Resolution of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors-Induced Inflammatory Arthritis while Maintaining Active Treatment with Checkpoint Inhibitors and After Its Discontinuation: an Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors-induced inflammatory arthritis (ICI-IA) affects about 5% of ICI recipients. We aimed 1) to characterize the resolution of ICI-IA during ICI treatment and after ICI discontinuation and 2) to assess how ICI-IA influences ICI management across time. METHODS: All ICI-treated patients referred to rheumatology at Bordeaux University Hospital were identified and patients with ICI-IA with a follow-up of ≥ 6 months after ICI-IA onset were included. Resolution of ICI-IA was defined by discontinuation of ICI-IA medications without recurrence of ICI-IA symptoms. RESULTS: Resolution of ICI-IA occurred in 13 of 80 patients (16%) while maintaining active ICI treatment, mainly in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR)-like clinical presentation (p=0.03). Synovitis was more frequent in those whose ICI-IA persisted throughout ICI treatment. In patients with persistent ICI-IA throughout ICI treatment, 34 (50%) and 47 (70%) resolved at 6- and 12-months post ICI discontinuation, respectively. Reason for terminating ICI was more frequently cancer stable or in remission in those who still had active ICI-IA at 6- and 12- months post ICI discontinuation. Both progression-free survival and overall survival were longer in the groups with active ICI-IA at 6- and 12-months after ICI discontinuation. DISCUSSION: In this cohort, ICI was safely continued in most patients experiencing ICI-IA. About one sixth of ICI-IA resolved despite maintaining active ICI treatment and allowing ICI-IA treatment discontinuation without recurrence of symptoms, mainly in those with PMR-like presentation. Larger studies are needed to determine predicting factors of resolving ICI-IA to minimize exposure to immunosuppressive treatment.

Safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge after severe immune-related adverse events: a retrospective analysis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) present clinicians with the challenge of managing immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can range from mild to severe due to immune system activation 1. While guidelines recommend discontinuing ICIs for grade 3 partial and all grade 4 irAEs, there is growing interest in rechallenging patients based on oncological outcomes, particularly for cardiovascular and neurological irAEs where data remains scarce 1,2. We retrospectively evaluated the safety of ICI rechallenge following grade 3-4 irAEs, specifically focusing on cardiovascular and neurological events, in patients discussed at our multidisciplinary immunotoxicity assessment board between 2019 and 2021. Fifteen patients were included, with a median time to severe irAE onset of 49 days. Among them, five patients experienced neurological adverse events (NAEs): aseptic meningitis (3), inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy (1), and ophthalmoplegia (1), while one patient presented with myocarditis. Of the 15 patients retreated with ICIs after initial severe irAEs, 11 (73%) remained free of subsequent irAEs, two (13%) experienced recurrence of the initial irAE, and two (13%) developed new irAEs distinct from the initial event. The median time to event recurrence was 69 days, occurring no earlier than the initial severe irAE. In the subset analysis focusing on severe cardiovascular and neurological irAEs, rechallenge with ICIs was generally well tolerated. However, one patient treated with anti-PD1 experienced a relapse of grade 2 aseptic meningitis. Overall, our findings suggest that rechallenging with ICIs after severe irAEs, including those affecting the cardiovascular and neurological systems, may be safe, particularly after irAE regression and corticosteroid withdrawal.

Molecularly matched targeted therapy: a promising approach for refractory metastatic melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Only a fraction of patients with metastatic melanoma derive durable benefit from approved treatments. The clinical impact of personalized medicine strategies for melanoma, apart from BRAF, NRAS, or CKIT targeting, has rarely been reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: By means of the Group of Cutaneous Oncology of the French Society of Dermatology, we retrospectively included all patients with advanced melanoma aged 18 years and older for whom molecular testing identified one or more actionable molecular alterations and who accordingly received molecularly matched therapy. We excluded patients with only BRAF, NRAS, or CKIT alterations and patients who received molecularly matched therapy for less than 15 days. RESULTS: We included 26 patients with a median follow-up of 8 months (1-54), a median age of 63 years (24-89), and a sex ratio of 2.7. These patients had been heavily pretreated, and 64% had elevated LDH levels. The disease control rate was 38%, with 4 cases of partial response (overall response rate: 15%) and 6 of stable disease for at least 6 months. The median duration of treatment was 3.1 months (0.9-13.5). Among patients with disease control, the median duration of control was 6.6 months (2.6-13.5) and 3 cases were ongoing at the end of the study. Patients with controlled disease had GNA11, MAP2K1, FYCO1-RAF1, HRAS, ATM, CCND1, MDM2/CDK4, and CDKN2A/NRAS alterations. CONCLUSIONS: High-throughput sequencing followed by matched targeted therapy is a promising approach for patients with advanced melanoma refractory to approved treatments.

Improved survival over time with immunotherapy in locally advanced and metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas.

PURPOSE: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common cancer in white-skinned populations. There is little information on the epidemiology of cSCC, and even less on advanced cases (acSCC). Therefore, we analyzed acSCC patients to describe their characteristics, management, and outcomes over time. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study was conducted over a period of 5 years, including all patients who started systemic therapy for acSCC. The patient characteristics, cSCC management, response to therapy, and survival were recorded. Patients were stratified into equal chronological periods (periods 1 and 2). A subgroup analysis was performed to compare patients who received immunotherapy (group 1) with those who did not (group 2). RESULTS: The study included 127 patients, and patient numbers increased by an average of 19.7% per year. Most patients were male (88/127), elderly (mean 81.6 years), with comorbidities, and 27.6% were immunocompromised. The median overall survival (OS) was higher in period 2 (20 months) than in period 1 (10 months) (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.62 [0.39; 0.98], p = 0.04). The risk of progression increased with age and immunosuppression. Of the 64 patients who received second-line therapy, 38 had immunotherapy (group 1) and 26 received other therapies (group 2). Immunotherapy reduced mortality and progression by 71% (p = 0.004) and 67% (p = 0.002), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with acSCC are usually very frail and elderly. OS increased over time, with a twofold improvement between periods 1 and 2, whereas progression-free survival (PFS) did not increase. Access to immunotherapy reduced mortality in a majority of patients in period 2. Immunosuppression and advanced age were associated with lower PFS.

Clinical impact of proton pump inhibitors and other co-medications on advanced melanoma patients treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors.

PURPOSE: While several studies reported the influence of co-medications on immune checkpoint therapy and chemotherapy, it remains poorly studied with targeted therapy. Targeted therapies inhibiting BRAF and MEK had significantly improved management of advanced melanoma with BRAFV600 mutation over the last decade, we aimed to investigate the possible influence of co-mediations on the efficacy and toxicity of these targeted therapies (TT). METHODS: We conducted an observational study identifying patients with advanced melanoma treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors between 2013 and 2020 in the Bordeaux University Hospital. Co-medications given within 1 month before until 3 months after the initiation of targeted therapy were recorded and classified by their mechanism or by their metabolism. Survival data were analyzed with univariable and multivariable cox regression and the combined effect of multiple factors was evaluated using a factor analysis of mixed data (FAMD). The impact of co-medications on toxicity related to TT was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 192 patients were included. Although several co-medications were associated with significantly shorter overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS), PPIs was the only co-medication with a significant impact in multivariable analysis considering all co-medications and specific prognostic factors. Co-medications did not influence the risk, type, or timing of TT-related toxicity. Additional FAMD revealed the impact of each factor on the oncological outcomes. In a subgroup of patients, residual plasma TT concentration was available and did not differ between PPIs users and non-users. CONCLUSION: Co-medications, especially PPIs, must be carefully assessed at the time of TT initiation.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in patients who previously experienced immune-related inflammatory arthritis: a multicentre observational study.

OBJECTIVE: Another course of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is often considered in patients with cancer progression and previous immune-related adverse events, including inflammatory arthritis (ICI-IA), but there are limited data regarding safety of ICI rechallenge in this setting. We aimed to assess the rate and clinical features associated with ICI-IA flare/recurrence on ICI rechallenge. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre observational study including cancer patients with ICI-IA who started a second course of ICI more than 3 months after ICI discontinuation in four French university hospitals. Primary outcome was the frequency of ICI flare/recurrence after ICI rechallenge. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were included. At the time of ICI rechallenge, 18 patients reported no symptoms of ICI-IA (78%) and 5 had grade 1 (22%), 11 patients (48%) were not receiving any ICI-IA treatment, 11 (48%) were still on prednisone, 2 (9%) were on conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and 1 (4%) on anti-IL-6. ICI-IA flare/recurrence occurred in 12 patients (52%) with a median time of 1 month after ICI rechallenge. ICI-IA phenotype, disease activity and ICI-IA treatment at the time of ICI rechallenge did not differ according to ICI-IA flare/recurrence status. CONCLUSION: In this first observational study of ICI-IA patients rechallenged with ICI, about half of the patients experienced ICI-IA flare/recurrence with a similar phenotype but occurring earlier than the initial ICI-IA, warranting close monitoring during the first month of retreatment. Risk of flare did not differ according to baseline immunosuppressive treatment at the time of rechallenge.

Brief Communication: Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Paraneoplastic Syndrome Associated With Merkel Cell Carcinoma Successfully Treated by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: 2 Cases.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine cutaneous tumor with high metastatic potential. In rare cases, it can be associated with paraneoplastic syndromes (PNS), which result from an antitumor immunity against antigens produced by the tumor itself. Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (LEMS) is a neurological autoimmune PNS characterized by an impairment of the neuromuscular junction, leading to proximal muscle weakness and fatigability. Although the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is a breakthrough in the management of many cancers, onset or worsen of immune diseases has been described. Thereby, in patients with previous neurological PNS like LEMS, the ICI therapy for cancer may aggravate neurological symptoms and lead to irreversible impairment. We report here 2 cases of patients with metastatic MCC associated with a LEMS at the diagnosis. Both successfully received ICI therapies (anti-PDL1 avelumab and anti-PD1 pembrolizumab) without worsening of LEMS and any major immune-related adverse effects. Their neurological condition improved and disappeared concomitantly with the efficacy of immunotherapy, and we did not observe relapse of both MCC and LEMS after treatment discontinuation. Finally, we performed a complete review of the literature, which confirmed that ICI treatment could be discussed for patients with paraneoplastic LEMS, and emphasized the need for multidisciplinary management.

Real-life use of trametinib after immunotherapy failure in BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma.

BRAF V600 wild-type advanced melanomas quickly reach a therapeutic dead-end, after immunotherapy failure. Even if preclinical studies have suggested sensitivity to MEK inhibitors such as trametinib in NRAS, NF1 or GNA mutated melanoma, therapeutic options are limited for these patients. We present a retrospective monocentric study of 22 patients with advanced melanoma treated by trametinib after immunotherapy resistance. Melanomas harboured NRAS (20), NF1 (1) or GNA 11 (1) mutations. For most of them (18), anti-PD1 was associated with trametinib. A disease-control was reported in 36% of patients (8/22), with six stable diseases and two partial responses according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Median progression-free survival was 2 months (1-14) and median overall survival was 6.5 months (2-24). In patients with progressive disease (14/22), dissociated radiologic responses and clinical benefits such as pain reduction were seen in five patients. High blood level of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) seemed associated with trametinib failure, without significance ( P = 0.06). Adverse events (grade 1-3) occurred in 91% of patients during the first weeks of treatment, mainly papulo-pustular rashes (77%), leg oedemas (36%), asthenia (18%) and diarrhoea (14%). This real-life study showed that trametinib may benefit some metastatic melanoma that progressed after chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Objective disease control (partial response or stable disease) using RECIST criteria was observed in 36% of patients. Because of frequent side-effects which can alter the quality of life and the short response duration, this off-label option has to be discussed with the patient. Studies with combination therapy with trametinib to improve relapse-free survival and lower side-effects are ongoing.

Is Infantile Hemangioma a Neuroendocrine Tumor?

Infantile hemangioma (IH) is the most common infantile tumor, affecting 5-10% of newborns. Propranolol, a nonselective ß-adrenergic receptor (ADRB) antagonist, is currently the first-line treatment for severe IH; however, both its mechanism of action and its main cellular target remain poorly understood. Since betablockers can antagonize the effect of natural ADRB agonists, we postulated that the catecholamine produced in situ in IH may have a role in the propranolol response. By quantifying catecholamines in the IH tissues, we found a higher amount of noradrenaline (NA) in untreated proliferative IHs than in involuted IHs or propranolol-treated IHs. We further found that the first three enzymes of the catecholamine biosynthesis pathway are expressed by IH cells and that their levels are reduced in propranolol-treated tumors. To study the role of NA in the pathophysiology of IH and its response to propranolol, we performed an in vitro angiogenesis assay in which IH-derived endothelial cells, pericytes and/or telocytes were incorporated. The results showed that the total tube formation is sensitive to propranolol only when exogenous NA is added in the three-cell model. We conclude that the IH's sensitivity to propranolol depends on crosstalk between the endothelial cells, pericytes and telocytes in the context of a high local amount of local NA.

Baseline co-medications may alter the anti-tumoural effect of checkpoint inhibitors as well as the risk of immune-related adverse events.

PURPOSE: As gut microbiota composition is an important determinant of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), we examined the effect of various co-medications known for their interaction with microbiota, when given at ICI initiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified patients with advanced cancer treated with ICI between May 2015 and September 2017 in our institution. Co-medications given within 1 month before or 1 month after the first administration of ICI were reviewed from medical records. Survival data were analysed with univariable Cox regression, and the combined effect of multiple factors was assessed with factor analysis of mixed data (FAMD). The impact of co-medications on immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occurrence was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 635 patients were included. Psychotropic drugs (41%), proton pump inhibitors (PPIs; 38%), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and/or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs; 32%), glucocorticoids (26%), antibiotics (24%), statins (21%) and morphine (20%) were the most prescribed co-medications. Baseline use of antibiotics, glucocorticoids >10 mg/day, PPIs, psychotropic drugs, morphine and insulin was associated with significantly shortened overall survival and decreased tumour response, whereas coadministration of statins, ACEs and/or ARBs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin and oral antidiabetic drugs did not impact patient outcomes. Treatments that altered the response to ICI were also associated with a decreased incidence of irAEs. FAMD revealed the respective weight of each factor or co-medication on the oncological outcomes. CONCLUSION: Co-medications must be carefully assessed at the time of ICI initiation and clinicians aware of their possible deleterious effect, notably for PPIs, glucocorticoids, antibiotics and psychotropic drugs.

Analysis of tumor response and clinical factors associated with vitiligo in patients receiving anti-programmed cell death-1 therapies for melanoma: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Clinical factors associated with vitiligo in patients receiving anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) remain unknown. OBJECTIVE: To better characterize the occurrence of vitiligo in patients receiving anti-PD-1. METHODS: The present single-center ambispective cohort study included patients with melanoma treated with anti-PD-1. Progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective tumor response were compared between patients with and those without vitiligo using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test. Demographic and clinical factors associated with vitiligo were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 457 patients included in the study, vitiligo developed in 85 patients. The clinical presentation of vitiligo consisted of the presence of ovalar and multiple flecked white macules, mainly located on chronic sun-exposed areas. The presence of vitiligo was associated with a significant improvement in overall survival and progression-free survival (P < .001). A Cox proportional hazards model estimation demonstrated markedly improved survival in patients with vitiligo compared with those without vitiligo (aHR [overall survival], 0.20; 95% CI, 0.12-0.33; P < .001; and aHR [progression-free survival], 0.33; 95% CI, 0.23-0.47; P < .001). In the multivariate logistic regression analyses, men showed an independent increased risk of the development of vitiligo (odds ratio, 1.66). In contrast, the presence of pulmonary metastases was found to be an independent factor associated with a reduced risk of the development of vitiligo (odds ratio, 0.50). LIMITATIONS: Single-center ambispective cohort. CONCLUSION: Vitiligo in patients receiving anti-PD-1 for advanced melanoma is associated with a better outcome. A gender effect associated with the development of vitiligo will need further investigation.

Myasthenia Gravis Lambert-Eaton overlap syndrome induced by nivolumab in a metastatic melanoma patient.

INTRODUCTION: Myasthenia gravis (MG) Lambert-Eaton (LE) overlap syndrome is a rare condition. Here, we describe the first case of MG-LE overlap syndrome revealed by the anti-programmed cell death 1 inhibitor, nivolumab, in a patient treated for metastatic melanoma. CASE: Three months after receiving nivolumab and 1 month after brain metastasis radiotherapy, our patient developed generalized fatigue with intermittent ptosis and swallowing difficulty suggesting a myasthenic syndrome. Electromyogram findings, anti-acetylcholine receptor, and anti-calcium channel antibodies levels were consistent with an immune-related myasthenic syndrome with specific features for both MG and LE syndromes. Immunotherapy with nivolumab was stopped. Patient was treated with systemic immunosuppressive and anti-cholinesterase drugs, with remarkable improvement of his neurological symptoms. Prolonged partial remission was obtained for his metastatic melanoma without need for a third-line treatment. Two years later, a relapse of hismyasthenic symptoms was observed along with new neurological symptoms related to brain radiation necrosis. CONCLUSION: We describe the first case of MG-LE overlap syndrome diagnosed after anti-PD1 immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma, which appeared after radiation therapy and then relapsed after brain radiation necrosis. We hypothesized a role for brain inflammation as a trigger for MG-LE onset. Neuro-muscular junctions disease induced or revealed by checkpoint inhibitors can be challenging and requires long-term follow-up.

Aseptic cystitis induced by nivolumab and ipilimumab combination for metastatic melanoma.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of advanced melanoma. Combination of ICI with ipilimumab cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 and nivolumab [anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)] improves tumoral response compared to anti-PD1 monotherapy in melanoma patients, but is associated with more severe and multiple immune-related adverse events. We report the first case of aseptic cystitis induced by ipilimumab and nivolumab combination in a 61-year-old melanoma patient. She described after two infusions, diarrhea, pollakiuria, intense bladder pain, urinary urgency, and nocturia. Repeated negative urine culture tests led to perform cystoscopy. Mucosal bladder biopsies showed lymphocytic T-cells infiltration in intraepithelial and in subepithelial connective tissue, which were consistent with the diagnosis of immune-related aseptic cystitis. Aseptic cystitis is a rare and poorly known side-effect related to ICI. Only four other cases with anti-PD1 monotherapy were found in literature, only in Japanese patients. It simulates bacterial cystitis with negative urinary tests, and is often associated with atypical symptoms like diarrhea, which may delay the diagnosis. Oral steroids appear to be the most efficient therapeutic options.

Esophageal Achalasia Induced by Ipilimumab and Nivolumab Combination: A Rare Neurological Manifestation of Immune-related Autonomic Neuropathy.

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has improved the prognosis of many cancers; a combination of nivolumab (anti-programmed cell death protein 1) and ipilimumab (anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4) is approved as first-line therapy for advanced melanoma, with objective responses obtained in more than half of patients. However, this combination is associated with a high rate of immune-related adverse events, which are often severe and multiple. Neurological immune-related adverse events are rare but feared because they can be life-threatening, their diagnosis and management are challenging, and patients can have irreversible sequelae. We reported a case of a young patient treated by nivolumab and ipilimumab combination for metastatic melanoma. Severe dysphagia with regurgitations, major weight loss, uveitis, and vitiligo occurred after 3 infusions of nivolumab and ipilimumab. Magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography scan showed complete remission of melanoma. The endoscopic examination did not find any digestive toxicity. Esophageal manometry revealed achalasia. This was associated with mydriasis, pathologic deep breath test, and alteration of the cutaneous sympathetic response on electromyogram, which was consistent with autonomic neuropathy. This rare etiology of atypical vomiting under ICI should be known by prescribers, as ICI prescription is widening in many new cancers.

Real-World Survival in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma after Discontinuation of Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy for Objective Response or Adverse Effects: A Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: Anti-PD-1 has dramatically improved the survival of patients with advanced melanoma. However, there is a lack of data on maintenance of the response after treatment discontinuation. We aimed to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with metastatic melanoma after anti-PD-1 interruption for objective response (OR) or limiting toxicity during clinical trials. METHODS: All patients with advanced melanoma who stopped single-agent anti-PD-1 antibodies for objective response or toxicity were included between April 2014 and January 2019 in our institution (data cut-off, September 10th, 2019). Clinical and biological factors associated with relapse were studied. RESULTS: The median follow-up after introduction of treatment was 36.5 months [4.6-62.4], and the median follow-up after discontinuation of treatment was 15.7 months (2.5-45.1). Out of 65 patients, 28 patients stopped immunotherapy for limiting adverse effects (AEs) (43.1%), 25 for complete response (CR) (38.4%), and 12 for partial response (PR) or long-term stable disease (SD) (18.5%). Twelve patients relapsed (18.5%) after a median time of 9 months [1.9-40.9 months]. Seven relapsed after discontinuation for AEs, 3 after discontinuation for CR, and 2 after discontinuation for PR/SD. The median PFS after therapy discontinuation was not reached. No statistical association was found between recurrence and age, sex, increased LDH, BRAF status, presence of brain metastases, previous treatments, radiotherapy, or time on anti-PD-1 treatment. CONCLUSION: This cohort shows a global recurrence rate of 18.5% and confirms a long-lasting response after anti-PD-1 cessation regardless of the cause of discontinuation.

Cemiplimab in locally advanced basal cell carcinoma after hedgehog inhibitor therapy: an open-label, multi-centre, single-arm, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Before February, 2021, there was no standard treatment regimen for locally advanced basal cell carcinoma after first-line hedgehog inhibitor (HHI) therapy. Cemiplimab, a PD-1 antibody, is approved for treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and has shown clinical activity as monotherapy in first-line non-small-cell lung cancer. Here, we present the primary analysis data of cemiplimab in patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma after HHI therapy. METHODS: We did an open-label, multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial across 38 outpatient clinics, primarily at academic medical centres, in Canada, Europe, and the USA. Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years and with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1) with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of metastatic basal cell carcinoma (group 1) or locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (group 2) who had progressed on or were intolerant to previous HHI therapy were enrolled. Patients were not candidates for further HHI therapy due to progression of disease on or intolerance to previous HHI therapy or having no better than stable disease after 9 months on HHI therapy. Patients received cemiplimab 350 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 93 weeks or until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response by independent central review. Analyses were done as per the intention-to-treat principle. The safety analysis comprised all patients who received at least one dose of cemiplimab. The primary analysis is reported only for group 2; group 1 data have not reached maturity and will be reported when the timepoint, according to the statistical analysis plan, has been reached. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03132636, and is no longer recruiting new participants. FINDINGS: Between Nov 16, 2017, and Jan 7, 2019, 84 patients were enrolled and treated with cemiplimab. At data cutoff on Feb 17, 2020, median duration of follow-up was 15 months (IQR 8-18). An objective response per independent central review was observed in 26 (31%; 95% CI 21-42) of 84 patients, including two partial responses that emerged at tumour assessments before the data cutoff and were confirmed by tumour assessments done subsequent to the data cutoff. The best overall response was five (6%) patients with a complete response and 21 (25%) with a partial response. Grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 40 (48%) of 84 patients; the most common were hypertension (four [5%] of 84 patients) and colitis (four [5%]). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 29 (35%) of 84 patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Cemiplimab exhibited clinically meaningful antitumour activity and an acceptable safety profile in patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma after HHI therapy. FUNDING: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi.

Real world safety outcomes using cemiplimab for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) mostly affects older and frail patients. Cemiplimab is an anti-PD1 antibody used in this indication since its approval by the FDA and the EMA in 2019 after encouraging results from phase II trials. We aimed to evaluate cemiplimab safety in patients from daily practice. METHODS: Retrospective and monocentric study including all patients who received at least one infusion of cemiplimab between August 2018 and September 2019. Adverse effects (AEs), treatment interruption, and efficacy were recorded (data cut-off, November 1st 2020). RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were included, median age was 83 [55-93], 73% were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0 or 1, 36% were immune compromised. After a median time on treatment of six months [0.7-22], seventeen patients (77%) experienced 24 AEs, comprising 45% serious AEs (SAEs) grade ≥ 3 and one SAE grade 5 (myositis). Patients who presented SAEs were all >65 years old. Nine patients (41%) definitively discontinued treatment due to AEs. Seventeen patients were evaluable, after a median follow-up of eleven months [1-22], 32% had an objective response (2 complete and 5 partial responses), 47% had controlled disease and 35% experienced progression. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, safety seemed to be worse than in phase II trial with more treatment discontinuations due to cemiplimab toxicity, probably reflecting the distinct demographic and medical characteristics of patients in daily care.

Critical role of Aquaporin-1 and telocytes in infantile hemangioma response to propranolol beta blockade.

Propranolol, a nonselective ß-adrenergic receptor (ADRB) antagonist, is the first-line therapy for severe infantile hemangiomas (IH). Since the incidental discovery of propranolol efficacy in IH, preclinical and clinical investigations have shown evidence of adjuvant propranolol response in some malignant tumors. However, the mechanism for propranolol antitumor effect is still largely unknown, owing to the absence of a tumor model responsive to propranolol at nontoxic concentrations. Immunodeficient mice engrafted with different human tumor cell lines were treated with anti-VEGF bevacizumab to create a model sensitive to propranolol. Proteomics analysis was used to reveal propranolol-mediated protein alteration correlating with tumor growth inhibition, and Aquaporin-1 (AQP1), a water channel modulated in tumor cell migration and invasion, was identified. IH tissues and cells were then functionally investigated. Our functional protein association networks analysis and knockdown of ADRB2 and AQP1 indicated that propranolol treatment and AQP1 down-regulation trigger the same pathway, suggesting that AQP1 is a major driver of beta-blocker antitumor response. Examining AQP1 in human hemangioma samples, we found it exclusively in a perivascular layer, so far unrecognized in IH, made of telocytes (TCs). Functional in vitro studies showed that AQP1-positive TCs play a critical role in IH response to propranolol and that modulation of AQP1 in IH-TC by propranolol or shAQP1 decreases capillary-like tube formation in a Matrigel-based angiogenesis assay. We conclude that IH sensitivity to propranolol may rely, at least in part, on a cross talk between lesional vascular cells and stromal TCs.