Evaluation of health and quality of life in apheresis patients - data from the WAA register.

OBJECTIVE: The World Apheresis Association (WAA) register contains data from more than 89 000 apheresis procedures in more than 12,000 patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate functional health and quality of life (QoL) in patients during apheresis treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Estimates of health condition (HC) were made in 40,445 and of QoL in 22112 apheresis procedures. This study focused on a 10-step graded evaluation of HC (scale from: 'bedridden, unable to eat' to a level of 'athletic competition') and self-assessment of QoL (scale from: worst ever '0' to best ever '10'). Data were compared in relation to various apheresis procedures and if the patient underwent the first or subsequent apheresis procedure. RESULTS: Of the patients treated with plasma exchange (PEX) with centrifugation technique (n = 15787) 10% were 'bedridden, unable to come out of bed' while for patients treated with plasma filtration technique (n = 1018) the percentage was 27%. During the first procedure these figures were 16% and 30%, respectively. Self-estimates of QoL were graded 'zero' or '1' in 1.6% of patients during the first apheresis procedure; At the first contact patients undergoing PEX graded like this in 4.3%. CONCLUSION: Many of the patients undergoing apheresis treatment have poor HC and QoL at the start of therapy. Of all therapeutic apheresis procedures patients undergoing PEX had the lowest score of QoL.

Distribution of indications and procedures within the framework of centers participating in the WAA apheresis registry.

The WAA apheresis registry was established in 2003 and an increasing number of centers have since then included their experience and data of their procedures. The registry now contains data of more than 74,000 apheresis procedures in more than 10,000 patients. This report shows that the indications for apheresis procedures are changing towards more oncological diagnoses and stem cell collections from patients and donors and less therapeutic apheresis procedures. In centers that continue to register, the total extent of apheresis procedures and patients treated have expanded during the latest years.

Adverse events in apheresis: An update of the WAA registry data.

Apheresis with different procedures and devices are used for a variety of indications that may have different adverse events (AEs). The aim of this study was to clarify the extent and possible reasons of various side effects based on data from a multinational registry. The WAA-apheresis registry data focus on adverse events in a total of 50846 procedures in 7142 patients (42% women). AEs were graded as mild, moderate (need for medication), severe (interruption due to the AE) or death (due to AE). More AEs occurred during the first procedures versus subsequent (8.4 and 5.5%, respectively). AEs were mild in 2.4% (due to access 54%, device 7%, hypotension 15%, tingling 8%), moderate in 3% (tingling 58%, urticaria 15%, hypotension 10%, nausea 3%), and severe in 0.4% of procedures (syncope/hypotension 32%, urticaria 17%, chills/fever 8%, arrhythmia/asystole 4.5%, nausea/vomiting 4%). Hypotension was most common if albumin was used as the replacement fluid, and urticaria when plasma was used. Arrhythmia occurred to similar extents when using plasma or albumin as replacement. In 64% of procedures with bronchospasm, plasma was part of the replacement fluid used. Severe AEs are rare. Although most reactions are mild and moderate, several side effects may be critical for the patient. We present side effects in relation to the procedures and suggest that safety is increased by regular vital sign measurements, cardiac monitoring and by having emergency equipment nearby.

TIDILAP: Treatment of iron deficiency in lipoprotein apheresis patients --A prospective observational multi-center cohort study comparing efficacy, safety and tolerability of ferric gluconate with ferric carboxymaltose.

OBJECTIVES: Iron deficiency (ID) and iron deficiency anemia (IDA) are common findings in patients undergoing lipoprotein apheresis (LA). Different intravenous (iv) formulations are used to treat ID in LA patients, however guidelines and data on ID/IDA management in LA patients are lacking. We therefore performed a prospective observational multi-center cohort study of ID/IDA in LA patients, comparing two approved i.v. iron formulations, ferric gluconate (FG) and ferric carboxymaltose (FCM). METHODS: Inclusion criteria were a) serum ferritin <100 µg/L or b) serum ferritin <300 µg/L and transferrin saturation <20%. Patients received either FG (62.5 mg weekly) or FCM (500 mg once in ID or up to 1000 mg if IDA was present) i.v. until iron deficiency was resolved. Efficacy and safety were determined by repeated laboratory and clinical assessment. Iron parameters pre and post apheresis were measured to better understand the pathogenesis of ID/IDA in LA patients. RESULTS: 80% of LA patients treated at the three participating centers presented with ID/IDA; 129 patients were included in the study. Serum ferritin and transferrin levels were reduced following apheresis (by 18% (p < 0.0001) and by 13% (p < 0.0001) respectively). Both FG and FCM were effective and well tolerated in the treatment of ID/IDA in LA patients. FCM led to a quicker repletion of iron stores (p < 0.05), while improvement of ID/IDA symptoms was not different. Number and severity of adverse events did not differ between FG and FCM, no severe adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that FG and FCM are equally safe, well-tolerated and effective in treating ID/IDA in LA patients. These data form the basis for follow-up randomized controlled trials to establish clinical guidelines.

The outcome in myasthenia gravis patients--an eight-year follow-up after finishing immunoabsorption therapy.

Eight years ago four patients suffering from myasthenia gravis (MG) type C and E according to Compston with failed drug therapy were treated three times (one patient 11 times) by protein A immunoabsorption (Immunosorba, Excorim, Fresenius Hemocare GmbH, StWendel, Germany). No further immunoabsorption treatments have been carried out. In addition, three patients were given a thymectomy. The present status of the patients was checked six and eight years thereafter. We could see a beneficial effect in all MG patients. The patients are fit for work; all have an improved Besinger index. The patients were used as their own controls. A higher anti-AChR-ab level six years after protein A immunoabsorption than at the beginning was seen in all patients combined with a less serious MG. In addition, their immunomodulation could be induced as seen in lymphocyte and inflammatory protein changes during the first 36 days after beginning immunoabsorption treatment. A larger population has to be investigated to verify these results.

Two cases of refractory endocrine ophthalmopathy successfully treated with extracorporeal immunoadsorption.

Endocrine ophthalmopathy (EO) is a severe disease entity that is characterized by retrobulbar swelling due to accumulation of glycosaminoglycans on an autoimmune basis. This disorder can lead to the loss of vision and often is resistant to conventional therapy. There is a relation to Graves' hyperthyroidism, but probably no close association. Two patients with severe EO that was resistant to usual therapeutic approaches including steroids and radiological and surgical measures underwent a 20 session course of intensive immunoadsorption therapy (Plasmaselect/Therasorb Anti-IgG) with a mean 2- to 3-fold plasma volume treated. After the first sessions, both patients voiced an impressive relief of their major symptoms, which was confirmed by ophthalmological investigation. Throughout the time of therapy until present, these patients have remained at their respective levels of improvement. We consider immunoadsorption an effective therapeutic opportunity in severe EO resistant to conventional treatment.