RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Taxane- based chemotherapy is widely used in patients with platinum- and immunotherapy refractory, metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Outcomes are poor and biomarkers associated with outcome are lacking. We aim to identify cancer hallmarks associated with survival in patients receiving paclitaxel. METHODS: Whole-transcriptome profiles were generated for a subset of patients enrolled in a randomised phase II study investigating paclitaxel and pazopanib in platinum refractory mUC (PLUTO, EudraCT 2011-001841-34). Estimates of gene expression were calculated and input into the Almac proprietary analysis pipeline and signature scores were calculated using ClaraT V3.0.0. Ten key gene signatures were assessed: Immuno-Oncology, Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition, Angiogenesis, Proliferation, Cell Death, Genome Instability, Energetics, Inflammation, Immortality and Evading Growth. Hazard ratios were calculated using Cox regression model and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: 38 and 45 patients treated with paclitaxel or pazopanib were included. Patients with high genome instability expression treated with paclitaxel had significantly improved survival with a HR of 0.29 (95% CI: 0.14-0.61, p=0.001) and HR 0.34 (95% CI: 0.17-0.69, p=0.003) for PFS and OS, respectively. Similarly, patients with high evading growth suppressor expression treated with paclitaxel had improved PFS and OS with a HR of 0.35 (95% CI: 0.19-0.77, p=0.007) and HR 0.46 (95% CI: 0.23-0.91, p=0.026), respectively. No other gene signatures had significant impact on outcome. In both paclitaxel and pazopanib cohorts, angiogenesis activation was associated with worse PFS and OS, and VEGF targeted therapy did not improve outcomes. CONCLUSION: High Genome-instability and Evading-growth suppressor biologies are associated with improved survival in patients with platinum refractory mUC receiving paclitaxel. These may refine mUC risk stratification and guide treatment decision in the future.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The tyrosine kinase inhibitors cabozantinib and axitinib have been widely used in England to treat advanced renal cell carcinoma following prior vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy, but data on real-world usage remain limited. Our objective was to describe the real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who received second-line or later-line (≥ 2L) cabozantinib or axitinib after vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy in clinical practice in England. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used clinical practice data (collected 2011-20) from the English Cancer Analysis System database. Patient characteristics, treatment sequence and duration, and overall survival (time from initiation of cabozantinib/axitinib treatment to death) were evaluated. RESULTS: Data from 1485 eligible adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma were analyzed: 440 received ≥ 2L cabozantinib (2L for 88.6% of them); 1045 received ≥ 2L axitinib (2L for 89.5%). The most common first-line treatments were sunitinib (2L cabozantinib subcohort, 48%; 2L axitinib subcohort, 46%) and pazopanib (46% and 54%, respectively); nivolumab was the most common third-line treatment (18% and 19%, respectively). Median (interquartile range) 2L therapy duration was 5.52 (2.73-11.74) months for cabozantinib and 4.60 (1.45-12.36) months for axitinib. Following adjustment for potential confounders using inverse probability weighting, overall survival (median [interquartile range]) was longer for ≥ 2L cabozantinib (11.2 [5.7-28.0] months) than for ≥ 2L axitinib (10.4 [4.7-22.0] months; log-rank p = 0.0034). CONCLUSIONS: The Cancer Analysis System database is a valuable research resource providing extensive real-world clinical data. Real-world overall survival was longer with ≥ 2L cabozantinib than with axitinib. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04637204; registered November 2020.
Cabozantinib and axitinib are anticancer drugs called tyrosine kinase inhibitors. They work by blocking the activity of proteins that cancer cells use to help them divide and grow. Cabozantinib and axitinib are treatment options for a common type of kidney cancer called renal cell carcinoma (RCC). There is evidence about how well cabozantinib and axitinib work in clinical trials, but it is less clear how well they work in standard practice outside of clinical trials. We investigated how cabozantinib and axitinib are used and how well they work as part of 'real-world' RCC care. We did this by analyzing patient data from an English cancer database. All patients in the study had advanced RCC and had been treated with at least one previous anticancer drug. This includes a type of drug that blocks new blood vessels forming, which tumors need for rapid growth. Most of the 1485 patients received cabozantinib or axitinib after receiving only one previous anticancer drug. These patients were treated for a median of 5.5 months with cabozantinib and 4.6 months with axitinib. Patients lived for a median of 11.2 months after starting cabozantinib treatment and a median of 10.4 months after starting axitinib treatment. This study provides new evidence showing how well cabozantinib and axitinib work in everyday RCC care. The results add to those from clinical trials and show the value of the English cancer registry for conducting studies of routine cancer care.