Separation effect, pain perception during functional activity and gingival inflammation of elastomeric and Kansal separators-a split mouth study.

INTRODUCTION: An effective space opening for band placement with minimal pain and gingival inflammation is a prime requisite during fixed orthodontic procedures. The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two types of separators, elastomeric and Kansal, in the amount of space opening, pain perception elicited, and gingival inflammation. METHODS: A random split-mouth study was designed with 30 subjects undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. Two different separators (Elastomer and Kansal) were placed alternatively on the left and right sides around the mesial and distal sides of the first molars in the mandibular arch of each subject. After 3 days, the amount of separation after 3 days was assessed with a leaf gauge on both mesial and distal sides. The subjective pain perception by visual analog Scale (VAS) at different points and during different functions for each of the 3 days was evaluated. A self-filled chart was utilized to be performed by the patients. Gingival index was used to assess the inflammatory changes. RESULTS: The most significant amount of separation (0.28 mm) was found with elastomers on the mesial side and is statistically significant (p < 0.001) compared to the mesial side (0.18 mm). The Kansal separators produced equivalent separation on mesial (0.19 mm) and distal sites (0.17 mm). The highest pain score was found after 24 h with elastomeric separators (median-40) for chewing and biting and the least for sleep (median-30). There is a statistical difference of pain perception between elastomers and Kansal separators at different points for the given function (p < 0.001). Both the separators resulted in mild gingival index of score less than 1 (0.70 ± 0.65, 0.97 ± 0.720, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two types of separators. CONCLUSION: Both the separators produced adequate separation after a minimum 3 days. Kansal produces minimum discomfort and pain compared to elastomeric separators. Mild gingival inflammation was observed with both the separators.

A comparison of different osteotomy techniques with and without pterygomaxillary disjunction in surgically assisted maxillary expansion utilizing modified hybrid rapid maxillary expansion device with posterior implants: A finite element study.

INTRODUCTION: The study aims to evaluate the effect of osteotomies with and without Pterygomaxillary disjunction (PMD) during Surgical Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion on the displacement pattern and stress distribution of Dental and Skeletal structures of the Nasomaxillary (NM) complex by a modified rapid maxillary expansion (RME) Hybrid appliance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A CT scan of a 20-year-old adult with maxillary constriction and the posterior bite was utilized for the restructuring of the finite element model. Five different meshed models were created individually with varying procedures of the osteotomy. A posteriorly anchored Hybrid-Hyrax appliance was utilized for RME. Groups included Group 0 - Control group without osteotomy; Group I - Only Midpalatal osteotomy; Group II - Only Subtotal Le fort I; Group III - Both Midpalatal and Subtotal Le fort I without PMD; Group IV - Midpalatal + subtotal Le fort I with bilateral PMD. The displacement pattern and stress distribution in all three dimensions were recorded and analyzed using analysis of variance and post-hoc Tukey test. RESULTS: Group IV with PMD exhibited the highest stress dissipation and displacement of the skeletal and dental structures followed by Group III osteotomies. The highest stress concentration was at midpalatal suture (292 MPa) for Group III osteotomies. There is no statistical difference between Group III and Group IV osteotomies for many of the parameters measured (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Posteriorly anchored Hybrid appliance without PMD is as effective as that with of PMD.