Phase I dose-escalation study of oral vinflunine administered once daily for 6 weeks every 8 weeks in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumours.

PURPOSE: Vinflunine ditartrate is a microtubule inhibitor belonging to the vinca alkaloid family. This phase I study was carried out to evaluate the maximal tolerated dose, the safety profile, the pharmacokinetics and the activity of oral vinflunine (VFL) given daily in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumours and who have failed standard therapy. METHODS: Patients were treated with oral VFL administered once daily for 6 weeks followed by a two-week rest. Sequential dose-escalating cohorts of patients were enrolled into 5 dose levels: 20, 40, 60, 75 and 95 mg/day. RESULTS: In total, 27 patients received 53 cycles. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were observed from 60 mg/day. The dose levels 75 and 95 mg/day were both assessed as maximal tolerated dose. The most frequent dose-limiting toxicities were of haematological origin. The recommended dose was defined as 60 mg/day, dose at which 4 patients experienced long stabilizations (≥4 months) and also received longer treatment duration in comparison with the other dose levels. Blood exposure of VFL and its active metabolite 4-O-deacetyl vinflunine (DVFL) increased proportionally to the dose levels. The concentrations of VFL and DVFL reached a steady state at, respectively, 5 and 20 days and remained stable for the rest of the cycle. Increased incidence of DLT/SAE was consistent with the increase of VFL dose and drug exposure. CONCLUSIONS: These results showed the feasibility of daily oral vinflunine administration on a 6-week treatment duration. This new schedule of administrations enabled sustained and stable blood concentrations of both VFL and DVFL. The recommended dose was defined at 60 mg/day, dose at which 4 patients experienced clinical benefit.

Phase II study of IV vinflunine in patients with chemotherapy naive metastatic malignant melanoma.

This phase II study evaluated vinflunine in chemotherapy naive patients with metastatic melanoma. Vinflunine was administered at 350 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks, but after 9 patients this was reduced to 320 mg/m(2) based on interim analyses of all phase II trials. A partial response was observed in 1 of the first 9 patients (11.1%) treated at 350 mg/m(2), which gives a 3.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.08-15.8] response rate in 33 patients. No change was the best response in 13 patients (39.4%) with progressive disease in 16 (48.5%) and 3 were not evaluable for response. The time to response was 1.4 months and duration was 6 months. At 350 mg/m(2) grade 4 neutropaenia occurred in 3 patients (33.3%) and grade 3 in 2 patients (22.2%) while at 320 mg/m(2) grade 4 neutropaenia occurred in 6 patients (25%) and grade 3 in 3 patients (12.5%) with 2 episodes of grade 3 febrile neutropaenia. Two patients (8.3%) had grade 3 anaemia. These results do not show activity at this dose and schedule for vinflunine in patients with chemotherapy naive metastatic melanoma.

A phase II study of oral vinorelbine in combination with cisplatin conducted in Taiwan in patients with unresectable localized or metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous vinorelbine plus cisplatin is widely prescribed for the treatment of NSCLC. The objective of this phase II study was to define the efficacy of an oral form of vinorelbine combined with cisplatin for first line treatment of advanced/metastatic NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From September 2002 to December 2003, 46 chemotherapy-naive patients received 80 mg/m(2) of cisplatin on day 1 and oral vinorelbine at 60 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: After an independent panel review, the response rate was 37.5 % [95% confidence interval (CI): 22.7-54.2%] in the evaluable population and 32.6% [95% CI: 19.5-48] in the intent-to-treat population. Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months and overall survival was 11.2 months. Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia was observed in 58.7% of patients, with febrile neutropenia and neutropenic infection in 4.3 and 8.7% of patients, respectively. The main non-haematological toxicities were hypotension, fatigue (8.7% for each) and gastrointestinal disorders with rare grades 3 and 4. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the combination of cisplatin at 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 with oral vinorelbine at 60 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks, is an active regimen, associated with acceptable toxicity. Oral vinorelbine is therefore a good alternative to the i.v. formulation.

Randomized study of vinorelbine--gemcitabine versus vinorelbine--carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The objective of this trial was to compare two vinorelbine-based doublets with carboplatin (CBDCA-VC) or with gemcitabine (VG) in patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 316 patients with advanced NSCLC previously untreated were randomized to either vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) D1,8 with carboplatin AUC 5 D1 (VC) or vinorelbine 25mg/m(2) with gemcitabine (VG) 1000 mg/m(2) both given D1,8 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was response rate with secondary parameters being survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tolerance and clinical benefit. RESULTS: The median number of cycles was four in each arm with a total of 1268 cycles. The objective response (OR) on intent-to-treat was 20.8% in VC and 28% in VG (p=0.15). Median PFS was 3.9 months in VC and 4.4 months (mo) in VG (p=0.18). Median survival was significantly longer (p=0.01) for VG with 11.5 mo compared to 8.6 mo in VC with 1 year survival at 48.9 and 34.4%, respectively. Tolerance was better in the VG arm as compared to the VC patients. Four toxic deaths were recorded in the VC group. Clinical benefit response rate was 32.4% compared to 40.9% in 111 and 110 evaluable patients in VC and VG, respectively. CONCLUSION: VG compared to VC resulted in a similar overall response rate, favourable median survival and a better toxicity profile. For non-cisplatin-based chemotherapy, VG is a useful alternative.