RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Competence Centers for Postgraduate Medical Education (KW) established throughout Germany represent complex programs to increase the efficiency and quality of postgraduate medical education in general practice. So-called Logic Models serve as the framework for evaluations and quality management processes of complex programs in many areas. The aim of this article is to develop such a model, using the example of the Competence Center in Baden-Württemberg (KWBW) in order to structure its complex program logic and use it as a framework for future evaluations and quality management processes. METHODS: The adaptation of the Logic Model to the KWBW took place in an informal, nominal group process with employees and participants of the program. RESULTS: We identified 76 core elements of the KWBW. These core elements were classified in one of the five pillars of the Logic Model (input, activity, output, outcome and impact) and categorized according to fields of action and target groups. DISCUSSION: The Logic Model, which was developed using the KWBW as an example, identifies and structures important core elements of a complex postgraduate medical training program for the first time. It seems to be well suited for visualizing the internal logic of this complex program and the interaction of the various elements within the KWBW. It can thus be used as the basis for a comprehensive and systematic evaluation concept and for quality assurance. CONCLUSION: The model is also a prerequisite for comparative research questions of other university programs for postgraduate medical education and thus offers an opportunity for cooperative development efforts. This article therefore contributes to promoting quality in continuing medical training.
Assuntos
Educação Médica , Medicina Geral , Currículo , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Medicina Geral/educação , Alemanha , Humanos , LógicaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In recent years, the motivation of the new generation of general practitioners to set up their own practice is decreasing. Knowledge of factors that promote and inhibit the process of setting up a practice can enable developing strategies to support this process. The aim of this study was to explore these determinants. METHODS: Between April and October 2016, self-employed general practitioners from Baden-Württemberg were invited to participate in a qualitative interview study. Stratification of 553 physicians, who participated in a general practice support program between 2008 and 2011 and set up a practice in 2008 to 2014, was based on the agglomeration in rural areas, the peripheral zones around the agglomeration and the urban agglomerations themselves. The transcripts of the interviews were analyzed by two authors with the content analysis according to Mayring and summarized. In a second step, a consensus version was elaborated. RESULTS: A total of 23 general practitioners were recruited, 57% female and 42 years on average, and mostly working in group practices. The main motivation to set up a practice was the desire to improve the situation in relation to the daily clinical routine. These included a lower duty load and more family-friendly working hours. Relevant supportive factors during setting up a practice were family support, participation in a postgraduate training rotation network program and professional counseling. Inhibiting factors were fears of recourse and indebtedness, a complicated accounting system and a bureaucratic process of admission. CONCLUSIONS: On the one hand, the study shows that the many advantages of working as a general practitioner, such as its being family friendly, need to be better communicated to the doctors and their financial concerns alleviated. On the other hand, the need for courses on management of one's practice has also become clear. A standardized and optimized process of setting up a practice with an improved overview and a collegial contact person can facilitate the decision for and implementing the setting up a medical practice as a general practitioner.