A systematic review and meta-analysis of optical coherence tomography studies in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder.

OBJECTIVES: Due to the common neurodevelopmental origin and easy accessibility, the retina serves as a surrogate marker for changes in the brain. Hence, Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), a tool to examine the neuronal layers of retina has gained importance in investigating psychiatric disorders. Several studies in the last decade have reported retinal structural alterations in schizophrenia (SCZ), bipolar disorder (BD), and major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the findings are inconsistent. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis to investigate alterations in OCT parameters in patients with SCZ, BD and MDD. METHODS: We searched electronic databases for studies that examined OCT parameters in patients with SCZ, BD and MDD published up to January 2023. The primary outcome measures were thickness and volumes of the retinal Nerve Fibre Layer (RNFL). We conducted meta-analysis using a random effects model. RESULTS: The searches yielded 2638 publications of which 43 studies were included in the final analysis across all disorders. Compared to controls, the RNFL was thinner in SCZ patients (SMD = -0.37, p = <0.001) and BD patients (SMD = -0.67, p = < 0.001), but not in MDD patients (SMD = -0.08, p = 0.54). On quadrant wise analysis, temporal quadrant RNFL was thinner in SCZ but not in BD, while all other quadrants were thinner in both SCZ and BD. CONCLUSION: We found significant reductions in RNFL thickness in SCZ and BD, but not in MDD. The differential involvement in various quadrants and parameters across the disorders has potential implications for using retinal parameters as a diagnostic biomarker.

Trust and psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Impaired trust in other humans is commonly seen in psychosis and it leads to poor societal functioning. However, examining trust behavior in an experimental setting is challenging. Investigators have used the trust game, a neuro-economic game to assess trust behavior in psychosis. However, the findings are inconsistent. Hence, we systematically reviewed the existing literature and conducted a meta-analysis to examine trust behavior in patients with psychosis, their relatives, and those at high risk for psychosis. METHODS: We searched electronic databases for studies that have examined trust game in patients with psychosis, published up to November 2021. The primary outcome measure was the baseline trust in a trust game by patients and controls. The meta-analysis was performed if at least three data sets of control and patient groups were available for that measure/design. We conducted meta-analyses with a random-effects model. The results were described narratively wherever meta-analysis was not possible due to paucity of studies. RESULTS: The searches across the databases including cross-references yielded 465 publications of which 10 studies were included in the final analysis. Baseline trust in the trust game was significantly lower in patients with psychosis compared to controls (SMD 0.39, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.64, p -0.002). However, a similar decrease in baseline trust was not present in relatives of patients (SMD 0.08, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.36, p -0.58). CONCLUSIONS: The current meta-analysis suggests significant trust deficits in patients with psychosis. Future studies with a bigger sample size are required to understand the nature of trust deficits and factors affecting this impairment.

Relation between frontal pole volumes and cognitive insight in Schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: Cognitive insight comprising self-reflection and self-certainty is an important determinant of functional outcomes in Schizophrenia. The neural correlates of cognitive insight in Schizophrenia are underexamined. The frontal pole (FP) is implicated in metacognitive function in healthy individuals, but its role is not well examined in Schizophrenia. We had earlier reported the relationship between Frontal pole volumes and cognitive insight in a small sample of only male patients. Hence, we studied this relationship in an independent sample of schizophrenia patients and healthy controls. METHODS: We examined 41 healthy volunteers (HV) and 57 patients with Schizophrenia (SCZ). We used a previously validated manual morphometric method to perform FP parcellation on images obtained from a 3 T scanner and calculated the volumes. Cognitive insight was measured using Beck's Cognitive insight scale (BCIS). To assess the relationship between FP volumes and BCIS scores, multiple linear regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: In the overall sample, age, years of education, and intracranial volume were significant predictors of BCIS scores. Within the SCZ group, age and left FP volume were significant predictors of BCIS composite scores and age, ICV for BCIS-self certainty. There was no significant relationship between age and FP volumes in either SCZ or HV group. DISCUSSION: The current study in an independent sample further supports the critical role of the frontal pole in cognitive insight, earlier reported by us. As cognitive insight has a vital role in functional outcome, our findings have potential clinical implications.