Ten years of monitoring dissolved inorganic nitrogen in runoff from sugarcane informs development of a modelling algorithm to prioritise organic and inorganic nutrient management.

Reducing nitrogen (N) losses from cropping systems to aquatic ecosystems is a global priority. In Australia, N losses from sugarcane production in catchments adjacent to the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) are threatening the health of this World Heritage-listed coral reef ecosystem. N losses from sugarcane can be reduced by improving fertiliser management. However, little is known about the contribution of organic sources of N, such as mill mud. We used more than 10 years of data from two of the main Australian sugarcane regions, a high (Wet Tropics) and moderate (Mackay Whitsundays) rainfall area, to calibrate and validate a model to predict dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) losses in runoff from both inorganic and organic fertilisers. DIN losses in runoff were well simulated (RMSE = 0.37 and 2.0 kg N ha-1 for the Wet Tropics and Mackay Whitsunday regions, respectively). Long-term simulations of rate and fertiliser deductions to account for N from organic sources showed that adopting best management practices for organic fertiliser (applying ≤50 wet t ha-1 mill mud) can significantly reduce DIN in runoff losses compared with applications of 150 wet t ha-1. Simulations of typical farmer practices in relation to fallow management (bare fallow vs. legume fallow) and organic fertiliser placement (buried in a fallow but surface applied to a green cane trash blanket in ratoons) showed that inorganic fertiliser rates need to be adjusted to account for N inputs from both mill mud and legume crops. Rates of application of organic N had a larger impact on DIN runoff losses than placement or timing of application. This work presents a DIN in runoff modelling algorithm that can be coupled with nitrogen models readily available in agricultural models to assess the impact of nutrient management on the quality of water leaving agricultural systems.

Farming and the geography of nutrient production for human use: a transdisciplinary analysis.

BACKGROUND: Information about the global structure of agriculture and nutrient production and its diversity is essential to improve present understanding of national food production patterns, agricultural livelihoods, and food chains, and their linkages to land use and their associated ecosystems services. Here we provide a plausible breakdown of global agricultural and nutrient production by farm size, and also study the associations between farm size, agricultural diversity, and nutrient production. This analysis is crucial to design interventions that might be appropriately targeted to promote healthy diets and ecosystems in the face of population growth, urbanisation, and climate change. METHODS: We used existing spatially-explicit global datasets to estimate the production levels of 41 major crops, seven livestock, and 14 aquaculture and fish products. From overall production estimates, we estimated the production of vitamin A, vitamin B12, folate, iron, zinc, calcium, calories, and protein. We also estimated the relative contribution of farms of different sizes to the production of different agricultural commodities and associated nutrients, as well as how the diversity of food production based on the number of different products grown per geographic pixel and distribution of products within this pixel (Shannon diversity index [H]) changes with different farm sizes. FINDINGS: Globally, small and medium farms (≤50 ha) produce 51-77% of nearly all commodities and nutrients examined here. However, important regional differences exist. Large farms (>50 ha) dominate production in North America, South America, and Australia and New Zealand. In these regions, large farms contribute between 75% and 100% of all cereal, livestock, and fruit production, and the pattern is similar for other commodity groups. By contrast, small farms (≤20 ha) produce more than 75% of most food commodities in sub-Saharan Africa, southeast Asia, south Asia, and China. In Europe, west Asia and north Africa, and central America, medium-size farms (20-50 ha) also contribute substantially to the production of most food commodities. Very small farms (≤2 ha) are important and have local significance in sub-Saharan Africa, southeast Asia, and south Asia, where they contribute to about 30% of most food commodities. The majority of vegetables (81%), roots and tubers (72%), pulses (67%), fruits (66%), fish and livestock products (60%), and cereals (56%) are produced in diverse landscapes (H>1·5). Similarly, the majority of global micronutrients (53-81%) and protein (57%) are also produced in more diverse agricultural landscapes (H>1·5). By contrast, the majority of sugar (73%) and oil crops (57%) are produced in less diverse ones (H≤1·5), which also account for the majority of global calorie production (56%). The diversity of agricultural and nutrient production diminishes as farm size increases. However, areas of the world with higher agricultural diversity produce more nutrients, irrespective of farm size. INTERPRETATION: Our results show that farm size and diversity of agricultural production vary substantially across regions and are key structural determinants of food and nutrient production that need to be considered in plans to meet social, economic, and environmental targets. At the global level, both small and large farms have key roles in food and nutrition security. Efforts to maintain production diversity as farm sizes increase seem to be necessary to maintain the production of diverse nutrients and viable, multifunctional, sustainable landscapes. FUNDING: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, CGIAR Research Programs on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security and on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health funded by the CGIAR Fund Council, Daniel and Nina Carasso Foundation, European Union, International Fund for Agricultural Development, Australian Research Council, National Science Foundation, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and Joint Programming Initiative on Agriculture, Food Security and Climate Change-Belmont Forum.

Increased levels of the translation initiation factor eIF4E in differentiating epithelial lung tumor cell lines.

Rates of eukaryotic protein synthesis and proliferation are dependent upon the availability of eIF4F, the cap-binding translation initiation complex that guides the ribosome onto the mRNA. One possible rate-limiting factor in eIF4F complex formation is the availability of eIF4E, which interacts specifically with the mRNA cap structure. As such, it has a potential role in the selective translation of growth-related mRNAs, with overexpression of eIF4E resulting in aberrant cell growth and transformation. A number of studies suggest that eIF4E may play a role in cellular differentiation as well as proliferation. We have previously reported that post-transcriptional regulation is involved in the induction of keratins in epithelial lung tumor cell lines exposed to the differentiation-modulating agent, bromo-deoxyuridine (BrdU). Here, we demonstrate that these BrdU-treated lung cells express elevated levels of eIF4E protein and enhanced phosphorylation of eIF4E. Overexpression of eIF4E by cDNA transfection in the poorly differentiated, keratin-negative human lung cell line, DLKP, was found to promote a flattened, more epithelial appearance to these cells, coupled with the induction of simple keratins (keratins 8 and 18). In contrast, levels of eIF4E expression were found to decrease during BrdU-induced differentiation of the leukemic cell line, HL-60, suggesting that there are cell-type differences in the response to BrdU and in the requirement for eIF4E during differentiation.