Rituximab maintenance for patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma in first remission: results of the randomized NHL13 trial.

We investigated rituximab maintenance therapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=662) or follicular lymphoma grade 3b (n=21) in first complete remission. Patients were randomized to rituximab maintenance (n=338) or observation (n=345). At a median follow-up of 45 months, the event-free survival rate (the primary endpoint) at 3 years was 80.1% for rituximab maintenance versus 76.5% for observation. This difference was not statistically significant for the intent-to-treat population (likelihood ratio P=0.0670). The hazard ratio by treatment arm was 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.57-1.08; P=0.1433). The secondary endpoint, progression-free survival was also not met for the whole statistical model (likelihood ratio P=0.3646). Of note, rituximab maintenance was superior to observation when treatment arms only were compared (hazard ratio: 0.62; 95% confidence interval 0.43-0.90; P=0.0120). Overall survival remained unchanged (92.0 versus 90.3%). In subgroup analysis male patients benefited from rituximab maintenance with regards to both event-free survival (84.1% versus 74.4%) (hazard ratio: 0.58; 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.94; P=0.0267) and progression-free survival (89.0% versus 77.6%) (hazard ratio: 0.45; 95% confidence interval 0.25-0.79; P=0.0058). Women had more grade 3/4 adverse events (P=0.0297) and infections (P=0.0341). Men with a low International Prognostic Index treated with rituximab had the best outcome. In summary, rituximab maintenance in first remission after R-CHOP-like treatment did not prolong event-free, progression-free or overall survival of patients with aggressive B-non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The significantly better outcome of men warrants further studies prior to the routine use of rituximab maintenance in men with low International Prognostic Index. This trial is registered under EUDRACT #2005-005187-90 and www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00400478.

An assessment of cardiopulmonary bypass-induced changes in platelet function using whole blood and classical light transmission aggregometry: the results of a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we explored whether antiplatelet medications impair whole blood impedance aggregometry after cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) compared with classical light transmission aggregometry (LTA). METHODS: Multiplate (M) assays measuring changes in electrical resistance as aggregation units over time, and LTA assays (% aggregation) induced by collagen (COL), adenosine diphosphate (ADP), or arachidonic acid were performed simultaneously using arterial blood samples obtained before induction of anesthesia, 15 min and 3 h after neutralization of heparin in 70 consecutive patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting. Patients in Group A (n = 48) discontinued intake of antiplatelet drugs for at least 7 days and served as controls, patients in Group B (n = 11) received aspirin 100 mg/d and those in Group C (n = 11) aspirin 100 mg/d and clopidogrel 75 mg/d (dual antiplatelet therapy) until the day before surgery. RESULTS: In patients without antiplatelet therapy, 15 min and 3 h after protamine a significant decrease in platelet aggregation was observed with all three agonists and both aggregation methods. In patients receiving aspirin alone, LTA-COL, LTA-ADP and M-ADP changed significantly over time, and ADP assays of both aggregation methods showed a significant decrease in platelet aggregation 15 min after protamine in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy. When calculating the areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves for discrimination of antiplatelet agents, LTA-COL was able to discriminate between controls and patients receiving aspirin or dual antiplatelet therapy 15 min and 3 h after CPB and the M-ADP assay was able to discriminate between controls and patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy 3 h after protamine. CONCLUSION: Whole blood and classical LTA performed with all commonly used agonists enable detection of CPB-induced changes in platelet aggregation in patients not taking antiplatelet medication, whereas in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy, ADP-induced antiplatelet assays are preferable for detecting CPB-induced impairment of platelet aggregation.