Hypereosinophilic obliterative bronchiolitis: a distinct, unrecognised syndrome.

Biopsy-proven cases of eosinophilic bronchiolitis have only been reported in isolation, and all come from Japan. We present six patients with hypereosinophilic obliterative bronchiolitis (HOB), defined by the following criteria: 1) blood eosinophil cell count >1 G·L(-1) and/or bronchoalveolar lavage eosinophil count >25%; 2) persistent airflow obstruction despite high-dose inhaled bronchodilators and corticosteroids; and 3) eosinophilic bronchiolitis at lung biopsy (n=1) and/or direct signs of bronchiolitis (centrilobular nodules and branching opacities) on computed tomography (n=6). Chronic dyspnoea and cough which was often severe, without the characteristic features of asthma, were the main clinical manifestations. Atopy and asthma were present in the history of three and two patients, respectively. One patient met biological criteria of the lymphoid variant of idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome. Mean blood eosinophil cell count was 2.7 G·L(-1) and mean eosinophil differential percentage at bronchoalveolar lavage was 63%. Mean initial forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity ratio was 50%, normalising with oral corticosteroid therapy in all patients. HOB manifestations recurred when oral prednisone was decreased to 10-20 mg·day(-1), but higher doses controlled the disease. HOB is a characteristic entity deserving to be individualised among the eosinophilic respiratory disorders. Thorough analysis is needed to determine whether unrecognised and/or smouldering HOB may further be a cause of irreversible airflow obstruction in chronic eosinophilic respiratory diseases.

Intravenous fluid temperature management by infrared thermometer.

BACKGROUND: The management of intravenous (IV) fluid temperature is a daily challenge in critical care, anesthesiology, and emergency medicine. Infusion of IV fluids at the right temperature partly influences clinical outcomes of critically ill patients. Nowadays, intravenous fluid temperature is poorly managed, as no suitable device is routinely available. Infrared (IR) thermometers have been recently developed for industrial, personal, or medical purposes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of an IR thermometer in measuring temperature of warmed and cooled infusion fluids in fluid bags. METHODS: This study compared temperatures simultaneously recorded by an infrared thermometer and a temperature sensor. Temperatures of warmed (41 degrees C) and cooled (4 degrees C) infusion fluids in fluid bags were recorded by 2 independent operators every minute until IV bags' temperature reached ambient temperature. RESULTS: The relation curve was established with 576 measures. Temperature measures performed with an IR thermometer were perfectly linear and perfectly correlated with the reference method (R(2) = 0.995, P < 10(-5)). CONCLUSION: Infrared thermometers are efficient to measure IV fluid bag temperature in the range of temperatures used in clinical practice. As these devices are easy to use and inexpensive, they could be largely used in critical care, anesthesiology, or emergency medicine.