RESUMO
Androgen receptor- (AR-) indifference is a mechanism of resistance to hormonal therapy in prostate cancer (PC). Here we demonstrate that ONECUT2 (OC2) activates resistance through multiple drivers associated with adenocarcinoma, stem-like and neuroendocrine (NE) variants. Direct OC2 gene targets include the glucocorticoid receptor (GR; NR3C1) and the NE splicing factor SRRM4, which are key drivers of lineage plasticity. Thus, OC2, despite its previously described NEPC driver function, can indirectly activate a portion of the AR cistrome through epigenetic activation of GR. Mechanisms by which OC2 regulates gene expression include promoter binding, enhancement of genome-wide chromatin accessibility, and super-enhancer reprogramming. Pharmacologic inhibition of OC2 suppresses lineage plasticity reprogramming induced by the AR signaling inhibitor enzalutamide. These results demonstrate that OC2 activation promotes a range of drug resistance mechanisms associated with treatment-emergent lineage variation in PC and support enhanced efforts to therapeutically target OC2 as a means of suppressing treatment-resistant disease.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Benzamidas , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Nitrilas , Neoplasias da Próstata , Receptores Androgênicos , Receptores de Glucocorticoides , Masculino , Humanos , Receptores Androgênicos/metabolismo , Receptores Androgênicos/genética , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Receptores de Glucocorticoides/metabolismo , Receptores de Glucocorticoides/genética , Neoplasias da Próstata/genética , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/genética , Benzamidas/farmacologia , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Nitrilas/farmacologia , Feniltioidantoína/farmacologia , Feniltioidantoína/análogos & derivados , Proteínas do Tecido Nervoso/genética , Proteínas do Tecido Nervoso/metabolismo , Epigênese Genética , Proteínas de Ligação a RNA/metabolismo , Proteínas de Ligação a RNA/genética , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/genética , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/patologia , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/metabolismo , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/tratamento farmacológico , Animais , Linhagem da Célula/genética , CamundongosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Multidisciplinary consultations improve decisional conflict and guideline-concordant treatment for men with prostate cancer (PC), but differences in the content discussed by specialty during consultations are unknown. METHODS: We audiorecorded and transcribed 50 treatment consultations for localized PC across a multidisciplinary sample of urologists, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists. Conversation was coded for narrative content using an open coding approach, grouping similar topics into major content areas. The number of words devoted to each content area per consult was used as a proxy for time spent. Multivariable Poisson regression calculated incidence rate ratios (IRR) for content-specific word count across specialties after adjustment for tumor risk and patient demographics. RESULTS: Coders identified 8 narrative content areas: overview of PC; medical history; baseline risk; cancer prognosis; competing risks; treatment options; physician recommendations; and shared decision making (SDM). In multivariable models, specialties significantly differed in proportion of time spent on treatment options, SDM, competing risks, and cancer prognosis. Urologists spent 1.8-fold more time discussing cancer prognosis than medical oncologists (IRR1.80, 95%CI:1.14-2.83) and radiation oncologists (IRR1.84, 95%CI:1.10-3.07). Urologists (IRR11.38, 95%CI:6.62-19.56) and medical oncologists (IRR10.60, 95%CI:6.01-18.72) spent over 10-fold more time discussing competing risks than radiation oncologists. Medical oncologists (IRR2.60, 95%CI:1.65-4.10) and radiation oncologists (IRR1.77, 95%CI:1.06-2.95) spent 2.6- and 1.8-fold more time on SDM than urologists, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Specialists focus on different content in PC consultations. Our results suggest that urologists should spend more time on SDM and radiation oncologists on competing risks. Our results also highlight the importance of medical oncologists in facilitating SDM.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Oncologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Urologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Urologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Relações Médico-PacienteRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Wearable technology is used to monitor and motivate physical activity (PA) and provides continuous, objective PA and sleep data outside the clinical setting. We reviewed the literature to understand how wearables are integrated into prostate cancer (PC) investigations in order to identify current practices, gaps, and research opportunities. METHODS: We conducted a literature search for articles using wearables, among PC survivors published between 2012 and 2022. We extracted study details, interventions and outcomes, participant baseline characteristics, and device characteristics and grouped them by study type: randomized control trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies. RESULTS: Of 354 articles screened, 44 met eligibility criteria (23 RCTs, and 21 non-randomized). 89% used wearables to monitor PA metrics, 11%, sleep metrics, and 6.8%, both. Most studies involved exercise (70% RCTs, 9% non-randomized studies) or lifestyle interventions (30% RCTs, 9% non-randomized studies). Intervention delivery methods included personalized computer-based (48%), in-person (e.g., trainer) (20%), and education web or print-based (20%). Interventions occurred at the participant's home (48%) or at a gym (20%). 57% of the studies evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of the wearable as an activity-measuring device or as part of a remotely delivered computer-based intervention. Studies used wearables to monitor adherence to PA interventions, motivate behavior change, to assess patient outcomes (e.g., patient function, quality of life, mood), or as data collection tools. CONCLUSIONS: Wearables are primarily being used to assess daily activity and monitor adherence to exercise interventions in clinical studies involving PC survivors. Findings suggest that they are feasible for use in this population. More research is needed to understand how to integrate wearables into routine clinical care, expand their use to predict clinical outcomes, or to deliver tailored interventions for PC survivors.
Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer , Exercício Físico , Neoplasias da Próstata , Dispositivos Eletrônicos Vestíveis , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Sobreviventes de Câncer/psicologia , Monitores de Aptidão Física , Sono , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
Interleukin (IL)-33 is an important cytokine in the tumour microenvironment; it is known to promote the growth and metastasis of solid cancers, such as gastric, colorectal, ovarian and breast cancer. Our group demonstrated that the IL-33/ST2 pathway enhances the development of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Conversely, other researchers have reported that IL-33 inhibits tumour progression. In addition, the crosstalk between IL-33, cancer cells and immune cells in SCC remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of IL-33 on the biology of head and neck SCC lines and to evaluate the impact of IL-33 neutralisation on the T cell response in a preclinical model of SCC. First, we identified epithelial and peritumoural cells as a major local source of IL-33 in human SCC samples. Next, in vitro experiments demonstrated that the addition of IL-33 significantly increased the proliferative index, motility and invasiveness of SCC-25 cells, and downregulated MYC gene expression in SCC cell lines. Finally, IL-33 blockade significantly delayed SCC growth and led to a marked decrease in the severity of skin lesions. Importantly, anti-IL-33 monoclonal antibody therapy increase the percentage of CD4+IFNγ+ T cells and decreased CD4+ and CD8+ T cells secreting IL-4 in tumour-draining lymph nodes. Together, these data suggest that the IL-33/ST2 pathway may be involved in the crosstalk between the tumour and immune cells by modulating the phenotype of head and neck SCC and T cell activity. IL-33 neutralisation may offer a novel therapeutic strategy for SCC.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Movimento Celular , Proliferação de Células , Interleucina-33 , Ativação Linfocitária , Interleucina-33/metabolismo , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/imunologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/metabolismo , Animais , Ativação Linfocitária/imunologia , Invasividade Neoplásica , Camundongos , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/imunologia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/metabolismo , Linfócitos T/imunologia , Linfócitos T/metabolismo , Microambiente Tumoral/imunologia , FemininoRESUMO
#PSMA is amazing new tech but is using it to expedite the call of disease progression helping #ProstateCancer patients?
Assuntos
Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração , Humanos , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/patologia , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Glutamato Carboxipeptidase II/metabolismo , Antígenos de Superfície , Metástase Neoplásica , Progressão da Doença , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangueRESUMO
Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy among men worldwide, and androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is a mainstay of treatment. There are observational data demonstrating an increased risk of cardiovascular events in patients who receive ADT, particularly those who have an elevated baseline cardiovascular risk. Because, for most patients with prostate cancer, death is predominantly from noncancer-related causes, cardiovascular disease and its risk factors should be optimized during cancer treatment. This review provides an overview of the landscape of ADT treatment and serves as a guide for appropriate cardiovascular screening and risk-mitigation strategies. The authors emphasize the importance of shared communication between the multidisciplinary cancer team and primary care to improve baseline cardiovascular screening and treatment of modifiable risk factors within this higher risk population.
Assuntos
Antagonistas de Androgênios , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Neoplasias da Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Antagonistas de Androgênios/efeitos adversos , Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco de Doenças Cardíacas , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Effective communication of treatment side effects (SE) is critical for shared decision-making (SDM) in localized prostate cancer. We sought to qualitatively characterize how physicians communicate SE in consultations. METHODS: We transcribed 50 initial prostate cancer treatment consultations across nine multidisciplinary providers (Urologists, Radiation Oncologists, Medical Oncologists) at our tertiary referral, academic center. Coders identified quotes describing SE and used an inductive approach to establish a hierarchy for granularity of communication: (1) not mentioned, (2) name only, (3) generalization("high"), (4) average incidence without timepoint, (5) average incidence with timepoint, and (6) precision estimate. We reported the most granular mode of communication for each SE throughout the consultation overall and across specialty and tumor risk. RESULTS: Among consultations discussing surgery (n = 40), erectile dysfunction (ED) and urinary incontinence (UI) were omitted in 15% and 12%, not quantified (name only or generalization) in 47% and 30%, and noted as average incidence without timeline in 8% and 8%, respectively. In only 30% and 49% were ED and UI quantified with timeline (average incidence with timeline or precision estimate), respectively. Among consultations discussing radiation (n = 36), irritative urinary symptoms, ED, and other post-radiotherapy SE were omitted in 22%, 42%, and 64-67%, not quantified in 61%, 33%, and 23-28%, and noted as average incidence without timeline in 8%, 22%, and 6-8%, respectively. In only 3-8% were post-radiotherapy SE quantified with timeline. Specialty concordance (but not tumor risk) was associated with higher granularity of communication, though physicians frequently failed to quantify specialty-concordant SE. CONCLUSIONS: SE was often omitted, not quantified, and/or lacked a timeline in treatment consultations in our sample. Physicians should articulate, quantify, and assign a timeline for SE to optimize SDM.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The summary presented herein covers recommendations on salvage therapy for recurrent prostate cancer intended to facilitate care decisions and aid clinicians in caring for patients who have experienced a recurrence following prior treatment with curative intent. This is Part III of a three-part series focusing on evaluation and management of suspected non-metastatic recurrence after radiotherapy (RT) and focal therapy, evaluation and management of regional recurrence, management for molecular imaging metastatic recurrence, and future directions. Please refer to Part I for discussion of treatment decision-making and Part II for discussion of treatment delivery for non-metastatic biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The systematic review that informs this Guideline was based on searches in Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to July 21, 2022), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (through August 2022), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (through August 2022). Update searches were conducted on July 26, 2023. Searches were supplemented by reviewing electronic database reference lists of relevant articles. RESULTS: In a collaborative effort between AUA, ASTRO, and SUO, the Salvage Therapy for Prostate Cancer Guideline Panel developed evidence- and consensus-based guideline statements to provide guidance for the care of patients who experience BCR after initial definitive local therapy for clinically localized disease. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous and deliberate efforts for multidisciplinary care in prostate cancer will be required to optimize and improve the oncologic and functional outcomes of patients treated with salvage therapies in the future.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Terapia de Salvação , Humanos , Masculino , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Terapia de Salvação/métodos , Revisões Sistemáticas como AssuntoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The summary presented herein covers recommendations on salvage therapy for recurrent prostate cancer intended to facilitate care decisions and aid clinicians in caring for patients who have experienced a recurrence following prior treatment with curative intent. This is Part I of a three-part series focusing on treatment decision-making at the time of suspected biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Please refer to Part II for discussion of treatment delivery for non-metastatic BCR after RP and Part III for discussion of evaluation and management of recurrence after radiotherapy (RT) and focal therapy, regional recurrence, and oligometastasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The systematic review that informs this Guideline was based on searches in Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to July 21, 2022), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (through August 2022), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (through August 2022). Update searches were conducted on July 26, 2023. Searches were supplemented by reviewing electronic database reference lists of relevant articles. RESULTS: In a collaborative effort between AUA, ASTRO, and SUO, the Salvage Therapy for Prostate Cancer Panel developed evidence- and consensus-based statements to provide guidance for the care of patients who experience BCR after initial definitive local therapy for clinically localized disease. CONCLUSIONS: Advancing work in the area of diagnostic tools (particularly imaging), biomarkers, radiation delivery, and biological manipulation with the evolving armamentarium of therapeutic agents will undoubtedly present new opportunities for patients to experience long-term control of their cancer while minimizing toxicity.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Terapia de Salvação , Humanos , Masculino , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Próstata/patologia , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Terapia de Salvação/métodos , Revisões Sistemáticas como AssuntoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The summary presented herein covers recommendations on salvage therapy for recurrent prostate cancer intended to facilitate care decisions and aid clinicians in caring for patients who have experienced a recurrence following prior treatment with curative intent. This is Part II of a three-part series focusing on treatment delivery for non-metastatic biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary radical prostatectomy (RP). Please refer to Part I for discussion of treatment decision-making and Part III for discussion of evaluation and management of recurrence after radiotherapy (RT) and focal therapy, regional recurrence, and oligometastasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The systematic review that informs this Guideline was based on searches in Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to July 21, 2022), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (through August 2022), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (through August 2022). Update searches were conducted on July 26, 2023. Searches were supplemented by reviewing electronic database reference lists of relevant articles. RESULTS: In a collaborative effort between AUA, ASTRO, and SUO, the Salvage Therapy for Prostate Cancer Panel developed evidence- and consensus-based guideline statements to provide guidance for the care of patients who experience BCR after initial definitive local therapy for clinically localized disease. CONCLUSIONS: Optimizing and personalizing the approach to salvage therapy remains an ongoing area of work in the field of genitourinary oncology and represents an area of research and clinical care that requires well-coordinated, multi-disciplinary efforts.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Terapia de Salvação , Humanos , Masculino , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Próstata/patologia , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Revisões Sistemáticas como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Physician treatment preference may influence how risks are communicated in prostate cancer consultations. We identified persuasive language used when describing cancer prognosis, life expectancy, and side effects in relation to a physician's recommendation for aggressive (surgery/radiation) or nonaggressive (active surveillance/watchful waiting) treatment. METHODS: A qualitative analysis was performed on transcribed treatment consultations of 40 men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer across 10 multidisciplinary providers. Quotes pertaining to cancer prognosis, life expectancy, and side effects were randomized. Coders predicted physician treatment recommendations from isolated blinded quotes. Testing characteristics of consensus predictions against the physician's treatment recommendation were reported. Coders then identified persuasive strategies favoring aggressive/nonaggressive treatment for each quote. Frequencies of persuasive strategies favoring aggressive/nonaggressive treatment were reported. Logistic regression quantified associations between persuasive strategies and physician treatment recommendations. RESULTS: A total of 496 quotes about cancer prognosis (n = 127), life expectancy (n = 51), and side effects (n = 318) were identified. The accuracy of predicting treatment recommendation based on individual quotes containing persuasive language (n = 256/496, 52%) was 91%. When favoring aggressive treatment, persuasive language downplayed side effect risks and amplified cancer risk (recurrence, progression, or mortality). Significant predictors (P < 0.05) of aggressive treatment recommendation included favorable side effect interpretation, downplaying side effects, and long time horizon for cancer risk due to longevity. When favoring nonaggressive treatment, persuasive language amplified side effect risks and downplayed cancer risk. Significant predictors of nonaggressive treatment recommendation included unfavorable side effect interpretation, favorable interpretation of cancer risk, and short time horizon for cancer risk due to longevity. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians use persuasive language favoring their preferred treatment, regardless of whether their recommendation is appropriate. IMPLICATIONS: Clinicians should quantify risk so patients can judge potential harm without solely relying on persuasive language. HIGHLIGHTS: Physicians use persuasive language favoring their treatment recommendation when communicating risks of prostate cancer treatment, which may influence a patient's treatment choice.Coders predicted physician treatment recommendations based on isolated, randomized quotes about cancer prognosis, life expectancy, and side effects with 91% accuracy.Qualitative analysis revealed that when favoring nonaggressive treatment, physicians used persuasive language that amplified side effect risks and downplayed cancer risk. When favoring aggressive treatment, physicians did the opposite.Providers should be cognizant of using persuasive strategies and aim to provide quantified assessments of risk that are jointly interpreted with the patient so that patients can make evidence-based conclusions regarding risks without solely relying on persuasive language.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Comunicação , Idioma , Comunicação Persuasiva , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Pesquisa QualitativaRESUMO
Interrogating plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to detect cancer offers promise; however, no current tests scan structural variants (SVs) throughout the genome. Here, we report a simple molecular workflow to enrich a tumorigenic SV (DNA palindromes/fold-back inversions) that often demarcates genomic amplification and its feasibility for cancer detection by combining low-throughput next-generation sequencing with automated machine learning (Genome-wide Analysis of Palindrome Formation, GAPF-seq). Tumor DNA signal manifested as skewed chromosomal distributions of high-coverage 1-kb bins (HCBs), differentiating 39 matched breast tumor DNA from normal DNA with an average AUC of 0.9819. In a proof-of-concept liquid biopsy study, cfDNA from 0.5 mL plasma from prostate cancer patients was sufficient for binary classification against matched buffy coat DNA with an average AUC of 0.965. HCBs on the X chromosome emerged as a determinant feature and were associated with AR amplification. GAPF-seq could generate unique cancer-specific SV profiles in an agnostic liquid biopsy setting.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Prostate cancer represents the most common cancer diagnosis in Black men and is the second leading cause of cancer death in this population. Multilevel disparities have been well-documented in Black men with prostate cancer and play a role in poorer survival outcomes when compared with White men with prostate cancer. In this review, we highlight the changing trend in disparities for systemic therapy outcomes in Black men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer. METHODS: We reviewed data from real-world registries and prospective clinical trials with a particular focus on equal access settings to compare outcomes to systemic therapies between Black and White men with metastatic prostate cancer. RESULTS: In metastatic prostate cancer, there is growing evidence to suggest that Black men may have similar, if not better, outcomes to systemic therapies than White men with advanced disease, as corroborated by prospective studies and clinical trials where health care delivery and follow-up are more likely to be standardized. CONCLUSION: This review illustrates the importance of nonbiological drivers of racial disparities in Black men with advanced prostate cancer. Mitigating barriers to health care access and delivery as well as including participation in clinical trials will be pivotal to ongoing efforts to address disparities in systemic therapy outcomes for Black men with metastatic prostate cancer.
Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Neoplasias da Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , População BrancaRESUMO
Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a promising source of gene mutations for cancer detection by liquid biopsy. However, no current tests interrogate chromosomal structural variants (SVs) genome-wide. Here, we report a simple molecular and sequencing workflow called Genome-wide Analysis of Palindrome Formation (GAPF-seq) to probe DNA palindromes, a type of SV that often demarcates gene amplification. With low-throughput next-generation sequencing and automated machine learning, tumor DNA showed skewed chromosomal distributions of high-coverage 1-kb bins (HCBs), which differentiated 39 breast tumors from matched normal DNA with an average Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.9819. A proof-of-concept liquid biopsy study using cfDNA from prostate cancer patients and healthy individuals yielded an average AUC of 0.965. HCBs on the X chromosome emerged as a determinant feature and were associated with androgen receptor gene amplification. As a novel agnostic liquid biopsy approach, GAPF-seq could fill the technological gap offering unique cancer-specific SV profiles.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The liver is a common site of cancer metastasis, most commonly from colorectal cancer, and primary liver cancers that have metastasized are associated with poor outcomes. The underlying mechanisms by which the liver defends against these processes are largely unknown. Prohibitin 1 (PHB1) and methionine adenosyltransferase 1A (MAT1A) are highly expressed in the liver. They positively regulate each other and their deletion results in primary liver cancer. Here we investigated their roles in primary and secondary liver cancer metastasis. METHODS: We identified common target genes of PHB1 and MAT1A using a metastasis array, and measured promoter activity and transcription factor binding using luciferase reporter assays and chromatin immunoprecipitation, respectively. We examined how PHB1 or MAT1A loss promotes liver cancer metastasis and whether their loss sensitizes to colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). RESULTS: Matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7) is a common target of MAT1A and PHB1 and its induction is responsible for increased migration and invasion when MAT1A or PHB1 is silenced. Mechanistically, PHB1 and MAT1A negatively regulate MMP7 promoter activity via an AP-1 site by repressing the MAFG-FOSB complex. Loss of MAT1A or PHB1 also increased MMP-7 in extracellular vesicles, which were internalized by colon and pancreatic cancer cells to enhance their oncogenicity. Low hepatic MAT1A or PHB1 expression sensitized to CRLM, but not if endogenous hepatic MMP-7 was knocked down first, which lowered CD4+ T cells while increasing CD8+ T cells in the tumor microenvironment. Hepatocytes co-cultured with colorectal cancer cells express less MAT1A/PHB1 but more MMP-7. Consistently, CRLM raised distant hepatocytes' MMP-7 expression in mice and humans. CONCLUSION: We have identified a PHB1/MAT1A-MAFG/FOSB-MMP-7 axis that controls primary liver cancer metastasis and sensitization to CRLM. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Primary and secondary liver cancer metastasis is associated with poor outcomes but whether the liver has underlying defense mechanism(s) against metastasis is unknown. Here we examined the hypothesis that hepatic prohibitin 1 (PHB1) and methionine adenosyltransferase 1A (MAT1A) cooperate to defend the liver against metastasis. Our studies found PHB1 and MAT1A form a complex that suppresses matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7) at the transcriptional level and loss of either PHB1 or MAT1A sensitizes the liver to metastasis via MMP-7 induction. Strategies that target the PHB1/MAT1A-MMP-7 axis may be a promising approach for the treatment of primary and secondary liver cancer metastasis.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Animais , Humanos , Camundongos , Linfócitos T CD8-Positivos/metabolismo , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Metaloproteinase 7 da Matriz/genética , Metionina Adenosiltransferase/genética , Metionina Adenosiltransferase/metabolismo , Proibitinas , Microambiente TumoralRESUMO
Black men with prostate cancer have historically had worse outcomes than white men with prostate cancer. The causes of this disparity in outcomes are multi-factorial, but a potential basis is that prostate cancers in Black men are biologically distinct from prostate cancers in white men. Evidence suggests that genetic and ancestral factors, molecular pathways involving androgen and non-androgen receptor signalling, inflammation, epigenetics, the tumour microenvironment and tumour metabolism are contributing factors to the racial disparities observed. Key genetic and molecular pathways linked to prostate cancer risk and aggressiveness have potential clinical relevance. Describing biological drivers of prostate cancer disparities could inform efforts to improve outcomes for Black men with prostate cancer.
RESUMO
Androgen receptor- (AR-) indifference is a mechanism of resistance to hormonal therapy in prostate cancer (PC). Here we demonstrate that the HOX/CUT transcription factor ONECUT2 (OC2) activates resistance through multiple drivers associated with adenocarcinoma, stem-like and neuroendocrine (NE) variants. Direct OC2 targets include the glucocorticoid receptor and the NE splicing factor SRRM4, among others. OC2 regulates gene expression by promoter binding, enhancement of chromatin accessibility, and formation of novel super-enhancers. OC2 also activates glucuronidation genes that irreversibly disable androgen, thereby evoking phenotypic heterogeneity indirectly by hormone depletion. Pharmacologic inhibition of OC2 suppresses lineage plasticity reprogramming induced by the AR signaling inhibitor enzalutamide. These results demonstrate that OC2 activation promotes a range of drug resistance mechanisms associated with treatment-emergent lineage variation in PC. Our findings support enhanced efforts to therapeutically target this protein as a means of suppressing treatment-resistant disease.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There are many FDA-approved drugs for advanced prostate cancer (PC), yet public interest in these drugs is not well understood. We compared public interest and state-level predictors of interest in five common oral adjunctive hormonal therapies. METHODS: Google Trends™ was queried for: "Enzalutamide", "Abiraterone Acetate", "Bicalutamide", "Apalutamide", and "Darolutamide" in the United States from January 2004 to November 2022. Data are presented as relative search index (RSI) by month. RSI ranges from 0 to 100 with 100 being peak popularity, 50 being half of the peak popularity, and 0 representing insufficient data to be determined. RESULTS: Several drugs abruptly increased in popularity following FDA approval including abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide. All drugs decreased in popularity from January 2020 to July 2020, corresponding with the COVID-19 pandemic. In the most recent 5 years, enzalutamide and abiraterone were the most common searched drugs, with bicalutamide a close 3rd place. States that did not expand Medicaid were significantly more likely to have bicalutamide as the top search drug vs. states that expanded Medicaid (p = 0.012). Across all states with data (n = 39), higher bicalutamide RSIs were significantly associated with lower household income (r = 0.385, p = 0.02) and greater percent of uninsured adults (r = 0.426, p = 0.007). This is the first study using Google Trends to compare advanced PC drugs by search popularity. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the emergence of more effective medications, bicalutamide remains relatively popular, particularly in states with lower household income, more uninsured adults, or those that did not expand Medicaid, possibly due to its lower cost.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer and is notorious for its resistance to both chemotherapy and small-molecule inhibitor targeted therapies. Subcellular targeted cancer therapy may thwart the resistance to produce a substantial effect. METHODS: We tested whether the resistance can be circumvented by subcellular targeted cancer therapy with DZ-CIS, which is a chemical conjugate of the tumor-cell specific heptamethine carbocyanine dye (HMCD) with cisplatin (CIS), a chemotherapeutic drug with limited use in ccRCC treatment because of frequent renal toxicity. RESULTS: DZ-CIS displayed cytocidal effects on Caki-1, 786-O, ACHN, and SN12C human ccRCC cell lines and mouse Renca cells in a dose-dependent manner and inhibited ACHN and Renca tumor formation in experimental mouse models. Noticeably, in tumor-bearing mice, repeated DZ-CIS use did not cause renal toxicity, in contrast to the CIS-treated control animals. In ccRCC tumors, DZ-CIS treatment inhibited proliferation markers but induced cell death marker levels. In addition, DZ-CIS at half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) sensitized Caki-1 cells to small-molecule mTOR inhibitors. Mechanistically, DZ-CIS selectively accumulated in ccRCC cells' subcellular organelles, where it damages the structure and function of mitochondria, leading to cytochrome C release, caspase activation, and apoptotic cancer cell death. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study strongly suggest DZ-CIS be tested as a safe and effective subcellular targeted cancer therapy.