Real-time intraoperative functioning lumen imaging probe during endoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy (pop).

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP) has emerged as a safe and effective first line option in medically refractory gastroparesis. Determining the appropriate extent of the pyloromyotomy continues to present a challenge as there are no standardized tools for measuring changes in pyloric distensibility during the procedure. The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of using impedance planimetry with endoscopic functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) to measure changes in pyloric distensibility after POP, and to compare these changes with improvement in symptoms and objective gastric emptying. METHODS: Patients with medically refractory gastroparesis underwent POP with FLIP measurements of the pylorus (EndoFLIP®, Medtronic, Fridley MN). FLIP measurements, as well as changes in symptoms measured by the validated gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI) and scintigraphic gastric emptying studies (GES), were evaluated before and after POP. RESULTS: A total of 14 patients underwent measurement with FLIP during POP, 12 of whom had pre- and post-POP measurements. Mean pyloric diameter increased by 1.4 mm, from 13.9 mm to 15.3 mm (p = 0.0012). Mean distensibility index increased from 6.2 mm2/mmHg to 9.1 mm2/mmHg (p = 0.0074). Successful division of the pylorus was achieved in 100% of patients with a mean operative time of 36 min and no perioperative complications. The mean length of stay was 0.7 days (0-3 days). Post-POP mean GCSI score improved from 2.97 to 2.28 at a mean follow-up time of 27 days (p < 0.001). Objective improvement in gastric emptying was observed in 80% of patients with scintigraphic GES, with mean four-hour retention decreasing from 46.3% to 32.4% (p < 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: FLIP is a safe and feasible tool to provide objective measurements during POP. Larger cohorts with longer follow-up are required to determine if measured improvements in pyloric diameter and distensibility are predictive of sustained improvements in GCSI and GES.

A cooperative approach for treatment of Zenker's diverticulum.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic Zenker's diverticulum management has evolved from an open intervention to an endoscopic management. At our center, both an otolaryngologist and a gastroenterologist are present in the operating room when treating these lesions. An intra-procedural consensus is reached to undergo either rigid endoscopy or flexible endoscopic diverticulotomy with ENT guidance. We evaluated the real-world efficacy with a cooperative gastroenterology-otolaryngology approach. METHODS: Single-center retrospective study of patients who underwent a cooperative endoscopic diverticulotomy by a gastroenterologist and otolaryngologist at Cleveland Clinic Florida between 2012 and 2019. Demographic and clinical data, intra-procedural findings/complications, post-procedural symptoms, recurrence rate, and reintervention variables were extracted. Patients included in the study were > 17 years old, with symptomatic confirmed typical single Zenker's diverticulum. RESULTS: 63 subjects were identified. Patients were predominantly males (63.5%) and white (84.1%), with mean age 73.5 years (53-95). Most subjects presented dysphagia (98.4%), mostly to solids (79.4%). Other demographic and clinical data are described in Table 1. The diverticula had a mean size of 36.3 mm. In 30.1% of the cases food debris was found during the procedure. The mean procedure length was 38.4 minutes. All cases were performed as outpatient. Technical success was achieved in all cases. Patients were followed for a mean of 3.24 months post-procedure. Clinical success was achieved in 92% subjects. One intra-procedural perforation was treated with endoclip. Table 1 Pre-procedural demographic and clinical variables in patients undergoing Zenker's diverticulum cooperative approach Variable Value (n = 63) Sex, n (%)  Male  Female 40 (63.5) 23 (36.5) Ethnicity/Race, n (%)  Non-Hispanic White  Hispanic  Black 53 (84.1) 7 (11.1) 3 (4.8) Smoking status, n (%)  Never  Former  Active 29 (46.0) 26 (41.3) 8 (10.7) Previous intervention for Zenker's diverticulum, n (%) 12 (19.1) Dysphagia, n (%)  Only to solids  Only to liquids  Both solids and liquids 50 (79.4) 0 (0) 12 (19.0) Regurgitation of food, n (%)  Chronic cough, n (%) 13 (20.6)  Halitosis, n (%) 9 (14.3) CONCLUSION: A cooperative endoscopic approach by gastroenterology and otolaryngology for symptomatic Zenker's diverticulum management offered excellent technical and clinical success. This approach proved to be safe and effective.

Endoscopic mucosal incision and muscle interruption (MIMI) for the treatment of Zenker's diverticulum.

BACKGROUND: In peroral endoscopic myotomy for Zenker's diverticulum (Z-POEM), the cricopharyngeus muscle is divided within a submucosal tunnel started in the hypopharynx. We aimed to evaluate the safety and preliminary outcomes in patients who underwent a modified version of the Z-POEM where the tunnel is made directly overlying the cricopharyngeus, the mucosal incision and muscular interruption (MIMI) approach, and to compare these with patients who underwent a non-tunneled flexible endoscopic approach. METHODS: All patients with ZD who were treated by flexible endoscopy at our institution between January 2015 and February 2020 were identified by a retrospective chart review. Dysphagia symptoms were assessed using a validated scoring system. RESULTS: Nineteen patients with ZD underwent MIMI (mean age 76.1 years, 68.1% male) and seven patients underwent non-tunneled flexible endoscopic approach (mean age 64.4 years, 85.7% male) during the study period. Mean ZD size was 2.8 cm in the MIMI group and 1.9 cm in the non-tunneled group (p = 0.03). Clinical success was achieved in 17/19(89.5%) MIMI patients and 7/7(100%) of non-tunneled flexible endoscopic patients (p = 0.101). Dysphagia scores improved in both groups, although this difference was only significant in the MIMI group (p ≤ 0.001). Recurrence occurred in 2/17(11.7%) MIMI patients and 3/7(42.9%) non-tunneled flexible endoscopic patients (p = 0.096). There were 4 complications, including one pharyngeal perforation requiring open surgical repair in a patient with a small ZD with an associated cricopharyngeal bar in the MIMI group. Median length of follow-up was 290 [142; 465] days in the MIMI group and 1056 [258; 1206] days in the non-tunneled group (p = 0.094). CONCLUSIONS: MIMI is a technically feasible and effective treatment for ZD. Care should be taken in patients with a cricopharyngeal bar and small ZD, as this may increase the risk of perforation. Larger studies with long-term follow-up are needed to determine if MIMI reduces the risk of symptom recurrence when compared to non-tunneled flexible endoscopic approaches.

A History of Flexible Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Surgeons have been involved, since the beginning, in the development and evolution of endoscopy. They have been instrumental in developing new methods and have been actively involved in most of the therapeutic applications. The continued evolution of endoscopic technique is inevitable and will involve the integration of new technology with innovative thinking.

Enhanced recovery outcomes following per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP): a comparison of safety and cost with same-day discharge versus inpatient recovery.

BACKGROUND: While per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP) has shown promise as a novel endoscopic procedure to treat medically refractory gastroparesis, standardized care pathways are not well-defined. We aimed to compare the safety and cost of same-day discharge (SDD) after POP with inpatient stay overnight or longer. METHODS: All patients with SDD after POP between January 2016 and May 2018 were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained registry. Propensity scores considering gender, age, gastroparesis etiology, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class were used to match a comparison group which stayed overnight or longer. Statistical tests included two-sample t tests for continuous variables, Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, and paired sample t tests for within-group comparisons with repeated measures. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients who underwent POP with SDD during the study period were propensity-matched with 54 patients with inpatient recovery. The SDD cohort was 85.2% female with a mean age of 44.8 years and median ASA class 3. The etiology of gastroparesis was idiopathic in 53.7% (n = 29), diabetic in 29.6% (n = 16), and post-surgical in 11.1% (n = 6). Operative time was shorter in the SDD cohort (25.4 vs. 31.3 min, p = 0.02). The mean post-procedure recovery time was 4 h in patients with SDD and 29.3 h in the inpatient cohort (p < 0.001). There was a trend towards less readmissions with SDD (7.4% vs. 18.5%, p = 0.08). There was no increased risk of complications with SDD (1.9% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.57). Compared to inpatient recovery, the average total cost for the procedure, recovery, and all subsequent care within 30 days was 26.0% less with SDD (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Following POP, patients can be safely discharged the same day with low risk of both complications and readmission. Total costs in the complete perioperative period are significantly less with SDD compared to inpatient recovery.

Safety and Feasibility of Per-Oral Pyloromyotomy as Augmentative Therapy after Prior Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Gastroparesis.

BACKGROUND: For medically refractory diabetic or idiopathic gastroparesis, gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is an excellent option for symptom control; however, a small subset of patients may develop recurrent or persistent symptoms. Per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP, also described by some authors as gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy or G-POEM) is an emerging therapy for medically refractory gastroparesis. This study investigated the safety and feasibility of POP after previous GES for recurrent or persistent gastroparesis. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively identified all patients undergoing POP between January 2016 and December 2017, with GES in situ. Patient characteristics, gastroparesis etiology, and procedural data were collected. Symptoms were assessed with the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) both before and 30 to 90 days after POP. Standard pre- and post-procedure 4-hour gastric emptying tests were obtained when available. RESULTS: There were 22 patients who met inclusion criteria (81.8% female, mean age 42.3 ± 12.4 years). Causes of gastroparesis were diabetes in 38.1%, and idiopathic in 61.9%. The average time since GES insertion was 3.45 years. Mean preoperative 4-hour gastric retention was 50.1%. Most POP procedures were performed in the operating room (90.9%), with mean operative time of 40 minutes and a 1.4-day length of stay. There were 4 readmissions within 30 days, but no POP-related complications. Overall, GCSI improved by an absolute reduction of 1.63 points (p = 0.002), with significant improvements in all sub-scores. Of 11 patients with post-procedural motility or emptying studies available, 7 were normal. CONCLUSIONS: Per-oral pyloromyotomy appears to be safe and feasible for patients with recurrent gastroparesis symptoms after GES. Both symptoms and motility significantly improved in the short-term. These data replicate similar data suggesting laparoscopic pyloroplasty as an effective augmentative therapy after GES, but may provide a less invasive option for patients.

Per-Oral Pyloromyotomy (POP) for Medically Refractory Post-Surgical Gastroparesis.

BACKGROUND: Post-surgical gastroparesis (psGP) is putatively related to vagal denervation from either therapeutic transection or inadvertent injury. Here, we present a series of patients undergoing endoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP) as a treatment for medically refractory psGP. METHODS: Patients identified from a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing POP procedures at our institution from January 2016 to January 2018 were included. Surgical history, symptom scores, and gastric emptying studies before and 3 months after POP were additionally recorded. RESULTS: During the study period, 177 POP procedures were performed, of which 38 (21.5%) were for psGP. The study cohort was 84.2% female with a mean body mass index of 27.6 kg/m2 and mean age of 55.2 years. Common comorbidities included hypertension (34.2%), depression (31.6%), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (28.9%). Hiatal/paraesophageal hernia repair (39.5%) or fundoplication (36.8%) preceded psGP diagnosis most often. The mean operative time was 30 ± 20 min. There were no intraoperative complications. Mean postoperative length of stay was 1.2 days. There were two readmissions within 30 days, one for melena and one for dehydration. The mean improvement in total Gastroparesis Symptom Index Score was 1.29 (p = 0.0002). The mean 4-h gastric retention improved from a pre-POP mean of 46.4 to 17.9% post-POP. Normal gastric emptying was noted in 50% of subjects with available follow-up imaging. CONCLUSION: POP is a safe and effective endoscopic therapy for patients with psGP. POP should be considered a reasonable first-line option for patients with medically refractory psGP and may allow stomach preservation.

Laparoscopic pyloroplasty versus endoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy for the treatment of gastroparesis.

BACKGROUND: Gastroparesis is a debilitating functional disorder of the stomach characterized by delayed gastric emptying absent an obstructive etiology. Surgical or endoscopic disruption of the pylorus has been utilized to treat this disease, but there is little evidence comparing laparoscopic pyloroplasty (LP) with endoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP). Herein we describe our experience at our institution using a propensity-matched cohort study to compare outcomes between these procedures. METHODS: All patients who underwent LP for the treatment of gastroparesis from October 2014 through September 2017 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity scoring was used to match these patients 1:1 to patients undergoing POP during this time period based on gender, age, and etiology of gastroparesis. Symptom scores using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI), scintigraphic gastric emptying studies (GES), and perioperative outcomes were compared between matched cohorts. Thirty patients underwent LP for gastroparesis during the study period which were matched 1:1 with patients undergoing POP. The etiology of gastroparesis was 63.3% idiopathic (n = 19), 20.0% post-surgical (n = 6), and 16.7% diabetic (n = 5) in both cohorts. RESULTS: Patients who underwent LP had a longer average length of stay (4.6 vs. 1.4 days, p = 0.003), operative time (99.3 vs. 33.9 min, p < 0.001), and estimated blood loss (12.9 vs. 0.4 mL, p < 0.001). There were more complications in the LP cohort (16.7 vs. 3.3%, p = 0.086), which included surgical site infection (6.7 vs. 0%, p = 0.153), pneumonia (6.7 vs. 0.0%, p = 0.153), and unplanned ICU admission (10.0 vs. 0.0%, p = 0.078). LP and POP both resulted in similar, significant improvements in both in GCSI scores and objective gastric emptying. CONCLUSIONS: Per-oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (POP) is safe and effective for the treatment of medical refractory gastroparesis. POP has less perioperative morbidity compared to LP with comparative functional outcomes.

Per-oral Pyloromyotomy (POP) for Medically Refractory Gastroparesis: Short Term Results From the First 100 Patients at a High Volume Center.

OBJECTIVE: For patients with gastroparesis, temporary pyloric disruption has been shown to improve symptoms and gastric emptying. Per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP) is an innovative endoscopic procedure to divide the pylorus from within a submucosal tunnel, as a corollary to surgical pyloromyotomy. Here we evaluate subjective and objective outcomes 12-weeks after POP at a high volume center. METHODS: The first 100 consecutive patients undergoing POP were included, with procedure dates between January 2016 and October 2017. Patients were evaluated using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI), and 4-hour solid-phase scintigraphic gastric emptying studies (GES) prior to procedure and at 90 days post-POP RESULTS:: The study cohort was 85% female with a mean age of 45.0 ±â€Š14.6 years. Gastroparesis etiologies were divided among idiopathic (56%), diabetic (21%), postsurgical (19%), and other in 4%. There were 67% of the patients who had previous endoscopic or surgical interventions for gastroparesis. Most POP procedures were performed in the operating room (97%) and were completed in an average of 33 minutes. Ten patients incurred complications (10%), which included 1 diagnostic laparoscopy and 2 cases of gastrointestinal bleeding. Overall GCSI improved from a preoperative mean of 3.82 ±â€Š0.86 to 2.54 ±â€Š1.2 (P < 0.001). The improvement in each GCSI subscore was also highly statistically significant. Among the patients with postoperative GES available, 78% had objectively better 4-hour emptying with a mean improvement in retention by 23.6% (P < 0.001). This included 57% of patients with normal gastric emptying post-POP. CONCLUSION: For patients with medically refractory gastroparesis, POP results in both subjective and objective improvement in the majority of patients. Prior intervention does not obviate POP as a therapeutic option. POP should be included along the treatment algorithm for patients with gastroparesis as an organ-sparing procedure.

Comparison of laparoscopic jejunostomy tube to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube with jejunal extension: long-term durability and nutritional outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Enteral access through the jejunum is indicated when patients cannot tolerate oral intake or gastric feeding. While multiple approaches for feeding jejunal access exist, few studies have compared the efficacy of these techniques. The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term durability, re-intervention rates, and nutritional outcomes following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes with jejunal extension tubes (PEG-JET) versus laparoscopic jejunostomy tubes (j-tubes). METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent PEG-JET or laparoscopic jejunostomy tube placement from January 2005 through December 2015 at our institution. Thirty-day and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients underwent PEG-JET and 307 patients underwent laparoscopic j-tube placement during the defined study period. In terms of 30-day outcomes, patients who underwent PEG-JET placement were significantly more likely to experience a tube dislodgement event (p = 0.005) and undergo a re-intervention (p < 0.001). Patients who had a laparoscopic j-tube placed were significantly more likely to meet their enteral feeding goals (p = 0.002) and less likely to require nutritional supplementation with total parenteral nutrition (TPN) (p < 0.001). With regard to long-term outcomes, patients who underwent PEG-JET placement were significantly more likely to experience tube occlusion (p < 0.001) and require an endoscopic or surgical tube re-intervention (p < 0.001). Patients who underwent laparoscopic j-tube placement were significantly more likely to experience a tube site leak (p = 0.015) but were less likely to require nutritional supplementation with TPN (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic jejunostomy tubes provide more durable long-term enteral access compared to PEG-JET. Consideration should be given to laparoscopic jejunostomy tube placement in eligible patients who cannot tolerate oral intake or gastric enteral feeding.

How I Do It: Per-Oral Pyloromyotomy (POP).

INTRODUCTION: Several surgical treatments exist for treatment of gastroparesis, including gastric electrical stimulation, pyloroplasty, and gastrectomy. Division of the pylorus by means of endoscopy, Per-Oral Pyloromyotomy (POP), is a newer, endoluminal therapy that may offer a less invasive, interventional treatment option. METHODS: We describe and present a video of our step by step technique for POP using a lesser curvature approach. The following are technical steps to complete the POP procedure from the lesser curve approach. CONCLUSION: In our experience, these methods provide promising initial results with low operative risks, although long-term outcomes remain to be determined.

Per oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy for refractory gastroparesis: initial results from a single institution.

INTRODUCTION: Gastroparesis is a debilitating disease characterized by delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. A new intramural technique, per oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (POP), has been proposed as an alternative to surgical pyloroplasty for the management of medical refractory gastroparesis. Herein, we detail the short-term results of POP at our institution. METHODS: POP was first performed at our institution in January 2016. All patients undergoing POP for management of gastroparesis from January 2016 through January 2017 were prospectively followed. All patients underwent a 4-h, non-extrapolated gastric emptying scintigraphy study and were asked to rate their symptoms using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) at their pre-procedure visit and at 3 months post-procedure. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients underwent POP during the defined study period. Twenty-seven (57.4%) patients had idiopathic gastroparesis, 12 (25.6%) had diabetic gastroparesis, and eight (17.0%) had post-surgical gastroparesis. Forty-one (87.2%) patients had at least one previous intervention (i.e., enteral feeding tube, gastric pacer, botox injection) for their gastroparesis symptoms. All patients had evidence of gastroparesis on pre-procedure gastric emptying studies. The average length of hospital stay was 1 day. One patient died within 30-days of their index procedure which was unrelated to the procedure itself. The average pre-procedure percentage of retained food at 4 h was 37% compared to an average post-procedure percentage of 20% (p < 0.03). The average pre-procedure GCSI score was 4.6 compared to an average post-procedure GCSI of 3.3 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: POP is a safe and feasible endoscopic intervention for medical refractory gastroparesis. Additional follow-up is required to determine the long-term success of this approach in alleviating gastroparesis symptoms.

Massive Biliary Dilation after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Is it Ampullary Achalasia?

BACKGROUND: This series of patients with a history of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and cholecystectomy presented with symptoms consistent with obstructive biliary disease and massive biliary dilation of ≥15 mm, suggesting a structural cause. Findings from laparoscopic-assisted transgastric (TG) ERCP were a normal-appearing ampulla without structural lesions or stones, suggesting a functional cause instead. STUDY DESIGN: Patients who underwent TGERCP from January 2008 to October 2016 and had a surgical history of RYGB and cholecystectomy were identified from an institutional database. Inclusion criteria was biliary dilation ≥15 mm, age 18 years or older, and no explanatory obstructive pathology. RESULTS: Nine female patients met the inclusion criteria. At time of TGERCP, their mean age was 53.9 years, mean BMI was 32.5 kg/m2, mean bile duct diameter was 18.1 mm, and all patients experienced abdominal pain. Six patients (66.7%) presented with abnormal liver enzymes, 5 (55.6%) with nausea and/or vomiting, and 4 (44.4%) with earlier episode(s) of acute pancreatitis. Each patient had a normal-appearing papilla of Vater without stones or strictures at the time of TGERCP, with 8 (88.9%) patients experiencing cessation of abdominal pain after biliary sphincterotomy. CONCLUSIONS: This cohort of patients with a history of RYGB and cholecystectomy presented with massively dilated biliary trees lacking an obstructive disease process and experienced immediate symptom improvement after sphincterotomy. Their surgical history predisposed them to vagal nerve injury, leading to denervation of the sphincter of Oddi, and resulting in tonic contraction of the ampulla, that is, ampullary achalasia.