Age-stratified comorbid and pharmacologic analysis of patients with glioblastoma.

Background: Increased age is a strong and unfavorable prognostic factor for patients with glioblastoma (GBM). However, the relationships between stratified patient age, comorbidities, and medications have yet to be explored in GBM patient survival analyses. Objective: To evaluate co-morbid conditions, tumor-related symptoms, medication prescriptions, and subject age for patients with GBM and to establish potential targets for prospective studies. Methods: Electronic health records for 565 patients with IDHwt GBM were evaluated at a single center between January 1, 2000 and August 9, 2021 were retrospectively assessed. Data were stratified by MGMT promoter methylation status when available and were used to construct multivariable time-dependent cox models and intra-cohort hazards. Results: Younger (<65 years of age) but not older (≥65 years) GBM patients demonstrated a worse prognosis with movement related disabilities (P < 0.0001), gait/balance difficulty (P = 0.04) and weakness (P = 0.007), as well as psychiatric conditions, mental health disorders (P = 0.002) and anxiety (P = 0.001). In contrast, older but not younger GBM patients demonstrated a worse prognosis with epilepsy (P = 0.039). Both groups had worse survival with confusion/altered mental status (P = 0.023 vs < 0.000) and an improved survival with a Temozolomide prescription. Older but not younger GBM patients experienced an improved hazard with a prescription of ace-inhibitor medications (P = 0.048). Conclusion: Age-dependent novel associations between clinical symptoms and medications prescribed for co-morbid conditions were demonstrated in patients with GBM. The results of the current work support future mechanistic studies that investigate the negative relationship(s) between increased age, comorbidities, and drug therapies for differential clinical decision-making across the lifespan of patients with GBM.

Shaping Our Understanding of Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor: A Bibliometric Analysis of the 100 Most-Cited Articles.

BACKGROUND: Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are rare yet highly aggressive soft tissue sarcomas of mesenchymal origin, characterized by a heterogeneous pathological spectrum, limited therapeutic options, and high metastatic potential. METHODS: Here, the authors conducted a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the 100 most-cited MPNST articles by utilizing Elsevier's Scopus to identify all relevant published and indexed articles referring to MPNST, thereby aiming to elucidate the pertinent research findings regarding the disease's pathophysiology and therapeutic advancements. Articles were classified as basic science or clinical and analyzed for various bibliometric parameters. RESULTS: The majority of articles (75%) focused on clinical aspects, reflecting the extensive clinicopathological characterization of MPNSTs. Notable studies investigated prognostic factors, histological and immunohistochemical features, and diagnostic modalities. The identification of loss of function mutations in the polycomb repressive complex 2 emerged as a pivotal role, as it opened avenues for potential targets for novel therapeutic interventions. Newer articles (published in or after 2006) demonstrated higher citation rates, suggesting evolving impact and collaboration. CONCLUSIONS: This bibliometric analysis showed how developments in the understanding of MPNST pathophysiology and the creation of novel therapeutic strategies occurred throughout time. Changes that have been noticed recently could portend future innovative therapeutic approaches.

Evolution of neurosurgical advances and nuances in medulloblastoma therapy.

Medulloblastoma, the most common malignant brain tumor in children, presents a complex treatment challenge due to its propensity for infiltrative growth within the posterior fossa and its potential attachment to critical anatomical structures. Central to the management of medulloblastoma is the surgical resection of the tumor, which is a key determinant of patient prognosis. However, the extent of surgical resection (EOR), ranging from gross total resection (GTR) to subtotal resection (STR) or even biopsy, has been the subject of extensive debate and investigation within the medical community. Today, the impact of neurosurgical EOR on the prognosis of medulloblastoma patients remains a complex and evolving area of investigation. The conflicting findings in the literature, the challenges posed by critical surrounding anatomical structures, the potential for surgical complications and neurologic morbidity, and the nuanced interactions with molecular subgroups all contribute to the complexity of this issue. As the field continues to advance, the imperative to strike a delicate balance between maximizing resection and preserving quality of life remains central to the management of medulloblastoma patients.