Cultivating the ideal obstetrical patient: How physicians-in-training describe pain associated with childbirth.

We explore the work labor pain does in cultivating obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) resident physicians' conceptualization of the "ideal" obstetrical patient - replete with moral, pharmacological, classed, and racialized dimensions. Our data is derived from a single-site, qualitative study conducted at an urban academic OB/GYN residency program in the midwestern U.S. between 2018 and 2019. 36 residents, 9 from each post-graduate year, were randomly selected to complete a semi-structured interview on their perceptions of patient pain surrounding OB/GYN procedures. Grounded theory analysis of the OB/GYN residents' interviews revealed the idealized obstetrical patient is quiet and easily controlled. Residents praised women whom they believed were suppressing their labor pain, a racialized and classed concept that furthers misconceptions about the "obstetric hardiness" of Black women and the hypersensitivity of wealthy White women. Participants' conceptions of "bad" patients included those with less cultural health capital due to low health literacy and socioeconomic status, which impeded the patients' ability to participate in shared decision-making. Despite acknowledging the importance of patient autonomy regarding pain control during labor, the interviewed residents positioned themselves as the ultimate authority. Their subjective assessment of patients' pain inherently invoked their personal biases, such as conflating low socioeconomic status and race. Some participants posited an inverse relationship between hardship and pain, while others questioned whether those with low health literacy exaggerate their pain due to fear of the clinical encounter or to secure medical attention. Both framings have concerning implications for inadequate pain control and the unintentional perpetuation of obstetric violence and obstetric racism within the profession.

Perceptions of a Spanish language Reproductive Health Self-assessment Tool Among Spanish-Speaking Women at a Federally Qualified Health Center.

Latinas face barriers to contraceptive and preconception care. Using a Reproductive Health Self-Assessment Tool (RH-SAT) before primary care visits may help overcome these barriers. Twenty Spanish-speaking women at a Federally Qualified Health Center in Chicago received the RH-SAT before their visit then completed a phone interview about their perceptions of the RH-SAT. Transcripts were thematically analyzed using a modified grounded theoretical approach. All participants self-reported Hispanic/Latina ethnicity, either of Mexican (N = 19) or Puerto Rican (N = 1) origin. Participants (1) believed the RH-SAT was easy to use and its content was useful for women with a variety of reproductive goals; (2) felt it provided new information about preparing for pregnancy and contraception; (3) were prompted by the RH-SAT to self-reflect and ask questions not previously considered; and (4) felt it could help overcome barriers some women experience in discussing reproductive health. Participants felt the RH-SAT provided new information and would prompt them to discuss contraception and/or preparing for pregnancy with their clinician. This tool has the potential to facilitate patient-clinician discussion of reproductive health in primary care and overcome barriers experienced by some Spanish-speaking women.

The Role of Patient Activation in Contraceptive Use.

PURPOSE: Many unintended pregnancies occur due to to contraceptive misuse and nonuse, which is partly due to to lack of knowledge and low self-efficacy related to contraception. We conducted an exploratory, cross-sectional study among low-income women to examine the relationship between knowledge, skills, and confidence in managing one's health, measured using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) and factors that influence contraceptive use. METHODS: A survey and chart review were conducted among 18- to 45-year-old women from a community health center in Chicago, Illinois, to measure the relationship between activation, self-confidence in avoiding pregnancy, contraception use, and contraceptive counseling. Associations between PAM and outcomes were evaluated using the χ(2) test and adjusted logistic regression models. RESULTS: Among 112 participants (61% Latina, 15% Black, 14% White), we found no differences in PAM by age, race/ethnicity, or parity. Women with higher PAM were more likely to be confident they could avoid pregnancy compared with women with lower PAM (50% vs. 7%; p = .02). Higher PAM remained a significant predictor for self-confidence after risk adjustment (odds ratio, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.11-8.78; p = .031). Greater confidence in avoiding pregnancy was associated with using a moderately or highly effective contraceptive method (43% vs. 14%; p = .047). Women with lower PAM were less likely to receive contraceptive counseling in the prior month (0% vs. 57%; p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Patient activation may be an important construct for understanding factors that influence women's contraceptive use, including self-confidence in avoiding pregnancy until it is desired and receiving contraceptive services in primary care.