Characteristics of patients with chronic kidney disease and Type 2 diabetes initiating finerenone in the USA: a multi-database, cross-sectional study.

Aim: Finerenone is safe and efficacious for treating patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and Type 2 diabetes (T2D). Evidence on the use of finerenone in clinical practice is lacking. Objective: To describe demographic and clinical characteristics of early adopters of finerenone in the United States, according to sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) use and urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) levels. Methods: Multi-database, observational, cross-sectional study, using data from two US databases (Optum Claims and Optum EHR). Three cohorts were included: finerenone initiators with prior CKD-T2D, finerenone initiators with prior CKD-T2D and concomitant SGLT2i use, finerenone initiators with prior CKD-T2D stratified according to UACR. Results: In total, 1015 patients were included, 353 from Optum Claims and 662 from Optum EHR. Mean age was 72.0 and 68.4 years in Optum claims and EHR, respectively. Median eGFR was 44 and 44 ml/min/1.73 m2; and median UACR was 132 (28-698)/365 (74-1185.4) mg/g, in Optum Claims and EHR, respectively. 70.5/70.4% were taking renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, 42.5/53.3% SGLT2i. Overall, 9.0/6.3% of patients had baseline UACR <30 mg/g, 15.0/20.2% had UACR 30-300 mg/g, and 14.4/27.6% had UACR >300 mg/g. Conclusion: Current management of patients with CKD-T2D reflects use of finerenone independently from background therapies and clinical characteristics, suggesting implementation of therapeutic strategies based on different modes of action.

Heavy Menstrual Bleeding-Visual Analog Scale, an Easy-to-Use Tool for Excessive Menstrual Blood Loss That Interferes with Quality-of-Life Screening in Clinical Practice.

Background: Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is defined as excessive menstrual blood loss that interferes with quality of life (QoL). The methods for assessing HMB are not suited for clinical practice. We analyzed the validity of a combined visual analog scale (VAS) tool assessing the intensity of menstrual bleeding (VASInt) and its impact on activities of daily living (VASImp) to identify women with HMB. Materials and Methods: Analysis conducted in the data set used to validate the Spanish HMB screening tool SAMANTA questionnaire. A logistic regression analysis was used to construct the model. Reference standard was the pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC). The performance of the HMB-VAS and the SAMANTA questionnaire was compared. Correlation with SAMANTA questionnaire, PBAC, and other QoL measurements was assessed. Results: The resulting function (HMB-VAS score = 10.86 × VASInt score +2.48 × VASImp score) showed a slightly lower accuracy versus the SAMANTA questionnaire (86.8% vs. 87.9%) but a similar area under the curve: 0.9396 versus 0.943, respectively (p = 0.6605). The cutoff point was established as 700. After rounding the regression coefficients, the resulting function (11 × VASInt +2 × VASImp) showed 87.6% accuracy. The correlation of HMB-VAS with the SAMANTA questionnaire was strong (r: 0.79819; p < 0.0001), whereas the correlation was moderate to strong with the PBAC (0.59299; p < 0.0001) and weak with the QoL (EuroQoL five dimensions five levels questionnaire [EQ-5D-5L]) and well-being (Psychological General Well-Being Index [PGWBI]) scales (EQ-5D-5L VAS and Index: -0.20332 and -0.24384; PGWBI: -0.21680; p < 0.0001 for both). Conclusion: The HMB-VAS shows good performance for HMB screening, providing an easy-to-use alternative to other psychometric tools.