Associations of maternal material hardships during childhood and adulthood with prepregnancy weight, gestational weight gain, and postpartum weight retention.

BACKGROUND: We examined associations of material hardship with prepregnancy body mass index (BMI), gestational weight gain (GWG), and substantial postpartum weight retention (SPPWR; ≥5 kg at 1 year). METHODS: We studied 2128 women in Project Viva, a Boston-area cohort with recruitment during1999-2002. At recruitment, women reported whether they experienced material hardship, defined as having ever received public assistance, welfare, or lacked basic necessities (food, rent, or medical care) during childhood, in adulthood before pregnancy, and/or in pregnancy. We used multivariable logistic models adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, and parity (and prepregnancy BMI for GWG and SPPWR) to examine associations of material hardship with the three weight-related outcomes (BMI, GWG, and SPPWR). RESULTS: Mean age was 31.8 (standard deviation, 5.2) years; 66% of women were white, 16% were obese (prepregnancy BMI ≥30.0 kg/m(2)), 50% experienced excessive GWG, and 17% experienced SPPWR. Material hardship was most common during childhood (n=192, 9%), followed by adulthood (102, 5%), and pregnancy (41, 2%). Hardship in adulthood was associated with prepregnancy obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m(2) vs. 18.5 to <25.0 kg/m(2)), odds ratio ([OR] 2.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29, 4.31), but hardship in childhood was not (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.80, 1.98). Hardship in childhood was associated with excess GWG (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.99, 2.14), but hardship in adulthood or during pregnancy was not. We saw trends among hardship in each of the periods and associations with SPPWR, but all confidence intervals included the null. CONCLUSION: The timing of hardship exposure may differently influence weight before, during, and after pregnancy.

Evaluating inpatient mortality: a new electronic review process that gathers information from front-line providers.

IMPORTANCE: Accurately and routinely identifying factors contributing to inpatient mortality remains challenging. OBJECTIVE: To describe the development, implementation and performance of a new electronic mortality review method 1 year after implementation. METHODS: An analysis of data gathered from an electronic instrument that queries front-line providers on their opinions on quality and safety related issues, including potential preventability, immediately after a patient's death. Comparison was also made with chart reviews and administrative data. RESULTS: In the first 12 months, reviewers responded to 89% of reviews sent (2547 responses from 2869 requests), resulting in at least one review in 99% (1058/1068) of inpatient deaths. Clinicians provided suggestions for improvement in 7.7% (191/2491) of completed reviews, and reported that 4.8% (50/1052) of deaths may have been preventable. Quality and safety issues contributing to potentially preventable inpatient mortality included delays in obtaining or responding to tests (15/50, 30%), communication barriers (10/50, 20%) and healthcare associated infections (9/50, 18%). Independent, blinded chart review of a sample of clinician reviews detected potential preventability in 10% (2/20) of clinician reported cases as potentially preventable. Comparison with administrative data showed poor agreement on the identification of complications with neither source consistently identifying more complications. CONCLUSIONS: Our early experience supports the feasibility and utility of an electronic tool to collect real-time clinical information related to inpatient deaths directly from front-line providers. Caregivers reported information that was complementary to data available from chart review and administrative sources in identifying potentially preventable deaths and informing quality improvement efforts.

Short-term global health research projects by US medical students: ethical challenges for partnerships.

Recent interest in global health among medical students has grown drastically, and many students now spend time abroad conducting short-term research projects in low-resource settings. These short-term stints in developing countries present important ethical challenges to US-based students and their medical schools as well as the institutions that host such students abroad. This paper outlines some of these ethical issues and puts forth recommendations for ethically mindful short-term student research.