Enhancing nursing care through technology and standardized nursing language: The TEC-MED multilingual platform.

PURPOSE: This study describes the design, integration, and semantic interoperability process of a minimum data set using standardized nursing language in the caring module of the TEC-MED care platform. METHODS: The caring module was developed in three phases (2020-2022): platform concept, functional design and construction, and testing and evaluation. Phases involved collaboration among academics, information technology developers, and social/healthcare professionals. Nursing taxonomies (NANDA-I, NOC, NIC) were integrated to support the nursing process. The platform was piloted in six Mediterranean countries. FINDINGS: The final platform features an assessment module with eight dimensions for data collection on older adults and their caregivers. A clinical decision support system links assessment data with nursing diagnoses, outcomes, and interventions. The platform is available in six languages (English, Spanish, French, Italian, Greek, and Arabic). Usability testing identified the need for improved Arabic language support. CONCLUSIONS: The TEC-MED platform is a pioneering tool using standardized nursing language to improve care for older adults in the Mediterranean. The platform's multilingualism promotes accessibility. Limitations include offline use and mobile app functionality. Pilot testing is underway to evaluate effectiveness and facilitate cross-cultural validation of nursing taxonomies. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: The TEC-MED platform offers standardized nursing care for older adults across the Mediterranean, promoting consistent communication and evidence-based practice. This approach has the potential to improve care quality and accessibility for a vulnerable population.

OBJETIVO: Este estudio describe el diseño, la integración y el proceso de interoperabilidad semántica de un conjunto mínimo de datos utilizando un lenguaje estandarizado de enfermería en el módulo de atención de la plataforma de cuidados TEC­MED. MÉTODOS: El módulo de atención se desarrolló en tres fases (2020­2022): concepto de la plataforma, diseño y construcción funcional, y pruebas y evaluación. Las fases involucraron la colaboración entre académicos, desarrolladores de tecnología de la información y profesionales sociales/sanitarios. Se integraron taxonomías de enfermería (NANDA­I, NOC, NIC) para apoyar el proceso de enfermería. La plataforma se pilotó en seis países mediterráneos. RESULTADOS: La plataforma final presenta un módulo de evaluación con ocho dimensiones para la recopilación de datos sobre adultos mayores y sus cuidadores. Un Sistema de Apoyo a la Decisión Clínica (CDSS) vincula los datos de evaluación con diagnósticos, resultados e intervenciones de enfermería. La plataforma está disponible en seis idiomas (inglés, español, francés, italiano, griego, árabe). Las pruebas de usabilidad identificaron la necesidad de mejorar el soporte en idioma árabe. CONCLUSIONES: La plataforma TEC­MED es una herramienta pionera que utiliza un lenguaje estandarizado de enfermería para mejorar la atención a los adultos mayores en el Mediterráneo. La disponibilidad en varios idiomas de la plataforma promueve la accesibilidad a la misma. Las limitaciones incluyen el uso sin conexión y la funcionalidad de la aplicación móvil. Se están realizando pruebas piloto para evaluar la efectividad y facilitar la validación intercultural de las taxonomías de enfermería. IMPLICACIONES PARA LA PRÁCTICA DE ENFERMERÍA: La plataforma TEC­MED ofrece atención de enfermería estandarizada para los adultos mayores en todo el Mediterráneo, promoviendo la comunicación consistente y la práctica basada en evidencia. Este enfoque tiene el potencial de mejorar la calidad y accesibilidad de la atención para una población vulnerable.

Perception of Utility and Efficacy of Implementation of TEC-MED Model of Care for Frail Older People and Their Caregivers: A Qualitative Study.

INTRODUCTION: The global population is ageing, and healthcare systems continue to adopt outdated social models of ageing that do not respond to older people's needs. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of participants in the implementation of the Transcultural social-ethical-care (TEC-MED) model for integrated community care. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive research study was conducted. Qualitative data were collected through individual interviews and focus groups with purposive sampling. RESULTS: We gathered experiences from five older people, five informal caregivers, two training agents (nurses), six healthcare professionals and eight stakeholders (senior management of businesses, public administrators, researchers and educators). Four themes were extracted: TEC-MED as a new model of home care, TEC-MED model outcome, key role of training agent and platform and resources. Overall, all the participants were satisfied with the model and various positive outcomes were found. The TEC-MED model of care was inclusive and personalised and bridged the communication and integration gaps between different services for the care of dependent older people and their caregivers in the community. Recommendations were made for improvements to the model. CONCLUSION: New models of care that are inclusive, personalised and integrated are necessary to respond to the multiple needs of the older people. A model that integrates the multiple skills of healthcare professionals is an optimum solution in the care of the older people and their caregivers in Mediterranean countries. Similar research is imperative for other healthcare systems to help them prepare adequately to respond effectively to the needs of present and new generations of older people. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The TEC-MED model presents a promising approach to addressing the complex care needs of older people and their caregivers by fostering inclusivity, personalisation and integration across services. For nursing practice, this model emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration and the role of nurses in facilitating the adoption of new care strategies. Implementing such models in everyday practice could improve the quality of care provided to older adults, enhancing communication between healthcare providers and ensuring that care is more aligned with the individual needs of patients. Furthermore, integrating digital platforms and targeted resources, as highlighted in the TEC-MED model, can aid in overcoming existing barriers in healthcare systems, improving the coordination of care at the community level.

Socio-Healthcare for Older People in the Mediterranean Basin: An Integrative Review and Quality Appraisal.

OBJECTIVES: The aging Mediterranean Basin population presents complex challenges for healthcare systems, which require innovative care approaches. The study aimed to critically assess 19 socio-healthcare practices in the Mediterranean Basin that target the elderly population by analyzing their theoretical foundations, integration of care services, ethical considerations, gender-specific approaches, and use of technology. DESIGN: An integrative literature review was conducted using a structured methodology. SAMPLE: Diverse sources across multiple languages were searched, with the inclusion criteria focusing on the alignment of socio-healthcare practices with the components of the nursing metaparadigm, the incorporation of transversal values, and relevance to the elderly population. RESULTS: The socio-healthcare practices exhibited common themes, such as person-centered care, interdisciplinary collaboration, and incorporation of technology for coordinated care delivery. Ethical principles of autonomy, dignity, and respect were central, with some socio-healthcare practices addressing gender-specific care needs. Evidence-based findings emphasized holistic care, integration, ethics, and innovation in elderly socio-healthcare. CONCLUSIONS: New eldercare frameworks should integrate these aspects, which offer a comprehensive approach to addressing the complex needs of elderly patients. Managers should design systems prioritizing patient well-being, whereas policymakers should develop equitable and high-quality care policies that collectively improve the well-being of the elderly population in the Mediterranean Basin.

Priorities and challenges in social and healthcare policies for older people living in the Mediterranean basin: A Delphi panel study.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the countries in the Mediterranean basin (which share cultural ties) have been showing a common trend of declining social support for the elderly, with deficiencies in social care models for this demographic. Thus, this Delphi panel study analyzed the gaps in social and integrated care among the participating countries in a European research project. METHODS: This three-round Delphi panel study focused on the European countries of Greece and Spain and the non-European countries of Egypt, Lebanon, and Tunisia. In this project, experts were identified according to their level of expertise in the subject matter, their gender, and their membership in different social groups. Subsequently, they were asked to identify the current situation of social care, set future goals, and locate the gaps regarding the social and healthcare models for older people in the participating countries. The median score (Mdn) and interquartile range (IQR) were calculated to assess the degree of consensus on the different priorities. RESULTS: Among the participating countries, there was a lack of state agreements to maintain social care models, a lack of coordination between public and private institutions to provide social care services, territorial inequalities in terms of access and coverage of rights, and job insecurity for professionals. The desired situation was to integrate social and healthcare services with a person-centered social care model, thus promoting autonomy and empowering users and families in participation and decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: This Delphi study reveals significant disparities in social and healthcare policies for older adults across Mediterranean countries, highlighting shared challenges and specific national needs. European nations like Greece and Spain face fragmented systems, while non-European countries such as Lebanon, Egypt, and Tunisia lack specialized geriatric services and social security. All countries urgently need better professional training, social and economic empowerment of older adults, and integrated national strategies. These findings offer key insights for policymakers to develop equitable, sustainable solutions for aging populations.

Thriving of Older People Assessment Scale (TOPAS): Transcultural adaptation, psychometric evaluation, and refinement in a Spanish sample.

The objective of this study was to culturally adapt the Thriving of Older People Assessment Scale (TOPAS) instrument and evaluate its psychometric properties. The study was carried out in two phases: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation and refinement through a cross-sectional study conducted between 2018 and 2020 with 314 participants. The refinement resulted in an abbreviated version of TOPAS, maintaining the original 5 factors with 16 items. Cronbach alpha was 0.91. Composite reliability (0.72-0.89) and average variance extracted (0.57-0.81), supporting discriminant validity. Maximum shared variance for the factors (0.22-0.50) and average shared variance (0.16-0.31), demonstrating discriminant validity. The abbreviated version of TOPAS showed evidence of being a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the adaptability of elderly residents in institutions. Implementing this instrument in Spanish nursing homes allows for a continuous evaluation of residents' well-being in relation to their environment, a construct not previously assessed with available scales.

Prevalence of NANDA-I Nursing Diagnoses in patients with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: This research quantitatively explored the prevalence of NANDA-I nursing diagnoses related to the care of patients experiencing heart failure. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted with the systematic review protocol registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42022382565). METHODS: Systematic searches were performed between March and April 2022, including peer review for selection, quality assessment, data extraction, and analysis of all included studies. A subsequent meta-analysis was performed, focusing on the proportion of nursing diagnoses in patients with heart failure. The logistic random effects model with maximum likelihood estimation assessed the combined proportion, and heterogeneity between studies was evaluated using the I2 statistic. The goodness-of-fit of the meta-analysis results was assessed using the leave-one-out method and by evaluating publication bias through contour-enhanced funnel plots. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, SCOPUS, CINAHL, WOS, and Embase were used. RESULTS: Of the 11 studies that met the eligibility criteria, 44 nursing diagnoses were identified as most frequently occurring in patients experiencing heart failure, and only 16 diagnoses appeared in more than one publication. The combined mean proportion was 35.73% (95% CI = [26.67%; 48.56%]), indicating the presence of heterogeneity based on the I2 value. However, no publication bias was observed. CONCLUSION: The results of the meta-analysis suggest priority diagnoses in individuals with heart failure, such as deficient knowledge (00126). Additionally, secondary diagnoses, such as activity intolerance (00092), excess fluid volume (00026), and ineffective breathing pattern (00032), were identified as responses to decreased cardiac output (00029). Less prevalent nursing diagnoses were associated with deterioration of health status and the need for hospitalization. OBJETIVO: Investigar cuantitativamente la prevalencia de diagnósticos de enfermería NANDA-I asociados con la atención de pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca. DISEÑO: Revisión sistemática y metanálisis. El protocolo de revisión sistemática quedó registrado en PROSPERO) número de registro: CRD42022382565). MÉTODOS: Se realizaron búsquedas sistemáticas entre marzo y abril de 2022, llevándose a cabo una revisión por pares sobre la selección, evaluación de calidad, extracción de datos y análisis de todos los estudios incluidos. Se realizó un metanálisis posterior centrado en la proporción de diagnósticos de enfermería en pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca. El modelo logístico de efectos aleatorios con estimación de máxima verosimilitud evaluó la proporción combinada y la heterogeneidad entre los estudios se evaluó mediante el estadístico I2. La bondad de ajuste de los resultados del metanálisis se evaluó mediante el método Leave-one-out y la evaluación del sesgo de publicación mediante gráficos de embudo (funnel plot), denominado Contour-Enhanced Funnel Plot. FUENTES DE DATOS: PubMed, SCOPUS, CINAHL, WOS, Embase. RESULTADOS: En los 11 estudios que cumplieron con los criterios de elegibilidad, se identificaron 44 diagnósticos de enfermería aunque sólo 16 diagnósticos aparecieron en más de una publicación. La proporción media combinada fue del 35,73% (IC del 95%) = [26,67%; 48,56%]), y el valor de I2 indica la presencia de heterogeneidad, aunque no hay sesgo de publicación. CONCLUSIÓN: Los resultados de este metaanálisis indican que habría diagnósticos prioritarios en personas con insuficiencia cardíaca, como Conocimientos deficientes (00126). Además, se han identificado otros diagnósticos de enfermería como diagnósticos secundarios: Intolerancia a la actividad (00092), Exceso de volumen de líquidos (00026) y Patrón respiratorio ineficaz (00032), que sería la respuesta a Disminución del gasto cardíaco (00029). Además de diagnósticos de enfermeríaa menos prevalentes relacionados con el deterioro del estado de salud y la necesidad de hospitalización.

Effectiveness of the best practice spotlight organizations program to reduce the prevalence of pressure injuries in acute care settings for hospitalized patients in Spain: A quasi-experimental study.

BACKGROUND: Pressure injuries are a major public health problem because of their impact on morbidity and mortality, quality of life, and increased healthcare costs. The Centros Comprometidos con la Excelencia en Cuidados/Best Practice Spotlight Organization (CCEC/BPSO®) program provides guidelines that can improve these outcomes. AIMS: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the CCEC/BPSO® program in improving the care of patients at risk of pressure injury (PI) at an acute care hospital in Spain. METHODS: A quasi-experimental regression discontinuity design in three periods was used: (1) baseline (2014), (2) implementation (2015-2017), and (3) sustainability (2018-2019). The study population was comprised of 6377 patients discharged from 22 units of an acute care hospital. The performance of the PI risk assessment and reassessment, the application of special pressure management surfaces, and the presence of PIs were all monitored. RESULTS: Forty-four percent of patients (n = 2086) met the inclusion criteria. After implementing the program, the number of patients assessed (53.9%-79.5%), reassessed (4.9%-37.5%), the application of preventive measures (19.6%-79.7%), and the number of people identified with a PI in implementation (1.47%-8.44%) and sustainability (1.47%-8.8%) all increased. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: The implementation of the CCEC/BPSO® program achieved improved patient safety. Risk assessment monitoring, risk reassessment, and special pressure management surfaces were practices that increased during the study period and were incorporated by professionals to prevent PIs. The training of professionals was instrumental to this process. Incorporating these programs is a strategic line to improve clinical safety and the quality of care. The implementation of the program has been effective in terms of improving the identification of patients at risk and the application of surfaces.

Short version of the Multidimensional Scale of Dating Violence (MSDV 2.0) in Spanish-language: Instrument development and psychometric evaluation.

AIMS: To develop and psychometrically test the short version of the Multidimensional Scale of Dating Violence (MSDV 2.0) in Spanish-language to detect violence perpetrated and suffered in dating relationships. DESIGN: A psychometric instrument development and validation study. METHODS: A two-phase approach was used: Phase (1) the items of the original instrument were revised and new items related to online violence and sexual violence were incorporated. Content validation by a Delphi panel with 25 psychometric and dating violence experts were performed. Next, a face validity was performed in 32 students followed by a pilot study in another 74 participants. Phase (2) Psychometric validation, the instrument was tested in a sample of 1091 university students, analysing the psychometric properties based on construct validity and internal consistency. The study was conducted from September to November 2020 in the context of the Andalusian Public University System. RESULTS: In phase (1) 42 items for each subscale (perpetration, victimization) were accepted by the Delphi panel, and acceptable values were obtained for the criteria of clarity, coherence, and relevance. In phase (2) the MSDV 2.0 showed acceptable psychometric properties. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a five-dimensional structure with 18 items for each subscale with excellent fit rates. Reliability analysis indicated adequate internal consistency (α = .879-.802) and correlations with the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (ρ = .418-.225) and the self-perceived health item (ρ = .380-.179), providing evidence of its convergent validity. Cut-off points were also calculated for each dimension, with their corresponding sensitivity and specificity, indicating to be a good instrument for detecting possible cases of dating violence. CONCLUSION: The MSDV 2.0 is the only short instrument published to date that measures the dating violence suffered and perpetrated taking into account all its dimensions. Its use would serve as support in prevention programs and design of public policies. IMPACT: The short version of the MSDV 2.0 could be a comprehensive enough instrument to enable a detection and evaluation of dating violence in the educational setting.

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of instrument to measure nursing care dependency.

OBJECTIVE: To cross-culturally adapt and validate the INICIARE instrument for use in Brazil. METHOD: methodological study divided into two phases: cross-cultural adaptation and validation. The first phase took place in six stages: translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert review, pre-test and submission to the author. The second, carried out with 130 patients, took place at a private hospital in Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, between May and July 2019. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee. Data were analyzed for stability, equivalence and internal consistency. RESULTS: In the cross-cultural adaptation, the expert committee adjusted the translated version, validating the content. At validation, most patients were women (64.6%) with a mean age of 59 ± 15.3. The reliability index was 0.744. CONCLUSION: The version of the instrument adapted for Brazil proved to be adequate and reflects the reality of daily nursing practice.

Predictive validity of the INTEGRARE scale in identifying the risk of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers in acute care hospital settings.

BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs) are prevalent around the world and are an indicator of care quality. Numerous instruments are available to predict their appearance, but few evaluate predictive validity. No instruments based on Nursing Outcomes Classification indicators have been found, despite these indicators reflecting the patient's condition. The aim of the study was to analyse the predictive validity of the INTEGRARE scale in preventing the risk of HAPUs. METHODS: A multicentre prospective observational cohort study design was used. 1,004 patients from 11 public hospitals in Andalusia (Spain) were recruited between February 2015 and October 2017. Participants were aged over 18 and had been admitted to medical and surgical units, with a predicted stay exceeding 48 h. Predictive validity was checked using a multivariate logistic regression model and a receiver operating characteristic curve, with development of pressure ulcers during the hospital stay as the dependent variable. RESULTS: The INTEGRARE scale obtained an area under the curve of 0.886 (95% CI = 0.85-0.923). Within the 30-point range, the optimal cut-off value is 23 points with a sensitivity of 80.8% and a specificity of 80%. The odds ratio was 16.86 (95% CI = 8.54-33.28). Among the patient variables, age was significant, while among the hospital variables, the type of unit and the Nurse Staffing Level (NSL) were significant. CONCLUSIONS: The INTEGRARE scale has robust predictive validity when patients are admitted to medical and surgical inpatient units. Patients with a higher risk of developing HAPUs are in surgical units, are elderly, and have an NSL exceeding 10.4.

Worldwide prevalence of inadequate work ability among hospital nursing personnel: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To estimate the worldwide pooled prevalence of inadequate work ability among hospital nursing personnel using the Work Ability Index (WAI). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted on Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Scielo, PsychInfo, CINAHL, Nursing and Allied Health, LILACS, and Google Scholar from inception to July 2021 to identify observational studies on work ability among hospital nursing personnel using the WAI. Two researchers independently completed the study selection, quality assessments, and data extraction on the prevalence of inadequate work ability that was pooled using the random effects model. Finally, subgroup analyses were performed to explore sources of heterogeneity. FINDINGS: A total of 42 studies were included, consisting of 24,728 subjects worldwide from 14 countries. Of these, 35 studies were included in the meta-analytical analyses. The worldwide pooled prevalence of inadequate work ability among hospital nursing personnel was 24.7% (95% CI = 20.2%-29.4%). High levels of heterogeneity were detected in all studies. Prevalence was higher in studies where samples were composed of nurses and nursing assistive personnel (26.8%; 95% CI = 22.4%-31.5%) than in those of nurses alone (22.2%; 95% CI = 13.1%-32.9%) and in studies where the sample was over 40 (28.1%; 95% CI = 19.5%-37.5%) than in those with a sample under that age (22.4%; 95% CI = 15.8%-29.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Almost one in four members of hospital nursing staff in the world has inadequate work ability and therefore are at risk of several negative outcomes during their working life. These prevalence data correspond to the pre-pandemic period, so new studies should also be especially useful in quantifying the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on work ability in the hospital nursing workforce. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The above findings justify the launch of initiatives that include annual assessment for the early identification of inadequate work ability, offering the possibility of anticipated corrective measures. Nursing workforce older than 40 years and those belonging to the professional category of nursing assistive personnel should be priority target groups for screening and intervention to improve work ability.

Filling a gap in standardized nursing terminology. Development of a new nursing diagnosis proposal on heart failure self-care.

PURPOSE: Heart failure is a highly prevalent chronic health problem associated with poor quality-of-life and negative outcomes. Self-care is a cornerstone in patients suffering from heart failure. Nurses are commonly engaged in enhancing patients' self-care behaviors, but the specific condition of deficit on self-care is not clearly identified by nurses. No nursing diagnoses focused on self-care of heart failure patients is currently available. This study aimed to develop a new nursing diagnosis that focuses on self-care in heart failure patients. DATA SOURCES: A concept and content analysis were used. Some steps of the concept analysis were performed through an integrative literature review conducted searching in PUBMED and CINAHL databases to identify attributes, antecedents, and consequences of the diagnosis. Forty-five articles were selected from the 1450 studies found. Then, the content analysis was performed by an international panel of 29 experts. Two Delphi rounds were used to achieve consensus and an item content validity index was calculated for each diagnostic element. DATA SYNTHESIS: Integrative review proposed four diagnostic labels, two definitions, 15 defining characteristics, and 44 related factors. After the two Delphi rounds a consensus was reached for each diagnostic indicator with a content validity index ranging from 82.8% to 100%. The nursing diagnosis-labeled heart failure self-care deficit-was validated with a definition, eight defining characteristics, 15 related factors, and five at-risk populations. CONCLUSIONS: This diagnosis allows nurses to document patients' self-care in daily clinical practice through a standard nursing terminology, by naming this health problem, describing its etiology, and clinical manifestations. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: This new diagnosis is expected to assist nursing clinicians, educators, and students in clinical reasoning with the aim to improve diagnostic accuracy in identifying patients with a heart failure self-care deficit, to select the most appropriate interventions and pursue better outcomes.

Defining and characterising the nurse-patient relationship: A concept analysis.

The nurse-patient relationship involves complex attitudes and behaviours with ethical and deontological implications. It has been linked to improvements in patient health outcomes, although there is still no consensus in the scientific literature as to the definition and characterisation of the concept. This article aim to define the concept of the nurse-patient relationship. A concept analysis was conducted using the Walker and Avant method to identify the attributes defining the nurse-patient relationship. An integrative review of the literature was conducted using the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature databases. A review of the grey literature and other minor non-indexed publications on the topic was also conducted. A total of 36 articles were included in the review. A model case, a contrary case, a related case, and empirical references were produced to clarify the concept and identify its essential attributes. The concept is defined as a helping relationship involving interaction between different players. It is the basis of nursing care and is intended to meet the healthcare needs of the individual receiving this care. It is also viewed as an intervention in itself, requiring a specific training process just like any other nursing skill. The essential attributes of the relationship are empathy, presence, contact, authenticity, trust, and reciprocity. In conclusion, the nurse-patient relationship is a helping relationship established with the patient and/or their family based on interaction, communication, respect for ethical values, acceptance, and empathy in order to encourage introspection and behavioural change. Key components include communication, active listening, and respect. Bioethical values and confidentiality must also be present to ensure that the relationship is built on equality and intimacy.

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of instrument to measure nursing care dependency / Adaptación transcultural y validación de instrumentos para medir la dependencia del cuidado de enfermería / Adaptação transcultural e validação de instrumento para medir a dependência de cuidados de enfermagem

ABSTRACT Objective: To cross-culturally adapt and validate the INICIARE instrument for use in Brazil. Method: methodological study divided into two phases: cross-cultural adaptation and validation. The first phase took place in six stages: translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert review, pre-test and submission to the author. The second, carried out with 130 patients, took place at a private hospital in Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, between May and July 2019. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee. Data were analyzed for stability, equivalence and internal consistency. Results: In the cross-cultural adaptation, the expert committee adjusted the translated version, validating the content. At validation, most patients were women (64.6%) with a mean age of 59 ± 15.3. The reliability index was 0.744. Conclusion: The version of the instrument adapted for Brazil proved to be adequate and reflects the reality of daily nursing practice.

RESUMEN Objetivo: Adaptar y validar transculturalmente el instrumento INICIARE para uso en Brasil. Método: estudio metodológico dividido en dos fases: adaptación y validación transcultural. La primera, en seis etapas: traducción, síntesis, retrotraducción, revisión de expertos, pre-test y envío al autor. El segundo, realizado con 130 pacientes, se llevó a cabo en un hospital privado de Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil, entre mayo y julio/2019. El estudio fue aprobado por el Comité de Ética en Investigación. Los datos se analizaron mediante estabilidad, equivalencia y consistencia interna. Resultados: En la adaptación transcultural, el comité de expertos ajustó la versión traducida, validando el contenido. En el momento de la validación, la mayoría de los pacientes eran mujeres (64,6%) con una edad media de 59 ± 15,3 años. La fiabilidad fue de 0,744. Conclusión: La versión del instrumento adaptada para Brasil resultó adecuada y refleja la realidad de la práctica diaria de enfermería.

RESUMO Objetivo: Adaptar transculturalmente e validar o instrumento INICIARE para uso no Brasil. Método: estudo metodológico dividido em duas fases: adaptação transcultural e validação. A primeira ocorreu em seis etapas: tradução, síntese, retrotradução, revisão por especialistas, pré-teste e submissão à autora. A segunda, realizada com 130 pacientes, ocorreu em um hospital privado de Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil, entre maio e julho de 2019. O estudo obteve aprovação pelo Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa. Os dados foram analisados através da estabilidade, equivalência e da consistência interna. Resultados: Na adaptação transcultural, o comitê de especialistas ajustou a versão traduzida, validando o conteúdo. Na validação, a maioria dos pacientes era mulher (64,6%) com média de idade 59 ±15,3. A confiabilidade foi de 0,744. Conclusão: A versão do instrumento adaptado para o Brasil mostrou-se adequada e reflete a realidade da prática diária da enfermagem.

Impact of the patient-nurse ratio on health outcomes in public hospitals of the Andalusian Health Service. Ecological study.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the patient-nurse ratio and its association with health outcomes in public hospitals of the Andalusian Health Service (SAS). METHOD: Cross-sectional ecological study carried out in adult units of 26 Andalusian public hospitals. Data on structure (beds, type of unit, nursing control), management (average stay, index of use of stays, complexity index) and nursing staff were collected. They were extracted from official sources: CMBDA, SAS/Health Council (CS) publications and specific respondents to Nursing Directorates. The patient-nurse ratio was calculated and related to 19 indicators of hospital quality, safety, and mortality. Measures of central tendency and Spearman's correlation coefficient were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A response was obtained from 100% of the Andalusian hospitals. The average patient-nurse ratio in the three shifts was lower in hospitals with a broader portfolio of services-regional scope (11.6), followed by those with a medium portfolio-specialties (12.7) and hospitals with a basic portfolio-county (13.5). By type of unit, the medical units were 11.8 (SD = 1.8) lower than the surgical ones 13.5 (SD = 2.7). Significant differences were only found in medical units of regional hospitals 10.5 (SD = 1.4) and district hospitals 13.03 (SD = 1.46) (p = .001). In critical care, the ratio was greater than 2 patients per nurse in the three groups. When relating the ratio to health outcomes, 5 significant associations were found: pressure ulcers (p = .005), prevalence of nosocomial infections (p = .036), postoperative sepsis (p = .022), zero bacteraemia verification (p = .045) and mortality from heart failure (p = .004). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate a high patient-nurse ratio in adult hospitalization units and that there is a positive association between the patient-nurse ratio and worse results related to nursing care.

[Humanized care in a death for COVID-19: A case study]. / El cuidado humanizado en la muerte por COVID-19: a propósito de un caso.

The world population is experiencing a pandemic due to infection with the SARS-Cov-2 virus, which causes the COVID-19 disease. In Spain, the growth rate of the epidemic is 6.79% since the alarm activation with 9,1% of deaths of the total infected. Recommendations of the National Government to prevent health professional contagion include the placement of personal protection devices (FPP2 mask, gloves, waterproof gown, hat, and protective glasses or screen). Once healthcare professionals are using protective equipment, it is necessary to argue about the humanization of nursing caring in people suffering dying situation, who are infected with COVID-19, regarding a clinical case. The aim is to enhance nursing thinking to bridge that distance, and maintain care as human and close as possible, at the end of life.

Implementing Holistic Care in Isolated Patients During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study Using Nursing Outcomes (NOC) and Interventions (NIC) Classifications.

The most effective strategy against SARS-Cov-2 virus spread is therapeutic isolation. Consequences of this measure are the presence of anxiety and depression. Therefore, it is the nurse's responsibility to identify strategies to implement humanized and holistic care in order to avoid physical and mental consequences of isolation.

[Implementation of the "Best Practice Spotlight Organization" Program at the Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital.] / Implantación del programa "Centros Comprometidos con la Excelencia en Cuidados" en el Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves. Rev Esp Salud Pública.

The objective of this work was to describe the implantation project presented by the Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital (Granada, Spain) to be selected as a candidate for "Best Practice Spotlight Organization"® (in Spain CCEC®) program in the cohort (2015-2017) to implement three guidelines for Nurses Association of Canada Ontario (RNAO) clinical practice of care. The methodology used was the model called "knowledge for action" and the actions developed for each of the phases of the action cycle for applying knowledge to practice were described: 1) identification of the problem, 2) adaptation to the local context, 3) evaluation of facilitators and barriers, 4) adaptation and implementation of interventions, 5) monitoring and evaluation of results and 6) sustainability. This work adds to the set of studies that address the improvement and maintenance of evidence-based practice programs in nursing, and in health services in general. It shows the application of a framework for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines for care in a specific health environment for its replication in other different health settings. It has been shown that it is essential to dedicate efforts to planning the implementation of this type of programs, taking into account the context in which they are developed, the specific characteristics of the population being served, identifying the different barriers and facilitators that may affect during the course of the program. process and defining actions to make the changes in practice sustainable.

El objetivo de este trabajo fue describir el proyecto de implantación presentado por el Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves (Granada, España) para ser seleccionado candidato del programa "Centros Comprometidos con la Excelencia en Cuidados" (CCEC)® en la cohorte (2015-2017) para implantar tres guías de práctica clínica de cuidados de la Asociación de Enfermeras de Ontario de Canadá (RNAO). La metodología utilizada fue el modelo denominado "conocimiento para la acción" y se describieron las actuaciones desarrollas para cada una de las fases de las que consta el ciclo de acción para la aplicación de conocimientos a la práctica: 1) identificación del problema, 2) adaptación al contexto local, 3) evaluación de los facilitadores y barreras, 4) adaptación e implantación de las intervenciones, 5) monitorización y evaluación de resultados y 6) sostenibilidad. Este trabajo se suma al conjunto de estudios que abordan la mejora y el mantenimiento de programas de prácticas basadas en la evidencia en enfermería, y en los servicios de salud en general. Muestra la aplicación de un marco de implantación de guías de práctica clínica de cuidados en un entorno sanitario específico para su replicación en otros escenarios de salud diferentes. Se ha demostrado que resulta esencial dedicar esfuerzos en planificar la implantación de este tipo de programas atendiendo al contexto en el que se desarrollan, a las características específicas de la población a la que se atiende, identificando las diferentes barreras y facilitadores que pueden afectar durante el proceso y definiendo acciones para hacer sostenible los cambios en la práctica.

[Effect of the guideline implementation "Risk assessment and prevention of pressure ulcers" of the Registered Nurses'Association of Ontario (RNAO).] / Alcance de la implantación de la guía "Valoración del riesgo y prevención de úlceras por presión" de la Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (RNAO).

OBJECTIVE: The Best Practice Spotlight Organizations Program is being developed in Spain to reduce the variability of clinical practice by implementing clinical practice guidelines from the Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario. This study described the results of the implementation of the guide "Risk assessment and prevention of pressure ulcers". METHODS: We carried out a retrospective observational study (2015-2018) at the Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves on 4,464 patients from 22 hospitalization units, analyzing type of unit, risk assessment, preventive measures, origin and category of ulcers. Descriptive analysis and contingency tables were performed with the Chi-square statistic p<0.05. RESULTS: The patients at risk were 62.2% in medical units, 53.4% in surgical units and 90% in intensive care. The application of preventive measures was 67.9%, 60.2% and 92.1% (respectively) for each unit. In medical units, 13.1% of pressure ulcers were identified, of which 68.1% were present at the time of admission. While in surgical units and intensive care they developed during hospitalization (60.8% and 88.9% respectively) (p<0.001). The presence of ulcers seemed to show a decreasing trend in the years analyzed (19.6% to 11.2%). CONCLUSIONS: There are favorable environments for implantation (medical units and intensive care) that reflect a higher level of risk assessment, use of pressure management surfaces and a decrease in prevalence. The recommendations have not been implemented homogeneously, with differences depending on the type of unit.

OBJETIVO: El Programa Centros Compro-metidos con la Excelencia en Cuidados®, se desarrolla en España, para reducir la variabilidad de la práctica clínica, implantando guías de práctica clínica de la Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario. Este estudio describió los resultados de la implantación de la guía "Valoración del riesgo y prevención de las úlceras por presión". METODOS: Se realizó un estudio observacional retrospectivo (2015-2018) en el Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves sobre 4.464 pacientes de 22 unidades de hospitalización, analizando el tipo de unidad, la valoración del riesgo, las medidas preventivas, la procedencia y la categoría de las úlceras. Se realizó análisis descriptivo y tablas de contingencia con el estadístico Chi-cuadrado p<0,05. RESULTADOS: Los pacientes de riesgo fueron el 62,2% en unidades médicas, 53,4% en las quirúrgicas y el 90% en cuidados intensivos. La aplicación de medidas preventivas fue del 67,9%, 60,2% y 92,1% (respectivamente) para cada unidad. En unidades médicas se identificaron un 13,1% de úlceras por presión, de las cuales el 68,1% estaban presentes en el momento del ingreso. Mientras que en unidades quirúrgicas y en cuidados intensivos se desarrollaron durante la hospitalización (60,8% y 88,9% respectivamente) (p<0,001). La presencia de úlceras pareció mostrar una tendencia a la disminución en los años analizados (19,6% a 11,2%). CONCLUSIONES: Existen entornos favorecedores para la implantación (unidades médicas y cuidados intensivos) que reflejan mayor nivel de valoración del riesgo, de utilización de superficies de gestión de la presión y disminución de la prevalencia. No se ha conseguido implantar las recomendaciones de forma homogénea existiendo diferencias en función del tipo de unidad.