[THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF EXTREMELY HIGH MATERNAL SERUM ALPHA FETOPROTEIN - A CASE REPORT].

INTRODUCTION: A 34 years-old woman was referred to genetic counseling due to extremely high maternal serum alpha fetoprotein (MSAFP) of 58 MoM (541 IU/mL, 654 ng/mL) in the second trimester biochemical test. The couple has five healthy children, three of them were delivered by cesarean section. Current pregnancy follow-up was uneventful except for the demonstration of placenta percreta during anomaly scan. The test also ruled out neural tube or abdominal wall defect. AFP levels in amniotic fluid were normal thus fetal disease was ruled out as the etiology. Total body MRI ruled out space occupying lesion as a source of ectopic secretion of AFP. After exclusion of other ominous etiologies for this extremely high MSAFP, it was related to the placental pathology and probably to abnormal feto-maternal shunts. Fetal fraction in cell free DNA was 18%, considered relatively high, a hint for those speculated shunts. We reviewed the literature regarding the differential diagnosis of high MSAFP including fetal, maternal and placental sources.

Personalized prenatal genomic testing: Couples' experience with choice regarding uncertain and adult-onset findings from chromosomal-microarray-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chromosomal-microarray-analysis (CMA) can identify variants of uncertain clinical significance, susceptibility-loci for neurodevelopmental conditions, and risk for adult-onset conditions. We explored choices made by couples undergoing prenatal CMA, their understanding of these findings, reasons for and against receiving them, and whether they believe parents or professionals should decide which are disclosed. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with women (n = 27) or their partners (n = 15) during the week following prenatal CMA testing and analyzed using grounded theory. RESULTS: Over half the interviewees (55%) recalled at least two of the three types of CMA results they chose whether to receive. Sixty-four percent found the choice simple, whereas 36% found it difficult. All participants could clearly explain their choices, which were based on the perceived actionability and psychological impact of the information. Sixty percent viewed their choice favorably, whereas ~21% would have preferred clinicians to decide for them. More women than men, and more decisive than indecisive participants supported parental choice. CONCLUSION: Overall, expectant parents can make informed choices about which uncertain findings about their fetuses they wish to receive, and value the opportunity to tailor results to their values and wishes. Arguments presented provide the basis for a decision-aid tool for expecting parents.