliability and validity of the final priority score. METHODS: Based on the evaluation of 199 research topics, forty-five experts identified additional criteria for priority-setting, rated their relevance, and ranked and weighted them in a three-round modified Delphi technique. A final priority score was developed and evaluated. Internal consistency, test-retest and inter-rater reliability were assessed. Correlation with experts' overall qualitative topic ratings were assessed as an approximation to validity. RESULTS: All seven original IOM criteria were considered relevant and two new criteria were added ("potential for translation into practice", and "need for knowledge"). Final ranks and relative weights differed from those of the original IOM criteria: "research impact on health outcomes" was considered the most important criterion (4.23), as opposed to "burden of disease" (3.92). Cronbach's alpha (0.75) and test-retest stability (interclass correlation coefficient = 0.66) for the final set of criteria were acceptable. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for overall assessment of priority was 0.66. CONCLUSIONS: A reliable instrument for prioritizing topics in clinical and health services research has been developed. Further evaluation of its validity and impact on selecting research topics is required.

[Current state of breast cancer surgery in Andalusia and Catalonia]. / Estado actual de la cirugía oncológica de mama en Andalucía y Cataluña.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is an essential element of breast cancer treatment. The aim of this study was to describe the progress and current practice in oncological breast surgery in Catalonia and Andalusia. MATERIAL AND METHOD: An observational study was conducted, collecting data from the Minimum Basic Data Set at Hospital Discharge. RESULTS: A total of 37,537 women from Catalonia and 24,186 from Andalusia were studied. The rate of admission due to breast cancer in women increased substantially during the study period, as well as the percentage of women who underwent breast-conserving surgery. However, the increase in breast-conserving surgery has not been consistent among age groups and hospital levels. CONCLUSIONS: As a whole, the increase in breast-conserving surgery has shown the need for interventions to promote the use of procedures of proven effectiveness.

Survival, clinical status and quality of life five years after coronary surgery. The ARCA study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the long-term outcomes of coronary surgery and their determinants in Spain. The objectives of this study were to evaluate clinical outcomes, quality of life and survival in a cohort of patients 5 years after undergoing a first aortocoronary bypass operation without any other associated procedure. METHODS: Patients who survived the operation and whose pre- and postoperative data had been collected prospectively were followed up by telephone interview after 5 years. RESULTS: Information was available after 5 years on 1,300 (85.2%) of the 1,525 patients who survived until hospital discharge. Of these, 13.6% had died, while 24% had either died, undergone revascularization or were readmitted because of a cardiac complaint. The cumulative survival rate (excluding the period of hospitalization) was 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.85-0.89). Mortality varied significantly with the level of preoperative risk (i.e. the EuroSCORE), to the extent that mortality in the low-risk group was equivalent to that in the general reference population. CONCLUSIONS: Three-quarters of patients who survived until hospital discharge after coronary surgery did not experience a major cardiac event within 5 years and their level of functioning and quality of life were good. The survival rate after the immediate postoperative period varied according to the patient's preoperative risk profile and, in low-risk patients, was equivalent to that in the general reference population.

Arthroplasty registers: a review of international experiences.

OBJECTIVES: Registers have proven to be a valuable instrument in the evaluation of arthroplasty procedures and the performance of implants. The aim of this study was to describe the structure, functioning, and content of arthroplasty registers in Europe and other parts of the world. METHODS: A search of technical reports was carried out through the Internet and in Medline/PubMed. The exhaustiveness of the information was confirmed using the links to Web pages of other registers and contacts with key people. Aims, methods in data collection and evaluation, internal structure and organization, participants, validity of the data, and other variables were assessed for each arthroplasty register using a qualitative content analysis of the texts. RESULTS: Fifteen arthroplasty registers were identified which published sufficient information to conduct a comparative analysis. Eight additional registers were identified but no information was available on the Internet or in English. Most registers were initiatives of an orthopaedic society receiving governmental funding. Data were collected using standardized clinical forms and additional information from clinical-administrative datasets or other registers (mortality, implant costs, hip fractures). The main outcome measure of these registers is survival of the prostheses. Registers use the Internet and their annual reports as the main strategy for the dissemination and feed-back of their results. CONCLUSIONS: Scientific or professional societies and the public health administration should collaborate in the development of arthroplasty registers. To adequately assess the results of observational data information on the structure, the process of arthroplasty interventions and patients characteristics should be collected.

[Hip and knee arthroplasties in Catalonia [Spain] from 1994 to 2005]. / Artroplastias de cadera y rodilla en Cataluña desde 1994 a 2005.

OBJECTIVE: Hip and knee arthroplasties are the most frequent surgical procedures in Catalonia. The aim of this study was to describe changes in the rates of these procedures and in their characteristics between 1994 and 2005. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of total hip (THR) and knee (TKR) primary and revision joint replacement discharges using the Minimum Data Set (ICD-9-CM codes 81.51, 81.53, 81.54 and 81.55). Standardized THR and TKR rates by age and sex and revision burden were calculated and changing trends were analyzed through joinpoint regression. Four time periods were defined and patient and hospital stay characteristics were analyzed by comparing period 4 with period 1 through logistic regression models. RESULTS: In THR, the rates per 10,000 inhabitants increased from 4.1 to 6.6 between 1994 and 2000. In TKR, rates increased from 2.6 to 15.5 between 1994 and 2005. Hip revision burden increased until 2001, whereas knee revision burden increased for the entire period. The main reason for surgery was osteoarthritis. In both THR and TKR, the number of patients aged 75 or older and comorbidity increased. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in the rates and the change in patients' profile may reflect broadening of the indication criteria for these procedures. The impact of the foreseeable increase in revision surgery could be reduced by developing systems to evaluate prosthesis survival and clinical practice guidelines.

Predicting in-hospital mortality with coronary bypass surgery using hospital discharge data: comparison with a prospective observational study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The aim was to determine the usefulness of the hospital discharge Minimum Basic Data Set (MBDS) for predicting in-hospital mortality with coronary bypass surgery by using data from a prospective observational study as a reference. METHODS: The observational study involved collecting data on all patients undergoing first coronary bypass surgery at five hospitals in Catalonia, Spain between November 2001 and November 2003. In addition, data covering the same period and hospitals were obtained from the MBDS for procedure code 36.1. We investigated the concordance between the information from the two data sources and logistic regression was used to derive predictive models for in-hospital mortality. The model derived using MBDS data was validated using data from the prospective observational study and MBDS data for the years 2004-2006. Model validity was evaluated using discrimination and calibration indices. RESULTS: Some 4.1% of cases in the observational study could not be found in the MBDS. The concordance between the two data sources was highly variable and generally low (kappa values ranged from 0.16 to 0.79). The discriminative ability of the MBDS model was equivalent to that of the observational study model (c=0.80 vs. c=0.79), but when the validity of the former was tested using prospective data and MBDS data for 2004-2006, the discrimination c-index decreased to 0.76 and 0.65, respectively, and the calibration worsened significantly (P< .001). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of in-hospital mortality following coronary surgery cannot be accurately evaluated using MBDS data. However, our results indicate that their use as a predictive tool could be improved.

The EuroSCORE and a local model consistently predicted coronary surgery mortality and showed complementary properties.

OBJECTIVE: To revalidate a local model for prediction of in-hospital mortality after coronary surgery several years after its introduction and the EuroSCORE in a specific area within its original scope. To assess the specific advantages of one type of instrument over the other in a definite context. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Data from consecutive patients undergoing a first isolated coronary artery bypass between November 2001 and November 2003 in five hospitals in Catalonia were prospectively collected. RESULTS: The study included 1,605 patients. Areas under the receiver-operating characteristics curves were around 0.75 for both models. Calibration was low for both models and the local model significantly overestimated risk. The ordering of operating centers by performance was identical with each strategy but the centers labeled as outliers differed. CONCLUSION: (1) Evaluation of performance of individual hospitals was consistent using both systems and almost identical when they were internally recalibrated, (2) The impact of the benchmark population characteristics on model performance may be greater than that of risk factors considered for score calculation, (3) Promoting the use of a widely used instrument as the EuroSCORE might be sufficient for most evaluations. Local scales can be useful to highlight locally relevant features and temporal trends.

Prioritisation of patients on waiting lists for hip and knee arthroplasties and cataract surgery: Instruments validation.

BACKGROUND: Prioritisation instruments were developed for patients on waiting list for hip and knee arthroplasties (AI) and cataract surgery (CI). The aim of the study was to assess their convergent and discriminant validity and inter-observer reliability. METHODS: Multicentre validation study which included orthopaedic surgeons and ophthalmologists from 10 hospitals. Participating doctors were asked to include all eligible patients placed in the waiting list for the procedures under study during the medical visit. Doctors assessed patients' priority through a visual analogue scale (VAS) and administered the prioritisation instrument. Information on socio-demographic data and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) (HUI3, EQ-5D, WOMAC and VF-14) was obtained through a telephone interview with patients. The correlation coefficients between the prioritisation instrument score and VAS and HRQOL were calculated. For the reliability study a self-administered questionnaire, which included hypothetic patients' scenarios, was sent via postal mail to the doctors. The priority of these scenarios was assessed through the prioritisation instrument. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between doctors was calculated. RESULTS: Correlations with VAS were strong for the AI (0.64, CI95%: 0.59-0.68) and for the CI (0.65, CI95%: 0.62-0.69), and moderate between the WOMAC and the AI (0.39, CI95%: 0.33-0.45) and the VF-14 and the CI (0.38, IC95%: 0.33-0.43). The results of the discriminant analysis were in general as expected. Inter-observer reliability was 0.79 (CI95%: 0.64-0.94) for the AI, and 0.79 (CI95%: 0.63-0.95) for the CI. CONCLUSION: The results show acceptable validity and reliability of the prioritisation instruments in establishing priority for surgery.

[The opinion of practitioners and internists on the impact of health technologies introduced in the last 25 years]. / Las tecnologías médicas más relevantes de los últimos 25 años según la opinión de médicos generalistas.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the most important health technologies (HT) introduced in the last 25 years and their impact on patients' health according to hospital internists and generalist physicians. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional descriptive study. The 30 HT receiving the highest number of bibliometric citations in the previous 25 years (1977-2002) in generalist and primary care journals were selected. To assess the health impact of HT, a postal survey of the medical heads of 46 hospitals with 100-400 beds and an equal random sample of the directors of primary care centers was carried out in Catalonia, Spain. The professionals surveyed were asked to consider how adverse the effect on their patients' health would be if each of the HT on the list were unavailable. The personal and professional characteristics of the participating physicians were also collected. RESULTS: A total of 49 physicians answered the survey (53%). Instrumental and diagnostic technologies were considered to have the greatest impact on health, diagnostic imaging being the most highly scored. The lowest impact would be caused if some drugs were not available, hypoglycemic agents receiving the lowest scores. Although assessments were similar regardless of professional/practice characteristics (r > or = 0.7), some differences in diagnostic HT were observed, as well as variability in the participants' responses. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of the impact of HT from the physicians' point of view varied. However, diagnostic and instrumental-visual technologies seem to be more highly rated than pharmacological innovations. Variability in responses was more closely related to the physicians' personal characteristics than to practice setting.