Update on Outcomes of a Novel Pathway for Thoracic Surgery Training.

BACKGROUND: The Joint Surgery-Thoracic Surgery (JS-TS) pathway began as a pilot program to grant both general surgery (GS) residency and thoracic surgery (TS) fellowship credit for 12 months of the PGY-4 and 5 years. This review updates the outcomes of this novel program. STUDY DESIGN: GS and TS programs in all approved JS-TS institutions were contacted for data collection, including JS-TS enrollee demographics and GS and TS case logs (CLs). National GS and TS CL data, and program and institutional data were publicly available. Enrollee case numbers were compared with those of their contemporaries. The American Board of Surgery and American Board of Thoracic Surgery provided certification data. Only enrollees who completed GS through 2019 were included. RESULTS: There were 90 JS-TS enrollees in 14 institutions. Two enrollees withdrew and 1 had not completed TS at the time of data collection leaving 87 for analysis. GS CLs were available for all 87 enrollees. TS CLs were available for all 62 enrollees who completed fellowship in 2016 or later. In GS, enrollees recorded fewer cases than their contemporary PGY-5s nationally in all domains except thoracic and endocrine. In TS, mean enrollee case numbers exceeded those of national contemporaries in every major category. Sixty-two JS-TS enrollees have achieved American Board of Surgery certification. Eighty-two enrollees are American Board of Thoracic Surgery certified with 5 currently in the certification process. CONCLUSIONS: The JS-TS pathway has proven a successful alternative route for TS training and could be a blueprint for other specialties considering novel avenues to specialty training.

Trends in pancreatic surgery experience in general surgery residency in the US, 1990-2021.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized a decline in resident pancreatic operative experience. The study assesses trends in that experience since 1990. METHODS: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) national case log data of general surgery residency graduates from 1990 to 2021 were reviewed. Collected and analyzed were the mean and median total number of pancreatic operations per resident, the mean number of specific case types performed, and the annual number of residency graduates. For selected procedures, the mean number of cases by resident role (Surgeon-Chief and Surgeon-Junior) was also analyzed. RESULTS: Both the mean and median total number of resident pancreatic operations has declined since 2009 as have the mean number of several specific pancreatic case types, including resections. The annual number of residency graduates has significantly increased since 1990, and particularly since 2009. CONCLUSIONS: Resident volume in pancreatic operations has significantly declined over the last decade.

Are General Surgery Residencies Preparing Graduates for the Practice of Today's General Surgeon? An Analysis of American Board of Surgery Data From Applicants and Re-certifying Surgeons.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the operative experience of general surgery residents and practicing general surgeons. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The scope of general surgery has evolved, yet it remains unknown whether residents are being exposed to the right mix of operations during residency. METHODS: A retrospective review of operative case logs submitted to the American Board of Surgery by US general surgery graduates and practicing general surgeons from 2013 to 2017 was performed. The operative experience of both cohorts was calculated as a proportion of total experience and ranked by frequency. The proportional experience between cohorts was analyzed using factorial analysis of variance. RESULTS: During the 5-year period, 5482 graduates applied for initial American Board of Surgery certification, and 4152 diplomates applied for recertification. Among all operative domains, the graduate experience was similar to that of diplomates in 6 of 12 areas (abdomen, alimentary tract, endoscopy, endocrine, other, skin/soft tissue; all P > 0.05). Residents have a greater experience in subspecialty areas (pediatric, thoracic, trauma, vascular, and plastic) at the expense of fewer breast procedures (all P < 0.05). The 30 operations most commonly performed by graduates comprised 67% of their total operative experience. Among these, residents performed 25 cases ≥10 times, 14 cases ≥20 times, and 7 cases ≥40 times. CONCLUSIONS: The operative experience of graduating US general surgery residents is largely similar to that of practicing general surgeons, particularly for core general surgery domains. These data offer reassurance that surgical training in the modern era appropriately exposes residents to the operations they may perform in practice.

Outcomes of the Early Specialization Program in Vascular Operation.

BACKGROUND: The Early Specialization Program (ESP) in vascular surgery (VS) began as a "pilot program" in 2003. There is only one published report on ESP outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: The general surgery (GS) and VS programs of all institutions using the ESP were contacted. Data gathered included demographics of ESP enrollees, participants' case logs (CLs), and CLs of participants' residency graduating classmates. National CLs, program and institutional data, and participants' certification status were publicly available. RESULTS: Nine institutions have enrolled 34 participants. Four withdrew, and four are in the GS component. Of 26 who have completed ESP, residency CLs were available for 20. Participants' percentile rankings among national contemporaries were lower than 13th for surgeon-junior cases (SJCs), higher than 73rd for surgeon-chief cases (SCCs), and 49th for total major cases (TMCs). They were lower than the 40th percentile in all domains except operative trauma (52; SD 23.8) and vascular (84.7; SD 22.1). As a percentage of the mean (% mean) for their own graduating classes, participants performed 91.8% (SD 16.5) as many SJCs, 143.7% (SD 45.1) as many SCCs, and 105% (SD 11.4) as many TMCs. Participants performed more than 79 % mean in every domain, including 213.4% (SD 82.4) as many vascular cases. As fellows, they ranked higher than the 50th percentile nationally in all but two categories. Twenty-four of 26 certified in GS. GS certification has lapsed for 5, 17 remain initially certified, and 2 have re-certified. All have current VS certification. CONCLUSION: Although infrequently employed, ESP remains an effective option for those who seek both GS and VS certification.

Contemporary Practice of General Surgery in the US: Analysis of American Board of Surgery Diplomate Case Logs.

BACKGROUND: The demographics and operative experience of general surgeons certified by the American Board of Surgery were last examined a decade ago. This study examines the contemporary workforce and scope of practice of general surgeons. STUDY DESIGN: Applications of diplomates seeking American Board of Surgery recertification from 2013 to 2017 were reviewed. Demographic data and case logs from the year before submission were analyzed. Total operative volume was examined, as were total volumes for 13 operative domains and 11 abdominal and alimentary tract subdomains. RESULTS: There were 4,735 general surgeons certified by the American Board of Surgery with a mean ± SD age of 53 ± 8 years and included 19% women and 14% international graduates. Regions of practice were 22% Northeast, 31% Southeast, 20% Midwest, 20% West, and 7% Southwest. Practice settings were 86% urban, 9% large rural, 4% small rural, and 1% isolated. Forty-one percent were 10 years, 35% were 20 years, and 24% were 30 years since initial certification. On average, general surgeons performed 417 ± 338 procedures per year, with abdominal, alimentary tract, and endoscopy being the most common. On multivariable analysis, male sex and being midcareer or late career were positively associated with being a high-volume (top quartile) surgeon, whereas age and practicing in either the Northeast or West demonstrated a negative association. CONCLUSIONS: The demographics of general surgeons have remained stable over time, except for an increased proportion of female surgeons. The overall operative experience is similar to years past but is widely variable between surgeons. Periodic analysis of these data is important for education and certification purposes.

The History of Surgical Education in the United States: Past, Present, and Future.

In just over 100 years, surgical education in the United States has evolved from a disorganized practice to a refined system esteemed worldwide as one of the premier models for the training of physicians and surgeons. But in the changing environment of health care, new challenges have arisen that could warrant a reform. To design our future, we must understand our past. The present work is not intended to be a comprehensive account of the history of American surgery. Instead, it tells the abridged history of surgical education in our country: the evolution from apprenticeships to residencies; the birth of hospital-based teaching; the impact of key historical events on training; the marks left by some preeminent characters; the conception of regulatory entities that steer our education; and, finally, how our process of training surgeons might need to be refined for the continued progress of our profession. Told in chronological order in a manner that will be memorable to readers, this story weaves together the key events that explain how our current surgical training models came to be. We conclude with a timely invitation to draw from these past lessons to redesign the future of graduate medical education, making a case for the transition to time-variable, competency-based medical education for surgical residency programs in America.

Impact of Integrated Thoracic Residency on General Surgery Residents' Thoracic Operative Volume.

BACKGROUND: Integrated thoracic surgery (I-6) programs have become popular over traditional general surgery (GS) pathways since their inception in 2007. However the effect of I-6 programs on GS resident training remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of I-6 programs on the thoracic operative experience of co-located GS residents. METHODS: Thoracic surgery cases recorded by residents in GS programs co-located with I-6 programs until 2019 were analyzed. Cases were reviewed 5 years before (TSR-5) through 5 years after (TSR-5) the matriculation of the first thoracic resident in the co-located I-6 program. To contextualize the overall trends in the field Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education GS resident case logs from 1990 to 2018 were analyzed and total thoracic surgery cases recorded. Statistical analysis was performed with linear regression. RESULTS: Residents in 19 GS programs with co-located I-6 programs showed an increase in total thoracic cases from 3710 to 4451 (Δ/year of +85.05 cases a year; P = .03) balanced by an increase in GS residents from 107 to 126 (Δ/year of +1.45; P = .01) with no significant overall change in the median thoracic operative case volume (31.00 at both thoracic residency before and after 5 years). Nationally from 1990 to 2018 there was no change in the total thoracic operative experience for GS graduates. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of I-6 programs did not negatively impact thoracic operative experience for residents in co-located GS programs. Adequate training of both I-6 and GS residents at the same institution is feasible.

Examining the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on the operative volumes of US general surgery residents.

BACKGROUND: In March 2020, the COVID-19 virus global pandemic forced healthcare systems to institute regulations including the cancellation of elective surgical cases, which likely decreased resident operative experience. The objective of this study was to determine whether the COVID-19 pandemic affected operative experiences of US general surgery residents. METHODS: The operative experience of general surgery residents was examined nationally and locally. Aggregate Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case logs for 2018 to 2019 (pre-COVID) and 2019 to 2020 (COVID) graduates were compared using national mean cumulative operative volume for total major and surgeon chief cases. Locally, ACGME case logs were used to analyze the operative experience among residents at a single, academic center. Average operative volumes per month per resident during peak COVID-19 quarantine months were compared with those the previous year. RESULTS: Compared with 2019 graduates, 2020 graduates completed 1.5% fewer total major cases (1055 ± 155 vs 1071 ± 150, P = .011). This was most evident during chief year, with 8.4% fewer surgeon chief cases logged in 2020 compared with 2019 (264 ± 67 vs 289 ± 69, P < .001). Institutional data revealed that during the peak of the pandemic, residents across all levels completed 42.5% fewer total major operations (12 ± 11 vs 20 ± 14, P < .001). This effect was more pronounced among junior residents compared with senior and chief residents. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with decreased resident case volume. The ramifications of the COVID-19 pandemic for operative competency and autonomy should be carefully examined.

Analysis of Sex Diversity Trends Among Ophthalmology Match Applicants, Residents, and Clinical Faculty.

IMPORTANCE: The proportion of women in the field of ophthalmology in the US trails the proportion of women in the general population. Sex diversity trends have been studied in other specialties, but there is a dearth of such literature in ophthalmology. OBJECTIVE: To investigate trends in the proportion of female ophthalmology match applicants, residents, and clinical faculty. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study examined data from the San Francisco Match, the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Association of American Medical Colleges, and American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2019. Data from ophthalmology match applicants, residents, clinical faculty at US medical schools, and AAO members were collected. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The proportion of female applicants, residents, and medical school clinical faculty in ophthalmology. RESULTS: Data were obtained from a total of 2807 ophthalmology applicants (35.3% female), 1 004 563 residents (43.8% female), 463 079 clinical faculty members (42.5% female), and 78 968 AAO members (26.1% female). Male ophthalmology residency applicants outnumbered female applicants by a ratio of 1.6:1 from 2016 to 2019. The percentage of female matched applicants in 2016 (41% [168/406]) and 2019 (42% [184/436]) differed by 1% (percent change, 0.99; 95% CI, -1.12 to 3.1; P = .36). There was a 2.3% increase (percent change, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.24-0.43; P < .001) in the percentage of female residents across all surgical specialties from 2011 (39.7% [8710/21 985]) to 2019 (42% [10 951/26 082]) but a 2.5% decrease (percent change, -0.45; 95% CI, -0.84 to -0.06; P = .02) in the percentage of female residents in ophthalmology from 2011 (41.5% [589/1419]) to 2019 (39% [575/1473]). The percentage of female ophthalmology clinical faculty differed by 2% (percent change, 1.02; 95% CI, -0.21 to 2.24; P = .10) from 2017 (38% [1179/3102]) to 2019 (40% [1225/3060]). From 2016 to 2019, male practicing ophthalmologists in the AAO outnumbered female practicing ophthalmologists by a ratio of 3:1. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study found that the percentage of women in the field of ophthalmology remains lower than percentages in other specialties, and the percentage of female ophthalmology residents has decreased in recent years. More efforts are needed to improve female representation in ophthalmology.

US Medical Licensing Exam Performance and American Board of Surgery Qualifying and Certifying Examinations.

BACKGROUND: Program directors use US Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) scores as criteria for ranking applicants. First-time pass rates of the American Board of Surgery (ABS) Qualifying (QE) and Certifying (CE) Examinations have become important measures of residency program quality. USMLE Step 1 will become pass/fail in 2022. STUDY DESIGN: American Board of Surgery QE and CE success rates were assessed considering multiple characteristics of highly ranked (top 20) applicants to 22 general surgery programs in 2011. Chi-square, t-test, Wilcoxon Rank sum, linear and logistic regression were used, as appropriate. RESULTS: The QE and CE first attempt pass rates were 96% (235/244) and 86% (190/221), respectively. QE/CE success was not significantly associated with sex, race, research experience, or publications. Alpha Omega Alpha (AΩA) status was associated with success on the index CE (98% vs 83%; p = 0.008). Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) scores of surgeons who passed QE on their first attempt were higher than scores of those who failed (Step 1: 233 vs 218; p = 0.016); (Step 2CK: 244 vs 228, p = 0.009). For every 10-point increase in Step 1 and 2CK scores, the odds of passing CE on the first attempt increased 1.5 times (95% CI 1.12, 2.0; p = 0.006) and 1.5 times (95% CI 1.11, 2.02, p = 0.008), respectively. For every 10-point increase in Steps 1 and 2CK scores, the odds of passing the QE on the first attempt increased 1.85 times (95% CI 1.11, 3.09; p = 0.018) and 1.86 times (95% CI 1.14, 3.06, p = 0.013), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 CK examination scores correlate with American Board of Surgery QE and CE performance and success. The USMLE decision to transition Step 1 to a pass/fail examination will require program directors to identify other factors that predict ABS performance for ranking applicants.

The Challenges of Program Accreditation Decisions in 2021 for the ACMGE Review Committee for Surgery.

Through only a few months, the COVID-19 pandemic has greatly impacted the daily activities and education of surgical residents and fellows and the programs in which they are enrolled. The pandemic has also forced many changes for the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and its Review Committee for Surgery. This article details some of those changes and their effect on the process of conferring 2021 accreditation decisions by the Review Committee.

Trends in Ophthalmology Resident Operative Experience and the Early Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Purpose This study aimed to evaluate trends in ophthalmology resident operative experience and the early impact of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Design Present study is a retrospective analysis of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Case Log System. Participants Anonymized graduating resident case logs from 2011 to 2020 academic years (AYs) were examined for this study. Methods Regression analysis for each procedure category was performed to identify trends between 2011 and 2019 AYs. Unpaired two-tailed t -test compared 2018 to 2019 and 2019 to 2020 AY's for each category surgeon (S) and as surgeon and assistant (S + A). Main Outcome Measures Mean and median cases as (S) and (S + A) during 2011 to 2019 AYs. Comparison between 2018 to 2019 and 2019 to 2020 AY's for each category as (S) and (S + A) to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results Total ophthalmology procedures as (S) rose from a mean of 479.6 to 601.3 ( p < 0.001; R 2 = 0.96; Δ/year = 16.9) and a median of 444 to 537 ( p < 0.001; R 2 = 0.97; Δ/year = 13.1). Total procedures as (S + A) rose from a mean of 698.1 to 768 ( p < 0.01; R 2 = 0.83; Δ/year = 9.07) and a median of 677 to 734 ( p < 0.05; R 2 = 0.61; Δ/year = 6.64). Cataract procedures as (S) rose from a mean of 152.8 to 208 ( p < 0.001; R 2 = 0.99; Δ/year = 7.98) and a median of 146 to 197 ( p < 0.001; R 2 = 0.97; Δ/year = 7.87). Cataract procedures as both (S + A) rose from a mean 231.4 to 268.7 ( p < 0.001; R 2 = 0.95; Δ/year = 5.5) and a median of 213 to 254 ( p < 0.001; R 2 = 0.93; Δ/year = 5.33). Between 2018 to 2019 and 2019 to 2020 AYs, the first pandemic year was associated with significant reductions in total procedures (601.3-533.7 [ p < 0.0001]) as (S) and 768.0 to 694.4 ( p < 0.0001) as (S + A), cataract surgery (208-162.2 [ p < 0.0001]) as (S) and 268.7 to 219.1 ( p < 0.0001) as (S + A), and glaucoma surgery (16.3-14.2 [ p = 0.0068]) as (S) and 25.6 to 22.6 ( p = 0.0063) as (S + A). Conclusion During 2011 to 2019 AYs, cataract, intravitreal injections, glaucoma, and total procedures increased significantly. During the early period of the COVID-19 pandemic (2019-2020 AY), national halting of elective procedures had a precipitous effect on resident cataract surgery experience to volumes similar to 2013 to 2014 AY where the mean was twice the current required minimum number. With few exceptions, other procedure volumes remained stable.

New endocrine fellowship programs do not decrease the endocrine surgery experience of residents in co-located general surgery programs.

BACKGROUND: New pediatric and vascular surgical fellowship programs decrease resident operative experience in those subspecialties in co-located general surgery programs.After 2 decades of increases, the mean number of endocrine surgery cases performed by general surgery residents nationally has decreased since 2010 to 2011. We hypothesized that new endocrine surgery fellowship programs lead to a decrease in the number of endocrine surgery cases performed by co-located general surgery residents and may be a contributing factor in the recent national decline in endocrine surgery cases performed by general surgery residents. METHODS: Endocrine surgery fellowship programs associated with a single, Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education-accredited general surgery program that have completed training of 1 fellow by the 2014-2015 academic year were identified. Endocrine surgery cases performed by general surgery residents who completed co-located general surgery programs from 2002 to 2003 through 2017 to 2018 were recorded. Descriptive statistics are shown as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance was calculated using the Mann-Whitney U Test. RESULTS: In the 13 general surgery programs with 5 years of case log data after the matriculation of the first fellow, the mean number of total endocrine surgery cases/resident increased from 47 ± 23 in year 0 to 57 ± 25 in year 5 (z-score = 2.53; P < .05). CONCLUSION: New endocrine surgery fellowship programs do not decrease the endocrine surgery cases performed by general surgery residents and have not contributed to the national decline in endocrine surgery cases by general surgery residents.

Where Has All the Complexity Gone? An Analysis of the Modern Surgical Resident Operative Experience.

OBJECTIVES: The operative experience of today's general surgery (GS) residents are changing. The Surgical Council on Resident Education (SCORE) was founded to provide a standardized, competency-based curriculum. We set out to evaluate resident operative experience in core and advanced operations. DESIGN: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) national operative log reports from 2010 to 2018 were reviewed. Operative volume data for 344 operations were extracted and analyzed. Operations were designated as core, advanced, or undefined as listed by SCORE, and stratified as GS or subspecialty. SETTING: National analysis utilizing ACGME operative log reports. PARTICIPANTS: All graduating general surgery residents between 2010 and 2018. RESULTS: A total of 10,118 residents completed GS training with an average of 1121.5 ± 29.3 total cases. Core operations comprised 80.5% of total volume while advanced comprised only 8.0%. The total core experience increased (+7.0 cases/year), while total advanced experience decreased (-1.4 cases/year) (p < 0.01 each). Compositional analysis among core operations revealed an increase in 9/13 GS domains and a decrease in 8/10 subspecialty domains (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There has been an increase in core operative experience with a concurrent decrease in advanced operative experience of graduating GS residents. These findings highlight the continued narrowing of the operative experience for trainees, with increasing focus on GS and less on subspecialty domains. Ongoing efforts to look beyond operative volume to ensure competency of graduates will prove beneficial.

The ups and downs of general surgery resident experience in endocrine surgery: Analysis of 30 years of ACGME graduate case logs.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine trends in the experience of general surgery residents with endocrine surgery cases. METHODS: American Association of Endocrine Surgeons national general surgery case logs from 1989 through 2019 were reviewed. The numbers of individuals completing residency and the mean and median number of endocrine surgery cases by type and by level of operating resident surgeon were abstracted from annual data and analyzed. Descriptive statistics and linear regression analyses were performed modeling endocrine surgery cases over time and stratified by procedure type and resident level. RESULTS: The number of individuals completing general surgery residency each year increased from 981 to 1,219 (P < .001). The average total number of endocrine surgery cases performed increased from 17 to 33.2 (P < .001) but has declined since its peak at 36.9 in 2010 to 2011 (P = .014). Thyroid operations increased from 11.4 to 19.8 (P < .001) but peaked at 23.5 in 2010 to 2011 and have since declined (P < .001). Parathyroid operations more than doubled from 4.2 to 9.7 (P < .001). Adrenal operations increased from 1 to 2.2 (P < .001) and pancreatic endocrine operations increased from 0.2 to 1.5 (P < .001). Surgeon Chief endocrine surgery cases peaked at 14.4 in 2003 to 2004 but have since declined by 22.2% (P < .001). Surgeon Junior endocrine surgery cases increased overall (P < .001) but peaked at 22.8 in 2011 to 2012. There was increasing heterogeneity over time in trainee experience (P < .001). CONCLUSION: After having increased for 2 decades, the number of endocrine surgery cases performed by general surgery residents is currently in decline. Possible contributing factors include growth in the number of general surgery residents, variable and narrowed case mix, and encroachment by other learners.

Beyond the Surgical Time-Out: A National Needs Assessment of Preoperative Communication in US General Surgery Residency Programs.

OBJECTIVE: Perioperative communication is critical for procedural learning. In order to develop a periprocedural faculty development tool, we aimed to characterize the current status of preoperative communication in US General Surgery residency programs. DESIGN: After Association of Program Directors in Surgery approval, a survey was distributed to general surgery programs. Participants were asked about perioperative communication, including the frequency of preoperative briefings, defined as dedicated educational discussions prior to a procedure. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. SETTING: An anonymous electronic survey was distributed to interested programs in early 2019. PARTICIPANTS: US General Surgery trainees and attending surgeons. RESULTS: A total of 348 responses were recorded from 27 programs: 199 (57%) attending surgeons and 149 (43%) surgical trainees. Most respondents (83%) were from a university-affiliated program. Attending surgeons indicated a higher frequency of performing preoperative briefings compared to trainees (p < 0.001). Both trainees and attending surgeons were more likely to select their own group when asked who initiates a preoperative briefing. The majority of respondents (58%) agreed that discussing autonomy preoperatively improves resident autonomy for the case. In regards to the timing of preoperative briefings, most took place in/adjacent to the operating room, with only 60 participants (17%) participating in preoperative briefings the day/night prior to the operation. The most frequent topic discussed during preoperative briefings was "procedural content." Most participants selected "time constraints" as the greatest barrier to preoperative briefings and indicated that attending surgeon engagement was necessary to facilitate their use. Trainees were less likely to report engaging in immediate postoperative feedback, but more likely to report postoperative self-reflection. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative briefings are not necessarily routine and attendings and trainees differ on their perceptions related to their content and frequency. Efforts to address timing and scheduling and encourage dual-party engagement in perioperative communication are key to the development of tools to enhance this important aspect of procedural learning.