Colorectal cancer incidence trends by tumour location among adults of screening-age in England: a population-based study.

AIM: Proximal and distal colorectal cancers (CRCs) exhibit different clinical, molecular and biological patterns. The aim of this study was to determine temporal trends in the age-standardized incidence rates (ASIRs) of proximal and distal CRC following the introduction of the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in 2006. METHOD: The National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service database was used to identify incident cases of CRC among adults of screening age (60-74 years) between 2001 and 2017. ASIRs were calculated using the European Standard Population 2013 and incidence trends analysed by anatomical subsite (proximal, caecum to descending colon; distal, sigmoid to rectum), sex and Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) quintile using Joinpoint regression software. RESULTS: Between 2001 and 2017, 541 515 incident cases of CRC were diagnosed [236 167 proximal (43.6%) and 305 348 distal (56.4%)]. A marginal reduction in the proximal ASIR was noted from 2008 [annual percentage change (APC) -1.4% (95% CI -2.0% to -0.9%)] compared with a greater reduction in distal ASIR from 2011 to 2014 [APC -6.6% (95% CI -11.5% to -1.5%)] which plateaued thereafter [APC -0.5% (95% CI -3.2% to 2.2%)]. Incidence rates decreased more rapidly in men than women. Adults in IMD quintiles 4-5 experienced the greatest reduction in distal tumours [APC -3.5% (95% CI -4.3% to -2.7%)]. CONCLUSION: Following the introduction of the English BCSP, the incidence of CRC has subsequently reduced among adults of screening age, with this trend being most pronounced in distal tumours and in men. There is also evidence of a reduction in the deprivation gap for distal tumour incidence. Strategies to improve the detection of proximal tumours are warranted.

Influence of splenic flexure mobilization on postoperative and oncological outcomes following anterior resection.

BACKGROUND: Splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) during anterior resection is often debated given its increased operative complexity and lack of clear data suggesting oncological benefit. This study aimed to compare postoperative complications and 3-year oncological outcomes in patients undergoing anterior resection with and without SFM. METHODS: A retrospective single center observational study was performed. Notes review was performed for all patients undergoing anterior resection over a one-year period at a high-volume institution for sigmoid and rectal cancers. Anterior resections performed for benign disease or non-colorectal cancers were excluded. RESULTS: One hundred seventeen patients were included and 49 (41.9%) underwent SFM. 75 (64.1%) cases were completed laparoscopically and 48 (41%) resulted in stoma formation. SFM significantly increased the risk of minor Clavien Dindo Grade 1 postoperative complications (18.4% vs. 5.9%, P=0.03), however, it had no impact on more major postoperative complications, including anastomotic leaks (4.2% vs. 7.1%, P=0.52). There were no significant differences in median total lymph node yield (21.0% vs. 21.1, P=0.57) or R0 resection margin (93.9% vs. 94.1%, P=0.96). There was a non-significant trend towards lower overall recurrence rates in the SFM group (10.2% vs. 19.1%, P=0.19). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing anterior resection for colorectal cancer, SFM provides no clear oncological benefit, but does increase the likelihood of minor postoperative complications. Whilst a trend towards lower overall recurrence rates was observed in the SFM group, this was not statistically significant. Therefore, SFM should be carefully considered on a case-by-case basis.

Influence of crural vessel run-off on short- and mid-term outcomes following femoro-popliteal bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the influence that the number of patent crural run-off vessels has on short- and mid-term outcomes following femoro-popliteal bypass. METHODS: All patients undergoing index femoro-popliteal bypass grafting between 2013 and 19 at our unit were included. Preoperative imaging was used to stratify patients into cohorts with either one or ≥2 patent run-off vessels. Primary outcomes measures included bypass patency and limb salvage rates at one and 3 years post-operatively. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Logrank test. RESULTS: 147 bypasses performed on 143 patients were included. 24 patients had one-vessel run-off and 123 had ≥2 vessels patent. Patients with one-vessel run-off had a higher proportion of emergency admissions (54% vs 41%) and diabetes (42% vs 31%). 31% of patients underwent diagnostic angiogram imaging in addition to having duplex ultrasound and/or computed tomography angiography. There were no significant differences in primary, primary-assisted or secondary patency rates between the cohorts at 12 or 36 months. Limb salvage rates were significantly higher amongst those with ≥2 vessel run-off at 12 (86% vs 71%, p = 0.03) and 36 (85% vs 71%, p = 0.04) months. For those with occluded grafts, a higher proportion of patients with ≥2 vessel run-off subsequently had an attempt at redo bypass grafting. CONCLUSIONS: Femoro-popliteal bypass is a reasonable treatment option for patients with one-vessel run-off. However, whilst patency rates are comparable, clinicians should be aware of the lower successful limb salvage rates for patients with one patent vessel (especially those presenting with tissue loss).

Demographic trends in the incidence of malignant appendiceal tumours in England between 1995 and 2016: Population-based analysis.

AIMS: Recent data suggest that the incidence of malignant appendiceal tumours is increasing. This study aimed to determine temporal trends in the incidence of malignant appendiceal tumours within England and a possible influence by demographic factors. METHODS: All incident cases of appendiceal tumours in patients aged 20 years and above were identified from the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service database between 1995 and 2016 using ICD-9/10 codes. Cancers were categorized according to histology. Joinpoint regression analysis was used to investigate changes in age-standardized incidence rates by age, sex, histological subtype and index of multiple deprivation quintiles, based on socioeconomic domains (income, employment, education, health, crime, barriers to housing and services and living environment). Average annual per cent changes (AAPCs) were estimated by performing Monte-Carlo permutation analysis. RESULTS: A total of 7333 tumours were diagnosed and 7056 patients were analysed, comprising 3850 (54.6 per cent) neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), 1892 (26.8 per cent) mucinous adenocarcinomas and 1314 (18.6 per cent) adenocarcinoma (not otherwise specified). The overall incidence of appendiceal tumours increased from 0.3 per 100 000 to 1.6 per 100 000 over the study interval. Incidence rate increases of comparable magnitude were observed across all age groups, but the AAPC was highest among patients aged 20-29 years (15.6 per cent, 95 per cent c.i 12.7-18.6 per cent) and 30-39 years (14.2 per cent, 12.2-16.2 per cent) and lowest among those aged 70-79 years (6.8 per cent, 5.7-8.0 per cent). Similar incidence rate increases were reported across all socioeconomic deprivation quintiles and in both sexes. Analysis by grade of NET showed that grade 1 tumours accounted for 63 per cent between 2010 and 2013, compared with 2 per cent between 2000 and 2003. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence rate of malignant appendiceal tumours has increased significantly since 1995 and is mainly attributed to an increase in NETs. The increased diagnosis of low-grade NETs may in part be due to changes in pathological classification systems.

Editor's Choice - Hybrid vs. Open Surgical Reconstruction for Iliofemoral Occlusive Disease: A Prospective Randomised Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this non-inferiority randomised trial was to compare the short and midterm safety and efficacy of hybrid repair (HR) and open reconstruction (OR) for patients with co-existing iliac and common femoral artery (CFA) occlusive disease. METHODS: The study was registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov register (identifier: NCT02580084). From 2015 to 2017, eligible patients presenting with combined iliac and CFA occlusive disease were randomised to either HR or OR. HR group patients underwent recanalisation and stenting of iliac arteries combined with CFA endarterectomy and patch angioplasty. The OR group underwent aortofemoral bypass with simultaneous CFA endarterectomy. Short (30 day) and midterm (36 month) outcomes including morbidity, mortality, and patency rates were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of 427 patients assessed, 202 were randomised (102 HR and 100 OR). The average hospital length of stay was shorter in the HR group (8.2 ± 4.2 days HR group vs. 15.7 ± 6.9 days OR group, p < .001); the 30 day peri-operative morbidity rate was 8.8% in the HR group vs. 21% in the OR group (p = .030). There was no significant difference in the 36 month mortality rate (p = .16). The cumulative primary patency rates were 93% (HR) vs. 93% (OR) at 12 months and 91% (HR) vs. 89% (OR) at 36 months (p = .38). The limb salvage rates were 99% (HR) vs. 99% (OR) at 12 months and 98% (HR) vs. 97% (OR) at 36 months (p = .49). CONCLUSION: The results of this first non-inferiority randomised study support the safety and midterm efficacy of hybrid procedures for patients with iliofemoral peripheral arterial disease. HR patients had a shorter length of stay with reduced peri-operative morbidity and similar medium term patency rates.

PrEdiction of Risk and Communication of outcomE followIng major lower limb amputation: a collaboratiVE study (PERCEIVE)-protocol for the PERCEIVE qualitative study.

INTRODUCTION: Deciding whether to proceed with a major lower limb amputation is life-changing and complex, and it is crucial that the right decision is made at the right time. However, medical specialists are known to poorly predict risk when assessing patients for major surgery, and there is little guidance and research regarding decisions about amputation. The process of shared decision-making between doctors and patients during surgical consultations is also little understood. Therefore, the aim of this study is to analyse in depth the communication, consent, risk prediction and decision-making process in relation to major lower limb amputation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Consultations between patients and surgeons at which major lower limb amputation is discussed will be audio-recorded for 10-15 patients. Semi-structured follow-up interviews with patients (and relatives/carers) will then be conducted at two time points: as soon as possible/appropriate after a decision has been reached regarding surgery, and approximately 6 months later. Semi-structured interviews will also be conducted with 10-15 healthcare professionals working in the UK National Health Service (NHS) involved in amputation decision-making. This will include surgeons, anaesthetists and specialist physiotherapists at 2-4 NHS Health Boards/Trusts in Wales and England. Discourse analysis will be used to analyse the recorded consultations; interviews will be analysed thematically. Finally, workshops will be held with patients and healthcare professionals to help synthesise and interpret findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by Wales REC 7 (20/WA/0351). Study findings will be published in international peer-reviewed journal(s) and presented at national and international scientific meetings. Findings will also be disseminated to a wide NHS and lay audience via presentations at meetings and written summaries for key stakeholder groups.

The PERCEIVE quantitative study: PrEdiction of Risk and Communication of outcome following major lower-limb amputation: protocol for a collaboratiVE study.

BACKGROUND: Accurate prediction of outcomes following surgery with high morbidity and mortality rates is essential for informed shared decision-making between patients and clinicians. It is unknown how accurately healthcare professionals predict outcomes following major lower-limb amputation (MLLA). Several MLLA outcome-prediction tools have been developed. These could be valuable in clinical practice, but most require validation in independent cohorts before routine clinical use can be recommended. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of healthcare professionals' predictions of outcomes in adult patients undergoing MLLA for complications of chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) or diabetes. Secondary aims include the validation of existing outcome-prediction tools. METHOD: This study is an international, multicentre prospective observational study including adult patients undergoing a primary MLLA for CLTI or diabetes. Healthcare professionals' accuracy in predicting outcomes at 30-days (death, morbidity and MLLA revision) and 1-year (death, MLLA revision and ambulation) will be evaluated. Sixteen existing outcome-prediction tools specific to MLLA will be examined for validity. Data collection began on 1 October 2020; the end of follow-up will be 1 May 2022. The C-statistic, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, reclassification tables and Brier score will be used to evaluate the predictive performance of healthcare professionals and prediction tools, respectively. STUDY REGISTRATION AND DISSEMINATION: This study will be registered locally at each centre in accordance with local policies before commencing data collection, overseen by local clinician leads. Results will be disseminated to all centres, and any subsequent presentation(s) and/or publication(s) will follow a collaborative co-authorship model.

A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Risk Prediction Tools Used to Estimate Mortality, Morbidity, and Other Outcomes Following Major Lower Limb Amputation.

OBJECTIVE: The decision to undertake a major lower limb amputation can be complex. This review evaluates the performance of risk prediction tools in estimating mortality, morbidity, and other outcomes following amputation. METHODS: A systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify studies reporting on risk prediction tools that predict outcomes following amputation. Outcome measures included the accuracy of the risk tool in predicting a range of post-operative complications, including mortality (both short and long term), peri-operative morbidity, need for re-amputation, and ambulation success. A narrative synthesis was performed in accordance with the Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis In Systematic Reviews. RESULTS: The search identified 518 database records. Twelve observational studies, evaluating 13 risk prediction tools in a total cohort of 61 099 amputations, were included. One study performed external validation of an existing risk prediction tool, while all other studies developed novel tools or modified pre-existing generic calculators. Two studies conducted external validation of the novel/modified tools. Nine tools provided risk estimations for mortality, two tools provided predictions for post-operative morbidity, two for likelihood of ambulation, and one for re-amputation to the same or higher level. Most mortality prediction tools demonstrated acceptable discrimination performance with C statistic values ranging from 0.65 to 0.81. Tools estimating the risk of post-operative complications (0.65 - 0.74) and necessity for re-amputation (0.72) also performed acceptably. The Blatchford Allman Russell tool demonstrated outstanding discrimination for predicting functional mobility outcomes post-amputation (0.94). Overall, most studies were at high risk of bias with poor external validity. CONCLUSION: This review identified several risk prediction tools that demonstrate acceptable to outstanding discrimination for objectively predicting an array of important post-operative outcomes. However, the methodological quality of some studies was poor, external validation studies are generally lacking, and there are no tools predicting other important outcomes, especially quality of life.

Posterior Cerebral Circulation Stroke Secondary to Foetal Origin of Posterior Communicating Artery: An Indication for Carotid Endarterectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Posterior cerebral circulation strokes are most commonly caused by posterior vasculature in situ thrombosis, cardiac emboli, or arterial dissection. However, the foetal origin of the posterior communicating artery is an anatomical variant of the cerebral circulation that results in communication between the internal carotid and posterior cerebral circulation. Therefore, rarely this can result in posterior cerebral territory infarction from internal carotid artery thrombo-embolism. This is the report of a case in which a patient suffered posterior circulation stroke secondary to this anatomical variation of the circle of Willis. REPORT: A 71 year old male patient was admitted to the stroke team with seizures, headache, and confusion. Examination revealed a left sided homonymous hemianopia. Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain 36 hours into his admission revealed an acute right posterior circulation infarct with extensive haemorrhagic transformation. Duplex ultrasound three days later revealed a heavily calcified right internal carotid artery mixed echogenicity plaque with 80%-90% stenosis. Subsequent computed tomography angiography showed a large right foetal variant posterior communicating artery. Following improvement in functional status, the patient underwent uneventful carotid endarterectomy to reduce risk of future stroke. DISCUSSION: In patients presenting with posterior circulation infarction, clinicians should consider embolism from an atheromatous internal carotid artery via the variant foetal origin of posterior communicating artery. If detected, consideration should be given to undertaking carotid endarterectomy to reduce future stroke risk if no other source is detected.

Editor's Choice - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Wound Adjuncts for the Prevention of Groin Wound Surgical Site Infection in Arterial Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Groin incision surgical site infections (SSIs) following arterial surgery are common and are a source of considerable morbidity. This review evaluates interventions and adjuncts delivered immediately before, during, or after skin closure, to prevent SSIs in patients undergoing arterial interventions involving a groin incision. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were searched. REVIEW METHODS: This review was undertaken according to established international reporting guidelines and was registered prospectively with the International prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42020185170). The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were searched using pre-defined search terms without date restriction. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies recruiting patients with non-infected groin incisions for arterial exposure were included; SSI rates and other outcomes were captured. Interventions reported in two or more studies were subjected to meta-analysis. RESULTS: The search identified 1 532 articles. Seventeen RCTs and seven observational studies, reporting on 3 747 patients undergoing 4 130 groin incisions were included. A total of seven interventions and nine outcomes were reported upon. Prophylactic closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) reduced groin SSIs compared with standard dressings (odds ratio [OR] 0.34, 95% CI 0.23 - 0.51; p < .001, GRADE strength of evidence: moderate). Local antibiotics did not reduce groin SSIs (OR 0.60 95% CI 0.30 - 1.21 p = .15, GRADE strength: low). Subcuticular sutures (vs. transdermal sutures or clips) reduced groin SSI rates (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.17 - 0.65, p = .001, GRADE strength: low). Wound drains, platelet rich plasma, fibrin glue, and silver alginate dressings did not show any significant effect on SSI rates. CONCLUSION: There is evidence that ciNPWT and subcuticular sutures reduce groin SSI in patients undergoing arterial vascular interventions involving a groin incision. Local antibiotics did not reduce groin wound SSI, although the strength of this evidence is lower. No other interventions demonstrated a significant effect.

Recent developments and current controversies in short-stay endovascular aneurysm repair.

INTRODUCTION: Short stay endovascular aneurysm repair pathways (SS-EVAR) provide potential advantages to both healthcare providers and patients. However, these benefits must be carefully balanced against the inherent risks to patient safety and tariff penalties associated with unplanned readmissions. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A literature review was performed using the databases MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library up until March 2019. Search terms used included "endovascular aneurysm repair," "aneurysm repair," "EVAR," "abdominal aortic aneurysm," "day case," "short stay," "fast track," and "ambulatory." EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Nine relevant articles (including one prior review on the topic) were identified. This early data suggests that SS-EVAR is associated with good patient satisfaction and modest cost savings for healthcare providers. Patient selection, preoperative preparation and supported discharge with early follow-up are essential components of a SS-EVAR pathway. Increasingly, SS-EVAR tends to be delivered via bilateral percutaneous access and loco-regional anesthesia. Over 70% of patients enrolled onto SS-EVAR pathways successfully complete them. Long procedures with excessive blood loss are associated with pathway non-completion. All serious complications occur within 6 hours of the procedure and the mortality (0-1%), morbidity (8-58%) and readmission rates (0-6%) associated with SS-EVAR remains acceptably low. SS-EVAR pathways can be safely and effectively implemented in both teaching and non-teaching hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Short-stay EVAR pathways are safe and acceptable to patients. With appropriate selection of motivated patients, successful expedited discharge can be achieved with limited readmissions, thus facilitating increased resource efficiency and cost savings for healthcare providers.

Study protocol for the groin wound infection after vascular exposure (GIVE) audit and multicentre cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infections (SSIs) following groin incision for arterial exposure are commonplace and a significant cause of morbidity and mortality following major arterial surgery. Published incidence varies considerably. The primary aim of GIVE will be to compare individual units' practice with established guidelines from The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Secondary aims will be to describe the contemporary rate of SSI in patients undergoing groin incision for arterial exposure, to identify risk factors for groin wound infection, to examine the value of published tools in the prediction of SSI, to identify areas of equipoise which could be examined in future efficacy/effectiveness trials and to compare UK SSI rates with international centres. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This international, multicentre, prospective observational study will be delivered via the Vascular and Endovascular Research Network (VERN). Participating centres will identify all patients undergoing clean emergency or elective groin incision(s) for arterial intervention during a consecutive 3-month period. Follow up data will be captured at 90 days after surgery. SSIs will be defined according to the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria. Data will be gathered centrally using an anonymised electronic data collection tool or secure email transfer. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will be registered as a clinical audit at all participating UK centres; research ethics approval is not required. National leads will oversee the appropriate registration and approvals in countries outside the UK as required. Site specific reports of SSI rates will be provided to each participating centre. Study results will be disseminated locally at each site, publicised on social media and submitted for peer-reviewed publication.

Simulation training for lobectomy: a review of current literature and future directions†.

With growing work-time restrictions and public expectations, the Halstedian educational model of 'see one, do one, teach one' is unfit for the modern training of thoracic residents. With the cardiothoracic surgical workforce set to decline by 50% over the next 10 years, new models are desperately needed to help trainees bypass the early error-prone phase of the lobectomy learning curve. In this review, we detail the development and validation of numerous simulators designed to teach trainees an array of skills ranging from basic technical skills to more complex non-technical skills. Given the recent increases in minimally invasive lobectomies, we critique both open and thoracoscopic simulators. We elucidate that whilst there are a growing number of thoracic simulators of varying fidelity available, fundamentally, there is currently a significant lack of well-designed trials validating various simulators for teaching lobectomy despite an awareness of their potential to improve surgical education. Furthermore, there is a void in the simulation training of non-technical skills within thoracic surgery. Encouragingly, there is a definite awareness of the ability of simulation to aid with the training of future thoracic surgical trainees.

Short Stay EVAR is Safe and Cost Effective.

OBJECTIVE: Reducing length of stay (LOS) following surgery offers the potential to improve resource utilisation. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is now delivered with a low level of morbidity and as such may be deliverable as a "23 hour stay" intervention. This systematic review aims to assess safety, feasibility and cost effectiveness of a short stay EVAR pathway. METHODS: A database search of Ovid MEDLINE (1996 - April 2018) and Embase (1974 - April 2018) was completed. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used. A Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was applied to assess study bias. RESULTS: In total, 570 papers were identified through the literature search, of which 32 abstracts were screened. This led to nine papers being assessed for eligibility. From five suitable studies, 450 (75%) patients were successfully discharged the same or next day after EVAR. Complications most often occurred within 3 hours of surgery, and major complications requiring intensive treatment unit admission occurred within 6 hours. Readmission rates were 0-5% for those discharged early, with no difference in 30 day readmission. Early discharge led to a statistically significant cost saving of £13,360 (LOS four days) to £9844 (LOS one day). CONCLUSION: Selected patients can safely undergo EVAR using a short stay pathway. A period of monitoring 6 h post-operatively for low risk patients would be sufficient. Reducing length of stay after EVAR in the UK from the current median of three days to 1.5 days would free 4361 bed days and lead to a saving of approximately £1,800,000 annually.

Are we losing future talent? A national survey of UK medical student interest and perceptions of cardiothoracic surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Cardiothoracic surgery appears to have become a significantly less popular career option among UK medical graduates. This study aimed to elucidate the current levels of interest in pursuing a career in cardiothoracic surgery among surgically orientated UK medical students and to determine the factors underlying this decision. METHODS: An online cross-sectional survey generated using the LimeSurvey was distributed to the surgical societies of all 32 UK medical schools. This assessed current career intentions, previous experience and perceptions of cardiothoracic surgery and the factors that attract or deter them to the speciality. RESULTS: A total of 352 responses were obtained. Although 31% of the total cohort was considering a career in cardiothoracic surgery, only 14% of the final year students were. Seventy-five percent felt that they had received inadequate exposure to cardiothoracic surgery during their undergraduate curriculum, with 74% having spent no time on a dedicated cardiothoracic placement. Extracurricular exposure to the specialty was poor with 13% having attended a cardiothoracic conference/careers day. Approximately 50% of students were aware of the publication of surgeon-specific mortality data and previous scandals affecting the speciality; however, 80% claimed that this did not deter them. The main factor attracting students was the ability to significantly influence or save lives, whereas the main deterring factor was perceived competition levels. CONCLUSIONS: Although there remains healthy interest among UK students to pursue a career in cardiothoracic surgery, there is a worrying decline in desire over the course of medical school which appears to stem from a lack of engagement with the specialty both within undergraduate curricula and through extracurricular events.

Should limb revascularization take priority over dissection repair in type a aortic dissection presenting as isolated acute limb ischaemia.

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was should limb revascularization take priority over dissection repair in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) presenting as isolated acute limb ischaemia? Altogether 133 papers were found using the reported search, of which 7 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. Six studies showed that aortic repair alone resulted in the reperfusion of 60-100% of ischaemic lower limbs and recommended a strategy prioritizing aortic repair. In those with persistent isolated limb ischaemia post-aortic repair, expeditious peripheral revascularization procedures produced excellent patient outcomes comparable to those of ATAAD patients without malperfusion syndromes. In the remaining study, aortic repair was delayed in order to prioritize percutaneous reperfusion therapy aimed at treating the peripheral malperfusion. However, this resulted in one-third of patients not surviving to aortic surgery. We conclude that delaying aortic repair for limb reperfusion procedures results in unacceptably high mortality rates and that repair alone results in high reperfusion rates of ischaemic limbs. We therefore strongly recommend that aortic repair be the primary therapy for ATAAD patients even when limb ischaemia is the presenting feature. Limbs should be reassessed immediately after aortic repair and revascularization procedures undertaken urgently if any pulse deficits remain.

Pleiotropic mechanisms of action of perhexiline in heart failure.

INTRODUCTION: The re-purposing of the anti-anginal drug perhexiline (PHX) has resulted in symptomatic improvements in heart failure (HF) patients. The inhibition of carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1 (CPT-1) has been proposed as the primary mechanism underlying the therapeutic benefit of PHX. This hypothesis is contentious. AREAS COVERED: We reviewed the primary literature and patent landscape of PHX from its initial development in the 1960s through to its emergence as a drug beneficial for HF. We focused on its physico-chemistry, molecular targets, tissue accumulation and clinical dosing. EXPERT OPINION: Dogma that the beneficial effects of PHX are due primarily to potent myocardial CPT-1 inhibition is not supported by the literature and all available evidence point to it being extremely unlikely that the major effects of PHX occur via this mechanism. In vivo PHX is much more likely to be an inhibitor of surface membrane ion channels and also to have effects on other components of cellular metabolism and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation across the cardiovascular system. However, the possibility that minor effects of PHX on CPT-1 underpin disproportionately large effects on myocardial function cannot be entirely excluded, especially given the massive accumulation of the drug in heart tissue.

Are Surgeons Born or Made? A Comparison of Personality Traits and Learning Styles Between Surgical Trainees and Medical Students.

OBJECTIVE: Medical students and surgical trainees differ considerably in both their preferential learning styles and personality traits. This study compares the personality profiles and learning styles of surgical trainees with a cohort of medical students specifically intent on pursuing a surgical career. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted contrasting surgical trainees with medical students specifying surgical career intent. The 50-item International Personality Item Pool Big-Five Factor Marker (FFM) questionnaire was used to score 5 personality domains (extraversion, conscientiousness, agreeableness, openness to experience, and neuroticism). The 24-item Learning Style Inventory (LSI) Questionnaire was used to determine the preferential learning styles (visual, auditory, or tactile). χ(2) Analysis and independent samples t-test were used to compare LSI and FFM scores, respectively. SETTING: Surgical trainees from several UK surgical centers were contrasted to undergraduate medical students. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 53 medical students who had specifically declared desire to pursue a surgical career and were currently undertaking an undergraduate intercalated degree in surgical sciences were included and contrasted to 37 UK core surgical trainees (postgraduate years 3-4). RESULTS: The LSI questionnaire was completed by 53 students and 37 trainees. FFM questionnaire was completed by 29 medical students and 34 trainees. No significant difference for learning styles preference was detected between the 2 groups (p = 0.139), with the visual modality being the preferred learning style for both students and trainees (69.8% and 54.1%, respectively). Neuroticism was the only personality trait to differ significantly between the 2 groups, with medical students scoring significantly higher than trainees (2.9 vs. 2.6, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Medical students intent on pursuing a surgical career exhibit similar personality traits and learning styles to surgical trainees, with both groups preferring the visual learning modality. These findings facilitate future research into potential ways of improving both the training and selection of students and junior trainees onto residency programs.

The current role of simulation in urological training.

INTRODUCTION: Simulation is becoming an increasingly popular educational tool in numerous surgical specialities, including urology. This article reviews the current role of urological simulators; discussing their need, availability, incorporation and current limitations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A literature review of the electronic databases Medline, Embase and Google Scholar was performed. RESULTS: For increasingly limited urological training programs, simulation can act as a valuable adjunct to clinical training. Evidence suggests that simulation enables the trainee to bypass the early, error-prone part of the surgical learning curve. It should be incorporated into proficiency-based curricula, with junior trainees initially beginning with low fidelity simulators to grasp basic surgical skills before moving onto full-procedural simulation as they progress through their training. A wide variety of simulators of differing fidelity are currently available, teaching both technical (eg. cystoscopy) and non-technical (eg. communication) urological surgical skills. Whist numerous studies have assessed the face, content and construct validity of various urological simulators, further work needs to be undertaken to determine whether the skills learnt actually improve trainee performance in the operating room. Then, educators will be able to make informed decisions about whether these resource demanding (financially and in terms of demands on faculty) simulators are a worthwhile educational tool. CONCLUSIONS: Although further investigation is required, urological simulators appear to have a considerable role for developing both technical and non-technical urological skills in an increasingly restricted educational environment in modern urogynecology.