Third-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for knee cartilage injury: 2-year randomized trial.

Numerous surgical techniques have been developed to treat osteochondral defects of the knee. A study reported encouraging outcomes of third-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation achieved using the solid agarose-alginate scaffold Cartipatch®. Whether this scaffold is better than conventional techniques remains unclear. This multicenter randomized controlled trial compared 2-year functional outcomes (IKDC score) after Cartipatch® versus mosaicplasty in patients with isolated symptomatic femoral chondral defects (ICRS III and IV) measuring 2.5-7.5 cm(2) . In addition, a histological evaluation based on the O'Driscoll score was performed after 2 years. We needed 76 patients to demonstrate an at least 10-point subjective IKDC score difference with α = 5% and 90% power. During the enrolment period, we were able to include 55 patients, 30 of them were allocated at random to Cartipatch® and 25 to mosaicplasty. After 2 years, eight patients had been lost to follow-up, six in the Cartipatch® group, and two in the mosaicplasty group. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were not significantly different. The mean IKDC score and score improvement after 2 years were respectively 73.7 ± 20.1 and 31.8 ± 20.8 with Cartipatch® and 81.5 ± 16.4 and 44.4 ± 15.2 with mosaicplasty. The 12.6-point absolute difference in favor of mosaicplasty is statistically significant. Twelve adverse events were recorded in the Cartipatch® group against six in the mosaicplasty group. After 2 years, functional outcomes were significantly worse after Cartipatch® treatment compared to mosaicplasty for isolated focal osteochondral defects of the femur.

Clinical and radiographic results of arthroscopic partial lateral meniscectomies in stable knees with a minimum follow up of 20 years.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective multicentric study was to evaluate the long-term effects of lateral meniscectomy and to identify those patients who are at the most risk of developing osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Eighty-nine arthroscopic partial lateral meniscectomies in stable knees with a mean follow-up of 22 ± 3 years were included. The following influencing factors were analyzed: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), physical activity, alignment, the types of meniscal lesions, the extent of meniscal resections and the initially associated cartilage lesions. An independent examiner reviewed all patients, using subjective (KOOS and IKDC scores) and objective clinical and radiological evaluations (IKDC score). The contralateral knee was used as a reference to calculate the prevalence and the incidence of OA. RESULTS: The mean age at the time of surgery was 35 ± 13 years. The main location of the lesions was the mid-section of the lateral meniscus (79% of the cases). At the latest follow-up, 48% of the patients had an active lifestyle with as many as 48% of the patients enjoying moderate to intense physical activity 22 years after the procedure (vs. 71% before surgery). The KOOS score evolved from 82 to 69% during the same period. The prevalence of OA was 56% in the affected knee and the difference of prevalence between the operated and healthy knees was 44%. In those patients presenting with an OA of the operated knee and a normal contralateral knee, the incidence of OA was 53%. Predictors of OA were an age superior to 38 years at the time of surgery, obesity (BMI >30), and valgus malalignment as well as the presence of cartilage and degenerative meniscal lesions at the time of surgery. CONCLUSION: In the long term, arthroscopic partial lateral meniscectomy in stable knees without initial cartilage lesions might yield good to excellent results in young patients. Patients are at higher risk to develop symptomatic OA if they are over 40, having a high BMI, valgus malalignment and cartilage lesions at the time of surgery. This study provides precise guidelines for the surgical treatment of lateral meniscus tears. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Histological features of the ACL remnant in partial tears.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the histological features of the remaining fibers bridging the femur and tibia in partial ACL tears. METHODS: Twenty-six ACL remnants were harvested from patients who had arthroscopic criteria concordant with a partial tear. Histological analysis includes cellularity, blood vessel density evaluation and characterization of the femoral bony insertion morphology. Immunohistochemical studies were carried out to determine cells positive for α-smooth actin and for mechanoreceptor detection. RESULTS: In these samples, a normal femoral insertion of the remnant was present in 22.7% of the cases. In 54% of the samples, substantial areas of hypercellularity were observed. Myofibroblasts were the predominant cell type and numerous cells positive for α-smooth actin were detected at immunostaining. Blood vessel density was increased in hypercellularity areas and in the synovial sheet. Free nerve endings and few Golgi or Ruffini corpuscles were detected in 41% of the specimens. The cellularity was correlated to the time between injury to surgery (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Competent histological structures including a well-vascularized synovial sheet, numerous fibroblasts and myofibroblasts and mechanoreceptors were found in ACL remnants. These histological findings bring additional knowledge towards the preservation of the ACL remnant in partial tears when ACL reconstruction or augmentation is considered. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Descriptive laboratory study.

Revision ACL reconstruction: influence of a lateral tenodesis.

PURPOSE: The aims of this article were to report the objective results of revision ACL reconstruction and to assess the influence of an associated lateral extra-articular tenodesis on knee stability and IKDC score. METHODS: This study focused on revision ACL reconstruction and was conducted over a 10-year period, from 1994 to 2003 with ten French orthopedic centers participating. The minimum follow-up required was 2 years. To be included, patients had to be evaluated at follow-up with the objective International Knee Documenting Committee (IKDC) scoring system. In 2006, 163 patients met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The objective IKDC knee score improved significantly after revision ACL reconstruction, with 72% IKDC A + B (26% A). When a lateral tenodesis was performed, 80% had a negative pivot shift, versus 63% without (P = 0.03), but there was no significant difference in the IKDC score. CONCLUSION: This study shows a significant improvement in the IKDC score after revision ACL reconstruction. The association of a lateral extra-articular tenodesis with the intra-articular graft increases knee stability after revision ACL reconstruction; however, this additional procedure does not significantly alter the IKDC score at follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective case series, Level IV.

Causes for failure of ACL reconstruction and influence of meniscectomies after revision.

The purpose of this multicenter retrospective study was to analyze the causes for failure of ACL reconstruction and the influence of meniscectomies after revision. This study was conducted over a 12-year period, from 1994 to 2005 with ten French orthopaedic centers participating. Assessment included the objective International Knee Documenting Committee (IKDC) 2000 scoring system evaluation. Two hundred and ninety-three patients were available for statistics. Untreated laxity, femoral and tibial tunnel malposition, impingement, failure of fixation were assessed, new traumatism and infection were recorded. Meniscus surgery was evaluated before, during or after primary ACL reconstruction, and then during or after revision ACL surgery. The main cause for failure of ACL reconstruction was femoral tunnel malposition in 36% of the cases. Forty-four percent of the patients with an anterior femoral tunnel as a cause for failure of the primary surgery were IKDC A after revision versus 24% if the cause of failure was not the femoral tunnel (P = 0.05). A 70% meniscectomy rate was found in revision ACL reconstruction. Comparison between patients with a total meniscectomy (n = 56) and patients with preserved menisci (n = 65) revealed a better functional result and knee stability in the non-meniscectomized group (P = 0.04). This study shows that the anterior femoral tunnel malposition is the main cause for failure in ACL reconstruction. This reason for failure should be considered as a predictive factor of good result of revision ACL reconstruction. Total meniscectomy jeopardizes functional result and knee stability at follow-up.