Alternative forms of tobacco use.

BACKGROUND: A review of the available scientific literature concerning forms of tobacco use other than regular cigarettes, cigars and pipes, the nature of such products, prevalence data and trends, health effects, regulatory issues and preventive measures. RESULTS: Narghile (water pipe), bidis, kreteks and other forms of oral tobacco are traditionally used in many low-income countries, and some of these are currently spreading to the Western countries. They are all linked to negative effects similar to, and often greater than, those associated with common cigarette smoking. Various potentially reduced exposure products (PREPs), including snus, targeted at smokers aware of the health risks of regular cigarettes, have recently been developed by the tobacco industry. Their pathogenic potential varies widely and is not fully known; it is in any case greater than that of pure nicotine forms (such as medicinal nicotine). Their use as cigarette substitutes should not be considered even by inveterate smokers who are unable or unwilling to quit nicotine before further independent evaluation and control. CONCLUSIONS: There is no such thing as a safe tobacco product. Like cigarettes, alternative forms of tobacco use need regulatory measures that are adapted to local situations and supplemented by preventive measures within the World Health Organization's Framework Convention for Tobacco Control.

What can be learnt from tobacco butts? An observational study in a realistic hospital setting.

OBJECTIVE: Examination of tobacco butts and its possible use in tobacco control. DESIGN: Macroscopic examination of cigarette butts collected outside or in dedicated smoking rooms of a smoke-free hospital. RESULTS: Of 925 butts, 3.8% were cigarillos, 11.1% cigarettes without filter, 57.7% ventilated filter cigarettes, 22.5% filter cigarettes without macroscopic ventilation and 4.9% undetermined. Thirty-six different cigarette brands were identified. A wide distribution of butt lengths (mean 32.1 mm, variation coefficient 28%), peripheral ovalisation of the filter in 83.9%, and extended browning of the mouth end of the filter in 48.6% were observed. Vent holes were macroscopically detectable in 70.5% and a sharp decrease in browning in 53.4% of the filter cigarettes. Most (94.7%) ventilation holes were located at > or =10 mm from the mouth end. CONCLUSIONS: In a smoke-free hospital, the use of tobacco products (mainly ventilated filter cigarettes) remains sizeable. Given the wide distribution of butt lengths, the number of cigarettes per day is a poor marker of toxin intake. Vent-hole localisation and signs of vent-blocking confirm the inadequacy of machine-measured smoke yields and the presence of compensatory smoking. More intensive individual cessation advice with pharmacological support is necessary. Examination of a smoker's own cigarette butts can be used as a tool for individual cessation advice.