Atezolizumab combined with immunogenic salvage chemoimmunotherapy in patients with transformed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) transformed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) from indolent B-cell lymphomas, including Richter transformation (RT), have a poor prognosis. PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies produce modest objective and complete response rates (ORR and CRR) in B-NHL as monotherapy but may synergize with immunogenic chemotherapies like gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GemOx). Thus, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab plus rituximab and GemOx (R-GemOx+Atezo) in R/R transformed DLBCL, including RT. We conducted a phase I trial including patients with transformed DLBCL after ≥1 prior therapy. Patients received up to 4 cycles of R-GemOx-+Atezo. Patients in CR could then proceed to Ratezo maintenance until progression. A safety lead-in with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) evaluation was enrolled to confirm the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), followed by 2 expansion cohorts: one for transformed follicular lymphoma (FL) and another for non-FL transformed DLBCL, including RT. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled. One of the 6 safety lead-in patients had a DLT attributed to atezolizumab, a grade 4 Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS). The most common grade ≥3 events were neutropenia (18.5%), lymphopenia (18.5%), and thrombocytopenia (14.8%). The overall and complete response rates (ORR and CRR) were 59% and 33%, respectively. The ORR and CRR in transformed FL were 79% and 43%, and 38% and 23% in transformed non-FL, respectively. The median PFS and OS of the total population were 4.2 and 7.7 months, respectively. R-GemOx+Atezo was well tolerated and demonstrated promising preliminary efficacy in patients with R/R transformed DLBCL.

Brentuximab Vedotin Plus Ibrutinib in Relapsed and Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is an antibody-drug conjugate that delivers monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) to CD30+ cells and is safe and effective in relapsed/refractory (r/r) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Although most patients respond to BV, only a minority will obtain a complete response (CR), and almost all patients eventually progress. Ibrutinib is a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor highly active in multiple subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma; limited data exist regarding its use in HL. It irreversibly inhibits interleukin-2-inducible kinase (ITK) with Th1 based immune responses. As we previously observed preclinical synergy between ibrutinib and BV, we hypothesized ibrutinib may enhance the antitumor activity of BV in HL. We designed and conducted a phase II trial of ibrutinib plus BV in patients with R/R HL, and herein report the final primary analysis of safety and efficacy. METHODS: This was a multicenter phase II trial with a lead-in cohort in patients with r/r HL. Eligibility criteria included age ≥ 15 years with r/r HL after at least one prior line of therapy. Treatment consisted of 1.8 mg/kg BV intravenously every 3 weeks and ibrutinib 560 mg PO daily (420 mg PO daily in the lead-in cohort). Prior BV was allowed if patients were not refractory. The primary endpoint was the CR rate according to Lugano 2014. Secondary endpoints included toxicities, overall response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR). RESULTS: The 39 patients were enrolled onto the study, of which 67% were male; the median age was 33 (range: 17-71). 38% had extranodal disease at baseline, 51% had advanced stage disease, 51% were refractory to the prior therapy, and 21% had prior BV. Of 36 patients who were evaluable for response, the CR rate was 33% and ORR 64%; median DOR was 25.5 months. Thirteen patients proceeded to autologous transplant and 3 patients proceeded to allogeneic transplant for consolidation after response. The most common adverse events were nausea (67%), peripheral neuropathy (62%), diarrhea (59%), fatigue (46%), thrombocytopenia (46%), headache (41%), rash (41%), elevated ALT (38%), anemia (36%), vomiting (36%), abdominal pain (33%), fever (33%), and hypertension (33%). Six patients experienced unacceptable toxicity, defined as Gr 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity or non-resolving Gr 3/4 hematologic toxicity including one patient who died of multiorgan failure from suspected COVID-19 infection during cycle 1. DISCUSSION: The combination of BV and ibrutinib was active in r/r HL; however, given significant toxicity, it cannot be recommended for future development.

Flotetuzumab as a salvage immunotherapy in advanced CD123-positive hematological malignancies, a phase 1 pilot study.

CD123 "expression" is common in hematological malignancies, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Flotetuzumab is a novel, investigational CD3/CD123 DART®. We conducted a phase 1 study evaluating safety and efficacy of flotetuzumab in relapsed/refractory ALL (Cohort A) and other advanced CD123-positive hematological malignancies (excluding myeloid malignancies) (cohort B). Thirteen patients (9 in Cohort A and 4 in Cohort B) were treated at dose level 1 (500 ng/kg/day) before early closure due to discontinuation of drug development by sponsor. Two dose limiting toxicities (Grade 4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia) occurred in one patient in Cohort B. Cytokine release syndrome occurred in most patients (85%), all being grade ≤2. Responses only occurred in Cohort B, with a partial response in one patient with Hodgkin's lymphoma and morphological complete remission in the bone marrow in one patient with blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm. In conclusion, flotetuzumab had a manageable safety profile in advanced CD123-positive hematological malignancies.

Durable response after tisagenlecleucel in adults with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: ELARA trial update.

ABSTRACT: Tisagenlecleucel is approved for adults with relapsed/refractory (r/r) follicular lymphoma (FL) in the third- or later-line setting. The primary analysis (median follow-up, 17 months) of the phase 2 ELARA trial reported high response rates and excellent safety profile in patients with extensively pretreated r/r FL. Here, we report longer-term efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetic, and exploratory biomarker analyses after median follow-up of 29 months (interquartile range, 22.2-37.7). As of 29 March 2022, 97 patients with r/r FL (grades 1-3A) received tisagenlecleucel infusion (0.6 × 108-6 × 108 chimeric antigen receptor-positive viable T cells). Bridging chemotherapy was allowed. Baseline clinical factors, tumor microenvironment, blood soluble factors, and circulating blood cells were correlated with clinical response. Cellular kinetics were assessed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Median progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS) were not reached. Estimated 24-month PFS, DOR, and OS rates in all patients were 57.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.2-67), 66.4% (95% CI, 54.3-76), and 87.7% (95% CI, 78.3-93.2), respectively. Complete response rate and overall response rate were 68.1% (95% CI, 57.7-77.3) and 86.2% (95% CI, 77.5-92.4), respectively. No new safety signals or treatment-related deaths were reported. Low levels of tumor-infiltrating LAG3+CD3+ exhausted T cells and higher baseline levels of naïve CD8+ T cells were associated with improved outcomes. Tisagenlecleucel continued to demonstrate highly durable efficacy and a favorable safety profile in this extended follow-up of 29 months in patients with r/r FL enrolled in ELARA. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03568461.

Results from a phase I trial of pembrolizumab plus vorinostat in relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Outcomes after programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade in B-cell lymphomas are disappointing with few durable responses. Histone deacetylase inhibitors exhibit favorable immunomodulatory effects and demonstrate synergistic anti-tumor immune responses with anti-PD-1 therapy in preclinical models. We, therefore, developed a phase I study to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of pembrolizumab with vorinostat in relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas. Patients were treated in a dose-escalation cohort using a Rolling 6 design followed by an expansion cohort at the recommended phase II dose (R2PD). Fifty-two patients were enrolled (32 Hodgkin and 20 non-Hodgkin lymphoma [NHL]). Here, we report safety data from the dose escalation cohort, and the toxicity and efficacy within NHL patients. Vorinostat was administered twice daily on days 1-5 and 8-12 (dose-level [DL]1: 100 mg; DL2: 200 mg) and pembrolizumab (200 mg) was administered on day 1 of each 3-week cycle. Of six patients treated at DL1, one had a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (Stevens-Johnson syndrome [SJS]), and one of six had a DLT at DL2 (thromboembolism); therefore, DL2 was the RP2D. The patient developing SJS was treated with corticosteroids, infliximab, and cyclosporine but ultimately died of invasive fungal infection from the extensive immunosuppression used to treat the SJS. The most common adverse events were hypertension, diarrhea, and cytopenias. Of 20 NHL patients, nine had follicular lymphoma (FL) and 11 had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Five DLBCL patients had primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBL). The complete and overall response rates (CR and ORR) were 11% and 22% for FL and 45% and 55% for all DLBCL. Amongst DLBCL, the CR and ORR was 80% and 80% for PMBL and 17% and 33% for non-PMBL. In conclusion, pembrolizumab with vorinostat was tolerable and produced responses in relapsed/refractory B-cell NHL, with particularly notable efficacy in PMBL (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT03150329).

Bendamustine lymphodepletion is a well-tolerated alternative to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide lymphodepletion for axicabtagene ciloleucel therapy for aggressive B-cell lymphoma.

Fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (Flu/Cy) is established for lymphodepletion (LD) prior to standard-of-care CAR T-cell therapy for lymphoma. There is ongoing need to test alternative LD regimens to preserve efficacy, improve safety, and address challenges including the recent national fludarabine shortage. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes among patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma who received bendamustine (n = 27) or Flu/Cy (n = 42) LD before axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) at our institution. The median change in absolute lymphocyte count from pre-LD to time of axi-cel infusion was -0.6×109 /L in bendamustine cohort and -0.7×109 /L in Flu/Cy cohort. The best overall response/complete response rates were 77.8% (95% CI: 57.7%-91.4%)/48.1% (95% CI: 28.7%-68.1%) among bendamustine cohort and 81.0% (95% CI: 65.9%-91.4%)/50.0% (95% CI: 34.2%-65.8%) among Flu/Cy cohort. Six-month progression-free survival were 43.8% (95% CI: 24.7%-61.3%) and 55.6% (95% CI: 39.0%-69.3%) in bendamustine and Flu/Cy cohorts, while 6-month overall survival were 81.5% (95% CI: 61.1%-91.8%) and 90.4% (95% CI: 76.4%-96.3%), respectively. Relative to Flu/Cy-treated patients, bendamustine-treated patients did not show an increase in hazards associated with experiencing progression/relapse/death (aHR:1.4 [95% CI: 0.7-2.8]; p = .32) or death (aHR:1.6 [95% CI: 0.5-5.6]; p = .46), after adjusting for baseline number of prior therapies and refractory disease. Any grade/grade ≥3 CRS were observed in 89%/3.7% and 86%/4.8% among bendamustine and Flu/Cy cohorts, while any grade ICANS/grade ≥3 ICANS were observed in 30%/19% and 55%/31% respectively. While more Flu/Cy-treated patients experienced grade ≥3 neutropenia compared with bendamustine-treated patients (100% vs. 68%), grade ≥3 infectious complications were comparable (24% vs. 19% respectively). More patients received bendamustine LD and axi-cel as outpatient than Flu/Cy cohort, without increased toxicities and with shorter median inpatient stays. In conclusion, we observed comparable efficacy and lower any grade ICANS among patients receiving bendamustine relative to Flu/Cy LD, followed by axi-cel.

Pembrolizumab plus vorinostat induces responses in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma refractory to prior PD-1 blockade.

This phase 1 study evaluated the addition of vorinostat to pembrolizumab in patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and follicular lymphoma. We report the results in cases of cHL. Adult patients with RR cHL who had received ≥1 prior lines of therapy and were ineligible for transplantation were treated in a dose-escalation cohort with 2 dose levels (DLs) and then on an expansion cohort at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) in 21-day cycles. Vorinostat 100 mg twice a day (DL1) and 200 mg twice a day (DL2) was administered orally from days 1 to 5 and 8 to 12; all patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks. The primary end point was safety and determination of RP2D. In total, 32 patients with cHL were enrolled, including 30 at DL2 (RP2D); 78% had received prior anti-programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD-1) therapy, and 56% were PD-1 refractory. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) included hypertension (9%), neutropenia (9%), hypophosphatemia (9%), thrombocytopenia (6%), and lymphopenia (6%). Immune-related AEs included grade 1 or 2 thyroiditis (13%), grade 1 rash (6%), and grade 3 esophagitis/duodenitis (3%). The overall response rate (ORR) was 72% and complete response (CR) rate was 34%. Patients refractory to prior PD-1 blockade (n = 18) had ORR and CR rates of 56% and 11%, respectively. Pembrolizumab and vorinostat was well tolerated with a high ORR rate in RR cHL including in anti-PD-1-refractory disease. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03150329.

A phase 1 first-in-human study of GS-0189, an anti-signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα) monoclonal antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

Signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα) is the receptor for cluster of differentiation (CD)47, a potent "don't eat me" signal for macrophages. Disruption of CD47-SIRPα signaling in the presence of prophagocytic signals can lead to enhanced phagocytosis of tumor cells, resulting in a direct antitumor effect; agents targeting this pathway have shown efficacy in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and other tumor types. GS-0189 is a novel anti-SIRPα humanized monoclonal antibody. Here we report: (1) clinical safety, preliminary activity, and pharmacokinetics of GS-0189 as monotherapy and in combination with rituximab from a phase 1 clinical trial in patients with relapsed/refractory NHL (NCT04502706, SRP001); (2) in vitro characterization of GS-0189 binding to SIRPα; and (3) in vitro phagocytic activity. Clinically, GS-0189 was well tolerated in patients with relapsed/refractory NHL with evidence of clinical activity in combination with rituximab. Receptor occupancy (RO) of GS-0189 was highly variable in NHL patients; binding affinity studies showed significantly higher affinity for SIRPα variant 1 than variant 2, consistent with RO in patient and healthy donor samples. In vitro phagocytosis induced by GS-0189 was also SIRPα variant-dependent. Although clinical development of GS-0189 was discontinued, the CD47-SIRPα signaling pathway remains a promising therapeutic target and should continue to be explored.

Adding venetoclax to lenalidomide and rituximab is safe and effective in patients with untreated mantle cell lymphoma.

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, incurable hematological malignancy with a heterogeneous presentation and clinical course. A wide variety of chemotherapy-based regimens are currently used in patients who are untreated. Over the last several years, several targeted or small-molecule therapies have shown efficacy in the relapsed/refractory setting and have since been explored in the frontline setting. Lenalidomide plus rituximab was explored in a phase 2 study of 38 patients with MCL who were untreated and ineligible to receive transplantation, in which the combination produced durable remissions. We looked to build upon this regimen by adding venetoclax to the combination. We conducted a multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized, single-arm study to evaluate this combination. We enrolled 28 unselected patients with untreated disease irrespective of age, fitness, or risk factors. Lenalidomide was dosed at 20 mg daily from days 1 to 21 of each 28-day cycle. The dose of venetoclax was determined using the time-to-event continual reassessment method. Rituximab was dosed at 375 mg/m2 weekly, starting on cycle 1, day 1 until cycle 2, day 1. No dose-limiting toxicities were noted. All patients were treated with venetoclax at the maximum tolerated dose of 400 mg daily. The most common adverse events were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. The overall and complete response rates were 96% and 86%, respectively. In total, 86% of patients achieved minimal residual disease undetectability via next-generation sequencing. The median overall and progression-free survivals were not reached. The combination of lenalidomide, rituximab, and venetoclax is a safe and effective regimen in patients with untreated MCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03523975.

Association Between Pretreatment Skeletal Muscle and Outcomes After CAR T-Cell Therapy.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the association between baseline skeletal muscle measurements, acute toxicity (immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome [ICANS], cytokine release syndrome), and treatment efficacy in patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy for B-lineage lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Skeletal muscle measurements were obtained from automated CT measurements in 226 consecutive patients who received CAR T-cell therapy between 2015 and 2021. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to examine progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 1-year. Multivariable regression was used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals, adjusted for covariates. RESULTS: The median age of the cohort was 63.1 years (range, 18.5-82.4 years), and most patients were male (66%) and had primary refractory disease (58%). Patients with abnormally low skeletal muscle at baseline were at greater risk of ICANS (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.05-2.87) and had longer length of hospitalization (mean 27.7 vs 22.9 days; P<.05) compared with those with normal muscle mass. Abnormal skeletal muscle was independently associated with risk of disease progression (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.11-2.57) and worse survival (HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.49-4.00) at 1 year compared with normal skeletal muscle. Individuals who had abnormal skeletal muscle and high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels at baseline had poor 1-year PFS (17%) and OS (12%) compared with those with normal skeletal muscle and LDH levels (72% and 82%, respectively; P<.001). Patients who had abnormal skeletal muscle and LDH levels had a 5-fold risk (HR, 5.34; 95% CI, 2.97-9.62) of disease progression and a 10-fold risk (HR, 9.73; 95% CI, 4.81-19.70) of death (reference: normal skeletal muscle, normal LDH), independent of prior lines of therapy, extent of residual disease at time of CAR T-cell therapy, functional status, or product. CONCLUSIONS: This information can be used for risk stratification prior to CAR T-cell therapy or to implement prehabilitation and nutritional optimization before lymphodepletion as well as thereafter. These efforts will be complementary to ongoing efforts toward sustained efficacy after CAR T-cell therapy.

Brentuximab vedotin plus nivolumab after autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for adult patients with high-risk classic Hodgkin lymphoma: a multicentre, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: After autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT), consolidation with brentuximab vedotin in patients with high-risk relapsed or refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma has been shown to improve progression-free survival compared with placebo. Brentuximab vedotin plus nivolumab is a safe and effective treatment for relapsed or refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma; therefore, we aimed to evaluate the safety and activity of this drug combination post-autologous HSCT consolidation in patients with high-risk relapsed or refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma. METHODS: We did a multicentre phase 2 trial at five centres in the USA. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with high-risk relapsed or refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma, had an ECOG performance status of 0-2, and had adequate organ and bone marrow function. Enrolled patients received brentuximab vedotin (1·8 mg/kg) and nivolumab (3 mg/kg) intravenously starting 30-60 days after autologous HSCT on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for up to 8 cycles. Nivolumab dose reduction was not allowed. Brentuximab vedotin dose reduction to 1·2 mg/kg was permitted. If one drug was discontinued because of a toxic effect, the other could be continued. The primary endpoint was 18-month progression-free survival in all treated patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03057795. FINDINGS: Between May 3, 2017, and July 13, 2019, 59 patients were enrolled and received the study therapy. Patients initiated brentuximab vedotin plus nivolumab for a median of 54 days (IQR 46-58) after autologous HSCT and received a median of 8 cycles (8-8). 34 (58%) of 59 patients were male, 29 (49%) completed 8 cycles of brentuximab vedotin plus nivolumab, and 45 (76%) completed 8 cycles of at least one drug. The median follow-up time was 29·9 months (IQR 24·6-34·8). The 18-month progression-free survival in all 59 patients was 94% (95% CI 84-98). The most common adverse events were sensory peripheral neuropathy (31 [53%] of 59) and neutropenia (25 [42%]), and immune-related adverse events requiring corticosteroids occurred in 17 (29%) of 59 patients. No treatment-related deaths were observed. INTERPRETATION: Brentuximab vedotin plus nivolumab was highly active post-autologous HSCT consolidation for patients with high-risk relapsed or refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma, most of whom had previous exposure to either brentuximab vedotin or PD-1 blockade. Combination immunotherapy in this setting should be further studied in patients with classic Hodgkin lymphoma with further refinement of the regimen to mitigate toxic effects, particularly in high-risk patients in whom more intensive therapy to prevent relapse is warranted. FUNDING: Bristol Myers Squibb, Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, Lymphoma Research Foundation, and National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health.

Cost-effectiveness of second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel in relapsed refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

The ZUMA-7 (Efficacy of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Compared to Standard of Care Therapy in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma) study showed that axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) improved event-free survival (EFS) compared with standard of care (SOC) salvage chemoimmunotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant in primary refractory/early relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); this led to its recent US Food and Drug Administration approval in this setting. We modeled a hypothetical cohort of US adults (mean age, 65 years) with primary refractory/early relapsed DLBCL by developing a Markov model (lifetime horizon) to model the cost-effectiveness of second-line axi-cel compared with SOC using a range of plausible long-term outcomes. EFS and OS were estimated from ZUMA-7. Outcome measures were reported in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, with a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Assuming a 5-year EFS of 35% with second-line axi-cel and 10% with SOC, axi-cel was cost-effective at a WTP of $150 000 per QALY ($93 547 per QALY). axi-cel was no longer cost-effective if its 5-year EFS was ≤26.4% or if it cost more than $972 061 at a WTP of $150 000. Second-line axi-cel was the cost-effective strategy in 73% of the 10 000 Monte Carlo iterations at a WTP of $150 000. If the absolute benefit in EFS is maintained over time, second-line axi-cel for aggressive relapsed/refractory DLBCL is cost-effective compared with SOC at a WTP of $150 000 per QALY. However, its cost-effectiveness is highly dependent on long-term outcomes. Routine use of second-line chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy would add significantly to health care expenditures in the United States (more than $1 billion each year), even when used in a high-risk subpopulation. Further reductions in the cost of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy are needed to be affordable in many regions of the world.

PD-1 Blockade After Avelumab in Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Anti-PD-1 directed therapy is safe and effective in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) cHL and is currently being studied in the frontline setting. There are currently little data regarding the safety and efficacy of PD-1 blockade after prior PD-L1 blockade with agents such as avelumab. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series evaluating r/r cHL patients treated with avelumab who subsequently received at least 1 dose of PD-1 blockade. Primary objective is efficacy as measured by overall response rate. Secondary objectives include duration of response and time to progression on PD-1 blockade as well as safety as evaluated by incidence and severity of immune-related adverse events (irAE) with PD-1 blockade. RESULTS: There were 7 patients treated with PD-1 blockade after avelumab, of whom 4 were re-treated. The median follow-up was 46.8 months. At the time of PD-1 blockade initiation median age was 36.6 years, all patients had advanced stage, 1 patient had B symptoms, and 4 patients had extranodal disease. Patients received median 7 prior lines of therapy including avelumab. Median duration on anti-PD-1 treatment was 15.9 months. A response was observed in 86% of patients with median duration of response of 26.4 months and median time to progression of 22.2 months. Only 1 patient experienced an irAE (grade 2 pneumonitis). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that PD-1 blockade after PD-L1 blockade in r/r cHL appears safe and may be effective with durable responses observed in a subset of patients.

Cost-effectiveness of polatuzumab vedotin combined with chemoimmunotherapy in untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

In patients with treatment-naive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the POLARIX study (A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Polatuzumab Vedotin With Rituximab-Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Prednisone [R-CHP] Versus Rituximab-Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone [R-CHOP] in Participants With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma) reported a 6.5% improvement in the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS), with no difference in overall survival (OS) or safety using polatuzumab vedotin, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (pola-R-CHP) compared with standard rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pola-R-CHP for DLBCL. We modeled a hypothetical cohort of US adults (mean age, 65 years) with treatment-naive DLBCL by developing a Markov model (lifetime horizon) to model the cost-effectiveness of pola-R-CHP and R-CHOP using a range of plausible long-term outcomes. Progression rates and OS were estimated from POLARIX. Outcome measures were reported in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, with a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Assuming a 5-year PFS of 69.6% with pola-R-CHP and 62.7% with R-CHOP, pola-R-CHP was cost-effective at a WTP of $150 000 (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, $84 308/QALY). pola-R-CHP was no longer cost-effective if its 5-year PFS was 66.1% or lower. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that pola-R-CHP is cost-effective up to a cost of $276 312 at a WTP of $150 000. pola-R-CHP was the cost-effective strategy in 56.6% of the 10 000 Monte Carlo iterations at a WTP of $150 000. If the absolute benefit in PFS is maintained over time, pola-R-CHP is cost-effective compared with R-CHOP at a WTP of $150 000/QALY. However, its cost-effectiveness is highly dependent on its long-term outcomes and costs of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Routine usage of pola-R-CHP would add significantly to health care expenditures. Price reductions or identification of subgroups that have maximal benefit would improve cost-effectiveness.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Tandem Autologous Transplantation Following Melphalan and Upon Recovery, Total Marrow Irradiation.

Total body irradiation in combination with melphalan for multiple myeloma (MM) has been shown to be prohibitively toxic. To ameliorate toxicity, total marrow irradiation (TMI) has been administered as the sole ablative modality during the second cycle of tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (TASCT) for MM patients on a phase I-II trial. Patients with MM in response or with stable disease and ≤18 months from diagnosis received melphalan 200 mg/m2 and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) (cycle 1) and then, after recovery, TMI and another ASCT (cycle 2), followed by maintenance with an immunomodulatory drug (ImiD) and dexamethasone for up to 12 months. TMI doses were escalated from 1000 cGy to 1800 cGy in 200-cGy increments. Fifty-four patients were to receive TASCT between 2004 and 2011; 8 patients received single ASCT because of patient or physician preference. The median time between melphalan and TMI was 65 days (range, 47 to 125 days). Thirty patients (55.6%) underwent TASCT at the maximum tolerated dose of 1600 cGy. The complete response and very good partial response rates were 48.1% and 22.2%, respectively, following ASCT and maintenance. The median follow-up among survivors was 12.3 years (range, 9.2 to 15.5+ years). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival at 10 years were 20.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.9% to 31.9%) and 38.8% (95% CI, 25.9% to 51.5%), respectively. Secondary neoplasms included (1 each) acute myelogenous leukemia, papillary thyroid and prostate carcinoma, and melanoma, and there was 1 case of ductal carcinoma in situ and 4 cases of nonmelanoma skin cancers. TMI as part of TASCT was well tolerated, and TASCT was associated with a 20.4% PFS plateau. The inclusion of TMI as a conditioning regiment for MM before ASCT warrants further study in the context of modern induction and maintenance therapies.

Response-adapted anti-PD-1-based salvage therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma with nivolumab alone or in combination with ICE.

This phase 2 trial evaluated PET-adapted nivolumab alone or in combination with ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (NICE) as first salvage therapy and bridge to autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) in relapsed/refractory (RR) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Patients with RR cHL received 240 mg nivolumab every 2 weeks for up to 6 cycles (C). Patients in complete response (CR) after C6 proceeded to AHCT, whereas patients with progressive disease at any point or not in CR after C6 received NICE for 2 cycles. The primary endpoint was CR rate per the 2014 Lugano classification at completion of protocol therapy. Forty-three patients were evaluable for toxicity; 42 were evaluable for response. Thirty-four patients received nivolumab alone, and 9 patients received nivolumab+NICE. No unexpected toxicities were observed after nivolumab or NICE. After nivolumab, the overall response rate (ORR) was 81%, and the CR rate was 71%. Among 9 patients who received NICE, all responded, with 8 (89%) achieving CR. At the end of protocol therapy, the ORR and CR rates were 93% and 91%. Thirty-three patients were bridged directly to AHCT, including 26 after Nivo alone. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in all treated patients (n = 43) were 72% and 95%, respectively. Among 33 patients who bridged directly to AHCT, the 2-year PFS was 94% (95% CI: 78-98). PET-adapted sequential salvage therapy with nivolumab/nivolumab+NICE was well tolerated and effective, resulting in a high CR rate and bridging most patients to AHCT without chemotherapy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov #NCT03016871.

Combination of Atezolizumab and Tazemetostat in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Results From a Phase Ib Study.

BACKGROUND: The combination of atezolizumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and inhibits the interaction between PD-L1 and its receptors, and tazemetostat, an EZH2 inhibitor, may lead to selective epigenetic reprogramming, alter the tumor microenvironment, and provide additive or synergistic response to patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an open-label, phase Ib study assessing the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of atezolizumab plustazemetostat in patients with R/R DLBCL. Atezolizumab (1200 mg) was administered via intravenous (IV) infusion on day 1 of each cycle and tazemetostat (800 mg) was given orally twice daily (BID) on days 1 to 21. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability, and to identify a recommended phase II dose (RP2D) for atezolizumab. Secondary efficacy endpoints included response rate and duration of response. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients were enrolled, receiving a median of 3 prior lines of treatment (range: 1-9). The RP2D for atezolizumab was 1200 mg IV infusion every 3 weeks in combination with tazemetostat 800 mg BID. At the RP2D, adverse events reported in ≥20% patients were anemia(11 patients [26%]), fatigue (10 patients [23%]), and nausea (10 patients [23%]). Overall response rate was 16% (complete response rate: 7%). Median progression-free survival was 2 months (range: 0-24) and median overall survival was 13 months (range: 1-29). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of atezolizumab and tazemetostat was determined to be safe and tolerable. However, anti-tumor activity of the combination was modest.

Combination of Atezolizumab and Obinutuzumab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Results from a Phase 1b Study.

BACKGROUND: This was an open-label, phase 1b study assessing the safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy and pharmacokinetics of the combination of atezolizumab and obinutuzumab in patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). There is a mechanistic rationale suggesting that this combination may enhance recruitment of both innate and adaptive immunity and be effective against CD20+ B-cell malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study consisted of a safety evaluation stage and an expansion stage. Patients received obinutuzumab 1000 mg intravenously (IV) in cycle (C) 1, obinutuzumab plus atezolizumab 1200 mg IV for C2-8, and atezolizumab only from C9. Primary endpoints were to identify a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for atezolizumab, and safety and tolerability in the safety and expansion stages. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients were enrolled (FL, n = 26; DLBCL, n = 23), with a median of 2 prior lines of treatment. The RP2D for atezolizumab was 1200 mg IV every 3 weeks. Adverse events reported in ≥ 20% of patients were fatigue (15 patients [31%]), nausea (13 patients [27%]), cough, and diarrhea (10 patients [20%] each). Objective response rate was 54% in the FL cohort (complete response [CR] rate: 23%) and 17% in the DLBCL cohort (CR: 4%). Median progression-free survival was 9 months for FL and 3 months for DLBCL. Median overall survival was not estimable for FL and 9 months for DLBCL. CONCLUSION: The combination of obinutuzumab and atezolizumab was determined to be safe and tolerable, with no new toxicities observed.

Efficacy and Safety of CT-P10 Versus Rituximab in Untreated Low-Tumor-Burden Follicular Lymphoma: Final Results of a Randomized Phase III Study.

INTRODUCTION: This double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled phase III trial (NCT02260804) assessed CT-P10 and rituximab safety and efficacy in patients with previously untreated low-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma (LTBFL), including after a single switch from rituximab to CT-P10. PATIENTS AND METHODS: LTBFL patients were randomized (1:1) to receive CT-P10 or rituximab (375 mg/m2 intravenously; day 1 of 4 7-day cycles). Patients achieving disease control entered a 2-year maintenance period. CT-P10 or rituximab were administered every 8 weeks (6 cycles) in year 1; all patients could receive CT-P10 (every 8 weeks; 6 cycles) in year 2. Secondary endpoints (reported here) were overall response rate (ORR) during the study period, progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). Safety and immunogenicity were evaluated. RESULTS: Between  November 9, 2015 and  January 4, 2018, 258 patients were randomized (130 for CT-P10; 128 for rituximab). ORR was similar between groups over the study period (CT-P10: 88%; rituximab: 87%). After 29.2 months' median follow-up, median PFS, TTP, and OS were not estimable; 24-month Kaplan-Meier estimates suggested similarity between groups. Overall, 114 (CT-P10: 88%), and 104 (rituximab: 81%) patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events. The single switch was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: These updated data support therapeutic similarity of CT-P10 and rituximab and support the use of CT-P10 monotherapy for previously untreated LTBFL.